請輸入想查詢的單字或片語
criterion
US /kraɪˈtɪriən/
・UK /kraɪ'tɪərɪən/
B1 中級英檢高級
n. (c./u.)名詞 (可數/不可數)標準：規範
The single most important criterion was whether the applicants had any experience
影片字幕
失敗並不重要，重要的是「如何」失敗 (It doesn’t matter if you fail. It matters *how* you fail. | Amy Edmondson for Big Think +)
- Criterion number one: it's in new territory.
標準一：這是一個新領域。
- Criterion two: it is in pursuit of a goal, whether that's learning a new sport or discovering a new molecule.
標準二：追求目標，無論是學習一項新的運動或發現一種新分子。
美國VS加拿大｜醫學院與成為醫生 (United States vs Canada | Medical School & Becoming a Doctor)
- Queens looks at all sections, while Ottawa doesn't use the M cat as an evaluation criterion at Western.
皇后區看的是所有部分，而渥太華在西區不以M貓作為評價標準。
日本和牛高中生的一天 (Day in the Life of a Japanese Wagyu High School Student)
- Since 2022, though, criterion-based assessments have also been added, evaluating students through small quizzes, presentations, group discussions, and daily attitude in their class aims to provide a more comprehensive evaluation, emphasizing communication, critical thinking, and other essential skills needed to meet the diverse challenges of today's world.
不過，自 2022 年以來，還增加了基於標準的評估，通過小測驗、演講、小組討論和日常課堂態度對學生進行評估，旨在提供更全面的評價，強調溝通、批判性思維和其他應對當今世界多樣化挑戰所需的基本技能。
大牌明星的滑稽表演和附表 A 的惡作劇 | The Vergecast (A-lister antics and Schedule A shenanigans | The Vergecast)
- So maybe you could go on the Criterion Closet, too.
所以，也許你也可以去 "標準衣櫥"。
- I would love to go into the Criterion Closet.
我很想進入標準衣櫥。
為什麼我們不能停止愛那些傷害我們的人 (Why We Can't Stop Loving Those Who Hurt Us)
- We don't need to think more about their psychology than they care to. We need to look very closely at what they do, not why they might be as they are. And conversely, despite our nausea, we don't need to keep holding it against certain others that they are kind, there is nothing wrong with them for being sweet, there is something very sad about our past that we are so easily sickened by their manner. If this sounds like us, we urgently need to tell ourselves that the person who has maltreated us or is maltreating us will never change. Our boundless hope that they might is not rooted in any reality. It's the legacy of a childhood which obliged us to keep faith with people who no free person should ever have had to keep faith with. There is one and only one criterion that determines whether we should be with someone. Whether or not they are kind to us. If they were but are no longer, we need to leave. If they are only a small percentage of the time, we need to leave. If they show a promise of kindness but no delivery, we need to leave. We need to break our addiction to a suffering that we were not owed then and definitely don't deserve now.
我們不需要過多地考慮他們的心理。我們需要仔細觀察他們的所作所為，而不是他們為什麼會這樣。反過來說，儘管我們感到噁心，但我們也不需要一直對某些人抱有偏見，因為他們是善良的，他們的可愛並沒有錯，我們的過去有一些非常可悲的東西，讓我們如此容易被他們的舉止噁心到。如果這聽起來像我們的想法，我們迫切需要告訴自己，曾經或正在虐待我們的人永遠不會改變。我們對他們可能會改變的無限希望並非植根於現實。這是童年留下的後遺症，童年讓我們不得不相信那些自由人都不應該相信的人。決定我們是否應該與某人在一起的標準有且只有一個。他們是
川普怒斥記者、神祕MRI檢查，還關閉邊境拒絕（非白人）移民！| The Daily Show (Trump Berates Reporters, Gets Mystery MRI & Closes Border to (Non-White) Immigrants | The Daily Show)
- I mean, what criterion will we use Now, Donald Trump said he plans to, quote, remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States.
我的意思是，我們要用什麼標準？現在，Donald Trump 說他打算，引述，「移除任何對美國不是淨資產的人。」
