injure
US /ˈɪndʒɚ/
・UK /ˈɪndʒə(r)/
A2 初級英檢中級多益
v.t.及物動詞傷害 ； 使受傷 ； 損害
Did you injure yourself when you fell off the bike?
影片字幕
川普 vs 希拉蕊 2016美國總統大選第三場辯論 (附字幕+在地化詞彙)！ (Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton - Third Presidential Debate (Subtitles + your native vocabulary))
- Well, I was upset because unfortunately dozens of toddlers injure themselves, even kill people,
嗯，我不高興，因為不幸的是，有數十名幼童傷害自己，甚至殺死人，
- Well, I was upset because, unfortunately, dozens of toddlers injure themselves, even kill people with guns because, unfortunately, not everyone who has loaded guns in their homes takes appropriate precautions.
讓我把 Trump 先生請回來，因為事實上，你反對對攻擊性
專注的力量！🧠🔥 - Theron Q. Dumont 的全集有聲書 | 自我成長與勵志經典 (THE POWER OF CONCENTRATION - FULL AudioBook by Theron Q. Dumont - Self Help & Inspirational)
- They very often injure the brain if they keep up this state.
才能變得有用。每個人都能完成偉大的工作，如果他
- They very often injure the brain if they keep up this state.
能被喚醒，發揮出最好的表現。但最偉大的人
飛機維修技師短缺！航空業下一個大挑戰是什麼？ (Why A Shortage Of Airplane Mechanics Is Aviation's Next Challenge)
- Jobs like air traffic controllers or maintenance carry a responsibility with them that one mistake could injure or kill hundreds of people.
空中交通管制員或維修人員等工作責任重大，一個失誤就可能導致數百人受傷或死亡。
- Jobs like air traffic controllers or maintenance carry a responsibility with them that one mistake could injure or kill hundreds of people.
能從事這樣的工作，感覺就像能飛的機器一樣，是一種榮譽和特權。
該換掉你的城市送貨小貨車了！ (It's time to replace urban delivery vans)
- They get the job done, but they also emit lots of carbon, take up lots of room, and kill and injure lots of people.
它們能完成工作，但也會排放大量碳，佔用大量空間，造成大量人員傷亡。
- and kill and injure lots of people.
它們能完成工作，但也會排放大量碳，佔用大量空間，造成大量人員傷亡。
那個讓你放不下的前任！ (The Ex You Can’t Get Over)
- But it can also injure and maul us like pretty much nothing else ever can.
過了很久，兩個人似乎達成了某種約定。
- It's a thrilling force, this it will acknowledge, but it can also injure and maul us like pretty much nothing else ever can.
它是一種令人激動的力量，這一點它會承認，但它也能像其他任何東西一樣傷害和蹂躪我們。
受傷的人如何尋求更進一步的懲罰？ (How Wounded People Seek Out further Punishment)
- It's just that for us, home was a place of grief and persecution. It's easy enough to see why children put up with poor treatment. They're born radically powerless. They can't run away. They are utterly at the mercy of others. They can't even think especially straight. What they must do, above all else, is adapt. Which in practice means learning to put up with poor treatment. They have to develop an advanced skill at not noticing quite how awful things are, an expertise at being unfazed by cruelty and neglect. Children in deprived circumstances tend to be geniuses at looking away, disassociating and making light of things. Of course, it might not be perfect that their father screams at them constantly, but there are some interesting shows on television and there's a really fascinating bit of the garden to explore in the morning. You can climb up the big tree and imagine it's a little house. And of course, ideally their mother wouldn't be so mocking and disloyal. But that's just the way things are, neither more or less sad than the fact it's often raining and there's a lot of homework to do. In any case, the bad treatment almost certainly has to do with something that they, the child, have done wrong. Badly treated children tend to take a compulsively generous view of those who injure them. Obviously, they aren't nasty on purpose. That would make no sense. Clearly, their ostensible brutality has sound explanations. It must be because they, the child, is in the wrong. That's why they're being neglected. That's why they've been declared fools. That's why they're being bullied. It's a great deal easier to believe that the parent is tough, yet fundamentally right, rather than gratuitously callous and unjustifiably hostile. In other words, what a bad childhood trains us to do, above all else, is to indulge meanness. The muscle that normally functions to repel attacks has had to be starved and has atrophied. In order to survive, we had to lose the ability to work out what was good and bad for us, lest we discover that we spent 18 years in the company of fiends. What this means for our futures is that we will be extremely poor at discerning when the partners we let into our lives cross the border into selfishness and malevolence. We'll continue under a narcoleptic command not to notice that we're being robbed and deceived. We'll be as blind to the blows now as we were then. For a long time, it simply won't occur to us to wonder why we've ended up paying for everything for the partner, or why they're unreliable in their promises, or constantly prioritise their friends over us, or are angrily defensive whenever we raise a complaint. We will simply, as we had to early on, fall into line and invent elaborate explanations for their behaviour. They're good, but they're tired. They're durable, but under pressure at work. They're fierce, but compensating for their childhood traumas, for which we have a lot of sympathy. Anything other than the more straightforward conclusion, we've fallen in with unconcerned egoists. We shouldn't compound our disloyalty towards ourselves by feeling, on top of everything else, ashamed for our tolerance. It isn't weakness, it's a survival strategy from childhood that served a very sensible purpose then but is liable to be ruining our lives now. To wake ourselves up, we need to consider our choices as if someone else had made them. We might wonder what we would advise a friend to do if they were in our situation. And through such a lens, we might start to perceive that the treatment we're facing isn't, as we've long thought, a sign of our partner's depth or complexity, but in the end, something much more humble, evidence that we need to get away. But this will be only a momentary liberation until we can understand the more fundamental issue, that the muscle most people use to eject poison has withered because of a distinctive history. We need to reverse the direction of our psychological fate. Our early suffering should not condemn us to yet more pain. It is what gives us an especially powerful claim on original sources of kindness, tenderness and calm.
只是對我們來說，家是一個充滿悲傷和迫害的地方。很容易理解為什麼孩子們要忍受惡劣的待遇。他們生來就毫無力量他們無法逃避。他們完全任由他人擺佈。他們甚至連思考的能力都沒有他們必須做的，最重要的，就是適應。在實踐中，這意味著要學會忍受惡劣的待遇。他們必須發展出一種高級技能，即不去注意事情有多糟糕，擅長對殘忍和忽視不為所動。生活在貧困環境中的孩子往往是睜一隻眼閉一隻眼、脫離現實和輕描淡寫的天才。當然，他們的父親經常對他們大吼大叫，這可能並不完美，但電視上有一些有趣的節目，而且早上可以去花園裡探索一個非常迷人的地方
- Badly treated children tend to take a compulsively generous view of those who injure them.
真實地培養自我價值感｜正念生活Podcast (Authentically Developing Self-Worth | Being Well Podcast)
- Have a kind of tenderness that doesn't muzzle ourself or walk on eggshells, but doesn't needlessly, needlessly injure the sense of worth in another person.
有些人可能知道，達賴喇嘛二十幾年前剛開始到西方弘法時，我記得是一位正念老師 Sharon Saltzberg，她很有意思，是將慈悲和善意推廣到當時常被認為比較嚴肅、偏重智慧的佛教思想進入西方的重要人物。
- doesn't needlessly, needlessly injure the sense of worth in another person.
不會不必要地、不必要地傷害到別人的自我價值感。