criterion
US /kraɪˈtɪriən/
・UK /kraɪ'tɪərɪən/
B1 中級英檢高級
n. (c./u.)名詞 (可數/不可數)標準：規範
The single most important criterion was whether the applicants had any experience
影片字幕
美國 vs 加拿大 | 醫學系與成為醫生的差異！ (United States vs Canada | Medical School & Becoming a Doctor)
- Queen's looks at all sections, while Ottawa doesn't use the MCAT as an evaluation criterion.
然而，在加拿大，MK評估因項目不同而有很大差異。
- Queen's looks at all sections, while Ottawa doesn't use the MCAT as an evaluation criterion.
然而，在加拿大，MK評估因項目不同而有很大差異。
找尋熱情所在？大多數人都做錯了！聽聽教授怎麼說 - Cal Newport（中英字幕） (怎樣才能找到你的熱情所在？大多數人都弄錯了... 聽聽教授怎麼說 - Cal Newport 卡爾‧紐波特（中英字幕）)
- And there's probably a lot of things that pass that criterion, and that's okay.
我喜歡這樣，也許它符合我的某些技能，我喜歡如果我做得好的話，它就會為我打開選擇的空間，它似乎以某種不明確或模糊的方式引起了我的共鳴。
- And there's probably a lot of things that pass that criterion, and that's okay.
我喜歡這樣，也許它符合我的某些技能，我喜歡如果我做得好的話，它就會為我打開選擇的空間，它似乎以某種不明確或模糊的方式引起了我的共鳴。
川普痛斥記者、神祕MRI檢查，還對（非白人）移民關閉邊境！| The Daily Show (Trump Berates Reporters, Gets Mystery MRI & Closes Border to (Non-White) Immigrants | The Daily Show)
- I mean, what criterion will we use now?
你是不是一個笨蛋？
- I mean, what criterion will we use Now, Donald Trump said he plans to, quote, remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States.
我的意思是，我們要用什麼標準？現在，Donald Trump 說他打算，引述，「移除任何對美國不是淨資產的人。」
德國的世界遺產巡禮！ (World Heritage Sites in Germany)
- The most important selection criterion is outstanding universal value.
這些地方每年給 1 到 1.2 千萬的鳥提供一個休息的地方。
- The most important selection criterion is outstanding universal value.
最重要的選擇標準是在於其顯著的普世價值。
川普說他不會因為治癒癌症而獲得肯定！ (Trump Says He Wouldn’t Get Credit for Curing Cancer)
- Here to take us through the nominees is "Late Night" writer and "Criterion Closet" enthusiast Mike Scollins with a "Scollywood Minute." Sup, Seth.
你說，寫下一些致詞。
- Here to take us through the nominees is late night writer and Criterion closet enthusiast Mike Schollens with the Scollywood minute.
今晚要為我們介紹入圍名單的是，深夜秀編劇、Criterion 鐵粉 Mike Schollens，帶來他的 Scollywood minute。
為什麼我們總是離不開傷害我們的人？💔 (Why We Can't Stop Loving Those Who Hurt Us)
- We don't need to think more about their psychology than they care to. We need to look very closely at what they do, not why they might be as they are. And conversely, despite our nausea, we don't need to keep holding it against certain others that they are kind, there is nothing wrong with them for being sweet, there is something very sad about our past that we are so easily sickened by their manner. If this sounds like us, we urgently need to tell ourselves that the person who has maltreated us or is maltreating us will never change. Our boundless hope that they might is not rooted in any reality. It's the legacy of a childhood which obliged us to keep faith with people who no free person should ever have had to keep faith with. There is one and only one criterion that determines whether we should be with someone. Whether or not they are kind to us. If they were but are no longer, we need to leave. If they are only a small percentage of the time, we need to leave. If they show a promise of kindness but no delivery, we need to leave. We need to break our addiction to a suffering that we were not owed then and definitely don't deserve now.
我們不需要過多地考慮他們的心理。我們需要仔細觀察他們的所作所為，而不是他們為什麼會這樣。反過來說，儘管我們感到噁心，但我們也不需要一直對某些人抱有偏見，因為他們是善良的，他們的可愛並沒有錯，我們的過去有一些非常可悲的東西，讓我們如此容易被他們的舉止噁心到。如果這聽起來像我們的想法，我們迫切需要告訴自己，曾經或正在虐待我們的人永遠不會改變。我們對他們可能會改變的無限希望並非植根於現實。這是童年留下的後遺症，童年讓我們不得不相信那些自由人都不應該相信的人。決定我們是否應該與某人在一起的標準有且只有一個。他們是
- There is one and only one criterion that determines whether we should be with someone - whether or not they are kind to us.
挑選伴侶時最常犯的9個錯誤！ (The 9 Most Common Mistakes We Make when Choosing a Partner)
- It's a criterion that clever people like us are especially prone to neglecting.
像我們這樣聰明的人特別容易忽視這個標準。
- It is a criterion that clever people like us are especially prone to neglecting.
當我們承認我們會、自然而然地、不可避免地與稍微不合適的人結婚時，我們的婚姻就會得到改善，但這只是因為不存在完全正確的那種人。