Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • Prof: Okay.

  • Let us start, ladies and gentlemen.

  • We're going to pursue the issue of musical form today.

  • It's an important thing to talk about because it allows us to

  • follow a particular piece of music,

  • and we'll be--I am using this metaphor of a musical journey

  • and wanting to know where we are in music throughout the day

  • today.

  • Form is particularly important in all types of music--

  • popular music as well as classical music--

  • and we have this complex of material coming at us,

  • this sonic material.

  • And we try to make sense of it, and we say that it has a

  • particular form.

  • And we say it could have a particular structure even,

  • so we tend to use metaphors having to do with architecture

  • and things such as this.

  • What we are really doing here is taking all of this sonic

  • information that's coming into our brain and getting sorted,

  • and makes us want to dance around or clap or be sad or

  • happy, and make sense of it in terms

  • of a few rather simple patterns.

  • And musicians like to have forms because oftentimes it

  • tells them what they ought to do next and where--here--I'm here

  • but what ought to happen next?

  • Well, if you've got a tried and true musical form that other

  • musicians have used over the years,

  • you might be inclined to use it too because your know your

  • listener will be able to follow you.

  • Now the other day, I asked early on in the course

  • about the form in popular music, and I threw this out not really

  • knowing what the answer would be.

  • What's the most common form that one encounters when dealing

  • with pop songs?

  • And for the most part there was silence across the room,

  • but one student--I have tracked him down--

  • Frederick Evans, gave a very good answer--

  • really a better answer than I could have given.

  • So, clearly Frederick knew something about this idea of

  • what he I think referred to as "verse and chorus"

  • structure.

  • I might call it "strophe and refrain,"

  • but it's the same thing whether you have it in a Lied of Franz

  • Schubert or in a piece that I know nothing about.

  • And Frederick is going to show us--introduce us--to a piece

  • that I know nothing about.

  • I sent him an e-mail last night saying, "Frederick,

  • you gave a really good answer.

  • Why don't you pick a piece, come up and demonstrate

  • this?"

  • So this is Frederick Evans.

  • We're going--or excuse me.

  • Yeah, Frederick Evans.

  • He's going to come up here.

  • I'm told we have to give him a microphone and he is going to

  • introduce us to this particular piece.

  • Now you probably all know what this piece is.

  • How many of you have heard the piece we were just listening to?

  • Everybody knows it.

  • Who is the one person in the room that's never heard this

  • piece before--has no clue what's happening?

  • Moi. Okay?

  • So Frederick, tell me about this piece,

  • please.

  • Frederick Evans: All right.

  • This is a piece by 'N Sync--back when I was in fifth

  • grade-- and it's "Bye Bye

  • Bye," and the pattern that it follows is really the

  • archetype of a lot of popular songs.

  • It's half of the chorus or so when it starts and then there's

  • verse, chorus, verse,

  • chorus and then what I call the bridge,

  • which is like an emotional climax.

  • And then the last one is a really powerful chorus where

  • they just bring it home and then the music fades away.

  • Prof: Okay.

  • So it's this idea of changing text,

  • then coming back to familiar text and familiar music,

  • then changing, going back to the familiar new

  • text, and then coming back to the

  • familiar in terms of the chorus.

  • Is that a fair shake?

  • Frederick Evans: Yes, Sir.

  • Yes.

  • Prof: Okay.

  • So shall we play--what are we going to hear first?

  • Frederick Evans: So first you'll hear from

  • seconds twenty-four to forty.

  • This is an example of the verse where they have the beginning of

  • the plot and then you have the chorus at seconds--

  • about fifty-six--and that's where you get your repeating

  • idea, which is what the piece is

  • based on.

  • And then last but not least, you have the emotional buildup

  • where the background and the chord progression changes,

  • a little more solemnly, and then there's the last

  • chorus that just brings it home.

  • Prof: Okay.

  • Great.

  • Let's listen to the-yeah.

  • >

  • Okay.

  • Frederick Evans: Yep.

  • So that was the first verse and that's when they really get you

  • into what they're talking about.

  • >

  • Prof: What really interests me here is what

  • they're using is a baroque ostinato "Lament

  • bass" but that's-- we'll get on to that in another

  • week or so.

  • So that's--okay.

  • Now we'll go to the bridge, Frederick?

  • Frederick Evans: Yes.

  • There at the bridge is where they really sum up all their

  • emotions and they really just want to tell you what they're

  • building towards.

  • >

  • Prof: Okay.

  • That's wonderful.

  • Thank you, Frederick.

  • That's exactly what I wanted.

  • >

  • >

  • Okay.

  • How many want Craig to continue teaching this course and how

  • many want Frederick?

  • Let's hear it for Craig.

  • >

  • Let's hear it for Frederick.

  • >

  • I knew it.

  • Okay, but that's a good way of getting introduced to the idea

  • of musical form.

  • Let's talk about form now in classical music.

  • The forms are a little more difficult in classical music

  • because the music is more complex.

  • And before we launch into a discussion of these musical

  • forms, I want to talk about the distinction of genre in music

  • and form in music.

  • So we're going to go over to the board over here and you can

  • see that I've listed the standard classical genres.

  • What do we mean by genre in music?

  • Well, simply musical type.

  • So we've got this type called a symphony and this type of music

  • called a string quartet and concerto, and so on.

  • We could add other types: ballet, opera,

  • things such as that.

  • In the popular realm we've got genres too.

  • We've got--classical New Orleans jazz would be a genre.

  • Blues would be a genre.

  • Grunge rock would be another sort of genre.

  • A genre presupposes a particular performing force,

  • a particular length of pieces and even dress and mode of

  • behavior of the auditors--the listeners.

  • If we were going to listen to the genre of a symphony,

  • we would dress up one particular way,

  • go to Woolsey Hall and expect to be there from eight o'clock

  • until ten o'clock.

  • If you were going to hear the Rolling Stones play at

  • Toad's--where they do play occasionally--obviously one

  • would not come at eight o'clock.

  • One would come later, and one would dress in a

  • particular sort of way and one would behave,

  • presumably, in a different sort of way.

  • So that's what we mean by genre, a kind of general type of

  • music.

  • Now today we'll start to talk about form in music,

  • and what I need to say here is that each of these genres is

  • made up of a-- of movements,

  • and each of the movements is informed by a particular form.

  • So with the symphony we have four movements there:

  • fast, slow, then either a minuet or a

  • scherzo, and a final,

  • fast movement, and each of these movements can

  • be in one of the number of different forms and we'll talk

  • about what they are in just a moment.

  • So when we come to the string quartet, same sort of thing:

  • fast, slow, minuet, scherzo, fast.

  • Any one of those can be in a particular form.

  • Concerto, generally, as mentioned before,

  • has just three movements and sonata,

  • a piano sonata, something played on a piano,

  • or a violin sonata with violin and piano accompaniment--

  • they generally have just three movements: fast,

  • slow, fast.

  • Okay.

  • Let's talk about our forms now.

  • In classical music things go by very quickly and it's difficult

  • to kind of get a handle on it, and we, generally in life,

  • don't like to be lost.

  • We like to know where we are, we like to know what is

  • happening, and this is what form allows us to do.

  • So that if we're hearing a piece of music and all this

  • stuff is coming at us we want to make sense of it by knowing

  • approximately where we are.

  • Am I still toward the beginning?

  • Am I in the middle of this thing?

  • Am I getting anywhere near the end of it?

  • How should I respond at this particular point?

  • Well, if we have in mind what I've identified here,

  • we will be referring to as our six formal types,

  • and we can think of these as templates that,

  • when we're hearing a piece of music we make an educated

  • decision about which formal type is in play.

  • And then we drop down the model of this formal type,

  • or the template of this formal type,

  • and we sort of filter our listening experience through

  • this template, or through this model.

  • So here are our six models: ternary form,

  • sonata allegro form, theme and variations,

  • rondo, fugue, and ostinato.

  • And they developed at various times in the history of music.

  • Theme and variations is very old.

  • Sonata-allegro is a lot more recent.

  • Now of these, the ones that we'll be working

  • with today are ternary form and sonata-allegro form,

  • and sonata-allegro is the hardest, the most complex,

  • the most difficult of all of these forms.

  • It's so-called because it usually shows up in the first

  • movement of a sonata, concerto, string quartet,

  • symphony, so--and the first movements are

  • fast so that's why we have allegro out there,

  • and it most is associated with this idea of the sonata.

  • It didn't necessarily originate there.

  • It originated there and in the symphony,

  • but for historical reasons we call this sonata because of its

  • association with the sonata and the fact that it goes--

  • and the fact that it goes fast--sonata-allegro form.

  • So that in a symphony, usually your very first

  • movement will be in sonata-allegro form.

  • Your slow movement, well, that could be in theme

  • and variations; it could be in rondo;

  • it could be in ternary form.

  • Your minuet and scherzo is almost always in ternary form

  • and your last fast movement could be in sonata-allegro form.

  • It could also be in theme and variations;

  • could be in rondo; could be in fugue.

  • Sometimes it's even in ostinato form.

  • So you can see that these forms can show up and

  • control--regulate--what happens inside of each of these

  • movements.

  • Okay?

  • Are there questions about that?

  • Does that seem straightforward enough?

  • We have a big picture of genre here, movements within genre,

  • and then forms informing each of the movements.

  • Yes.

  • Student: Did you say that the ternary form is

  • normally used for the second movement?

  • Prof: No.

  • I said it's possible that it is--could be--used for the

  • second movement.

  • A ternary form is one of the forms that could be used with

  • the slow second movement.

  • We could also have theme and variations.

  • We're going to hear one of those later in our course.

  • It could also be a sort of slow rondo.

  • So it's just one of really three possibilities there,

  • but thanks for that question.

  • Anything else?

  • Okay.

  • If not, let's talk then about ternary form because ternary

  • form has much in common with what we experience in

  • sonata-allegro form.

  • Let me take a very straightforward example of

  • ternary form.

  • It's from Beethoven's "Für Elise,"

  • the piece-- the piano piece that Beethoven

  • wrote for one of his paramours at one time or another.

  • Here.

  • I'm going to tell you a story about this.

  • My cell phone broke the other day.

  • My cell phone broke the other day so I had to buy a new one.

  • I was really happy about that.

  • I hated to lose my old Mozart theme, but I then had to find a

  • new Mozart theme.

  • And nowadays my selections are more limited.

  • So when you go on to these things--and in truth,

  • I actually had my youngest son do this because I'm hopelessly

  • incompetent with this kind of thing--

  • you go on to these things, and now they only have one

  • option for classical music, one option for--but it's called

  • "Mozart" so good choice.

  • Mozart has become the icon of classical music and I think it's

  • the individual that should be the icon for classical music.

  • All classical music now has been reduced down to just

  • Mozart.

  • Okay.

  • I have no idea what that was about, but, well,

  • who's calling?

  • All right.

  • So we have this piece in ternary form by Beethoven,

  • and ternary form is--conveys to us simply the idea of

  • presentation, diversion, re-presentation or

  • statement, digression,

  • restatement--anything like this.

  • We like to diagram these in terms of alphabetical letters.

  • You can think just A, B, A.

  • >

  • All right.

  • I'm going to pause here.

  • We started out here.

  • >

  • We are in this key.

  • Major or minor?

  • What do you think?

  • Minor. All right.

  • So were coming to the end of this A section.

  • Here--The A section is very short <<plays

  • piano>>

  • but then <<plays piano>>

  • we--major or minor?

  • Major. Right.

  • >

  • So what happened there?

  • What do we call this?

  • >

  • It's a very quick modulation.

  • We've changed keys.

  • And I'm going to digress here just for a moment to talk about

  • this, which is this concept of relative major and minor.

  • You may have noticed in music--and it's discussed

  • briefly in the textbook--that there are pairs of keys,

  • pairs of keys that have something in common.

  • The members of the pairs have the same key signature,

  • and we could take any key signature--

  • three flats or two sharps, whatever--

  • but there's going to be one major key with three flats and

  • one minor key with three flats.

  • And I think we have up on the board here an example of just

  • that so you can see written in here the three flats,

  • and this is a minor scale with three flats.

  • Now we could also have three flats over here,

  • but we encounter three flats where we have the major scale.

  • This happens to work out so that it's pitched on C.

  • If we come up three half steps in the keyboard,

  • we come up to E-flat so the relative major--

  • the major key in this pair--is always three half steps--

  • >

  • one, two, three--three half steps up above its paired minor.

  • Here's another one down at the bottom--happens to have one

  • sharp in it.

  • We have the key of G major here with one sharp but if we come

  • down three half steps >

  • we get its relative minor down here, and the reason I mentioned

  • this is not because we actually hear this very much.

  • I'm not sure that I hear modulations to relative major

  • because I don't have absolute pitch and I'm not tracking keys

  • when I listen to pieces-- and my guess is you're not

  • either.

  • So for the average listener, we may not hear the actual

  • pitch relationship but we may hear that we've had a modulation

  • and you can kind of make an educated guess:

  • that about fifty percent of the time if it's going minor to

  • major, it's coming in this relative

  • arrangement-- where major down to minor;

  • it's going in this relative arrangement, so this happens a

  • lot.

  • So here we are in the mid section of our ternary form,

  • A B A.

  • Here's the B part <<plays piano>>

  • and then back to <<plays piano>>

  • the minor A.

  • >

  • Now that's just the opening section of this piece.

  • It goes on to do other things, but it's a very succinct

  • example of ternary form, and ternary form is a useful

  • way of introducing a larger concept,

  • which is sonata-allegro form.

  • So let me flip the board here, and here we go on to this

  • rather complex diagram.

  • As I say, it's the most complex one of all the six forms that

  • we'll be working with.

  • It consists of three essential parts: exposition,

  • development and recapitulation.

  • So you could think you were coming out of ternary form.

  • You've got an A here, you've got a B idea here and

  • then you've got an A return back here--but this is a lot more

  • complicated.

  • There are things--lots of things--going on.

  • And I should say also--in terms of fairness in advertising--that

  • this is a model.

  • This is also something of an abstraction or an ideal.

  • Not every piece written in sonata-allegro form conforms to

  • this diagram in all particulars.

  • Composers wouldn't want to do that--they'd have to assert

  • their independence or originality in one way or

  • another--but it's a useful sort of model.

  • It tells us what the norm is, what we can generally expect.

  • So we've got these three sort of sine qua non here and

  • then we've got two optional parts of this that we'll talk

  • about as we proceed.

  • So this is the way we set out then sonata-allegro form:

  • exposition, development, recapitulation.

  • So we start out with the first theme, in the tonic key of

  • course.

  • It might even have subsets to it so that we could have one A

  • and one B and one C up here.

  • I won't put them up there but it can happen.

  • Then we have a transition in which we have a change of key,

  • moving to the dominant key.

  • Transitions tend to be rather unsettled.

  • It gives you the sense of moving somewhere,

  • going somewhere.

  • That's why it's called a transition.

  • It could also--musicians like--quickly--like to call it a

  • "bridge."

  • It's sort of leading you somewhere else--and maybe in

  • that way it is similar to the type of bridge that Frederick

  • was talking about earlier.

  • So we have a transition or bridge that takes us to a second

  • theme in--now in the dominant key.

  • If, however, our symphony happened to begin

  • in a minor key, then the second theme would

  • come in in the relative major.

  • So if we had C minor as Beethoven does in his Fifth

  • Symphony-- <<plays piano>>

  • So there we are there in C minor, but the second theme

  • >

  • is in the relative major of E-flat.

  • Both have three flats in it.

  • So if you have the start in minor, then composers

  • traditionally modulate, not to the dominant,

  • but to the relative major-- which is up on the third degree

  • of the scale.

  • That's why there's a big three (III) there.

  • So then the second theme comes in.

  • It's usually contrasting, lyrical, sweeter.

  • You heard the difference there--more song-like in the

  • Beethoven-- not so much of that musical

  • punch in the nose as I like to refer to it,

  • but a more relaxed sort of second theme,

  • and there is oftentimes some filler or what we might call an

  • interstice and we come to a closing theme.

  • That's abbreviated up here, just CT, closing theme of the

  • exposition, closes the exposition.

  • Closing themes tend to be rather simple in which they rock

  • back and forth between dominant and tonic so that you could end

  • on the tonic and that gives you a sense of conclusion of the

  • exposition.

  • Now what happens?

  • Well, you see these dots up on the board.

  • Anybody know what these dots mean?

  • I think we--actually we talk about this if you read ahead in

  • the textbook Can somebody tell me what the dots mean*>* Jerry?

  • Student: Repeat?

  • Prof: Okay. Repeat. Okay.

  • So that's what dots in music do-- when we have these double

  • bars and dots that means repeat so we got to repeat the whole

  • exposition.

  • If we didn't like it the first time, we get a second pass at it

  • in the repeat.

  • Then we go on to the development and as the term

  • "development" suggests,

  • we're going to develop the theme here,

  • but it is oftentimes more than that.

  • It could be something other than just the development and

  • the expansion.

  • It could actually be a contraction.

  • Beethoven likes to strip away things and sort of play with

  • particular subsets of themes or play with parts of motives.

  • Generally speaking, your development is

  • characterized by tonal instability--moves around a lot.

  • You can't tell what key you're in--tonal instability--and it

  • also tends to be, in terms of texture,

  • the most polyphonic of any section in the piece.

  • There's a lot of counterpoint usually to be found in the

  • development section.

  • Then towards the end of the development section we want to

  • get back here to the return and we want to get back to our first

  • theme and our tonic key.

  • So composers oftentimes will sit on one chord.

  • What they will sit on will happen to be the dominant.

  • So I could put that up here.

  • We could put a five (V) up here because we want a long period of

  • dominant preparation.

  • >

  • is where we're going, back over here.

  • But we're going to set this up as preparation in terms of the

  • dominant that wants to push us in to the tonic.

  • So there we are back in the tonic now and all the first

  • themes come back as they did before.

  • We also have a bridge but this time it does not modulate.

  • It stays in the tonic key.

  • We don't want it to modulate because we've got to finish in

  • the tonic here.

  • So I was thinking just a moment ago it's kind of the

  • "bridge to nowhere."

  • It really is a bridge to nowhere.

  • You go right back to where you were.

  • You stay in that tonic key and the second theme material comes

  • in, your closing theme comes in, and you could end the

  • composition here.

  • Sometimes Mozart as we will see in our course will end a piece

  • right at this point-- the end, right there--but more

  • often than not composers will throw on a coda.

  • What's a coda do?

  • Well, it really says to the listener that "hey,

  • the piece is sort of at an end here."

  • Codas generally are very static harmonically.

  • They're--there's not a lot of movement.

  • It's--and I keep--maybe I should have got-- come up a

  • different metaphor here--the idea of throwing an anchor over,

  • slowing the whole thing down, simplifying it to say we're at

  • the end.

  • So you get a lot of the >

  • kind of things in the coda just to tell the listener it's time

  • to think about clapping at this point, or reaching for your

  • coat.

  • And the other optional--Coda--What's that come

  • from?

  • The Latin cauda (caudae) I guess.

  • Italian coda means tail, and these can be,

  • like all tails, long or short.

  • Mozart happened to like short codas.

  • Beethoven liked longer codas.

  • And the other optional component here is the

  • introduction.

  • My guess is--Jacob, what would you guess?

  • How many--what portion of classical symphonies--

  • you're an orchestral player--what portion of

  • classical symphonies would begin with an introduction,

  • would you say?

  • Student: Most of them.

  • Prof: Most of them?

  • Well, we'll consider that.

  • Let's go for fifty percent at the moment.

  • We'll consider fifty percent at the moment, so we'll see.

  • Now let's jump into a classical composition that begins with a

  • movement in sonata-allegro form.

  • We're going to open here with Mozart's "Eine kleine

  • Nachtmusik," "A Little Night

  • Music."

  • This is sort of serenade stuff that he wrote for Vienna--sort

  • of night music, evening music.

  • Let's listen to a little of it.

  • We're going to start with the first theme idea,

  • and before she does let me play this.

  • >

  • What about that?

  • Conjunct or disjunct melody?

  • Students: Disjunct.

  • Prof: Disjunct, yeah.

  • There's a lot of jumping around >

  • and that kind of thing.

  • Notice it's mostly >

  • just a major triad with >

  • underneath.

  • So if we were at a concert and we wanted to remember this,

  • we'd probably have a lot of skippy Xs here.

  • We don't have time to get into the particulars of this,

  • but that's why we're doing all of this diagramming stuff.

  • So we got a lot of these skipping Xs.

  • All right.

  • So let's listen to the first theme of Mozart's "Eine

  • kleine Nachtmusik."

  • >

  • A little syncopation there.

  • And a sort of a counterpoint to this, so maybe we've got a

  • couple of little ideas in here: A, B and C.

  • >

  • Ah, agitation, movement.

  • >

  • Here goes the bass.

  • >

  • Pause.

  • So we had a cadence there, >.

  • That would be the end of the musical phrase,

  • a cadence, and the music actually stopped.

  • I used to like to think of this in terms of almost a drama.

  • We've got a change of scene here the--where some characters

  • have gone off, the stage is now clear,

  • and other characters are going to come on.

  • So what characters are going to come on?

  • Well, a more lyrical second theme.

  • I'm going to play just a bit of it for you.

  • >

  • What about this?

  • Is this a conjunct melody?

  • Obviously, it's descending.

  • Conjunct or disjunct?

  • >

  • Very conjunct.

  • Actually, it's just running down the scale.

  • Now we don't have time, because this music is going by

  • so fast.

  • We've got our skippy opening theme going around like that.

  • We don't have time to sort of write down all those Xs so maybe

  • just--yeah.

  • >

  • And maybe something-- >

  • something like that.

  • So this is our first skippy theme.

  • Our second theme >

  • has a nice sort of fall to it.

  • Okay. Here's the second theme.

  • >

  • Repeat.

  • >

  • Now closing theme already.

  • >

  • What's the most noteworthy aspect of that theme?

  • >

  • What do you think?

  • Thoughts--what would you remember about that?

  • How would you graph that?

  • Yeah.

  • Student: >

  • Prof: Okay.

  • Yeah.

  • It starts out <<plays piano>>

  • and then it's really conjunct, right,

  • because it's staying on one pitch level,

  • sort of the ultimate conjunct joined to the point that it's a

  • unison pitch, >.

  • So I'd remember that just like this idea.

  • So our closing theme, >

  • almost is the "woodpecker"

  • idea.

  • Sorry.

  • But think of that kind of >

  • or maybe even a machine gun--whatever sort of silly

  • analogy you want to construct to help you remember that.

  • Okay.

  • So here we are almost at the end of the exposition.

  • Let's listen now to the end of exposition and then we'll stop.

  • >

  • Okay.

  • So we're going to stop there.

  • Now on this recording what do you think?

  • Well, I think--reasons for time--let's go ahead and we'll

  • advance it up to the beginning of the development section.

  • So now we should listen to this whole complex once again,

  • but we're not going to do that.

  • We're going to proceed here and we're going to go in to the

  • development section.

  • And it's kind of fun the way Mozart starts the development

  • section here.

  • >

  • Let me ask you this.

  • We started here.

  • >

  • The development begins higher or lower?

  • >

  • Yeah?

  • Student: Lower.

  • Prof: Lower so he's dropped down to the dominant.

  • He's now in the dominant >

  • and if he continued as he had, >

  • that's what he would have done.

  • That's not what he does, however.

  • >

  • He's sitting here <<plays piano>>

  • and he ends up there >

  • so we get this sort of dissonant shift,

  • and it's a signal.

  • It's like the composer holding up a sign:

  • "development---time for the development now!"

  • Okay?

  • So something--we've shifted, we--or a sort of slap in the

  • face telling us that we're at a new point in our form,

  • a new section in our form, the development section.

  • So as we listen to this we'll hear Mozart move quickly through

  • some--lots of different keys.

  • I wouldn't be able to tell you what keys they are.

  • I really wouldn't.

  • But I do know that he moves through different keys.

  • Then we will hear a re-transition start,

  • but here is my challenge to you and why I'm sort of putting all

  • these things up here.

  • Which theme does he choose to develop here?

  • Kind of interesting.

  • Does he go with the first theme, >

  • or the >

  • or the >?

  • So which one?

  • >

  • >

  • Prof: Now he is all the way--first of all,

  • what's the answer to the question?

  • Which theme did he use here?

  • We're now at the re-transition, we're almost finished this

  • short development.

  • Which one did he use?

  • Who thinks they know?

  • Raise your hand.

  • Elizabeth?

  • Student: The closing theme.

  • Prof: Used just the closing theme

  • >

  • so nothing but the closing theme in this short development

  • section.

  • Now we are at the re-transition and you're going to hear the

  • violins come down >

  • but if I could sing the harmony--Maybe we should all

  • sing it together.

  • We'll be singing >.

  • It's the implied bass line.

  • >

  • Then it's going to go >

  • back to the tonic.

  • Then we're going to go >.

  • Then that first theme is going to come back in here.

  • So let's listen to Mozart write a re-transition,

  • and I'm going to sing the implied--or then sounded

  • dominant that's going to lead to the tonic.

  • >

  • >

  • So all of the first theme material coming back--nothing

  • new.

  • >

  • Here goes our bridge now--movement.

  • >

  • And he just cut it short.

  • The first time he went there >.

  • That was what the bass did.

  • This time he just stops the thing and stays in the tonic

  • key.

  • And then the rest of the material will come back in in

  • the proper order in the tonic key.

  • All right, but we need not hear that.

  • Let's go on now to the coda and we're just going to listen

  • generally to what happens in the coda here--typical coda with

  • Mozart.

  • >

  • Tonic.

  • >

  • >

  • It's almost stereotypical.

  • Right?

  • >

  • You could have written that.

  • I--even I could have written that--not so hard,

  • but as they say, it's just a load of bricks to

  • bring this thing to a conclusion.

  • But it's a beautiful example of sonata-allegro form.

  • It does what our model requires in all particulars in an

  • unusually rapid rate here--about six minutes for this particular

  • movement.

  • Let's go on to a rather--another famous example

  • of sonata-allegro form, and that's the beginning of

  • your own Beethoven's Fifth Symphony,

  • Symphony number Five.

  • We, of course, worked with this before and you

  • know the beginning, but let's listen to a bit of

  • this and we're going to follow it through now all the way to

  • the-- into the exposition and

  • development in terms of form-- not some of the issues we were

  • working with before, but in terms of form.

  • >

  • So no introduction--just starts off with his first motive there,

  • a four-note motive.

  • >

  • And now the bridge is going to start.

  • >

  • You get a sense of moving from point A to point B or from first

  • theme to second theme.

  • >

  • Okay.

  • So we'll pause it there, and the horn sort of says

  • >

  • >

  • "yes, this is the end of the bridge,"

  • something like that.

  • This is the end of that, and then a new lyrical theme

  • will come in.

  • >

  • What interests--always interested me here,

  • sort of like the "Jaws"

  • movie.

  • You never know when it's safe to go back in the water.

  • You've got this nice melody of >

  • but underneath you have >.

  • Sort of lurking under there is this pernicious four-note

  • motive.

  • All right.

  • So let's listen to the second theme as it starts in the

  • violins and then we'll build up with Beethoven here.

  • >

  • Building up dynamics and pitch.

  • >

  • A little bit of interstice here, <<music

  • playing>>

  • our closing theme.

  • >

  • A couple of points--note again--sort of breathe the air

  • of this particular performance.

  • Ah. Okay?

  • It's because we're going to change to a different recording

  • now.

  • Let me comment on the closing theme.

  • Notice how in this symphony Beethoven once again is obsessed

  • with this four-note motive.

  • We heard it underneath >

  • and at the end how does he create a closing theme?

  • >

  • Well, <<plays piano>>

  • just coming down an arpeggio--just taking that

  • triad.

  • >

  • Is this a major triad or a minor triad?

  • >

  • What is it in relationship to the opening tonality?

  • It's the relative major. Okay?

  • So it just goes from, >

  • up to <<plays piano>>

  • short, short, short, long,

  • so everything's sort of short, short, short,

  • long.

  • All right.

  • So that's how he constructs the closing theme--just a different

  • configuration of that short, short, short long motive.

  • Let's go back now and hear a different recording and tell me

  • what you think about this recording.

  • How does it differ from the preceding one that we were

  • listening to?

  • Let's start with the repeat of the beginning if you can get

  • there, repeat of the exposition, that-- <<music

  • playing>>

  • Perfect.

  • >

  • Okay. Any thoughts about that?

  • Just on one playing I know it's hard.

  • I should sit the two up here and play this one four times and

  • this one four times, back and forth.

  • What about this one though?

  • Yeah.

  • Student: >

  • Prof: The second one sounds faster,

  • yeah.

  • It's the same music.

  • You--they have the same score.

  • One conductor thinks this should go >.

  • That's how Leonard Bernstein would do it and did do it.

  • Another conductor--still living, conducting frequently in

  • New York also, Bernard Haitink

  • >.

  • So it gets through this about-- through this exposition--about

  • thirty seconds faster than Leonard Bernstein did--just a

  • difference in interpretation.

  • So let's listen now quickly, because it does go quickly,

  • to Bernard Haitink's interpretation of the exposition

  • of this first movement.

  • >

  • Prof: <<music playing>>

  • Okay.

  • That's probably enough of that.

  • Let's go on to the development now.

  • Development--well, how does the development of

  • this symphony start?

  • Which theme is he using?

  • Well, you can imagine.

  • Prof: <<plays piano>>

  • His four-note motive >

  • >

  • >

  • --then rather quickly >

  • he modulates through different keys.

  • Every time you hear the strings sweep <<plays

  • piano>>

  • --we're moving to a new key and then >

  • modulating to a higher key there.

  • Then he begins to build up--begins to build up in terms

  • of pitch, <<plays piano>>

  • taking it up higher and higher and higher, and then we get

  • >

  • that sort of sound.

  • Well, first of all, let's talk about this chord.

  • What do you think about that chord?

  • >

  • Full of tension, dissonance?

  • Yeah, it has a lot.

  • It's called a diminished triad and we have put this up here.

  • Remember we've had major triads, with major third in the

  • bottom, a minor third on the top.

  • And then we had minor triads.

  • But what would happen if you constructed a triad with just a

  • minor third on the bottom and then another minor third-- two

  • minor thirds?

  • Well, you get this sort of more dissonant sound,

  • >

  • a more biting sound.

  • So that's what Beethoven is using here, this dissonant

  • triad.

  • There is another thing that's quite interesting and that is

  • that-- this idea of just pounding away

  • on one particular chord, this sound, <<plays

  • piano>>

  • that sort of thing.

  • Beethoven started doing this.

  • Did you ever have your CD player get-- <<plays

  • piano>>

  • It drives you crazy, right?

  • Why is he doing this?

  • So think about how the audience of that time would have

  • perceived this.

  • The--what did the Germans of 1808?

  • "Ludwig, Ludwig, was tun Sie hier?

  • Die ist nicht die Musik.

  • Sind Sie wacklich? Hier ist die Musik."

  • >

  • --and so on.

  • So this is a--this kind of thing-- <<plays

  • piano>>

  • It's almost like that kind of thing they used to use in old

  • silent movies and then they tied her up <<plays

  • piano>>

  • and then they lit the fuse >

  • and then <<plays piano>>

  • they're building up tension.

  • If you take this diminished triad and keep placing it at

  • successively higher degrees of the scale,

  • you get this extreme of tension, and what's he done in

  • terms of note values here?

  • Well, we have this *.

  • It's almost as if he's stripped it down to just one note--

  • sort of reduced it to its most elemental,

  • and I--well, I could give you metaphors

  • about taking matter and reducing them down to some sort of their

  • densest potential and atomic explosions and things like that,

  • but >

  • that's kind of what he's done here.

  • He hasn't expanded in the development section.

  • He's contracted, sort of to maximize the

  • rhythmic energy--the almost electrical energy inherent in

  • this particular concept.

  • Well, all right, so then he backs off of this

  • >

  • and gets sweeping <<plays piano>>

  • and then he starts playing around with just two notes.

  • >

  • Why two notes?

  • Well, his original theme >

  • had just two notes in it, and then he breaks it down to

  • just one note, once again reaching for the

  • essence here.

  • Now this might not sound like one note, but here's what he's

  • got.

  • >

  • That sounds like high, low, high, low,

  • but if you stop and think about it >

  • they're just coming down an octave, so he's really just

  • working with one note here.

  • >

  • And then he changes it >

  • and then the theme >

  • >

  • but the diminished chord won't let it in.

  • >

  • He just sort of keeps repeating that one- note idea,

  • high, low, high, low, high, low <<plays

  • piano>>

  • --"please let me in," and finally this sort of

  • insistent motive <<plays piano>>

  • just breaks down the door >

  • and then the recapitulation can begin <<plays

  • piano>>

  • --and so on.

  • The recapitulation begins at that point.

  • So that's the development section of the Fifth Symphony

  • here, first movement of the Fifth

  • Symphony, where he puts this electrical

  • moment right in the-- smack in the middle of the

  • development section-- in the middle of the

  • movement--and then we get to the recapitulation.

  • So we've heard some music of Leonard Bernstein's

  • interpretation of this.

  • We've heard Bernard Haitink's interpretation of this.

  • Now let's go on to--as you go out, you can use this as kind of

  • exit music, a silly--a bit of silliness

  • here--the Bee Gees' interpretation of Beethoven's

  • Fifth Symphony.

Prof: Okay.

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 美國腔

第九講.奏鳴曲-快板形式。莫扎特和貝多芬 (Lecture 9. Sonata-Allegro Form: Mozart and Beethoven)

  • 44 6
    songwen8778 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字