But I needtomakethisquickandcoherent, andthisisthefastestwayofdoingso.
I wantedtoaddresssomeoftheissuesthat I believemadeourdiscussionbothmoretryingandlessvaluable.
Thatmighthavebean a problemthatmanyofthepeoplewhonowlistentoitrightlyidentify.
I thinkthatourdiscussionwouldperhapsbemoreproductiveifwestartedfromtherealizationthatwe'rebothtryingtoaddressthesameproblem.
Whatistherelationshipbetweenscienceandethics?
Yousee, ethicshasnestedinsidescientificrealism.
Now, obviously, that's a contentiousclaim, whichisnotthesame.
Isitbeingwrong?
Butthefactthatit's contentiousreDavidHumeandhisproblemwithderiving a noughtFurmanismeansthatthereis a realproblemthere.
I see a scientificgreatrealismisnestedinsideDarwiniancompetition, atleastpotentiallynotnecessarily.
I couldbewrong, but I amtryingtoaddresstherealproblemand I thinkthefactthatyou'readdressingthescienceslashethicsproblemindicatesthatyouseethatthere's a realproblemthere, too.
I alsothinkweonlygottotheproblemswithmyformulation, nottheproblemswithyoursolution.
Hewastryingtoformulate a scientificsolutiontotheproblemofethics, and I'vedrawn a lotofmythinkingfromthat.
Now I'm goingtojumpto a levelofanalysis, andwhen I doso, itwillmakemanythink I'vegoneofftherailsofthisargument.
I askforyourindulgencewhile I trytoputthingstogetherthathavenotyetbeingputtogether.
Thismeansthat I havetopresentmanyideassimultaneously, asiflookingat a picture, orisifdescribing a picture, whichishowtheseideashavefrequentlybeingrepresented.