Name: "定義和平"--彼得-約瑟夫講座全文｜12年2月6日｜時代精神運動。 ("DEFINING PEACE" - Full Lecture | by Peter Joseph | Feb. 6th '12 | The Zeitgeist Movement)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T07:00:49.000Z
Duration: 1 h 29 min 16 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

過去非真實條件句型

At times like this, I really wish I spoke Hebrew.

I have no idea what he just said, but I'm going to make a quick introduction

in great gratitude to The Zeitgeist Movement Israel

I work with an organization called The Zeitgeist Movement.

While most of my talks are about inherent economic inefficiencies

which are fueling the majority of the civil unrest, ecological abuse

and general deprivation that we see in the world today

coupled with highlighting existing, yet unapplied scientific realizations

that could solve such problems in general

not to mention creating a new societal design

originating out of another form of thought

that would virtually guarantee environmental

the central focus of this talk is a little bit more temporal.

It's different than any other talk I've given.

The title of this presentation is 'Defining Peace: Economics

The first is entitled 'The History of Human Conflict

As the evidence will show, the stubborn concept that we

humans are inherently and inalterably aggressive

Finding that early societies did not engage

especially the large scale mobilization we see in the modern world

the human being into a position of aggression.

This will then lead us into the consideration of our environmental condition

and the structural and psychological modes that encompass it

leading to the understanding that when it comes to war

the condition as we know it is set by the state

Part 2: 'The State Character and Coercion'.

We'll consider the origin of the modern state and its characteristics.

It's been found that there's an average set of qualities

that pertain to these concentrations of power.

Moreover and more profoundly, the influence of the state

on the values of the culture will be addressed

for a very small number of political and commercial interests

to entice the public that their wars are moral, right and beneficial.

a deeper look at the underlining condition motivation

which appears to have created the state and its power

and the war propensity itself will be considered.

Focusing on the roots of our social system

It will be expressed that the structural basis and resulting psychology

that exists in the monetary market system of economics

that governs the world today is the core driver

In the final section, Part 4: 'Defining Peace

we will consider the causal logic of what we have described prior

and in a basic reductionist method, deduce what societal characteristics

our societal condition to allow for this newfound human balance

Before we begin, I need to address a broader issue

It seems to sit at the core of society as historically lackluster inability

to change (which I think we all might notice)

not only in the context of global warfare

which we see as almost natural in the world today, unfortunately

but also with respect to common sense social changes for the better

which are systematically rejected, without legitimate logical defenses.

Very simply, it appears that traditional sentiment

is constantly in conflict with emergent knowledge.

For example, once an ideological institution is established

usually with the basic consensus of the population at large

which implies that this practice or belief is now empirical to the human condition

We see this characteristic in religious, political and economic thought

most pervasively, but no intellectual discipline

Even those who call themselves scientists

claiming to hold dear the vigorous ethic demanded by the scientific method

and erroneous loyalties, skewing their findings.

out of a traditional, customary culture and its dominant institutions

with which those personalities are groomed.

I think Dr. Gabor Maté put this issue very well

"It is simply a matter of historical fact

that the dominant intellectual culture of any particular society

reflects the interests of the dominant group in that society.

In a slave-owning society, the beliefs about human beings and human rights

字幕列表影片播放

"定義和平"--彼得-約瑟夫講座全文｜12年2月6日｜時代精神運動。 ("DEFINING PEACE" - Full Lecture | by Peter Joseph | Feb. 6th '12 | The Zeitgeist Movement)

applause

concept

debate

sense