B1 中級 美國腔 107 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
Lets say you think of an amazing three act story
that you want to create.
"I think I just"
"yeah"
"I just had an idea"
The first question you have to ask yourself is
What do you make?
Should your story be written as a movie or a novel?
It's a simple question, but the answer gets complicated
because of how often stories get retold in different artforms
The majority of highest grossing and most critically acclaimed movies
were adapted from novels and many unforgettable stories became famous
both as a novel and as a film
but each of these stories is presented differently depending on the medium used
so what's the difference between telling a story through a film and through a novel
What can a novel convey well that a film may have trouble with?
When I was in high school, I read "How to Write a Movie in 21 Days."
The first chapter of the book provides an interesting thought experiment
to consider the differences between a novel and a screenplay.
The experiment asks you to think of a scene and write that scene both as a novel and as a movie.
Consider a scene where a robber breaks into a home to steal something.
In a novel, we may get the inner thoughts of the robber before the robbery.
The robber and his predicament get described to us through various literary devices.
no other option and with the shaking
hand he lifted the hammer and smashed

the window shattering the glass in his
expectations for a quiet life free of

Where the novel stands out is its ability to put us in the thoughts and perspective of a character so smoothly.
Of course, movies do the same thing.
Movies narrate, have voice-overs and even talk directly to the viewer
but the novel can transition from thought to action so seemlessly
to the point where the vast majority of some novels can take place completely within the mind of a character
and the story can remain gripping and moving.
In movies, action is more common than just thinking.
"Alright, you just need to calm down. We need to think for a second."
"We just need to think this out."
"Fuck thinking, we need to act."
It's rare for a movie to spend the whole time narrating because it would get boring
but novels are different.
Instead of showing a character, a novel completely inhabits the mind of a character in the world of the narrative.
Novels can tells us how a person is feeling, tell us what something looks like, or what something tastes like
in a way a movie has trouble with.
"Catcher in the Rye" wouldn't work very well as a movie because movies are best at showing action and movement.
The vast majority of "Catcher in the Rye" takes place inside the mind of Holden, and little action occurs as Holden ponders.
So when a scene consists of nothing but Holden sitting on a train thinking,
the novel is the best method for bringing Holden's thoughts and character to life
While there are definitely good movies that showcase a character's thoughts,
novels do it better.
In the adaptation of "The Hunger Games" from the novel to the big screen, the writers had to do away with a lot of what was going on inside Katniss's head
because it didn't transition well to screen.
In "The Hunger Games," Katniss has to fake a romance with Peeta to win affection from the viewers
and in the first two books, she constantly thinks about Gale back home and has an inner struggle about whether or not she likes Gale or Peeta
The movies almost entirely do away with this plotline in the earlier films because it's really awkward adding love triangle to a film that has no action associated with it.
Movies aren't good at thoughts. They're good at actions.
The "Great Gatsby" film adaptation has several differences with the novel and it capitalizes on what movies do better than books.
They show. To show Gatsby's anxiety towards seeing Daisy,
he orders a ridiculous amount of flowers for the house and hires dozens of servants to redecorate Nick's lawn.
The visuals show Gatsby's overpreparation and anxiety from seeing Daisy.
The scene of him waiting for Daisy has the ever-increasing volume of the time ticking in the background as we get closer and closer to the clock.
"I can't wait all day. I'm leaving"
Along with DiCaprio's performance all the elements of the scene--the editing, sound, visuals and acting--convey the sense of anxiety Gatsby has.
The novel does it a little bit differently. The

novel has no flowers delivered and only
one of Gatsby servants comes to mow the

lawn. Instead of representing nerves
through big visuals we get told about

Gatsby's nerves through literary devices.
Both scenes are written very similarly with
almost the same dialogue and action but

the subtle differences between the
movie's visuals and the novel's

descriptions are how two different art
forms convey the same mood. The novel

tells us about his nerves through
description and the movie shows us his

nerves through editing, lighting, sound
and acting. So what would a robbery look like

as a movie? To play to the strengths of
film when it comes to conveying the

robber's hesitation and regret we would
show rather than tell. Maybe we get a

close-up of his trembling hand or sweat on his brow. Maybe he'd be dressed in
everyday attire instead of the typical
robber gear. The shots could be close ups

and point-of-view shots to place us into
his perspective and empathize with him

and the shots could be edited very quickly to up the pace and anxiety of the scene.
These visuals are what would make the
story powerful. For the novel, metaphors

tone, hyperbole and all the other
countless literary techniques are the

key to telling a story and lighting,
camera angle, actor placement and other

cinematic techniques are how movies
show a story. Different techniques with

different strengths and weaknesses.
Movies show. Novels tell. Many people on

the internet loathe movies that don't stay
true to the novel's they are based on.

There are a lot of reasons for the
changes from novel to screen like

fitting feature-length screen time and a
desire to appeal to a larger audience

but I think one key difference some
people miss is that movies can't always

replicate the mood of a novel because
movies have to present the story with

different techniques. Perhaps "The Great
Gatsby" wasn't a good adaptation because

it focused too heavily on the visuals of
the story and not the emotion behind it.

Take this excerpt from the novel
That moment is recreated
in the movie like this

"He seemed to be reaching towards
something out there in the dark."

The movie doesn't come close to capturing the moment correctly. In the novel, Gatsby can
be seen trembling even from a distance
with both arms stretched out. It's

obviously a very personal moment for Gatsby, where he looks extremely desperate
almost pathetic with such dramatic body
posture. In the movie he just does this.

No trembling. Just one arm. Not
embarrassing, not intimate. It's

completely casual and this is the whole
point of the scene. It's supposed to be a

very uncomfortable moment to see Gatsby's desperate and weak side but the
movie recreates this moment totally wrong. The movie's visuals made Gatsby look so
cool and his life so dazzling that we
miss how he's not just a cool rich guy

with a weakness for a girl. He's actually
an extremely empty, hollow failure that's

anything from great. The movie's visuals
along with the modern score made Gatsby's

character much less moving and pathetic
like the novel did. So sometimes the movie

gets it wrong. There are many more
examples where the movie does it write

and maybe even better. What better way to show the clamor of a foreign world than
to go from a world in black and white to
a world in color? What better way to show

a narrator dominating the scene than by
having him look straight at us and

introduce us to the world himself? What
I'm saying is that for every poor

adaptation there are dozens of examples
proving otherwise. Many stories work very

well on screen and off so I don't think
movie adaptations of a book are cursed

to be worse than the book. I just think
that sometimes the filmmaker doesn't

bring the emotion of the book onto the
screen properly. So the next time you

read a book or watch a movie
ask yourself does it show or tell?
"I know kung-fu."
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

什麼因素造成小說與電影不同 (Film vs. Novel: What Makes Them Different?)

107 分類 收藏
Pedroli Li 發佈於 2019 年 1 月 29 日
看更多推薦影片
  1. 1. 單字查詢

    在字幕上選取單字即可即時查詢單字喔!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔