字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 Cancer is a creepy and mysterious thing. In the process of trying to understand it, to get better at killing it, we discovered a biological paradox that remains unsolved to this day. Large animals seem to be immune to cancer. Which doesn't make any sense. The bigger a being, the more cancer it should have. To understand why, we first need to take a look at the nature of cancer itself. [Kurzgesagt Theme] Our cells are protein robots made out of hundreds of millions of parts. Guided only by chemical reactions, they create and dismantle structures, sustain a metabolism to gain energy, or make almost perfect copies of themselves. We call these complex chemical reactions pathways. They are biochemical networks upon networks, intertwined and stacked on top of each other. Most of them can barely be comprehended by a single human mind, and yet they function perfectly. Until... they don't. With billions of trillions of reactions, happening in thousands of networks over many years, the question is not if something will go wrong, but when. Tiny mistakes add up, until the grandiose machinery gets corrupted. To prevent this from getting out of hand, our cells have kill-switches that make them commit suicide. But these kill-switches are not infallible. If they fail, a cell can turn into a cancer cell. Most of them are slain by the immune system very quickly. But this is a numbers game. Given enough time, a cell will accrue enough mistakes, slip by unnoticed, and begin making more of itself. All animals have to deal with this problem. In general, the cells of different animals are the same size. The cells of a mouse aren't smaller than yours. It just has fewer cells in total and a shorter lifespan. Fewer cells and a short life means a lower chance of things going wrong, or cells mutating. Or, at least, it should mean that. Humans live about fifty times longer, and have one thousand times more cells than mice. Yet the rate of cancer is basically the same in humans and in mice. Even weirder, blue whales, with about three thousand times more cells than humans don't seem to get cancer at all, really. This is Peto's Paradox- the baffling realisation that large animals have much, much less cancer than they should. Scientists think there are two main ways of explaining the paradox: evolution, and hypertumours. Solution one: evolve, or become a blob of cancer. As multicellular beings developed six hundred million years ago, animals became bigger, and bigger. Which added more and more cells, and hence, more and more chances that cells could be corrupted. So, the collective had to invest in better and better cancer defenses. The ones that did not died out. But cancer doesn't just happen- it's a process that involves many individual mistakes and mutations in several specific genes within the same cell. These genes are called proto-oncogenes, and when they mutate, it's bad news. For example, with the right mutation, a cell would lose its ability to kill itself. Another mutation, and it will develop the ability to hide. Another, and it will send out calls for resources. Another one, and it will multiply quickly. These oncogenes have an antagonist, though. Tumour suppressor genes. They prevent these critical mutations from happening or order the cell to kill itself if they decide it's beyond repair. It turns out that large animals have an increased number of them. Because of this, elephant cells require more mutations than mice cells to develop a tumour. They are not immune- but more resilient. This adaption probably comes with a cost in some form, but researchers still aren't sure what it is. Maybe tumour suppressors make elephants age quicker later in life, or slow down how quickly injuries heal. We don't know yet. But the solution to the paradox may actually be something different: hypertumours. Solution two: Hypertumours. Yes, really. Hypertumours are named after hyperparasites: the parasites of parasites. Hypertumours are the tumours of tumours. Cancer can be thought of as a breakdown in cooperation. Normally, cells work together to form structures like organs, tissue, or elements of the immune system. But cancer cells are selfish, and only work for their own short-term benefit. If they're successful, they form tumours- huge cancer collectives that can be very hard to kill. Making a tumour is hard work, though. Millions or billions of cancer cells multiply rapidly, which requires a lot of resources and energy. The amount of nutrients they can steal from the body becomes the limiting factor for growth. So the tumour cells trick the body to build new blood vessels directly to the tumour, to feed the thing killing it. And here, the nature of cancer cells may become their own undoing. Cancer cells are inherently unstable, and so they can continue to mutate- some of them faster than their buddies. If they do this for a while, at some point, one of the copies of the copies of the original cancer cell might suddenly think of itself as an individual again, and stop cooperating. Which means, just like the body, the original tumour suddenly becomes an enemy, fighting for the same scarce nutrients and resources. So, the newly mutated cells can create a hypertumour. Instead of helping, they cut off the blood supply to their former buddies, which will starve and kill the original cancer cells. Cancer is killing cancer. This process can repeat over and over, and this may prevent cancer from becoming a problem for a large organism. It is possible that large have more of these hypertumours than we realise. They might just not become big enough to notice. Which makes sense. A two-gram tumour is 10% of a mouse's body weight, while it's less than 0.002% of a human. And 0.000002% of a blue whale. All three tumours require the same number of cell divisions, and have the same number of cells. So an old blue whale might be filled with tiny cancers, and just not care. There are other proposed solutions to Peto's Paradox, such as different metabolic rates, or different cellular architecture. But right now, we just don't know. Scientists are working on the problem. Figuring out how large animals are so resilient to one of the most deadly diseases we know could open the path to new therapies and treatments. Cancer has always been a challenge. Today, we are finally beginning to understand it, and by doing so, one day, we might finally overcome it. This video was sponsored by... you! If you want to help us make more, you can do so by supporting us on Patreon, or getting one of the beautiful things we've made. Like our space explorer notebook, with infographic pages and unique grids to inspire your creativity, or an infographic poster bundle, or the very comfy Kurzgesagt hoodie. Or, if you missed it the first time, the second run of our gratitude journal. We put a lot of time and love into our merch, because just like with our videos, we only want to put things into the world that we feel good about. Kurzgesagt is a project that by right, shouldn't really work. Videos like the one you just watched take months to finish and we're only able to put in so much time because of your direct support. Because you watch and share, and because you care. Thank you for watching. [End Credits]
B1 中級 為什麼藍鯨不會得癌症--佩託的悖論。 (Why Blue Whales Don't Get Cancer - Peto's Paradox) 64 6 Peggie Fang 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字