Name: TED】奧拉維爾-埃利亞松。玩轉空間和光線 (【TED】Olafur Eliasson: Playing with space and light)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T06:27:13.000Z
Duration: 11 min 7 s

祈使句型

which is down there in this snow, just last weekend.

就在上個周末，這邊剛下了一場大雪。

In the studio we do a lot of experiments.

在工作室中我們從事了很多的實驗。

I would consider the studio more like a laboratory.

與其說是工作室我更相信它是個實驗室。

I have occasional meetings with scientists.

我在那邊經常與科學家進行例行會議。

And I have an academy, a part of the University of Fine Arts in Berlin.

並且在柏林大學內，我有主持一個學會。

我們稱它為生命的空間(Life in Space)。

Life in Space is really not necessarily about

生命的空間並不是很著重我們該怎麼做，

我們該怎麼做，而是為甚麼我們要那麼做。

Do you mind looking, with me, at that little cross in the center there?

請和我一同看一看這個在屏幕上十字符號。看到了嗎?

So you will have a yellow circle, and we will do an after-image experiment.

然後你會感覺到你看到一個黃色的圓。這就是我們得到的視覺暫留所產生的現象。

When the circle goes away you will have another color, the complementary color.

當圓消失之後你會得到另外的一個顏色，那就是互補色。

I am saying something. And your eyes and your brain are saying something back.

這就是我所說的。你的眼睛與頭腦告訴你它們回來了。

This whole idea of sharing, the idea of constituting reality

這些點子值得我們去分享，這些點子的正是構成是交織在

by overlapping what I say and what you say --

Since two years now, with some stipends from the science ministry in Berlin,

從兩年前至今，由柏林大學內的科學部所提供的薪水，

I don't necessarily think the film is so interesting.

我不需要這樣去想它是否非常的吸引人。

Obviously this is not interesting at all in the sense of the narrative.

很明顯的在敘述的認知上它並不一定有趣。

But nevertheless, what the potential is --

然而，甚麼是它所代表的背後的的潛力呢，

甚麼是這所帶來的潛力，很明顯的，

is to kind of move the border of who is the author,

導演他讓邊界的一種移動的表現，

誰是欣賞者，假如你需要的話，

and who has responsibility for what one sees?

誰可以為每個來欣賞的人下同樣的定義呢?

我認為這樣的表現承現在我們對於社會觀念的看法之上，

這是在倫敦的泰特現代美術館(Tae Modern)。

那雪在這裡，那個景象，就在那。

It was about a space in which I put half a semi-circular yellow disk.

這就是我剛剛放出的黃色半圓盤狀的圓型在這個空間之中。

I also put a mirror in the ceiling, and some fog, some haze.

我放了一片鏡子在天花板的中間，有些霧，有些模糊。

And my idea was to make the space tangible.

這整個概念，非常明顯的讓空間形成一個實在的感受。

在這樣一個大的空間之中，問題是

在直覺之下用幾分熱情來擁抱這個空間。

So here I had the hope that by inserting some natural elements,

如果你想要所以在這我希望能借由一些個大自然的元素，

if you want -- some fog -- I could make the space tangible.

一些微霧，我可以打造出你對空間的感受。

And what happens is that people, they start to see themselves in this space.

那麼這些人發生了甚麼事呢，他們開始在這空間中看到自己身在其中。

Of course they have to look through a bloody camera

當然她們在博物館內透過這些血腥的鏡頭看到這些。

in a museum. Right? That's how museums are working today.

是嗎? 這些就是我們今日博物館的功能。

as she's checking out, looking at herself in the mirror.

就像她檢查的一樣，透過鏡子觀看她自己。

She wasn't really sure whether she was seeing herself or not.

她不確定她所看到的那雙腳是否為她的。

how do we configure the relationship between our body and the space?

這整個點子是如何聯繫著我們的身體與空間的關係呢?

How do we know that being in a space makes a difference?

我們如何認知在空間中所造成的這些個差異呢?

Do you see when I said in the beginning, it's about

你看到我在一開始所用的言語的，

我用為甚麼那麼做，來取代如何做嗎?

為甚麼那麼做表示了實際的問題，

"What consequences does it have when I take a step?"

”當我決定下一步時會帶來甚麼樣的結果呢?”

"Does it matter if I am in the world or not?"

”假如我在這世界之中的與否是否會帶來事情不同的變化呢?”

"And does it matter whether the kind of actions I take

過濾每一件我所採取的行動時，這些事情會變的如何呢?”

我會跟你說是的。這是非常明確地

not just about decorating the world, and making it look even better,

關於我們如何裝飾這世界，乃至於讓它看起來更加的美好。

或者讓這世界變的更差，假如您問我的話。

It's obviously also about taking responsibility,

它是那麼樣的顯而易見的，就像我需要負起我所做的事情的責任一般，

like I did here when throwing some green dye in the river

我曾在河流之中投下綠色的染料

像是洛杉磯、斯德哥爾摩、挪威與東京

The green dye is not environmentally dangerous,

這些綠色的染料並不會對我們的環境帶來任何的負擔，

but it obviously looks really rather frightening.

但那件事的確引起相當大的驚恐。

And it's on the other side also, I think, quite beautiful,

在某一方面是這樣的，但在另一方面來看，我認為它是件美麗的事情。

as it somehow shows the turbulence in these kind of downtown areas,

這些綠色的染料總是會在世界上不同的城市之中

The "Green river," as a kind of activist idea, not a part of an exhibition,

綠色的河流，像是活動的份子，不只是展覽的某一部份而已，

城市，在城市之中的人們走過，

that space has dimensions. A space has time.

經過這些空間而建構出來的氛圍。空間之中呈現出時間的概念。

And the water flows through the city with time.

而城市中的水流跟著時間一同流動著。

讓城市變的可觸摸並且可探討的。

Negotiable meaning that it makes a difference

所謂可探討的意思是不管您做了些甚麼

是與否都會造成這城市的不同。

It makes a difference whether you say, "I'm a part of this city.

它就會造成不同不管你是否這樣說 : “我是這城市之中的一份子。

假如我投下那一份足以改變的行為

If I take a stand, it makes a difference."

假如我表明態度，它一定會變的不一樣的。”

This whole idea of a city not being a picture is,

這整個城市的概念不只是個圖像，

The idea that art can actually evaluate the relationship

這整個概念是藝術能真正評估圖像它的關聯性

between what it means to be in a picture,

and what it means to be in a space. What is the difference?

它在空間中又象徵著甚麼?這些有甚麼不同?

The difference between thinking and doing.

它的差別是關於所認知的與所作為的不同。

So these are different experiments with that. I won't go into them.

所以這些不同的試驗代表了這意義。在這我不多說。

Iceland, lower right corner, my favorite place.

在右下角是我最喜愛的地方冰島。

These kinds of experiments, they filter into architectural models.

透過這些類型的試驗，他們篩選出建築的模型。

字幕列表影片播放

TED】奧拉維爾-埃利亞松。玩轉空間和光線 (【TED】Olafur Eliasson: Playing with space and light)

sense

fall

necessarily

world