字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 THE JACK HAMMERS. JOHN ROBERTS NORTH LAWN. >> Sandra: FOR MORE ON THIS LET'S TURN TO BUCK SEXTON FORMER C.I.A. ANALYST. WE RECEIVED A STATEMENT FROM DAN HOFFMAN. HE COULDN'T COME ON THIS MORNING BUT WE REACHED OUT TO HIM FOR A STATEMENT. HE SAID I HAVE LESS OF PROBLEM WITH CNN INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS RUNNING WITH A HOT STORY THAN THE SOURCES THAT TIPPED THEM OFF. IF ANY OF STORY IS TRUE, WHOEVER WAS DISCUSSING THIS SENSITIVE STORY WITH CNN WAS COMMITTING A MAJOR DERELICTION IN DUTY. PUTIN WILL NOT HESITATE TO LAUNCH ASSASSINATIONS THOSE WHO BRANDS TRAITORS. JUST LOOK AT THE FATE OF OTHERS. I CAN IMAGINE OUR OUR SOURCES RISKING THEIR LIVES BEHIND ENEMY LINES WHETHER IT'S WORTH IT AND IT WILL EXPOSE THEIR IDENTITIES. THE KEY POINT OF THE STORY A C.I.A. SOURCE HAD TO BE TAKEN OUT AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP COMPROMISED HIM AND THEIR SACRED WORK OUT OF PARTISAN POLITICS. OTHER ISSUES ON WHICH TO ARGUE WITH THE PRESIDENT. BEFORE I WENT OVER AS CHIEF OF STATION MANY YEARS AGO A C.I.A. VETERAN WAS GIVING ME SOME ADVICE HOW BEST TO DO OUR WORK. HE SUMMED IT UP SIMPLY. THE SECRET OF OUR SUCCESS IS THE SECRET OF OUR SUCCESS. YOUR REACTION TO THE REPORTING THIS MORNING. >> I AGREE WITH MY OLD COLLEAGUE DAN AND SUMS IT UP NICELY IN THE STATEMENT. I WOULD ADD TO IT THERE IS AN OBVIOUS RECKLESSNESS FROM ANYBODY WHO WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT THIS KIND OF STORY THAT HAD ACCESS OR KNEW ANYTHING IF THAT'S WHAT WENT ON HERE. SEEMS TO BE THE CASE. THERE IS ALSO JOURNALISTS WHO RUN WITH THIS. THEY HAVE TO AS AMERICANS AND PATRIOTS MAKE SOME DETERMINATIONS WHAT THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW VERSUS WHAT ACTUALLY DOES PUT PEOPLE IN JEOPARDY AND WHAT CAN BE PROBLEMATIC FROM A NATIONAL SECURITY PERSPECTIVE. LEGALLY THEY CAN -- IT DOESN'T MEAN THEY CAN REPORT ON WHATEVER THEY WANT. IN THIS CASE IT'S CLEAR IT WAS JUST MEANT TO GET TRUMP. THE STORY HERE ISN'T ABOUT THE WHOLE OPERATION. THE AGENCY HAS COME OUT, RARE, AND SAID IT IS B.S. AND NOT TRUE. BUT THIS WAS ALL MEANT TO BE A WEAPON AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. AND THAT'S WHY I THINK SOME OF THE OTHER BARRIERS BOTH FROM PEOPLE ALLEGEDLY INSIDE THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY TALKED ABOUT THIS AND SOME OF THE JOURNALISTS WHO RAN WITH A HALF BACKED IF NOT ENTIRELY UNTRUE STORY BECAUSE WE'RE IN THE GET TRUMP ERA, ALL THE RULES OF A SUDDEN DON'T APPLY THE SAME WAY. THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED I THINK WITH THIS STORY. >> Sandra: THAT PART WAS CLEAR BY YOURSELF AND YOUR COLLEAGUE DAN HOFFMAN WHO I WANT TO POINT OUT IS A FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR. YOU LOOK AT THE REPORTING IN THE "NEW YORK TIMES," THOUGH, AND THEY DON'T SAY IT IS BECAUSE SPECIFICALLY OF DONALD TRUMP THAT THIS PERSON WAS EXTRACTED FROM RUSSIA. THEY SAY IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE MEDIA. YOU'VE HAVE DUG INTO THAT REPORT AS WELL. CNN REPORT DONALD TRUMP'S ROLE IS THE TOP OF THE STORY AND THEY ASSUME THEIR READERSHIP IS INTERESTED IN THAT COMPONENT. THE OVERALL DETAILS WOULD BE OF MUCH LESSER INTEREST. AGAIN, C.I.A. HAS ALREADY SAID IT IS FALSE. BUT WHAT THEY'VE TOLD US IS REALLY MEANT TO BE A POLITICAL STORY. NOT SO MUCH A NATIONAL SECURITY STORY. WHY "THE NEW YORK TIMES" AND SOME OTHER OUTLETS WOULD THINK IT IS SOMETHING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT IF THERE WAS, FORGET ABOUT IT BEING SPECIFIC TO RUSSIA. ANY HIGH LEVEL SOURCE IN A GOVERNMENT USEFUL TO OUR INTELLIGENCE SERVICE JOURNALISTS SHOULD KNOW THAT. IT SHOULD NEVER BE TALKED ABOUT PUBLICLY AS A PATRIOTIC DUTY. IT'S A QUESTION OF JUDGMENT AND ETHICS. I THINK IN THIS CASE YOU'VE SEEN A LOT OF PEOPLE JUST DECIDED BECAUSE IT MAKES TRUMP LOOK RECKLESS WE'LL SAY IT'S SOMETHING PEOPLE NEED TO HEAR ABOUT. >> Sandra: YOU HAVE THE CNN REPORT THE C.I.A. IS SAYING IS MISGUIDED AND UNTRUE. "THE NEW YORK TIMES" REPORT SAYING THIS HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE MEDIA. NBC FOLLOWED UP ON THE CNN REPORT AND DROVE TO THE PERSON'S HOUSE AT WHICH TIME S.U.V.'S PULLED UP ALONGSIDE THEM AND GOT THEM TO LEAVE AND GO AWAY. THIS PARTICULAR CORRESPONDENT. HOW MUCH DAMAGE CAN THIS DO COMING FROM THE C.I.A. >> THE FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH AND REALITY OF DOING INTELLIGENCE WORK IS TO PROTECT SOURCES AND METHODS. IT IS NOT JUST FOR THE INDIVIDUAL'S SAFETY. IT IS FOR THE PEOPLE DOWN THE LINE THAT YOU ARE GOING TO ASK TO TAKE RISKS ON YOUR BEHALF. THE AGENCY SAID THIS STORY IS NONSENSE. LET'S ASSUME FOR A MOMENT THERE IS SOME DEGREE OF TRUTH TO IT SOMEWHERE. IF THE NBC REPORTERS CAN FIND THIS PERSON THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT CAN FIND THIS PERSON. WE KNOW HOW THE RUSSIANS DEAL WITH PEOPLE THAT SPEAK OUT OF SCHOOL PARTICULARLY IF THEY WERE CLOSE TO PUTIN OR A PROBLEM FOR THE GOVERNMENT. THERE ARE REAL RISKS HERE. JOURNALISTS HAVE TO ASK THEMSELVES WAS IT WORTH IT TO GET ANOTHER GRUDGE SHOT IN AGAINST DONALD TRUMP? I HOPE THEY THINK THE ANSWER IS
B1 中級 巴克-塞克斯頓稱CNN的間諜報告是 "對付唐納德-特朗普的武器 (Buck Sexton calls CNN's spy report a 'weapon against Donald Trump') 20 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字