deterministic
US /dɪˌtɜ:mɪ'nɪstɪk/
・UK /dɪˌtɜ:mɪ'nɪstɪk/
B2 中高級
adj.形容詞決定論的 ； 命運注定論 ； 宿命論
The philosopher had a deterministic view of life
影片字幕
ZEITGEIST: MOVING FORWARD | 官方發佈 | 2011年版 (ZEITGEIST: MOVING FORWARD | OFFICIAL RELEASE | 2011)
41:26
- built around nature as deterministic
即先天自然的遺傳因素起根本性作用
- a deterministic view of life,
一種深植於生物學
我們能預測一切嗎? (Can we Predict Everything?)
02:10
- In our everyday world, we're used to absolute, deterministic predictions: throw a ball in
在我們的日常生活中，我們習慣於絕對的、確定性的預測：把一個球扔到
- had more data you could explain everything, is the classical, deterministic view of the
有更多的數據，你可以解釋一切， 是經典的，決定論的觀點。
科學家探索經典物理學和量子物理學之間的突破點 (Scientists Explore the Breaking Point Between Classical and Quantum Physics)
06:08
- In classical mechanics, the answer is what we call deterministic.
在經典力學中，答案就是我們所說的確定性。
人工智能與事實的關係很複雜。這個問題能解決嗎？ (AI has a tricky relationship with facts. Can that be fixed?)
41:27
- But at the same time, when it comes to enterprise and for businesses where close enough is not good enough, then there needs to be some other technology, some other innovations in the space outside of LLMs, that's going to close the gap between true deterministic accuracy and some something that just feels a little bit off, a little bit of randomness in the system, ultimately leading to likely an erosion of trust and sort of an embrace of the technology itself.
但同時，對於企業和商業來說，「差不多就好」是行不通的，這時候就需要有別於大型語言模型的其他技術、其他創新，來彌補真正的確定性準確性與感覺有點不對、系統中帶有隨機性的東西之間的差距，最終可能導致信任的侵蝕，以及對這項技術本身的抗拒。
- So rtech at in factory is essentially a platform that allows anyone that is trying to build AI technology for the enterprise to apply RTech in such a way that you can get that level of accuracy, you will have citations, accuracy, attribution, deterministic answers alongside the generative AI capabilities.
所以，「in factory」的 rtech 本質上是一個平臺，讓任何想為企業建構 AI 技術的人，都能以這種方式應用 RTech，進而獲得那樣的準確性，你會得到引用、準確性、歸因、確定性的答案，同時也兼具生成式 AI 的能力。
肖恩-卡羅爾我們是否生活在發條宇宙中？ (Sean Carroll: Are we living in a clockwork universe?)
09:29
- So philosophers have settled on what they decided to call compatibilism, in the sense that on the one hand, the deep down microscopic laws of physics are perfectly deterministic.
所以哲學家們已經決定了他們稱之為相容論的東西，意思是，一方面，深層的微觀物理定律是完全決定論的。
- Or they're not if you're in quantum mechanics, but they're pretty deterministic anyway.
或者如果你在研究量子力學，它們就不是，但它們反正也相當決定論。
肖恩-卡羅爾解釋為什麼物理學既簡單又不可能 | 完整訪談 (Sean Carroll explains why physics is both simple and impossible | Full Interview)
26:40
- It's just a thought experiment to make vivid the implications of determinism. So philosophers have settled on what they decided to call compatibilism, in the sense that on the one hand, the deep down microscopic laws of physics are perfectly deterministic, or they're not if you're in quantum mechanics, but they're pretty deterministic anyway. But since you don't know it, you should be asking yourself, what is the best I can do? What is the best way that I can try to understand human beings given the vastly incomplete information I have? I know about my friend's personality and their predilections and their traits, but I don't know every neuron in their brain. And under those circumstances, you will model, you will think about a fellow human being or about yourself as an agent capable of making choices. Everyone does that, and that's the right thing to do because you are not Laplace's demon.
這只是一個思想實驗，旨在生動地說明決定論的含義。是以，哲學家們決定將其稱為兼容自由主義，即一方面，物理學深層次的微觀法則是完全決定論的，或者說，如果你是在量子力學中，它們就不是，但無論如何，它們都是相當決定論的。但既然你不知道，你就應該問自己，我能做的最好的是什麼？在我所掌握的資訊極不完整的情況下，我能嘗試理解人類的最好方法是什麼？我知道我朋友的性格、偏好和特徵，但我不知道他們大腦中的每一個神經元。在這種情況下，你就會建立模型，你就會把一個人類同伴或你自己當成一個能夠做出選擇的人。每個人都會這樣做，這樣做
- And this was just bizarre and crazy for all sorts of reasons. People didn't like the idea that probabilities were involved at all. Of course, there's probabilities when you flip a coin, but that's just because you just don't know everything there is to know about the coin. Since the time of Newton and Laplace, we thought that physics, deep down, was perfectly deterministic.
由於種種原因，這實在是太離奇、太瘋狂了。人們根本不喜歡涉及概率的想法。當然，擲硬幣是有概率的，但那只是因為你不知道硬幣的所有資訊。從牛頓和拉普拉斯時代開始，我們就認為物理學在本質上是完全確定的。
理查德-裡夫斯工人階級男性為何面臨最嚴重的衰退 | 完整訪談 (Richard Reeves: Why working-class men are facing the sharpest decline | Full Interview)
37:07
- And the problem right now is that even having this conversation and trying to, in good faith, articulate ways in which these underlying traits can be good or bad on both sides, just immediately sends these little alarm bells ringing in your own head that someone's going to hear that and say, oh, well, that's very deterministic, right?
而現在的問題是，即使進行這樣的對話，並真誠地試圖闡明這些潛在特徵對雙方都有好壞影響的方式，也會立即在你的腦海中敲響小警鐘，擔心有人聽到後會說："哦，好吧，這是非常確定的，對嗎？
尤瓦爾-諾亞-哈拉里：如何在垃圾信息時代保護你的思想 (Yuval Noah Harari: How to safeguard your mind in the age of junk information)
13:23
- All the social and economic and political structures, and it often does so in a non-deterministic way.
所有的社會、經濟和政治結構，而且往往是以非決定性的方式進行的。
是時候搞怪了 | 灰色地帶 (It’s time to get weird | The Gray Area)
58:09
- Do you think I'm too fatalistic or too deterministic?
你認為我太宿命論還是太決定論？
- Do you think I'm too fatalistic or too deterministic?
你認為我太宿命論還是太決定論？