illegality
US /ˌɪliˈɡælɪti/
・UK /ˌɪliˈgæləti/
B2 中高級
n. (u.)不可數名詞不法
The illegality of bribery is stated in the law
影片字幕
什麼是純粹的強迫症？ (What is Pure OCD?)
05:52
- By latching onto thoughts of complete illegality, one is assured that one's self-esteem will remain at rock bottom.
將自己困在完全不正當的想法中，可以確定一個人的自尊將會保持在谷底
特朗普如何動員追隨者挑戰票數？| 美國2020年大選 (How is Trump mobilizing his followers to challenge the vote count? | US election 2020)
09:57
- President Trump was making claims of illegality even before million's of ballots were counted.
特朗普總統在百萬選票統計之前，就提出了非法性的主張。
埃隆-馬斯克是對民主的威脅 (Elon Musk Is A Threat To Democracy)
22:04
- I found this story about Elon Musk. Elon Musk promises to award $1 million each day to a signer of his petition. In the 181 articles Ground News gathered covering this topic, the left emphasizes the legality concerns surrounding Musk's campaign, while the right underscores Musk's aspirations, portraying his plan as an extraordinary use of wealth to influence voters, while underplaying legal implications. This is a great example of how different the media reports on stories, depending on their bias. You can see left-leaning The Daily Beast used the headline, expert rips Elon Musk's clearly illegal $1 million lottery to sign his MAGA PAX petition, while far-right publication WLT Report uses the headline, yes it's real, here's how to win $1 million each day from Elon Musk. Very different takes, with the left clearly emphasizing the illegality of this scheme, and this far-right publication using a clickbaity headline to make the scheme seem appealing, exciting, and positive. This is where Ground News comes in, and why I've been using them for over a year. Today's partner Ground News is a great tool for understanding the news. They offer helpful context you need when faced with starkly different headlines about the same story. Here you can see the overall bias distribution of the news sources covering this story, with 46% of news sources right-leaning, and only 21% left-leaning, indicating that this isn't being reported on much by the left. If you scroll down, you can see the overall factuality rating of the sources, with only 31% of sources scoring high factuality ratings, meaning a lot of dubious news sources are picking up this story and running with it. You can also see more information about who owns which source, with 30% of these sources owned by media conglomerates, and another 23% owned by wealthy private individuals. All of these tools can be really helpful to provide more context to your own echo chamber. You and your social media bubble may have had one reaction, but it's important to understand the larger picture and what people outside your bubble are saying, and I'm able to get all of this context and information thanks to Ground News.
我發現了這個關於埃隆-馬斯克的故事。埃隆-馬斯克承諾每天向其請願書的簽名者獎勵 100 萬美元。在 Ground News 收集到的 181 篇有關這一話題的文章中，左派強調了馬斯克競選活動的合法性問題，而右派則強調了馬斯克的抱負，將他的計劃描繪成利用財富影響選民的非凡之舉，同時淡化了法律方面的影響。這是一個很好的例子，說明了媒體報道的不同，取決於他們的偏見。你可以看到左傾的《野獸日報》（The Daily Beast）使用了這樣的標題："專家抨擊埃隆-馬斯克的100萬美元彩票顯然是非法的，請在他的MAG
哈利波特與鳳凰社-哈利波特的聽證會 (Harry's Hearing | Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix)
04:39
- The charges against the accused are as follows that he did knowingly and in full awareness of the illegality of his actions produce a Petronas charm in the presence of a Muggle.
對被告人的指控如下：他在明知自己的行為非法的情況下，在麻瓜面前製作了一個Petronas護身符。
