This'll CE Not necessarily the main reason.

But is this significant in the fact that City's performances have dropped off the season?

Then it mean ordinarily, you wouldn't highlight it because he may even fourth highest on the list last season.

So he's obviously manager likes to change things around, but reports have suggested the players would like amore settled system.

How much does it disturb players in general when things are moved around on a morte than often basis?

I've always believed that some some stability and regularity helps performance in terms of partnerships and understandings of where people run where they play and stuff like that.

I also understand that when I was at Liverpool with Jared, Julia and the squad got bigger and we got better played him or more games, more competitions, that the rotation was inevitable and needed to maintain the level of performance we wanted to achieve.

So it's a balancing act.

I think I think the Pep Guardiola star is no as relevant as the leak from the dressing rooms throughout that got out that would be more worrying for me because he has got a squad off wonderfully gifted players so he can rotate more than the other Primitive manages to Eddie.

Great for the fact that that got out, if it is true, is awarded the The way I see it is the cornerstone of a successful team is that solid regular team you could you could spy on your team mainly spine, till we can use the word team.

But you could rattle off teams of the past that have been successful.

Can you?

Because they were nearly the same, the spine especially.

But the tip.

The 11 players were regular.

Now that does change, doesn't it?

In certain areas.

But my big issue with Manson in terms of their changes, they've been in real key areas that need stability and reliability than most.

Are you centerbacks?

Is that a real problem?

Not not not.

Do tow tinkering through injury, mainly left backs.

You know there's been four or five different left backs is probably 123456 different centerback pairings this season so far.

So it is difficult, but I think it's harder to put consistent runs.

Have formed together.

It is when you're changing those key areas that often think of you there.

Have you said that they're sorry to interrupt you?

It was hard post match, too.

Be critical of Manchester City because they could be home and Jose way home and hosed by halftime.

They play brilliantly.

Yeah, And so performance is more important than usual.

Yes, managers.

So if if they had one on Sunday, we wouldn't be talking about correctly.

Theater thing is well from just quickly in terms of judging, you know, you're right about the injuries and the concerns because of what's happening last year when they went on that amazing runs to catch Liverpool and win the league company and report played center ops.

Fernandina played in front, best holding midfield, best complete mint field and probably for years last five years.

Now they're not just missing company love, Paul for Nandhini.

Oh, in all his wisdom has dropped from peppers.

Put a minute center off.

Still comfortable a center off.

It was good, it was good, but also lose what you had in midfield protecting because more athletic than Audrey.

Several women, three double women.

So they so but going back to triple win because you get you're not getting them.

You're not getting the performances out of Fernandina Center Back in my raise, Stones are tremendous.

So in consumes of the other thing which year, right?

They played well and should have won the game.

But for someone to come out and start saying, Well, someone said this and someone said that that's not happened before.

Really, we haven't read too much of that in pep squad or or club.

One of the things we'll talk about, especially your crop on pep, is the ability to keep a group of superstars happy.

Maybe we should treat that report with a little coarse and then maybe I I I think I think generally your spot on with the nucleus the team been.

If you look at Liverpool, it's the same latitude.

See, the only back five is more or less set in stone order than whoever paid pairs.

Van Dyke.

But that was because of Gomez injury matavz injury, but the the other status.

You don't have to be looked at every team across the board.

I look at Sheffield United, I look at Wolf.

Seems that excel ing for there, there, there, there, above the level, probably where we picture them to be because they have that stability and you know their team every week.

It's hard for the players in the squad, in center back positions in those type of positions.

Really difficult, because you not get enough games.

It will get changed on the peripheral, the white players, the high energy players.

The second tweaks.

But those core positions stay the same.

Or what crop does is he basically only road states to midfield all the time, So he's got six midfielders for three positions, and they all know how to do the job.

But the hind that their high energy high intensity, the front three generally play the back four pictures show the same.

And then you got Henderson, Milner, Keita win.

I'll DM Oxlade Chamberlain on a mission.

Whoever did the one is, you say, hoping being for beena has been injured, but just so six.

But the back four in the front?

Three of the same.

If if no one's injured, they play there to say, Okay, let's move on to James.

Melton is only 18 months into a five year deal at Leicester City, but they're looking to reward him on Dhe.

He's apparently in talks over a new contract.

If you were advising the player, would you tell him to sign?

The big question for me is is, is signing a contract for Matt for James Madison?

Is it gonna limit his possibilities of where he might want to go individually?

Lester's a brilliant club, and I'm sure it's very happy is performing very well there.

But if he would want us got his eye on going somewhere else at some point, is signing an extended contract gonna limit that at that club?

I think that's a question that he'll want to ask himself.

You've obviously got a ll the all the elements off you have a wage increase.

And if you don't tell if you turn that down, then you're gonna lose that type of revenue up to the point of where you either signed a new deal or you move away.

These things that will come into the play, will it make him happier?

Will it make him feel Maur secure, But the football club or valued?

Um, I don't think it makes any difference to him in terms of his aspirations to go anywhere else, whether he signs it or not.

Because, as we've seen with football, if the movie is gonna happen, it'll happen whether or not your contract it.

But I think it's hard, always hard to turn down a contract.

If you get offered a good contract, Tough to tough to turn it down, would you?

If you're his adviser, would you want a release clause at a certain figure?

Massive, of course, if the club will play ball.

I think the release clause is the only I agree that, he said.

I think it's it's beneficial for Madison to sign the contract.

I don't think Lester needs you got from your contract.

I think we should.

Peter, what's he got left three years waiting for the summer, keeping motivated tendencies because you're not gonna if lets this element of someone who's got three years left that price won't change if you had five years left.

So keeping motivates, lnc.

Make sure he keeps his brilliant player, but it doesn't answer the question as to why they need to offer it to him at this moment in time.

It doesn't it does seem.

I understand that the urgent need for it to happen.

There is no urgent need.

I mean, maybe it Maybe it's a simple case of you've done brilliantly for us.

We want to tell you up.

So let's get it done.

Maybe you're not worried about, you know, playing the game, and that's fair enough.

Look after your players.

That's what the best clubs dough, but the the claws off an amount of money that the club prospective buyer would have to reach.

It's a very difficult one because that might bay a stumbling block, depending on how high it was set.