Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • >>Dan Ariely: I want to start with the question of what can we learn from Buddhism and your

  • own experience about happiness? How do we become.

  • >>Matthieu Ricard:Well, I was thinking about when the panel started with pleasure, the

  • relationship between the two. You know, people speak of magic moments. Walking in the snow

  • and under the stars with a wonderful person. But sometimes this is magic moment, there's

  • nothing I can do about it, but when you think about why was it magic? At that time, it was

  • a sense of having no inner conflicts, of feeling a bit spacious with the universe, with a loved

  • one, this kind of peace. So it's not that magic. You can understand why it happened.

  • So could we consider that as something like a way of being that we could cultivate as

  • a skill? Now, to come back to pleasure, you come back

  • from this walk in the snow and under the stars and you take a wonderful hot shower. It's

  • bliss. Pleasure. Now, you stay 24 hours in that hot shower,

  • it's not so interesting. So pleasure is very much dependent upon time,

  • circumstances. It's something that uses itself as we consume it. And if it's -- on top of

  • that you add craving or grasping, then somehow it dims the feeling of deep satisfaction.

  • Actually, you can enjoy something pleasurably, and in the brain build up the wanting circuit

  • which is different, and at the end you may experience something that you want without

  • feeling pleasure. That's called addiction. So in a way --

  • >>Dan Ariely: Just a moment there. So you're trying to separate happiness from pleasure

  • and you say pleasure is much more temporary and --

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Well, pleasure, you look for pleasurable sensations. And so those are

  • very vulnerable, let's say, to outer circumstances. And basically if you are keeping on trying

  • to renew that all the time, and this is the recipe for happiness, it looks more like a

  • recipe for exhaustion than happiness. So let's take happiness now as a way of being.

  • So a way of being that is not just happiness on its own but a cluster of human qualities.

  • It is inner peace, inner strength, inner freedom. It is loving kindness, compassion, friendship,

  • resilience, inner courage. And those are things that the more you experience them, rather

  • than pleasure, the more actually they get deeper and stronger because it builds up something.

  • So in the end you end up with inner resources to deal with the fundamentals of life, no

  • matter what happens, that is the opposite of pleasure.

  • So it builds a platform in life on which you come back. After winning the lottery, you

  • come up, you even go below. If it's a drama, you also come back to that platform, but you

  • raise that platform as a skill. So now it's also something that give you a

  • sense of confidence that you can go through the ups and downs of life, so, therefore,

  • you feel less vulnerable, you feel less threatened, you feel less protective, so you also naturally

  • will open more to others. So that element, I think especially the notion of loving kindness,

  • altruism, compassion, benevolence, those are key components to generating happiness. And

  • it's not necessarily pleasant. We were talking yesterday while we were taking

  • a walk that can it be compatible with sadness? So if it's pleasure, no way. But you see an

  • injustice, a massacre, it's incredibly sad. But you can keep the sense of courage, of

  • determination to change that, of compassion, of sense of direction in life, and so you

  • will treat that in the best possible way, in a constructive way. You won't fall into

  • despair. So it's compatible with what I call a way

  • of being, which is flourishing and well-being, even though it's very unpleasant.

  • So in that sense, it is different. >>Dan Ariely: Yeah. Sorry, I want to find

  • out how you do this because it's interesting -- I mean, it sounds promising. So here's

  • my kind of big struggle with pleasure. There is an analysis of people who have been climbing

  • mountains. And when you read these stories about mountain climbing, they look -- they

  • seem like stories of pure misery. You would think it's elation? No. First of all, it's

  • very dangerous, but it's frostbite and hard to breathe and hard to walk and injuries and

  • so on. And from these descriptions you say somebody just did that, and they got to the

  • top. They will say this was the biggest mistake of their lives, they'll go down and never

  • do it again, and from there just try to get simple pleasures out of life rather than this

  • horrific experience. Nevertheless, people finish climbing big mountains,

  • the Himalayas and they go back and do the same thing again. And it's the kind of pleasure

  • that looks to me like it's not captured day-to-day thinking. It's a pleasure that comes from

  • achievement, and it's a pleasure that comes from competition. It's a pleasure that comes

  • from overcoming challenges. It's a pleasure that comes from pain and misery in some interesting

  • -- >>Matthieu Ricard: You know the idea of flow.

  • >>Dan Ariely: Yeah. >>Matthieu Ricard: It is not so much the competition.

  • I think flow is something that you are fully engaged in. You forget yourself. It's just

  • challenging enough that you have to put the best of yourself and not too much that you

  • panic. So it's not boring and not stressing. So flow can be achieved through mountain climbing

  • or a surgeon or an artist. It could be achieved also through medication. It's flow without

  • action. So a continuous stream of experience which

  • has a quality, a sense of flourishing, that time takes another value. When I sit in my

  • hermitage, some people say it must be so boring sitting months alone in the hermitage. Don't

  • you feel lonely? Doesn't the time seem long? >>Dan Ariely: You must have access to Paul's

  • movies when you sit there. >>Matthieu Ricard: Right. But I find the time

  • so rewarding. Just before lunch break, 15 minutes, it's like a stream of melted gold.

  • I have this 15 minutes to just go deeper and trying to generate compassion and all that.

  • So it is a kind of inner flow. So I think, really, it's the quality of experience

  • that will determine over the long time how you go about that.

  • >>Dan Ariely: So you have been called the happiest man in the world, I think.

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Sorry. I have made so many disclaimers about that.

  • >>Dan Ariely: I don't think you said it. >>Matthieu Ricard: Forget about that.

  • >>Dan Ariely: Somebody said it. Clearly you're very happy.

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Not too bad. >>Dan Ariely: Not too bad.

  • [ Laughter ] >>Dan Ariely: So we've tried to kind of think

  • about what kind of things we do wrong and how can we do it better. Spending money, being

  • happy, what kind of things our intuitions are generally not correct. And from your experience,

  • what kind of things actually are making people become happier and more satisfied?

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Typically, you know, the lottery is studied very much. The comment,

  • people say, "Oh, of course he's happy. I would be happy."

  • And then you hear of people who have everything to be happy. They are beautiful, they are

  • famous, they have a lot of money and they are very depressed. "Oh, what's wrong with

  • this guy? If I had that, I would be very happy." I think it's too much. Of course we need to

  • improve the outer conditions. No question. Especially there's still 1.5 billion people

  • living in abject poverty. There's conflict. There are mothers who cannot feed their children.

  • No question that we should improve outer condition in this world.

  • This being said, especially when we have what we need, if we keep on placing all our hopes

  • and fear in the outer world, we are in for a big disappointment because precisely, we

  • when we get it, we say so what? We expected something wonderful and it is just ordinary.

  • So we vastly underestimate the importance of inner conditions. We deal with our mind

  • from morning to evening. That's the ultimate experience of whatever we do. Whether you

  • get a Ferrari or something else, it's your mind that is going to translate that into

  • happiness or misery. And that mind can be your best friend or your worst enemy. Depends

  • how it works. So at least if we could pay some attention

  • of how to deal with the mind, how to deal with emotions, how to recognize that aggressivity,

  • hatred, jealousy arrogance, craving will just destroy your happiness and physically make

  • you unhappy and will destroy the happiness of others. And if you find out that loving

  • kindness, compassion, cultivating inner peace, the simplicity of the present moment contribute

  • to flourishing and then you will be a person that will be happier to be with and that transformation

  • will lead you to serve better others, and then you realize cultivating as skills those

  • inner conditions matter tremendously. >>Dan Ariely: I buy it. So how do you -- I

  • want to be less jealous. >>Matthieu Ricard: How do you learn chess?

  • How do you learn to read and write? How do you learn to juggle or play tennis? You practice.

  • So we do have this unconditional love feeling for a very dear person for 15 seconds or so

  • and it comes back and goes, but who sits for 30 minutes cultivating loving kindness? Very

  • few. We go at 5:00 in the morning --

  • >>Dan Ariely: We have email all the time. How do we have time?

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: You are on this bicycle that goes nowhere not even in the kitchen

  • because fitness is good for your health. Why there's no compassion gymnasium? My friend

  • Paul Ekman says we should have compassion gymnasiums every block.

  • >>Dan Ariely: So give us a specific example. How do you practice compassion?

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Let's say you want to practice loving kindness. You start with something

  • easy, someone you really love so you don't have to try absolutely have loving kindness

  • for a dictator or something. Or someone even worse, your next colleague at the office.

  • [ Laughter ] >>Matthieu Ricard: So you start with that,

  • and you have this natural love and feeling, embracing and you want only that person to

  • be happy, be safe, be flourishing in life. And then instead of giving few thoughts, you

  • let that fill your mental landscape. If it declines, you revive it. And you don't do

  • that just for a few thoughts, you try to extend that for ten or 15 minutes. Or you repeat

  • it several times in the day. >>Dan Ariely: So you think about that person

  • and all the wonderful things you want. >>Matthieu Ricard: Not only that but you try

  • to grow a genuine sense of living. Not just thinking again. But it's a trigger. And then

  • after that, you think, well, I don't wake up in the morning thinking may I suffer the

  • whole day and if possible my whole life. So does that person, so does that person, so

  • does that person. So I project myself in your mind, in their mind, and I say they may be

  • diluted in the way they try to find happiness in the wrong place, but basically they don't

  • want to suffer. So if I value my own happiness and that of

  • my child, I start valuing them, I see the interdependence among all sentient beings,

  • and suddenly I can extend that. So then comes something that is very rewarding, is that

  • sense of connectedness, of having this natural benevolence to others, that readiness to be

  • of service when occasion comes, and it suddenly makes it much more fulfilled life.

  • Experientally, this emotion, loving kindness and compassion. Neuroscience will tell you

  • this is the strongest activation of positive emotion.

  • >>Dan Ariely: So lets look at a little bit of data. Can you share with us a little bit

  • of -- >>Matthieu Ricard: Yes. If you could show

  • the slide. So of course we say that this is good for you. You sit in these beautiful places.

  • It's easier to be there. It disappeared.

  • >>Dan Ariely: Are we in the way? >>Matthieu Ricard: Well, it's gone. You are

  • there, this is the data. Now it's gone again. Okay. Now you are there. It is good for you.

  • You can meditate. It is in a traffic jam. I don't know why it's running so fast. I don't

  • know, whatever task. Then the idea came about 15 years ago to see

  • what long-term meditators who had done 50- to 60,000 hours of meditation, like a violinist

  • will do his first concert, it's 10,000, so five times that, what will happen if we look

  • in their brain, in their immune system. So we took some of those guys, myself included

  • -- >>Dan Ariely: Can we have the data slides?

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Yes. So that's, for instance, one of the great teacher that trained us on

  • compassion and loving kindness. And then so you can see that it seems to be some kind

  • of, you know, strength, inner peace, inner felicity. They don't seem too much stressed.

  • Then we took them to Madison, Wisconsin, and then we tried to measure the brain activity

  • with electro encephalogram, I won't give you the details, all with the scanner that the

  • meditators described as it is cold, it is noisy, it is dark, it is narrow. Nevertheless,

  • and we spent two and a half hours. This is the first time I came after two and a half

  • hours upon arrival with Richard Davidson. But what they found with experienced, you

  • see the curve below, that is the novice group that did one week of loving kindness meditation.

  • The pink line is when they rest, the blue line is when they meditate. Nothing happens.

  • Look at the upper curve. The bottom line is when they are at rest and don't do anything

  • specific. When they engage in compassion meditation, you see a huge increase, several hundred percent,

  • in the gamma frequency. That's huge. It was so huge that they thought it was an artifact.

  • It has to be replicated many times. If you look in the brain, look on the left

  • side, the meditator at rest, and when they engage in compassion, several critical areas

  • of the brain having to do with empathy, with parental love, with positive emotion are activated.

  • On the right, this is novices at rest. Nothing happened. Meditation, nothing happened. That

  • shows the effect of training. >>Dan Ariely: Let's go back to the previous

  • slide. So it tells you that meditators are able to have basically brain control over

  • compassion? >>Matthieu Ricard: Yes. What I was just going

  • to show next, actually, is if you ask them something strange, to meditate, 30% of compassion,

  • 60%, 90, that seems odd. I give you 30% of my compassion only because I don't like you

  • or you, I like very much? We did it for 22 hours. It was a marathon. They did (indiscernible)

  • of three days, fortunately, and it turns out that those subjective feeling of 30% of bringing

  • compassion and more and more, it matches with what is measured in the brain.

  • So you can actually just generate brain state at will.

  • And similarly, now we could show that that's fine for 50,000 hour. Now we show that two

  • weeks can make change in the brain. Structurally, it's in hippocampus which, as you know, integrates

  • novelty when you have new experiences. And in many areas of the brain, two weeks,

  • three weeks, eight weeks, it already makes structural change. Neuro plasticity is taking

  • place simply with 30 minutes a day of mind training. So that is a huge potential as a

  • secular contribution to society. It's not going to the hermitage. It's doing it simply

  • as much as you do physical fitness, you need to do emotional and mental fitness.

  • >>Dan Ariely: That's great. And as a last question, so you've -- Buddhism for a long

  • time, have practiced kind, loving meditation and argued it's correct. Now neuroscience

  • is showing changes in the brain is according to both experts and novices. Why -- Why do

  • you think this is not part of the human intuition of the modern world that this is something

  • we should be doing? Because how many people here meditate?

  • That's probably a big percentage compared to a regular audience.

  • Why do you think this is not something that people intuit?

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: First of all, we need to demystify. Meditation in Sanskrit is bavla,

  • means to cultivate or to become familiar with. So we become familiar with many things but

  • possibly not the exactly right things for general flourishing.

  • So in the eastern tradition, this is part of life, so not as odd as here.

  • >>Dan Ariely: Yeah. >>Matthieu Ricard: So I think it's probably

  • that we vastly underestimate the potential of mind to change as skills. Oh, this is for

  • granted. I'm like that, take it or leave it but I can't do much about it. So that's a

  • loser sort of perspective. But what neuroscience shows, and that's why

  • that collaboration is so fruitful, is that neuro plasticity can happen at all ages and

  • it start within two weeks and it certainly makes a difference and in the behavior. We

  • don't have time, but just now with Richard Davidson there is a program for preschoolers

  • -- four, five years old -- eight weeks very simple training of the (indiscernible) behavior,

  • gratitude and so forth, and you will be amazed at the result. It completely breaks after

  • eight weeks the in group, out group. We ask them to give stickers to their best friend

  • and to the less likely friend in the class after ten weeks, although at the beginning

  • they give everything to their best friend. So simple intervention. Secular that based

  • on this experience from the contemplative side that can be an immense contribution.

  • We also work, for instance, with burnout. >>Dan Ariely: I have to stop you.

  • >>Matthieu Ricard: Yeah. >>Dan Ariely: This has been fantastic and

  • inspiring, and I'm looking forward to more. Thank you very much.

  • [ Applause ]

>>Dan Ariely: I want to start with the question of what can we learn from Buddhism and your

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

快樂原則--Matthieu Ricard, Zeitgeist Europe 2013. (The Pleasure Principle - Matthieu Ricard, Zeitgeist Europe 2013)

  • 170 17
    孫子文 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字