Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • The following content is provided under a Creative

  • Commons license.

  • Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare

  • continue to offer high quality educational resources for free.

  • To make a donation or to view additional materials

  • from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare

  • at ocw.mit.edu.

  • ANDREW W. LO: So on behalf of the Sloan School

  • I want to welcome all of you to 15.401 Finance Theory.

  • This course is meant for first year MBA students.

  • And so that's the focus, and I'm going

  • to assume that that's the background that all of you

  • will have.

  • We may have a few other students in the class,

  • but primarily it will be first year MBAs who

  • are thinking about a career in finance,

  • as well as those of you who aren't

  • sure about a career in finance but are curious about it.

  • Hopefully over the next 13 weeks we'll

  • be able to satisfy that curiosity.

  • I want to start by talking a little bit

  • about what finance is, and how I got interested in it,

  • because I think it's often helpful in order

  • to motivate a subject to get a sense of how

  • somebody else decided to choose this as a profession.

  • To do that I have to go back a little bit,

  • and give you some background about

  • my own educational experiences.

  • So let me start by mentioning that I've

  • been at MIT for the past 20 years,

  • and been in the finance group all that time.

  • Before that I taught at the Wharton School for four years.

  • And before that, I got my PhD in economics

  • from Harvard University, and then graduated in 1980

  • from Yale also majoring in economics.

  • And during that time I've learned an enormous amount

  • both about finance and the real world,

  • but one of the things that I keep coming back to

  • is the fact that the finance field

  • is almost unique in how it applies to practical management

  • problems.

  • And what I want to try to do over the next 13 weeks

  • is to convince you of the fact that finance

  • is in fact, the most important subject

  • that you'll ever encounter.

  • That in fact, finance is at the core of everything

  • that you will ever do in business and in management.

  • Now that's a tall order I recognize,

  • and I suspect that some of you are

  • quite skeptical about the role that finance might play

  • in your own career objectives.

  • And I know many of you have very different career objectives.

  • And I'm not even trying to convince all of you

  • to go into a career in finance, but I

  • am trying to convince all of you that finance is really

  • the lifeblood and the basic lingua

  • franca of all of business.

  • And that's one of the reasons why finance

  • is such an important subject.

  • Now before I begin, let me ask you a question.

  • How many people have had no finance background whatsoever?

  • Oh, that's great.

  • I look forward to a challenge.

  • But the other reason it's great is

  • I have to tell you that it's a real privilege for me to be

  • here in front of you to tell you about finance

  • for the very first time.

  • And it reminds me a little bit of my younger

  • son who is an extraordinarily fussy eater,

  • he's eight years old now.

  • But ever since he was born he had some allergies,

  • and he just refused to eat most of everything.

  • In fact, my wife often says that my younger son is a vegetarian

  • except he doesn't eat vegetables.

  • So he's an incredibly fussy eater,

  • and somehow when he was one year old

  • he saw my older son eating an ice cream cone,

  • and figured that that's something he ought to try.

  • How he figured that out, I don't know.

  • But he tasted it for the very first time,

  • and you could see his face change in about four seconds

  • from disgust to curiosity to absolute, you know,

  • enthrallment with the taste and feel of ice cream.

  • He just loved it thereafter.

  • That's one of his major food groups now.

  • It's ice cream.

  • And so I feel privileged to be able to share that experience

  • here in the sense that once you get a taste of finance,

  • I think you're going to be incredibly

  • excited and enthralled by the subject.

  • Because it's one of the few subjects,

  • in fact, that's the only subject that I've encountered

  • that is both rigorous, it's extraordinarily

  • challenging from a research and intellectual perspective,

  • and at the end of the day it's extremely practical.

  • In fact, I would say it's indispensable

  • for financial management.

  • So I'm going to try to convince you of that over the next 13

  • weeks, and I'm going to do that by going over material

  • that you will find indispensable.

  • As many of you know, at the end of the course

  • we have a ritual where we hand out teaching ratings.

  • And among the finance faculty, among all the faculty,

  • we're very concerned about good teaching.

  • So these teaching ratings actually matter.

  • And I've always thought that having a teaching rating

  • survey at the end of the semester,

  • is somewhat misguided.

  • What I'd like to do, and what I've proposed

  • hasn't been adopted yet, I propose

  • to have teaching ratings submitted five

  • years after a course is done.

  • Now this may be a problem for some people who aren't

  • up to speed in the classroom.

  • But the reason I say this is, because it will only

  • be after you get into your jobs, into your careers,

  • before you realize how useful finance is.

  • And five years from now, I suspect all of you

  • will come back and say, gee, this

  • is one of the most important courses you have ever taken.

  • Not because of me, but because of the substance of what

  • we're going to cover over the next 13 weeks.

  • It's because of you and all of the work

  • that you will put into this course.

  • This will be the most challenging course

  • you will ever love.

  • So I-- stealing from the military--

  • I think that you'll really appreciate

  • how the discipline of financial logic

  • will help you to think smarter about all of your management

  • decisions no matter what you decide to do with your careers.

  • Now that's a very tall order.

  • I've built up expectations.

  • So I'm going to have to deliver over the next 13 weeks,

  • and we'll see whether or not we can do that.

  • But let me start now by talking about what

  • we're going to cover today.

  • I want to start with a little bit of motivation,

  • and then talk about the dramatis personae.

  • These are the cast of characters that we're

  • going to be focusing on over the next 13 weeks.

  • And then I'm going to lay out the fundamental challenges

  • of financial analysis.

  • It turns out there are only two.

  • There are only two challenges in financial analysis,

  • and once you figure both of those out, you're done.

  • So if by chance you can figure that out

  • before the end of the class, you don't

  • need to come back for the rest of the lectures.

  • Then I'm going to turn to providing you

  • with a framework for thinking about these financial

  • challenges.

  • To me it's very important to have a framework to start with,

  • because I like to organize my thoughts

  • into things that I know and things that I don't know.

  • And of the things that I know, how did it relate to the stuff

  • that I already knew, or thought I knew.

  • So I want to give you a sense of that kind of framework

  • to think about financial analysis upfront.

  • You probably won't fully appreciate it at this point,

  • but sometime over the next 13 weeks you will get it.

  • And so I want to give that to you

  • so that you can start thinking about it subconsciously,

  • unconsciously, and then eventually you

  • will understand how all the pieces fit together.

  • I then want to talk about the importance

  • of two aspects of financial analysis

  • that make finance different from every other discipline you

  • will ever encounter here at MIT and elsewhere.

  • And that is time and risk.

  • Without those two factors it turns out

  • that finance is actually done.

  • In other words, there's no real research challenges,

  • no open questions left once you eliminate time and risk.

  • Put in another way, the only reason

  • that there exists a finance department, and finance

  • faculty, and finance journals, and a finance industry,

  • the only reason is because of time and risk.

  • So I'm going to come back to that.

  • Then I'm going to conclude by giving you the six

  • basic principles of finance.

  • These are principles that you will encounter

  • in all of your finance courses for the rest of your stay

  • at MIT and elsewhere.

  • These are the ideas, the fundamental ideas,

  • that have shaped financial markets

  • and that are at the root cause of all of the financial market

  • innovations, as well as all of the financial market crises

  • that we've seen including what's been going on

  • over the last several months in the subprime mortgage market.

  • In fact, we're going to talk about the subprime mortgage

  • problems after we cover fixed income securities.

  • Right now I suspect most of you know

  • that there's something going on, know that it's bad stuff,

  • but you don't know why, how, where, when,

  • and what to do about it.

  • Well, in about five lectures, you will.

  • It's not complicated, but it's different from anything

  • that you've ever encountered.

  • And in fact, financial analysis, I suspect,

  • is different from anything most of you have ever encountered.

  • I'm hoping that by the end of the course,

  • it will change the way you think about everything.

  • And again, I recognize that that's a tall order,

  • but you tell me 13 weeks from now

  • whether or not I've delivered.

  • And then I'll conclude by talking about the course

  • overview, and then finally I want

  • to say a few words about how as a student

  • you can get the most out of this course.

  • This is a part of the lecture that I've always

  • felt is critical at the very start of a course

  • like this, because there are a number of challenges

  • that you will face over the next 13

  • weeks regarding this material.

  • And I've always thought that it would

  • be helpful for the instructor to let me know where

  • those challenges might come from,

  • and what I should do in advance to prepare

  • for those challenges.

  • So I'm going to do that at the end of this hour and a half.

  • For next time I'd like you to read Brealey and Myers,

  • chapters one and two.

  • We are going to be covering that today as well as next Monday.

  • So please keep up with your readings.

  • And at the end of this lecture, I

  • will talk a bit about the course requirements

  • and other aspects of the course mechanics.

  • Any questions?

  • All right, let me start with some motivation

  • about why you might want to study finance

  • and why finance is so important.

  • And I've always found that with motivation it's really best

  • to do it in a personal way.

  • That is, to try to find an individual or a group

  • of individuals that personify a particular discipline

  • or endeavor.

  • And so there are three people that I'd

  • like to introduce you to.

  • I suspect you'll know at least two out of the three,

  • but my guess is you won't know all of them.

  • The first person-- oh, before I do

  • that, I want to introduce a very simple definition of what

  • finance is.

  • So this is the very first equation

  • that you'll ever see in this course,

  • and there'll be many others of course.

  • But the first expression of exactly what is finance

  • is this, finance is simply equal to mathematics plus money.

  • Now that suggests that mathematics as a discipline

  • is equal to finance without the money,

  • but really that's not my point.

  • Although it's true by the way, that's not my point.

  • My point is that finance is the study,

  • the systematic and disciplined study of financial transactions

  • of money.

  • Now when you see this you might think, well, gee,

  • I don't really have a strong math background.

  • Maybe I'm in the wrong place or the wrong class.

  • And I want to explain to you that that's completely

  • inaccurate, and inappropriate.

  • When I say mathematics, I'm actually

  • talking about a very wide range of mathematics.

  • Everything from the extraordinarily

  • complex and profound to the extremely pedestrian

  • and obvious.

  • So literally the range from differential geometry

  • and partial differential equations

  • on one end of the spectrum to arithmetic and high school

  • algebra at the other end of the spectrum.

  • Now since this is an introductory finance class,

  • I assume that you know nothing.

  • What I mean by that is, I assume that there

  • are no prerequisites that you have other than what it took

  • for you to get into here, which is

  • pretty substantial by the way.

  • Congratulations to all of you for getting in.

  • But we're not requiring that you have

  • any background in quantitative analysis, computers,

  • upper level mathematics.

  • So when I say finance is equal to mathematics plus money,

  • there's a variety of kinds of mathematics

  • that can be appropriate for creating

  • an extraordinarily profitable career in this industry.

  • And now here are the three examples.

  • Anybody know who James Simons is?

  • Who is he?

  • AUDIENCE: Well, I know about Renaissance.

  • ANDREW W. LO: You know about Renaissance Technologies.

  • Do you know what James Simons did before he started

  • Renaissance Technologies?

  • Yeah.

  • AUDIENCE: He's a math professor.

  • ANDREW W. LO: He's a math professor, that's right.

  • James Simons is a math professor.

  • Well, was a math professor.

  • In fact, he was quite a well-known math professor.

  • When I first heard of him, it wasn't

  • because of Renaissance Technologies,

  • which is a hedge fund that he started

  • about 15 or 20 years ago.

  • James Simons was a differential geometer who for many years

  • was the chairman of the math department

  • at Stony Brook in New York.

  • And he authored with S.S. Chern a particular field of study

  • in differential geometry called Chern-Simons theory, which

  • has subsequently proved to be extraordinarily

  • useful in an area of physics known as string theory.

  • Extraordinarily abstract.

  • And Simon started a hedge fund about 20 years ago.

  • And this is probably the single most successful hedge fund

  • in the history of the industry in terms of its performance

  • record.

  • Over the course of 15 or 20 years,

  • he's put together a track record that has literally

  • beaten every other hedge fund manager's track

  • record by a lot.

  • So it's not just a little bit.

  • He's just sort of way out there.

  • He's the Michael Phelps of quantitative investment

  • strategies.

  • By the way, just to give you a sense of how successful

  • he has been.

  • In 2006, two years ago, it was reported

  • by Institutional Investor's Alpha Magazine--

  • this is a trade publication for the hedge fund industry-- it

  • was reported that James Simons was the single most highly

  • paid hedge fund manager that year

  • with a take-home pay of $1.7 billion.

  • Now, that's not wealth, that's income.

  • That was on his W-2.

  • That was one year's compensation.

  • And he did it--

  • he did this by building a quantitative investment

  • management company with 75 PhDs in mathematics, physics,

  • computer science, and so on.

  • And nobody, nobody knows what he does or how he does it.

  • It's extraordinarily secret.

  • But there's no doubt that he's incredibly successful.

  • So that's one end of the spectrum.

  • That kind of mathematics can make money,

  • and can be extraordinarily relevant financial analysis.

  • Now at the other end of the spectrum, we have this guy.

  • You may have heard of him, Warren Buffett.

  • He is currently the richest man on earth.

  • In 2008 Forbes ranked him number one in terms of wealth.

  • At the time, February of 2008, he was worth $62 billion.

  • In fact, in a private conversation

  • I was told that when Simons found out he said, really?

  • $62 billion?

  • How did he get that?

  • It's amazing.

  • That's an extraordinary amount of wealth for an individual

  • to put together.

  • And what's extraordinary about it, is how he did it.

  • As many of you know Warren Buffett is an investor based

  • in Omaha, Nebraska.

  • His office is probably smaller than many of the conference

  • rooms here at Sloan.

  • The number of people he has working for him, I suspect,

  • is fewer than many of you who have

  • done your startups or plan to.

  • He's got an extraordinarily small staff.

  • Mainly it's Charlie Munger and him,

  • and a couple of secretaries, and maybe

  • a few accountants here and there, and lawyers of course.

  • But what he does is to read company prospectuses, income

  • statements, balance sheets.

  • And with literally high school arithmetic

  • he's built this incredible investment empire

  • by looking at valuation.

  • Simple accounting.

  • Now I say simple accounting, but there's nothing simple

  • about what he does.

  • And so clearly he has certain skills

  • that also involve mathematics, but not

  • the kind of mathematics that James Simons uses.

  • And finally, the third individual

  • that I'd like to introduce you to is this fellow, Jack Welch.

  • Now again, many of you know him or know of him.

  • You know that he actually teaches a course here at Sloan.

  • But you may not know that his PhD was actually

  • in engineering.

  • And he started out at General Electric in 1960.

  • Became CEO in 1981, and at that time the revenues

  • of General Electric was about $26 billion a year.

  • So it was already a big and successful company.

  • And Jack Welch took it over in 1981.

  • At the time there were 400,000 employees for General Electric.

  • Five years later, there were 300,000 employees

  • at General Electric.

  • He eliminated 100,000 jobs.

  • That's one of the reasons why he developed the nickname Neutron

  • Jack, because like a neutron bomb,

  • he eliminated a huge segment of the population.

  • But five years later with 300,000 employees,

  • he increased the market value of General Electric

  • by several fold.

  • And at the end of his tenure in 2001, 20 years later,

  • General Electric's revenues was not $26 billion,

  • it was $130 billion.

  • He increased it by a factor of 4 and 1/2

  • over the course of 20 years.

  • It's an extraordinary accomplishment

  • for an individual.

  • Now why do I put him up here?

  • It's because one of the things that Welch

  • did at General Electric, one of the things

  • that he was extraordinarily good at, was making

  • good decisions about investments, making

  • good decisions about costs, being able to understand

  • the language of finance despite the fact

  • that he used none of his PhD skills in his job.

  • He was an engineer by training, not a manager.

  • He didn't go to management school,

  • although he did a lot of executive education

  • after his PhD.

  • The reason that I give you these three cast of characters

  • is because they are so different in what they do.

  • They have such different backgrounds.

  • They're all extraordinarily successful,

  • but there's one thing in common.

  • The thing in common is that they all understand innately,

  • deeply, fundamentally, the language of finance.

  • And what we're going to cover over the next 13 weeks,

  • are the very basics.

  • Things that they take for granted.

  • Things that they use on a daily basis to do their jobs.

  • So it's not to say that if you do well in this course

  • you'll end up being one of these guys,

  • but it's certainly a prerequisite I would say.

  • There's nobody that's been successful in business,

  • truly successful, without having an understanding, at least

  • an innate or instinctive understanding,

  • of the concepts that we're going to cover over the next 13

  • weeks.

  • So to me, that's exciting.

  • Now again, I'm not trying to motivate you by greed.

  • I'd rather motivate you by the intellectual challenge

  • of finance, and there will be some extraordinarily

  • challenging ideas.

  • Ideas that are not natural for any of you at this point,

  • but which I hope will be very natural

  • at the end of this 13 weeks.

  • So let me start with the cast of characters

  • that we're going to be studying over the next 13 weeks.

  • There are going to be four components of the economy

  • that we're going to focus on.

  • Now this is a flow diagram of the economy.

  • Since we're at MIT we have to have flow diagrams

  • at some point, right?

  • So here's my version of a flow diagram.

  • This is a flow model of the economy,

  • and there are four components that

  • comprise the financial system.

  • Households, financial intermediaries,

  • non-financial corporations, and then capital markets.

  • Now obviously the economy is comprised

  • of additional components like labor markets and product

  • markets.

  • We're not going to focus on that.

  • Although there are certain financial aspects of those

  • markets.

  • Given that we only have 13 weeks,

  • our attention will be spent on those four components,

  • and I'm going to cover each of those four components,

  • both in parallel and to a certain degree sequentially,

  • all right?

  • So I want you to be familiar with these four,

  • because we're going to be talking

  • about them interchangeably at various points in time.

  • Financial analysis applies to all of these components

  • in exactly the same way.

  • But once you apply them to the specific context,

  • the terminology may change, the particular applications

  • may look different.

  • What I'm going to try to teach you in this 13 weeks

  • is the underpinning theories that

  • unify all of the various different kinds of ideas.

  • So these are the four components that we're

  • going to be looking at from now and then.

  • Now let me talk about the fundamental challenges

  • of finance.

  • I told you that there are only two, right?

  • And here they are.

  • There are two aspects of financial analysis

  • that we're going to be focused on.

  • The first is the valuation of assets.

  • And the second is very simply the management of assets.

  • That's it.

  • That's all there is to it.

  • Valuing and managing.

  • And I can tell you exactly what the managing

  • part is going to look like.

  • Managing is going to involve figuring out which of two

  • possibilities is more valuable.

  • And then you know what?

  • You take the more valuable option.

  • That's it.

  • That's all there is to it.

  • Figuring out the value, that's going to be challenging.

  • So we're going to take that first challenge

  • to start with, and try to understand valuation.

  • I'm going to argue that all business

  • decisions, any kind of business decision,

  • involves those two challenges.

  • Valuing something, and then once you value it,

  • make a decision on what you want to do with that value.

  • This is why I've argued that finance

  • is the most important subject, because literally any business

  • decision that you will ever engage in,

  • constitutes those two components.

  • Valuation and management.

  • Now valuation is going to be a challenge by itself,

  • because it's not at all clear what value we're talking about.

  • In other words, what is value?

  • Is water valuable?

  • Well, life can't be sustained without it.

  • At least carbon based forms of life.

  • So water is pretty valuable.

  • But water is not that expensive.

  • At least before Poland Springs came along.

  • Now what about diamonds?

  • As far as I know, humans do not need diamonds to survive,

  • and yet diamonds are extraordinarily expensive.

  • There are certain gems that are invaluable.

  • Now how can that be?

  • Clearly we have to think more carefully

  • about what we mean by value.

  • And of course, once value is established then

  • management is relatively easy to do.

  • Objectives plus valuations obviously leads to decisions.

  • So once you tell me what you're trying to achieve,

  • and then you value all the various different

  • possibilities, then I can tell you what the right decision is.

  • Pick the decision that is the most valuable for achieving

  • the objectives that you want.

  • Now that doesn't really help a lot

  • if we can't apply this to specific contexts,

  • and come up with specific value.

  • So I want to hammer this home, and to do

  • that I want to talk about how it is that financial markets helps

  • us establish value through the price discovery mechanism.

  • And to do that, I am going to do a simple demonstration.

  • Now when I was growing up I went to one

  • of these specialized high schools

  • that focused on science.

  • So we were always getting these various different kinds

  • of neat demonstrations of the Tesla kind of coil.

  • I've always been very jealous of these science teachers,

  • because they have these cool demonstrations that we

  • in finance don't.

  • So I've developed a little demonstration of my own.

  • It's a simple one that has to do with the price discovery

  • mechanism, and because I teach two sections,

  • I'm going to have to make it a little bit more

  • involved than normally.

  • So I need two volunteers.

  • The first volunteer-- thank you.

  • I'd like you to take these two pieces of paper,

  • these are blank pieces of paper.

  • On one of them write heads, and the other write tails.

  • And then place them face down, and shuffle them

  • so you don't know which is which.

  • And I need another volunteer who has a coin that they can flip,

  • because-- thank you.

  • So as soon as he's done, I'm going

  • to ask you to flip a coin.

  • Do you have a coin by the way?

  • AUDIENCE: Yeah.

  • ANDREW W. LO: OK.

  • I have two items here.

  • One of which is going to be auctioned off in this section,

  • and the other is going to be auctioned off

  • in the later section.

  • And since I don't know what your preferences are

  • for one or the other, I want to randomize this

  • so that there's no chance that I favor one section or the other.

  • So are you done with that?

  • You shuffled them.

  • You don't know which is which.

  • OK, I'd like you to take these two face down, and put

  • one in front of one of these packages,

  • and the other in front of the other face down as well.

  • While you do that, can you go ahead and flip your coin?

  • And as soon as he puts that on there,

  • I want you to tell me whether you flipped heads or tails.

  • And based upon that, the particular object

  • that is chosen will be auctioned off in this particular section.

  • OK, go ahead.

  • What have you got?

  • AUDIENCE: Tails.

  • ANDREW W. LO: Tails, OK.

  • So tails.

  • This is heads, and this is tails.

  • So here is the item that I'm going to auction off.

  • Before I do that, I'm going to ask somebody.

  • Anybody know what's in here?

  • Nobody knows what's in that box?

  • Well, what do you think its value is?

  • Zero?

  • Negative?

  • Can't be negative, right?

  • There's limited liabilities.

  • You can't owe me for something that's in there.

  • So good.

  • We've established some information.

  • There's a zero lower bound.

  • Well, I don't know what the value is.

  • So what we're going to do is we're going to figure it out.

  • Rather, you're going to figure it out.

  • I'm going to auction this off, and now this is for real.

  • So don't bid if you can't pay me, and by the way,

  • I expect to be paid in cash.

  • All right?

  • So I'm serious.

  • This is a serious game.

  • So if you don't want to participate,

  • you're not prepared to pay me in cash at the end

  • of this lecture, do not bid.

  • All right?

  • OK, I'm going to open it up.

  • Anybody want to start bidding for this item?

  • AUDIENCE: $1.

  • ANDREW W. LO: $1.

  • AUDIENCE: Three.

  • ANDREW W. LO: $3.

  • AUDIENCE: $4.

  • AUDIENCE: Four.

  • AUDIENCE: Six.

  • ANDREW W. LO: Six.

  • AUDIENCE: Five.

  • ANDREW W. LO: All right, $6 is the high bid.

  • Can't do that.

  • All right, $6 is the high bid.

  • AUDIENCE: Ten.

  • AUDIENCE: Ten.

  • ANDREW W. LO: Ten.

  • OK, we got two tens here.

  • You were the first.

  • So that's your bid.

  • Your bid is the high bid. $10.

  • AUDIENCE: 20.

  • ANDREW W. LO: 20.

  • We have 20.

  • Wow!

  • AUDIENCE: High roller.

  • ANDREW W. LO: $20.

  • You do see that this package is smaller than this one, right?

  • It's a tiny little thing. $20.

  • AUDIENCE: 30.

  • ANDREW W. LO: $30.

  • $30.

  • High bid.

  • Any more than $30?

  • AUDIENCE: Can I ask a question, please?

  • ANDREW W. LO: Yes.

  • AUDIENCE: Where does the money-- who gets it?

  • ANDREW W. LO: I get the money.

  • That's a great question.

  • That's a great question.

  • This is going to go to the foundation

  • to support Andrew Lo.

  • I'm the charity.

  • So this is not a charity auction.

  • This is going to go to me.

  • By the way, I paid for these items.

  • So that's why it's going to go to reimburse my teaching costs.

  • AUDIENCE: It's going to ice cream, [INAUDIBLE]

  • ANDREW W. LO: Right.

  • OK, $30 high bid.

  • Any higher bid than that?

  • $30?

  • Nothing higher?

  • AUDIENCE: 31.

  • ANDREW W. LO: 31.

  • AUDIENCE: 35.

  • ANDREW W. LO: 35.

  • OK, do I hear 40?

  • Anybody want to do 40?

  • $40?

  • AUDIENCE: I'll give you 40.

  • ANDREW W. LO: $40.

  • All right, we've got $40.

  • Anybody willing to go 45?

  • $45?

  • All right.

  • AUDIENCE: 45.

  • ANDREW W. LO: $45.

  • Wow!

  • OK.

  • Do we hear 50?

  • $50?

  • 45 is the high bid.

  • Anybody for 50?

  • AUDIENCE: Can I short too?

  • ANDREW W. LO: No shorting, sorry.

  • I'm the only auctioneer here.

  • $45 is the high bid.

  • Anybody here 50?

  • Going once.

  • Going twice.

  • All right, sold. $45.

  • Now you're going to pay me, right?

  • AUDIENCE: Yep.

  • ANDREW W. LO: All right.

  • We established the value.

  • It's $45.

  • That's the market at work.

  • None of you knew what was in here.

  • It could be nothing actually.

  • But I suspect that you didn't think it was nothing,

  • because you bid for it, right?

  • Moreover, I didn't let you touch it.

  • I didn't let you feel it.

  • I didn't let you shake it.

  • There was no information whatsoever other

  • this very pretty packaging.

  • And yet somehow magically you were

  • able to come up with a value.

  • Now we could argue whether that value is good or bad.

  • But it's a number, and it's a number that

  • can now be used for analysis.

  • Now again, I'm not commenting on how good or bad the number is.

  • In a minute we're going to find out,

  • because I'm going to open this.

  • Or let this gentleman here open it, and see what he bought.

  • But before he does that, I want to comment that knowing nothing

  • without any information whatsoever,

  • we've established value.

  • That's remarkable.

  • Now it's not true, though, that there is no information.

  • In fact, there's a tremendous amount

  • of information in this room.

  • Tremendous amount.

  • Because you know a number of things.

  • You know about the size of packages.

  • You know about the fact that I'm a professor,

  • and if I really cheat you then I might get in trouble

  • with the dean.

  • There are a number of constraints that are in place,

  • and with this audience those constraints affected the value.

  • For the next five weeks that's what we're going to be doing,

  • is talking about valuation and trying

  • to understand how what just happened happened.

  • OK, would you like to open it up, and let us know

  • what you've got for your $45?

  • And you'll let me know whether this

  • has been a good deal or a bad deal for you and for me.

  • Oh, just rip it.

  • My wife does this all the time.

  • It drives me crazy.

  • My sons are just--

  • AUDIENCE: I'm enjoying my [INAUDIBLE] $45.

  • ANDREW W. LO: Fair point.

  • Fair point.

  • AUDIENCE: Oohhh!

  • [APPLAUSE]

  • ANDREW W. LO: Anybody know what the retail value of that is?

  • It's an iPod Nano 4 gig version.

  • AUDIENCE: 125.

  • ANDREW W. LO: 149 to be precise.

  • So you had a good deal.

  • AUDIENCE: Yeah, yeah.

  • Thank you.

  • ANDREW W. LO: You're welcome.

  • Thank you, because what we did was

  • to engage in a price discovery process

  • with limited information.

  • With limited information.

  • I couldn't get the value out of that that I wanted to.

  • I would have loved to have gotten a bid of $149,

  • but would any of you be willing to pay that for a box

  • with no information at all?

  • Probably not.

  • So the lack of transparency, the lack of information,

  • actually reduced the value of that object.

  • But nevertheless, it did have a value.

  • Because some of you were willing to take a chance

  • that there might be something interesting in that package.

  • That is what we're going to try to understand over the next 13

  • weeks, and for the first five of those weeks

  • we're going to try to take it apart.

  • We're going to try to understand how it is that the market comes

  • up with the value.

  • And it's going to be a challenge.

  • This is hard to do, because just like

  • if we decided to spend the rest of the lecture figuring out

  • how you came up with a $45 bid, or why you

  • weren't willing to go to 50.

  • It's going to be really hard for us to tease out

  • all of the thinking that went into this kind of discussion.

  • So that's why we have work to do.

  • It will be exciting work, because at the end

  • we are going to come up with specific quantitative analysis

  • that will tell us how valuation is done.

  • So that's where we're going to focus on

  • for the next few weeks.

  • Clearly once we figure out valuation,

  • we can then focus on management.

  • And the first two-thirds of this class

  • will be focused on valuation.

  • The last one third will be focused on taking those ideas,

  • and applying them to management contexts like capital budgeting

  • and risk management.

  • For valuation, the kind of questions

  • that we're going to tackle are ones that implicitly we

  • did in just a few minutes here.

  • It's going to be how are financial assets valued

  • versus how should they be valued,

  • and is that always the same?

  • Is it the case that financial assets

  • are valued the way they should be valued,

  • and what do we even mean by whether or not it should

  • be valued in a way or not.

  • And finally, we're going to ask the question for valuation,

  • how well do financial markets really work?

  • Can we always rely on them to work well?

  • In this case, I don't know if you

  • would call this particular auction

  • one that worked out well.

  • Certainly worked out well for you,

  • but it didn't work out well for me.

  • So in what sense did it work out well?

  • Well, it worked out well in the sense

  • that if I really wanted to get rid of that box,

  • if I really wanted to unload it, I actually was able to do that.

  • And I got something for it.

  • Sight unseen, with no information whatsoever,

  • I actually got $45.

  • Roughly a third of the value of the asset.

  • That's actually not too bad.

  • If you're trying to sell an asset sight unseen,

  • and you need to do it immediately,

  • a 66% discount is actually pretty fair.

  • Now we're going to see more examples of that

  • over the next few weeks.

  • Once we determine value, then the question is management.

  • How much should I save or spend?

  • That's a management question that all of you

  • have to deal with at some point or another in your lives.

  • What should I buy?

  • What should I sell?

  • When should I buy and sell it, and how should I

  • finance the transaction?

  • Those are the problems of financial analysis

  • plain and simple.

  • These are problems that apply to Jack Welch, to James Simons,

  • to Warren Buffett, and to you.

  • And it applies to you not just from the corporate perspective,

  • but from a personal perspective as well.

  • Every one of you have to think about these issues

  • on a daily basis.

  • And so finance really is completely

  • inclusive in the sense that it applies to virtually everything

  • that you will ever encounter in life.

  • To do that I have to go over the framework

  • of financial analysis, and the starting point is accounting.

  • Accounting is the language, the lexicon of finance

  • in that it's the beginning of how

  • to measure economic concepts.

  • Like profit and loss, revenues and costs, and so on.

  • So while many of you may not have accounting backgrounds,

  • you will learn a fair bit of accounting in this course,

  • just because you're going to have to in order to understand

  • the material in the lectures.

  • So you'll need to get familiar with the basic terms

  • of accounting, and in particular you're

  • going to have to focus on two concepts that are probably

  • alien to you.

  • The notion of a stock and a flow.

  • Now when I say stock, I don't mean common stock or equities,

  • I have a different term in mind.

  • By stock in this context, I mean the stock of assets.

  • The level of assets.

  • And by flow I mean the rate of change of assets.

  • You know when I was in grad school,

  • we started discussing this concept on the first day

  • of macroeconomics, and then one of the students

  • in the back of the room said, excuse me, Professor,

  • but isn't that just the distinction between a variable

  • and its first derivative?

  • And the professor was a little bit taken aback and said,

  • well, yes, that's right.

  • But let me give you another way of thinking about it that

  • is somewhat more intuitive.

  • And that is, think about a bathtub,

  • and think about the faucet turned on

  • and the water flowing into it.

  • The stock is the level of the water.

  • The flow is how fast the water is coming into the tub.

  • And so after that explanation the student

  • still seemed confused, and so the professor said,

  • you know what, some people find bathtubs intuitive,

  • other people find derivatives intuitive.

  • So to each his own.

  • These two concepts are extraordinarily

  • critical to financial analysis.

  • And accounting counterparts are nothing more than the balance

  • sheet and the income statement.

  • The balance sheet measures the stock of wealth of a company.

  • What your assets are, and what your claims on those assets

  • or liabilities are.

  • On the other hand, the flow of wealth into a company

  • or out of a company is measured by the income statement.

  • This tells you how much the company

  • is making per unit time versus its losses.

  • So the framework for financial analysis

  • that we're going to be coming back to time and again

  • is this framework of a corporation.

  • A corporation has a certain set of assets.

  • It's got claims on those assets, which are called liabilities.

  • So this picture, this snapshot, measures

  • the level of the bathtub.

  • But that's not enough to understand

  • how a company is doing.

  • You also have to look at the income statement, which

  • tells you the sources of funds, and the uses of funds

  • over any time period.

  • Typically on a quarterly basis.

  • So we're going to come back to this concept as the framework

  • for financial analysis.

  • And by the way, this is the sum total of the tools

  • that Warren Buffett uses for analyzing his investments.

  • That's it.

  • Believe it or not.

  • Nothing fancier.

  • So it's an incredibly powerful set of ideas

  • if you know how to read it.

  • That framework when you think about it

  • from a corporate financial decision perspective,

  • involves making decisions at five points in time.

  • Corporate financial decisions involve

  • thinking about how to deal with cash raised from investors.

  • How to think about cash invested in real assets,

  • and how to deal with cash generated by operations.

  • How much cash to reinvest, and how much cash you

  • give back to your investors.

  • So from this you should get the idea

  • that as a corporate financial officer

  • you are focused on cash, the flow of cash.

  • In fact, cash you can think of as the lifeblood of a company.

  • If you follow the cash, you will eventually

  • hit upon every important aspect of the modern corporation's

  • operations.

  • And as a financial officer, you will

  • be responsible for analyzing that flow.

  • And as a decision maker, as a leader of a corporation,

  • you're going to have to make decisions about that cash flow.

  • Jack Welch uses the information to be

  • able to make those decisions.

  • But he doesn't just get those decisions prepackaged for him,

  • he has to understand what those numbers mean.

  • Just like Warren Buffett.

  • Now the corporate financial decisions involved,

  • obviously, have a variety of different components

  • from a perspective of career paths.

  • From the management perspective real investment decisions

  • involve two and three.

  • So if you're thinking about investing

  • in a new division or a new plant or getting

  • involved in a new product area, you've

  • got to focus on two and three.

  • On the other hand, if you're the chief financial officer,

  • and you're thinking about how should the company finance

  • its operations, you're going to be focused on one and four.

  • If you're the board of directors,

  • and you're deciding how much to pay out to the shareholders,

  • you're going to be thinking about five.

  • And if you're engaged in managing

  • the risks of the corporation, you're

  • going to be worried about one and five.

  • And ultimately your objective as a shareholder

  • and as a manager of this corporation

  • is to do well by the owners.

  • So your objective is to maximize shareholder wealth,

  • and the framework that I've introduced

  • is going to allow you to do that.

  • Now again, this may seem kind of theoretical to you,

  • and I realize that.

  • So I'm going to ask you to make this more personal.

  • And to do that, I'm going to ask you to turn this

  • into your own personal household financial decision

  • making framework.

  • So I'd like you to take all of these ideas

  • and literally apply them to yourself.

  • Think about the cash flows that are

  • flowing through your own life.

  • There may not be that much right now since you're at school,

  • but believe me, it will grow.

  • So the household, this is you, sits in

  • between real economic activities.

  • In other words, your job, and financial assets

  • and liabilities, which are all of the financial transactions

  • that you deal with.

  • So this cash flow process that I outlined for corporations, it

  • works for you too.

  • So there's cash raised from financial institutions, right?

  • Like student loans or borrowing or home equity loans.

  • There's cash invested in real assets.

  • What's the biggest real asset that you are all

  • investing in right now?

  • AUDIENCE: Education [INAUDIBLE].

  • ANDREW W. LO: Exactly.

  • Human capital, yourselves.

  • Your own education.

  • Cash generated by labor supply.

  • Well, obviously, when you get a job

  • you're going to be generating cash.

  • Cash consumed and reinvested in real assets.

  • So consumed means beer or pretzels or whatever,

  • and investing in real assets means

  • you invested either in yourself or you invest it

  • in a home or your children.

  • Those are real assets.

  • Sometimes they're also real liabilities,

  • but that's a separate issue.

  • And finally cash invested in financial assets.

  • Most of you may not have a lot of financial assets

  • at this point, but you actually have some.

  • I suspect 401(k) plans, retirement, Social Security.

  • Those are financial assets that whether you know it or not,

  • you're invested in.

  • And so when you think about management,

  • think about personal management.

  • How are you managing yourself?

  • You've got to think about real investment.

  • Consumption and financing, savings and investment,

  • risk management, and, obviously, what is

  • your overall objective in life?

  • And what you ought to be doing is with that objective in mind,

  • managing your real and financial assets

  • to maximize the likelihood of achieving those objectives.

  • So what I'm asking you to do is, I want you

  • to take this course personally.

  • I want you to take the ideas.

  • Every single idea that I mention,

  • and whether I tell you to or not for the next 13 weeks,

  • I want you to take that idea and ask the question,

  • how does that make my life better off?

  • How can I use that in my own personal management activities

  • to improve the kind of decisions that I'm making?

  • Because if you could do that, if you

  • learn how to do that instinctively,

  • you will then take those ideas and apply them

  • to management contexts in your career.

  • And it will make it much more likely

  • that you'll get more out of this course

  • than you otherwise might.

  • Now there are two other factors that I describe

  • that make financial analysis challenging,

  • and those two factors are time and risk.

  • I've argued before that without these two elements

  • finance is complete.

  • There is no more research to be done.

  • There's no more analysis to be done, and all of you

  • probably will already be able to intuit a lot of the decisions

  • that you're going to be forced to make.

  • Because without time-- and by time I mean decisions

  • at different points in time--

  • without time and without risk financial decisions

  • actually reduce to basic micro economic analysis.

  • If you've taken an undergraduate course in microeconomics

  • supply equal demand, well, you've

  • learned all there is to learn about finance without time

  • and risk.

  • The only reason that finance is interesting,

  • the only challenging aspects of what we do

  • are because of time and risk.

  • The fact that cash flows now are not the same as cash

  • flows later, and that time flows in only one direction.

  • In about four lectures, I'm going

  • to give you an alternative proof of the theory

  • of special relativity.

  • And this proof will have to do with the fact

  • that interest rates are not negative.

  • It turns out that there's a very deep philosophical connection

  • between finance and physics that we're going to get to.

  • But this is something that you don't need to be a physicist

  • to understand.

  • In fact, I'd argue that Warren Buffett,

  • although he may not be able to articulate these principles,

  • these are principles that are somehow

  • inbred in his worldview.

  • He knows that $1 today is not the same as $1 next year.

  • And he also knows that $1 today without risk

  • is not the same as $1 today with a little bit of risk.

  • Even a tiny little bit of risk, he knows that.

  • And at the end of this course, you will too.

  • So risk we have to talk about in a much more serious way.

  • We're not going to get to that for probably six weeks,

  • because that's going to take a whole different set of tools

  • to understand.

  • So what I'd like to do for the first three or four weeks

  • is to focus on time and just time,

  • and then I'm going to bring in risk once we develop

  • a little bit more machinery to understand how to capture risk.

  • And when we put these two together,

  • we're going to get modern finance.

  • So that will happen some time in week six, seven, and eight.

  • Now finally, I want to talk about

  • the fundamental principles of finance,

  • and then I'm going to talk specifically about this course.

  • There are six fundamental ideas that finance has come up

  • with that really will change the way you think about the world,

  • and you won't appreciate it today.

  • I know that.

  • But I want to put it into your subconscious today,

  • because sometime over the next 13 weeks,

  • at least I hope over the next 13 weeks, your face will light up

  • and you're going to get it one day.

  • You're going to get it in the sense

  • that you will understand at that point in time

  • how these six principles can be used

  • to make any financial decision that you need to make

  • for the rest of your careers.

  • The first principle is pretty obvious.

  • There is no such thing as a free lunch.

  • Actually all of these principles are

  • approximations to a much more complex truth.

  • So if you really want to be strict about it,

  • it should read, there may be free lunches on occasion,

  • but there's no such thing as a free lunch program.

  • There isn't systematic free lunches.

  • You might be able to find one or two every now and then

  • if you're lucky and if you work hard,

  • but systematic transfers of wealth for no reason at all

  • are unlikely.

  • Second principle.

  • Other things equal-- and this is a phrase

  • that you'll hear economists utter all the time.

  • And of course, other things are never equal,

  • but let's pretend that they are.

  • Other things equal, individuals satisfy three characteristics.

  • They prefer more money to less.

  • That's often called non-satiation.

  • They prefer money now to money later,

  • and they prefer less risk to more risk

  • when risk is defined properly.

  • Now I'd argue that these principles

  • are in fact fairly universal.

  • Not that you can't find exceptions every now and then

  • for every individual, but by and large over periods of time

  • and over a large population this is generally true.

  • And if you don't believe me or if you

  • know people that don't satisfy these principles,

  • please introduce them to me after class.

  • I'd like to get to know them, and do some business with them.

  • Principle three.

  • All agents act to further their own self-interest.

  • Now again, this is not to say that there aren't

  • Mother Teresas out there.

  • That there aren't people that care about the general welfare

  • of the public.

  • But economists in their own unique and annoying way

  • have been able to redefine preferences to even argue

  • that Mother Teresa is incredibly selfish, because her utility

  • function is the function-- the utility

  • function of other people.

  • And so by doing all this good, Mother Teresa

  • was only furthering her own self-interests.

  • Isn't she so selfish.

  • Now, so in a way when the economist defines preferences,

  • they almost define it as a tautology.

  • But finance makes economics practical in the sense

  • that I'll describe in a few weeks exactly

  • what kinds of preferences are actually embodied in decision

  • making, and why this principle is more often than not,

  • a pretty good approximation to a much more complex reality.

  • Now the last three principles I'm not

  • going to talk about in great detail, because those really

  • embody a much larger set of issues

  • about economics and finance.

  • We're going to talk about those three principles,

  • but only in the last lecture oddly enough.

  • We're going to use them.

  • We're going to use these principles,

  • but in the last lecture I'm going

  • to question all of the framework that I've developed for you,

  • and show you where the holes are.

  • For the first 13 weeks, I'm going

  • to need you to willingly suspend your disbelief as we describe

  • the relatively straightforward and standardized framework

  • for thinking about financial problems.

  • And in the last lecture I'm going

  • to describe to you where the approximations were made,

  • and why you need to take advanced courses in finance

  • to fill those gaps.

  • So with that said, let me now turn to course overview,

  • and then I'll take questions about course mechanics.

  • There are going to be four sections of the course

  • as outlined in the syllabus.

  • The four sections are the introductory material,

  • which we've gone over today.

  • Section B, which we will cover for the next three or four

  • lectures is valuation.

  • Discounting and the mathematics of net present value.

  • Pricing stocks, bonds, futures, forwards, and options,

  • and the relative kinds of issues that

  • come up across those different asset classes.

  • Section C will focus on risk, and introduce risk

  • into the framework of section B. So once we complete Section C,

  • we will then have focused on time and risk.

  • And finally section D will be how

  • to apply those principles to problems in corporate finance.

  • What Jack Welch did from 1981 to 2001.

  • How do you take these ideas, and apply them

  • to practical circumstances.

  • And then the last lecture will be

  • a lecture-- this is not the same last lecture

  • as other last lectures.

  • I'm not going to die, but so I don't mean

  • to call it the final lecture.

  • That sounds a little ominous.

  • The idea behind this last lecture

  • is to put it all together, and explain

  • how these financial theories interact

  • with imperfections in the marketplace, and what is--

  • or is not good approximations.

  • Let me talk about course requirements now.

  • Obviously the lectures and the readings,

  • and attendance and participation will be an important part

  • of the course.

  • We are not going to cover the entire tome of Brealey, Myers

  • and Allen.

  • This is a book, which if dropped off of a six-story building

  • could actually kill somebody if it hit them.

  • So we can't possibly cover the entire textbook.

  • We'll cover selected chapters, but this is Finance 401,

  • so it's an introductory course.

  • And so the readings that you are going to be responsible for

  • are the ones that are outlined on the reading list,

  • and that I've listed in every lecture.

  • So for example, chapters one and two,

  • you are now responsible for.

  • And we will be grading class participation.

  • So I expect you to come to class prepared, and ready

  • to discuss material, and possibly

  • questions that we may have raised in the previous lecture.

  • And there will be one case study that you

  • will be responsible for writing up and handing in,

  • and that will be worth 10% of the grade.

  • And attendance and participation will be worth another 10%.

  • So that's 20% of your grade.

  • And then finally the midterm and final exam

  • will be worth 25% and 55%.

  • Let me explain a little bit about how

  • the midterm and final exam works, because it's

  • a little different in this class than in some

  • of the other classes.

  • And by the way, this grading scheme

  • and the particular mechanisms are

  • identical in these two sections that I teach,

  • and in the sections that Professor Wang teaches.

  • So he and I have coordinated to have the same approach, so

  • as not to advantage or disadvantage any one section.

  • In your readings packet will be a collection of problems

  • that we've put together.

  • And actually I don't know if it's in there right now

  • or if it's being photocopied, but we

  • will prepare a list of problems that you can work on.

  • These are completely optional.

  • And there are far too many problems for you

  • to be able to do even in one full semester.

  • The reason we give them to you is,

  • because the only way to learn finance is to do finance.

  • If you come into the class and listen

  • to my lectures you may be entertained

  • for an hour and a half, you won't learn the material.

  • In fact, I've now changed the way I talk about the course,

  • and I don't describe what I do as teaching anymore.

  • Because teaching implies that I can force feed knowledge

  • into your brains.

  • It turns out it can't be done.

  • And my two sons have proven that to me time and again.

  • You have to want to learn the material,

  • so you have to pull the knowledge from me into you.

  • In other words, you have to be an active participant.

  • My 12th grade math teacher used to say that mathematics

  • is not a spectator sport.

  • That's the same for finance.

  • Finance is not a spectator sport.

  • You actually have to do it.

  • You have to confront yourself with problems time and again,

  • and think about how to apply the principles in our lecture

  • to those problems.

  • The purpose of a lecture is to give you the motivation,

  • and take you through the most difficult aspects

  • of the principles and the theories of financial analysis.

  • But it's your job to do the analysis.

  • And to that end we're going to give you some motivation.

  • And the motivation is that the midterm and the final exams

  • are structured so that most of the weight

  • is placed on the final.

  • The reason is the final is cumulative.

  • So it's going to cover twice the material as the midterm.

  • Therefore it should be worth roughly double.

  • But the other reason is that financial analysis

  • is alien to the typical human cognitive process.

  • None of you are hard wired to engage in net present value

  • calculations.

  • And so it's going to take some time before you get it,

  • before it sinks in.

  • And I've taught this class many times

  • before, and usually somewhere between week eight and week 13

  • a light goes off in your head, and you get it.

  • And I see this by the bright smiles

  • on your face around that time.

  • It could be because you're getting

  • to the end of the semester, and you're

  • glad to be done with the class.

  • But I like to think that it's because at some point

  • you actually get it.

  • In a few rare cases it happens at week 14,

  • which is not so good, but hopefully

  • before the final exam.

  • Now in order to provide you with extra incentive to do problems,

  • and given this is an MBA class, I realize that all of you

  • have very busy schedules, and you

  • can schedule your own activities better than we can.

  • So rather than have weekly problem sets that are due,

  • and you have to hand them in, we have to hand them back.

  • It's a hassle for everybody.

  • There are no problem sets in this class.

  • None.

  • However, we're going to give you a package of problems

  • and solutions upfront.

  • You'll get that within the next few days.

  • And I will promise you that the majority of exam questions

  • will come verbatim from this package of problems.

  • Majority.

  • Meaning more than 50% of the points

  • will come from the package.

  • So if all you did was to memorize this entire stack,

  • you could ace the course.

  • But of course, that would mean you

  • would spend enormous amounts of time

  • in finance, which is not such a bad outcome either.

  • So we want to do this to eliminate

  • a lot of the fear and anxiety with financial analysis.

  • It is challenging, but it's a lot of fun too.

  • We want you to have fun, because that's

  • the only way you're going to learn this material well.

  • So it's up to you as to how much you want to do.

  • The recitations will cover selected problems.

  • So you're not going to be left on your own.

  • The recitations will go over problems and how to solve them.

  • I'll do a few in class, the ones that

  • are particularly challenging, but then you'll

  • need to do more on your own.

  • And if you do that, you will be prepared for the final exam

  • better than most.

  • The other material will be readings and lecture material,

  • and therefore there will be some customization,

  • because my lecture style is different from Professor

  • Wang's.

  • But the majority of the exam will be identical,

  • and it will be drawn from these problem banks

  • that you're going to get a copy of in advance.

  • Now frankly, I have to tell you that I don't really

  • like to give grades at all, but I'm forced to do so.

  • And so that's why we set up this process for assigning grades.

  • In fact, a few years ago, I came up

  • with what I thought was a brilliant way to assign grades,

  • but I haven't been able to convince the dean's office

  • to let me do that.

  • And you know what it is?

  • It goes like this.

  • Let me show you.

  • I propose to give everybody in this class a B. That's it.

  • Everybody gets a B. Now before I do this,

  • how many people would object to that?

  • Raise your hand.

  • All right, those of you with your hands up, you get As.

  • Done.

  • You see how brilliant that is?

  • I get a grade distribution.

  • No work.

  • The only problem is it only works once.

  • And when you're teaching two sections, so

  • somehow the second section, it doesn't work as well.

  • So I'm sorry I have to give grades.

  • You're all adults.

  • I realize that.

  • But nevertheless, this is a necessary part

  • of the curriculum.

  • So that's how we're going to be assigning grades.

  • In the last four minutes, and I think

  • I'm going to try to keep on time for the entire semester

  • so we end at five before the half hour,

  • and we start five after the hour.

  • In the last four minutes, I want to tell you

  • a little bit about how to get the most out of this course.

  • And we can take this up next time if you've got questions,

  • but I want you to spend time thinking about this.

  • Most of this course will be devoted to theory.

  • But finance is not a theoretical subject

  • unlike algebraic topology.

  • That's a theoretical subject.

  • I've never heard anybody become a practical or applied

  • algebraic topologist.

  • Finance on the other hand, there's

  • no finance without practice.

  • So while the course will be focused on the theory,

  • I need you to think about the practical elements of it,

  • and I'm going to help you in a couple of different ways.

  • One is by problems, but the other

  • is to encourage you to sit in on a pro-seminar called

  • the Practice of Finance.

  • This is a new pro-seminar that we're launching.

  • September 17 is the first meeting.

  • It doesn't carry any units, so you can come and go

  • as you please.

  • But it'll give you a sense of the practical aspects

  • of the industry, and in particular information

  • about the career aspects of the industry

  • like what are starting salaries for financial analysts.

  • Or how do I get a job in finance if I don't

  • have any background in it.

  • It'll go through those kinds of issues.

  • So I'd encourage you to keep that in mind.

  • The second thing is with respect to the course,

  • I will give you lecture notes ahead of time

  • for all of the lectures.

  • I expect you to take a look at them in advance.

  • Just skim them.

  • You don't have to read them, and try

  • to sort out what I'm saying.

  • But I want you to skim it at least.

  • And then in class I urge you to take lots of notes,

  • because the lecture notes are not meant to be complete.

  • In fact, they are purposefully incomplete

  • so that you have to use your hand

  • and write down your impressions of the material

  • as I'm speaking.

  • Because in that method, you will actually

  • absorb more of the material, and it'll stay with you longer.

  • I would urge you to review the lectures afterwards.

  • Review what I said.

  • Because you may have heard what I said,

  • but you may not have understood what I said,

  • and you may not be able to apply what I said.

  • So you need to spend time afterwards soaking it in.

  • I urge you to work on the assignments

  • in groups, but also alone.

  • Because when you do the midterm and final exams,

  • you'll be doing them alone.

  • So do both.

  • Don't just assume that you can do the same in groups

  • what you will do alone.

  • And finally, I would ask you to ask plenty of questions.

  • I'm going to manage the class discussion.

  • So that if we have time, I'd be happy to talk about issues that

  • are current and on your mind.

  • Even whether or not you should refinance your auto loan.

  • We're happy to take those kind of questions assuming

  • that it's apropos, and that we have the time

  • to be able to cover that.

  • I want you to get engaged.

  • I want you to take this course personally,

  • because that's the only way you're going

  • to really learn the material.

  • All right, thank you very much.

  • We're out of time.

  • We'll see you next Monday.

The following content is provided under a Creative

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

A2 初級 美國腔

麻省理工學院15.401金融理論I,2008年秋季。 (MIT 15.401 Finance Theory I, Fall 2008)

  • 113 4
    eric830919 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字