He’s not happy, though the reasons elude most Western readers.

Though not democratic, Xi is a politician.

He must balance wisdom with pleasing the veiled powers that overshadow the goings on of China.

Those powers won’t hesitate to give the ax to any leader who fails to deliver on their

expansionist ambitions.

Xi has fought corruption and sought infrastructure.

Xi was gaining momentum.

Now, the US and Russia are rumbling in both of China’s back yards weeks after Xi announced

that, where military tech is concerned, China needs to play “catch-up” or become “ketchup”.

This can’t be good for Xi’s inside politics with Chinese elections approaching.

Trump certainly isn’t pulling any punches.

Striking Syria while dining with China’s Chairman wasn’t unintentional.

Remember, Trump has dealt with the Chinese on many occasion.

Xi is difficult to read, except to say his rehearsed Asian smile is waning.

A micron might as well be a mile in an Asian smile.

In the weeks ahead, remember that Xi is half himself and half the hidden hand that controls

all that goes on in China.

That’s true of every Chinese president.

In all this, Xi met with Trump and all went well.

No matter when or how Xi’s career closes, no matter what his true ambitions were, China

will go on and history will remember Chinese President Xi as the builder of bridges, inroads,

aircraft carriers, and islands.

Xi wanted to remind the US of its Capitalist values: Don’t blame others for your problems.

Yet, China clearly doesn’t share those values.

Neither does North Korea, the stray dog that has adopted the doorstep at China’s northern

back yard.

From China’s vantage point, North Korea is a nuisance and an excuse for an unwelcome

US presence.

Kim Dynasty narcissism has over-played and pushed the envelope with Beijing.

Watch for Chinese heads of State to bark, then look the other way, much how the US does

when Israel responds to Palestine.

So, why is the media announcing and discussing the possibilities of dealing with North Korea?

True military tactics never make it on television—unless the reporter finds himself accused of a frivolous-like

sexual crime and holes-up in an Ecuadoran Embassy to avoid extradition for espionage.

It’s discussion on US military options like we saw over North Korea this week that makes

it difficult for a US prosecution of WikiLeaks founder Julian “Espionage” Assange to

seem believable from any angle.

“Assassination, nuke-up, or surgical strike” are only media talking points to make the

greater point: Knock it off or else.

Assassinations are illegal for the US according to the US’ own law, viz Executive Order

12333.

It is doubtful, even in Trump’s stock-up on signing pens, that he plans to wipe out

that order for North Korea alone—if he does, Assad is his next target and Kim was just

an excuse.

The US hopes to finish this situation in Korea before a nuclear buildup has time to grow

moss.

So does China.

A “nuke-up” wouldn’t be grand strategy.

An internal strike inside North Korea would illicit an avalanche.

Anti-Iraq II Donald J. Trump won’t want to create another “vacuum”.

A surgical strike would be an assist to something else.

What’s really going on?

Don’t think for one second that the media does know or that CIA doesn’t.

There’s joker in the North Korean deck and it is stacked to favor the West.

We’ll just have to keep watching.