Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • Climate change and agriculture are interrelated processes, both of which

  • take place on a global scale. Climate change affects agriculture in a number

  • of ways, including through changes in average temperatures, rainfall, and

  • climate extremes; changes in pests and diseases; changes in atmospheric carbon

  • dioxide and ground-level ozone concentrations; changes in the

  • nutritional quality of some foods; and changes in sea level.

  • Climate change is already affecting agriculture, with effects unevenly

  • distributed across the world. Future climate change will likely negatively

  • affect crop production in low latitude countries, while effects in northern

  • latitudes may be positive or negative. Climate change will probably increase

  • the risk of food insecurity for some vulnerable groups, such as the poor.

  • Agriculture contributes to climate change by anthropogenic emissions of

  • greenhouse gases, and by the conversion of non-agricultural land into

  • agricultural land. Agriculture, forestry and land-use change contributed around

  • 20 to 25% to global annual emissions in 2010.

  • There are range of policies that can reduce the risk of negative climate

  • change impacts on agriculture, and to reduce GHG emissions from the

  • agriculture sector. Impact of climate change on agriculture

  • Despite technological advances, such as improved varieties, genetically modified

  • organisms, and irrigation systems, weather is still a key factor in

  • agricultural productivity, as well as soil properties and natural communities.

  • The effect of climate on agriculture is related to variabilities in local

  • climates rather than in global climate patterns. The Earth's average surface

  • temperature has increased by 1.5 °F since 1880. Consequently, agronomists

  • consider any assessment has to be individually consider each local area.

  • On the other hand, agricultural trade has grown in recent years, and now

  • provides significant amounts of food, on a national level to major importing

  • countries, as well as comfortable income to exporting ones. The international

  • aspect of trade and security in terms of food implies the need to also consider

  • the effects of climate change on a global scale.

  • A study published in Science suggests that, due to climate change, "southern

  • Africa could lose more than 30% of its main crop, maize, by 2030. In South Asia

  • losses of many regional staples, such as rice, millet and maize could top 10%".

  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has produced several reports that

  • have assessed the scientific literature on climate change. The IPCC Third

  • Assessment Report, published in 2001, concluded that the poorest countries

  • would be hardest hit, with reductions in crop yields in most tropical and

  • sub-tropical regions due to decreased water availability, and new or changed

  • insect pest incidence. In Africa and Latin America many rainfed crops are

  • near their maximum temperature tolerance, so that yields are likely to

  • fall sharply for even small climate changes; falls in agricultural

  • productivity of up to 30% over the 21st century are projected. Marine life and

  • the fishing industry will also be severely affected in some places.

  • Climate change induced by increasing greenhouse gases is likely to affect

  • crops differently from region to region. For example, average crop yield is

  • expected to drop down to 50% in Pakistan according to the UKMO scenario whereas

  • corn production in Europe is expected to grow up to 25% in optimum hydrologic

  • conditions. More favourable effects on yield tend to

  • depend to a large extent on realization of the potentially beneficial effects of

  • carbon dioxide on crop growth and increase of efficiency in water use.

  • Decrease in potential yields is likely to be caused by shortening of the

  • growing period, decrease in water availability and poor vernalization.

  • In the long run, the climatic change could affect agriculture in several ways

  • productivity, in terms of quantity and quality of crops

  • agricultural practices, through changes of water use and agricultural inputs

  • such as herbicides, insecticides and fertilizers

  • environmental effects, in particular in relation of frequency and intensity of

  • soil drainage, soil erosion, reduction of crop diversity

  • rural space, through the loss and gain of cultivated lands, land speculation,

  • land renunciation, and hydraulic amenities.

  • adaptation, organisms may become more or less competitive, as well as humans may

  • develop urgency to develop more competitive organisms, such as flood

  • resistant or salt resistant varieties of rice.

  • They are large uncertainties to uncover, particularly because there is lack of

  • information on many specific local regions, and include the uncertainties

  • on magnitude of climate change, the effects of technological changes on

  • productivity, global food demands, and the numerous possibilities of

  • adaptation. Most agronomists believe that

  • agricultural production will be mostly affected by the severity and pace of

  • climate change, not so much by gradual trends in climate. If change is gradual,

  • there may be enough time for biota adjustment. Rapid climate change,

  • however, could harm agriculture in many countries, especially those that are

  • already suffering from rather poor soil and climate conditions, because there is

  • less time for optimum natural selection and adaption.

  • But much remains unknown about exactly how climate change may affect farming

  • and food security, in part because the role of farmer behaviour is poorly

  • captured by crop-climate models. For instance, Evan Fraser, a geographer at

  • the University of Guelph in Ontario Canada, has conducted a number of

  • studies that show that the socio-economic context of farming may

  • play a huge role in determining whether a drought has a major, or an

  • insignificant impact on crop production. In some cases, it seems that even minor

  • droughts have big impacts on food security, versus cases where even

  • relatively large weather-related problems were adapted to without much

  • hardship. Evan Fraser combines socio-economic models along with

  • climatic models to identifyvulnerability hotspotsOne such study

  • has identified US maize production as particularly vulnerable to climate

  • change because it is expected to be exposed to worse droughts, but it does

  • not have the socio-economic conditions that suggest farmers will adapt to these

  • changing conditions. = Observed impacts =

  • So far, the effects of regional climate change on agriculture have been

  • relatively limited. Changes in crop phenology provide important evidence of

  • the response to recent regional climate change. Phenology is the study of

  • natural phenomena that recur periodically, and how these phenomena

  • relate to climate and seasonal changes. A significant advance in phenology has

  • been observed for agriculture and forestry in large parts of the Northern

  • Hemisphere. Droughts have been occurring more

  • frequently because of global warming and they are expected to become more

  • frequent and intense in Africa, southern Europe, the Middle East, most of the

  • Americas, Australia, and Southeast Asia. Their impacts are aggravated because of

  • increased water demand, population growth, urban expansion, and

  • environmental protection efforts in many areas. Droughts result in crop failures

  • and the loss of pasture grazing land for livestock.

  • = Projections = As part of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment

  • Report, Schneider et al. projected the potential future effects of climate

  • change on agriculture. With low to medium confidence, they concluded that

  • for about a 1 to 3 °C global mean temperature increase there would be

  • productivity decreases for some cereals in low latitudes, and productivity

  • increases in high latitudes. In the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, "low

  • confidence" means that a particular finding has about a 2 out of 10 chance

  • of being correct, based on expert judgement. "Medium confidence" has about

  • a 5 out of 10 chance of being correct. Over the same time period, with medium

  • confidence, global production potential was projected to:

  • increase up to around 3 °C, very likely decrease above about 3 °C.

  • Most of the studies on global agriculture assessed by Schneider et al.

  • had not incorporated a number of critical factors, including changes in

  • extreme events, or the spread of pests and diseases. Studies had also not

  • considered the development of specific practices or technologies to aid

  • adaptation to climate change. The US National Research Council

  • assessed the literature on the effects of climate change on crop yields. US NRC

  • stressed the uncertainties in their projections of changes in crop yields.

  • Their central estimates of changes in crop yields are shown above. Actual

  • changes in yields may be above or below these central estimates. US NRC also

  • provided an estimated the "likely" range of changes in yields. "Likely" means a

  • greater than 67% chance of being correct, based on expert judgement. The

  • likely ranges are summarized in the image descriptions of the two graphs.

  • Food security The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report also

  • describes the impact of climate change on food security. Projections suggested

  • that there could be large decreases in hunger globally by 2080, compared to the

  • 2006 level. Reductions in hunger were driven by projected social and economic

  • development. For reference, the Food and Agriculture Organization has estimated

  • that in 2006, the number of people undernourished globally was 820 million.

  • Three scenarios without climate change projected 100-130 million undernourished

  • by the year 2080, while another scenario without climate change projected 770

  • million undernourished. Based on an expert assessment of all of the

  • evidence, these projections were thought to have about a 5-in-10 chance of being

  • correct. The same set of greenhouse gas and

  • socio-economic scenarios were also used in projections that included the effects

  • of climate change. Including climate change, three scenarios projected

  • 100-380 million undernourished by the year 2080, while another scenario with

  • climate change projected 740-1,300 million undernourished. These

  • projections were thought to have between a 2-in-10 and 5-in-10 chance of being

  • correct. Projections also suggested regional

  • changes in the global distribution of hunger. By 2080, sub-Saharan Africa may

  • overtake Asia as the world's most food-insecure region. This is mainly due

  • to projected social and economic changes, rather than climate change.

  • Individual studies Cline looked at how climate change might

  • affect agricultural productivity in the 2080s. His study assumes that no efforts

  • are made to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, leading to

  • global warming of 3.3 °C above the pre-industrial level. He concluded that

  • global agricultural productivity could be negatively affected by climate

  • change, with the worst effects in developing countries.

  • Lobell et al. assessed how climate change might affect 12 food-insecure

  • regions in 2030. The purpose of their analysis was to assess where adaptation

  • measures to climate change should be prioritized. They found that without

  • sufficient adaptation measures, South Asia and South Africa would likely

  • suffer negative impacts on several crops which are important to large food

  • insecure human populations. Battisti and Naylor looked at how

  • increased seasonal temperatures might affect agricultural productivity.

  • Projections by the IPCC suggest that with climate change, high seasonal

  • temperatures will become widespread, with the likelihood of extreme

  • temperatures increasing through the second-half of the 21st century.

  • Battisti and Naylor concluded that such changes could have very serious effects

  • on agriculture, particularly in the tropics. They suggest that major,

  • near-term, investments in adaptation measures could reduce these risks.

  • "Climate change merely increases the urgency of reforming trade policies to

  • ensure that global food security needs are met" said C. Bellmann, ICTSD

  • Programmes Director. A 2009 ICTSD-IPC study by Jodie Keane suggests that

  • climate change could cause farm output in sub-Saharan Africa to decrease by 12

  • percent by 2080 - although in some African countries this figure could be

  • as much as 60 percent, with agricultural exports declining by up to one fifth in

  • others. Adapting to climate change could cost the agriculture sector $14bn

  • globally a year, the study finds. = Regional =

  • Africa In Africa, IPCC projected that climate

  • variability and change would severely compromise agricultural production and

  • access to food. This projection was assigned "high confidence."

  • Africa's geography makes it particularly vulnerable to climate change, and

  • seventy per cent of the population rely on rain-fed agriculture for their

  • livelihoods. Tanzania's official report on climate change suggests that the

  • areas that usually get two rainfalls in the year will probably get more, and

  • those that get only one rainy season will get far less. The net result is

  • expected to be that 33% less maizethe country's staple cropwill be grown.

  • Asia In East and Southeast Asia, IPCC

  • projected that crop yields could increase up to 20% by the mid-21st

  • century. In Central and South Asia, projections suggested that yields might

  • decrease by up to 30%, over the same time period. These projections were

  • assigned "medium confidence." Taken together, the risk of hunger was

  • projected to remain very high in several developing countries.

  • More detailed analysis of rice yields by the International Rice Research

  • Institute forecast 20% reduction in yields over the region per degree

  • Celsius of temperature rise. Rice becomes sterile if exposed to

  • temperatures above 35 degrees for more than one hour during flowering and

  • consequently produces no grain. A 2013 study by the International Crops

  • Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics aimed to find science-based,

  • pro-poor approaches and techniques that would enable Asia's agricultural systems

  • to cope with climate change, while benefitting poor and vulnerable farmers.

  • The study's recommendations ranged from improving the use of climate information

  • in local planning and strengthening weather-based agro-advisory services, to

  • stimulating diversification of rural household incomes and providing

  • incentives to farmers to adopt natural resource conservation measures to

  • enhance forest cover, replenish groundwater and use renewable energy. A

  • 2014 study found that warming had increased maize yields in the

  • Heilongjiang region of China had increased by between 7 and 17% per

  • decade as a result of rising temperatures.

  • Australia and New Zealand Hennessy et al.. assessed the literature

  • for Australia and New Zealand. They concluded that without further

  • adaptation to climate change, projected impacts would likely be substantial: By

  • 2030, production from agriculture and forestry was projected to decline over

  • much of southern and eastern Australia, and over parts of eastern New Zealand;

  • In New Zealand, initial benefits were projected close to major rivers and in

  • western and southern areas. Hennessy et al.. placed high confidence in these

  • projections. Europe

  • With high confidence, IPCC projected that in Southern Europe, climate change

  • would reduce crop productivity. In Central and Eastern Europe, forest

  • productivity was expected to decline. In Northern Europe, the initial effect of

  • climate change was projected to increase crop yields.

  • Latin America The major agricultural products of Latin

  • American regions include livestock and grains, such as maize, wheat, soybeans,

  • and rice. Increased temperatures and altered hydrological cycles are

  • predicted to translate to shorter growing seasons, overall reduced biomass

  • production, and lower grain yields. Brazil, Mexico and Argentina alone

  • contribute 70-90% of the total agricultural production in Latin

  • America. In these and other dry regions, maize production is expected to

  • decrease. A study summarizing a number of impact studies of climate change on

  • agriculture in Latin America indicated that wheat is expected to decrease in

  • Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. Livestock, which is the main

  • agricultural product for parts of Argentina, Uruguay, southern Brazil,

  • Venezuela, and Colombia is likely to be reduced. Variability in the degree of

  • production decrease among different regions of Latin America is likely. For

  • example, one study that estimated future maize production in Latin America

  • predicted that by 2055 maize in eastern Brazil will have moderate changes while

  • Venezuela is expected to have drastic decreases.

  • Suggested potential adaptation strategies to mitigate the impacts of

  • global warming on agriculture in Latin America include using plant breeding

  • technologies and installing irrigation infrastructure.

  • = Climate justice and subsistence farmers in Latin America =

  • Several studies that investigated the impacts of climate change on agriculture

  • in Latin America suggest that in the poorer countries of Latin America,

  • agriculture composes the most important economic sector and the primary form of

  • sustenance for small farmers. Maize is the only grain still produced as a

  • sustenance crop on small farms in Latin American nations. Scholars argue that

  • the projected decrease of this grain and other crops will threaten the welfare

  • and the economic development of subsistence communities in Latin

  • America. Food security is of particular concern to rural areas that have weak or

  • non-existent food markets to rely on in the case food shortages.

  • According to scholars who considered the environmental justice implications of

  • climate change, the expected impacts of climate change on subsistence farmers in

  • Latin America and other developing regions are unjust for two reasons.

  • First, subsistence farmers in developing countries, including those in Latin

  • America are disproportionately vulnerable to climate change Second,

  • these nations were the least responsible for causing the problem of anthropogenic

  • induced climate. According to researchers John F. Morton

  • and T. Roberts, disproportionate vulnerability to climate disasters is

  • socially determined. For example, socioeconomic and policy trends

  • affecting smallholder and subsistence farmers limit their capacity to adapt to

  • change. According to W. Baethgen who studied the vulnerability of Latin

  • American agriculture to climate change, a history of policies and economic

  • dynamics has negatively impacted rural farmers. During the 1950s and through

  • the 1980s, high inflation and appreciated real exchange rates reduced

  • the value of agricultural exports. As a result, farmers in Latin America

  • received lower prices for their products compared to world market prices.

  • Following these outcomes, Latin American policies and national crop programs

  • aimed to stimulate agricultural intensification. These national crop

  • programs benefitted larger commercial farmers more. In the 1980s and 1990s low

  • world market prices for cereals and livestock resulted in decreased

  • agricultural growth and increased rural poverty.

  • In the book, Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change, the authors describe the

  • global injustice of climate change between the rich nations of the north,

  • who are the most responsible for global warming and the southern poor countries

  • and minority populations within those countries who are most vulnerable to

  • climate change impacts. Adaptive planning is challenged by the

  • difficulty of predicting local scale climate change impacts. An expert that

  • considered opportunities for climate change adaptation for rural communities

  • argues that a crucial component to adaptation should include government

  • efforts to lessen the effects of food shortages and famines. This researcher

  • also claims that planning for equitable adaptation and agricultural

  • sustainability will require the engagement of farmers in decision making

  • processes. North America

  • A number of studies have been produced which assess the impacts of climate

  • change on agriculture in North America. The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report of

  • agricultural impacts in the region cites 26 different studies. With high

  • confidence, IPCC projected that over the first few decades of this century,

  • moderate climate change would increase aggregate yields of rain-fed agriculture

  • by 5–20%, but with important variability among regions. Major challenges were

  • projected for crops that are near the warm end of their suitable range or

  • which depend on highly utilized water resources.

  • Droughts are becoming more frequent and intense in arid and semiarid western

  • North America as temperatures have been rising, advancing the timing and

  • magnitude of spring snow meltoods and reducing river flow volume in summer.

  • Direct effects of climate change include increased heat and water stress, altered

  • crop phenology, and disrupted symbiotic interactions. These effects may be

  • exacerbated by climate changes in riverow, and the combined effects are likely

  • to reduce the abundance of native trees in favor of non-native herbaceous and

  • drought-tolerant competitors, reduce the habitat quality for many native animals,

  • and slow litter decomposition and nutrient cycling. Climate change effects

  • on human water demand and irrigation may intensify these effects.

  • United States The US Global Change Research Program

  • assessed the literature on the impacts of climate change on agriculture in the

  • United States: Many crops will benefit from increased

  • atmospheric CO2 concentrations and low levels of warming, but higher levels of

  • warming will negatively affect growth and yields. Extreme events will likely

  • reduce crop yields. Weeds. diseases and insect pests benefit

  • from warming, and will require more attention in regards to pest and weed

  • control. Increasing CO2 concentrations will

  • reduce the land's ability to supply adequate livestock feed. Increased heat,

  • disease, and weather extremes will likely reduce livestock productivity.

  • According to a paper by Deschenes and Greenstone, predicted increases in

  • temperature and precipitation will have virtually no effect on the most

  • important crops in the US. Polar regions

  • Anisimov et al.. assessed the literature for the polar region. With medium

  • confidence, they concluded that the benefits of a less severe climate were

  • dependent on local conditions. One of these benefits was judged to be

  • increased agricultural and forestry opportunities.

  • For the Guardian newspaper, Brown reported on how climate change had

  • affected agriculture in Iceland. Rising temperatures had made the widespread

  • sowing of barley possible, which had been untenable twenty years ago. Some of

  • the warming was due to a local effect via ocean currents from the Caribbean,

  • which had also affected fish stocks. Small islands

  • In a literature assessment, Mimura et al. concluded that on small islands,

  • subsistence and commercial agriculture would very likely be adversely affected

  • by climate change. This projection was assigned "high confidence."

  • = Poverty impacts = Researchers at the Overseas Development

  • Institute have investigated the potential impacts climate change could

  • have on agriculture, and how this would affect attempts at alleviating poverty

  • in the developing world. They argued that the effects from moderate climate

  • change are likely to be mixed for developing countries. However, the

  • vulnerability of the poor in developing countries to short term impacts from

  • climate change, notably the increased frequency and severity of adverse

  • weather events is likely to have a negative impact. This, they say, should

  • be taken into account when defining agricultural policy.

  • = Mitigation and adaptation in developing countries =

  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reported that agriculture is

  • responsible for over a quarter of total global greenhouse gas emissions. Given

  • that agriculture’s share in global gross domestic product is about 4 percent,

  • these figures suggest that agriculture is highly greenhouse gas intensive.

  • Innovative agricultural practices and technologies can play a role in climate

  • mitigation and adaptation. This adaptation and mitigation potential is

  • nowhere more pronounced than in developing countries where agricultural

  • productivity remains low; poverty, vulnerability and food insecurity remain

  • high; and the direct effects of climate change are expected to be especially

  • harsh. Creating the necessary agricultural technologies and harnessing

  • them to enable developing countries to adapt their agricultural systems to

  • changing climate will require innovations in policy and institutions

  • as well. In this context, institutions and policies are important at multiple

  • scales. Travis Lybbert and Daniel Sumner suggest

  • six policy principles: The best policy and institutional responses will enhance

  • information flows, incentives and flexibility. Policies and institutions

  • that promote economic development and reduce poverty will often improve

  • agricultural adaptation and may also pave the way for more effective climate

  • change mitigation through agriculture. Business as usual among the world’s poor

  • is not adequate. Existing technology options must be made more available and

  • accessible without overlooking complementary capacity and investments.

  • Adaptation and mitigation in agriculture will require local responses, but

  • effective policy responses must also reflect global impacts and

  • inter-linkages. Trade will play a critical role in both mitigation and

  • adaptation, but will itself be shaped importantly by climate change.

  • The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project was developed in

  • 2010 to evaluate agricultural models and intercompare their ability to predict

  • climate impacts. In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, South America and East

  • Asia, AgMIP regional research teams are conducting integrated assessments to

  • improve understanding of agricultural impacts of climate change at national

  • and regional scales. Other AgMIP initiatives include global gridded

  • modeling, data and information technology tool development, simulation

  • of crop pests and diseases, site-based crop-climate sensitivity studies, and

  • aggregation and scaling. = Crop development models =

  • Models for climate behavior are frequently inconclusive. In order to

  • further study effects of global warming on agriculture, other types of models,

  • such as crop development models, yield prediction, quantities of water or

  • fertilizer consumed, can be used. Such models condense the knowledge

  • accumulated of the climate, soil, and effects observed of the results of

  • various agricultural practices. They thus could make it possible to test

  • strategies of adaptation to modifications of the environment.

  • Because these models are necessarily simplifying natural conditions, it is

  • not clear whether the results they give will have an in-field reality. However,

  • some results are partly validated with an increasing number of experimental

  • results. Other models, such as insect and disease

  • development models based on climate projections are also used development).

  • Scenarios are used in order to estimate climate changes effects on crop

  • development and yield. Each scenario is defined as a set of meteorological

  • variables, based on generally accepted projections. For example, many models

  • are running simulations based on doubled carbon dioxide projections, temperatures

  • raise ranging from 1 °C up to 5 °C, and with rainfall levels an increase or

  • decrease of 20%. Other parameters may include humidity, wind, and solar

  • activity. Scenarios of crop models are testing farm-level adaptation, such as

  • sowing date shift, climate adapted species, irrigation and fertilizer

  • adaptation, resistance to disease. Most developed models are about wheat, maize,

  • rice and soybean. = Temperature potential effect on

  • growing period = Duration of crop growth cycles are above

  • all, related to temperature. An increase in temperature will speed up

  • development. In the case of an annual crop, the duration between sowing and

  • harvesting will shorten. The shortening of such a cycle could have an adverse

  • effect on productivity because senescence would occur sooner.

  • = Effect of elevated carbon dioxide on crops =

  • Carbon dioxide is essential to plant growth. Rising CO2 concentration in the

  • atmosphere can have both positive and negative consequences.

  • Increased CO2 is expected to have positive physiological effects by

  • increasing the rate of photosynthesis. This is known as 'carbon dioxide

  • fertilisation'. Currently, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 380

  • parts per million. In comparison, the amount of oxygen is 210,000 ppm. This

  • means that often plants may be starved of carbon dioxide as the enzyme that

  • fixes CO2, RuBisCo, also fixes oxygen in the process of photorespiration. The

  • effects of an increase in carbon dioxide would be higher on C3 crops than on C4

  • crops, because the former is more susceptible to carbon dioxide shortage.

  • Studies have shown that increased CO2 leads to fewer stomata developing on

  • plants which leads to reduced water usage. Under optimum conditions of

  • temperature and humidity, the yield increase could reach 36%, if the levels

  • of carbon dioxide are doubled. A study in 2014 posited that CO2 fertilisation

  • is underestimated due to not explicitly representing CO2 diffusion inside

  • leaves. Further, few studies have looked at the

  • impact of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations on whole farming systems.

  • Most models study the relationship between CO2 and productivity in

  • isolation from other factors associated with climate change, such as an

  • increased frequency of extreme weather events, seasonal shifts, and so on.

  • In 2005, the Royal Society in London concluded that the purported benefits of

  • elevated carbon dioxide concentrations are "likely to be far lower than

  • previously estimated when factors such as increasing ground-level ozone are

  • taken into account." Effect on quality

  • According to the IPCC's TAR, "The importance of climate change impacts on

  • grain and forage quality emerges from new research. For rice, the amylose

  • content of the grain—a major determinant of cooking qualityis increased under

  • elevated CO2". Cooked rice grain from plants grown in high-CO2 environments

  • would be firmer than that from today's plants. However, concentrations of iron

  • and zinc, which are important for human nutrition, would be lower. Moreover, the

  • protein content of the grain decreases under combined increases of temperature

  • and CO2. Studies using FACE have shown that increases in CO2 lead to decreased

  • concentrations of micronutrients in crop plants. This may have knock-on effects

  • on other parts of ecosystems as herbivores will need to eat more food to

  • gain the same amount of protein. Studies have shown that higher CO2

  • levels lead to reduced plant uptake of nitrogen resulting in crops with lower

  • nutritional value. This would primarily impact on populations in poorer

  • countries less able to compensate by eating more food, more varied diets, or

  • possibly taking supplements. Reduced nitrogen content in grazing

  • plants has also been shown to reduce animal productivity in sheep, which

  • depend on microbes in their gut to digest plants, which in turn depend on

  • nitrogen intake. = Agricultural surfaces and climate

  • changes = Climate change may increase the amount

  • of arable land in high-latitude region by reduction of the amount of frozen

  • lands. A 2005 study reports that temperature in Siberia has increased

  • three degree Celsius in average since 1960. However, reports about the impact

  • of global warming on Russian agriculture indicate conflicting probable effects :

  • while they expect a northward extension of farmable lands, they also warn of

  • possible productivity losses and increased risk of drought.

  • Sea levels are expected to get up to one meter higher by 2100, though this

  • projection is disputed. A rise in the sea level would result in an

  • agricultural land loss, in particular in areas such as South East Asia. Erosion,

  • submergence of shorelines, salinity of the water table due to the increased sea

  • levels, could mainly affect agriculture through inundation of low-lying lands.

  • Low lying areas such as Bangladesh, India and Vietnam will experience major

  • loss of rice crop if sea levels rise as expected by the end of the century.

  • Vietnam for example relies heavily on its southern tip, where the Mekong Delta

  • lies, for rice planting. Any rise in sea level of no more than a meter will drown

  • several km2 of rice paddies, rendering Vietnam incapable of producing its main

  • staple and export of rice. = Erosion and fertility =

  • The warmer atmospheric temperatures observed over the past decades are

  • expected to lead to a more vigorous hydrological cycle, including more

  • extreme rainfall events. Erosion and soil degradation is more likely to

  • occur. Soil fertility would also be affected by global warming. However,

  • because the ratio of carbon to nitrogen is a constant, a doubling of carbon is

  • likely to imply a higher storage of nitrogen in soils as nitrates, thus

  • providing higher fertilizing elements for plants, providing better yields. The

  • average needs for nitrogen could decrease, and give the opportunity of

  • changing often costly fertilisation strategies.

  • Due to the extremes of climate that would result, the increase in

  • precipitations would probably result in greater risks of erosion, whilst at the

  • same time providing soil with better hydration, according to the intensity of

  • the rain. The possible evolution of the organic matter in the soil is a highly

  • contested issue: while the increase in the temperature would induce a greater

  • rate in the production of minerals, lessening the soil organic matter

  • content, the atmospheric CO2 concentration would tend to increase it.

  • = Potential effects of global climate change on pests, diseases and weeds =

  • A very important point to consider is that weeds would undergo the same

  • acceleration of cycle as cultivated crops, and would also benefit from

  • carbonaceous fertilization. Since most weeds are C3 plants, they are likely to

  • compete even more than now against C4 crops such as corn. However, on the

  • other hand, some results make it possible to think that weedkillers could

  • gain in effectiveness with the temperature increase.

  • Global warming would cause an increase in rainfall in some areas, which would

  • lead to an increase of atmospheric humidity and the duration of the wet

  • seasons. Combined with higher temperatures, these could favor the

  • development of fungal diseases. Similarly, because of higher

  • temperatures and humidity, there could be an increased pressure from insects

  • and disease vectors. = Glacier retreat and disappearance =

  • The continued retreat of glaciers will have a number of different quantitative

  • impacts. In the areas that are heavily dependent on water runoff from glaciers

  • that melt during the warmer summer months, a continuation of the current

  • retreat will eventually deplete the glacial ice and substantially reduce or

  • eliminate runoff. A reduction in runoff will affect the ability to irrigate

  • crops and will reduce summer stream flows necessary to keep dams and

  • reservoirs replenished. Approximately 2.4 billion people live in

  • the drainage basin of the Himalayan rivers. India, China, Pakistan,

  • Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Myanmar could experience floods followed

  • by severe droughts in coming decades. In India alone, the Ganges provides water

  • for drinking and farming for more than 500 million people. The west coast of

  • North America, which gets much of its water from glaciers in mountain ranges

  • such as the Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada, also would be affected.

  • = Ozone and UV-B = Some scientists think agriculture could

  • be affected by any decrease in stratospheric ozone, which could

  • increase biologically dangerous ultraviolet radiation B. Excess

  • ultraviolet radiation B can directly affect plant physiology and cause

  • massive amounts of mutations, and indirectly through changed pollinator

  • behavior, though such changes are not simple to quantify. However, it has not

  • yet been ascertained whether an increase in greenhouse gases would decrease

  • stratospheric ozone levels. In addition, a possible effect of rising

  • temperatures is significantly higher levels of ground-level ozone, which

  • would substantially lower yields. = ENSO effects on agriculture =

  • ENSO will affect monsoon patterns more intensely in the future as climate

  • change warms up the ocean's water. Crops that lie on the equatorial belt or under

  • the tropical Walker circulation, such as rice, will be affected by varying

  • monsoon patterns and more unpredictable weather. Scheduled planting and

  • harvesting based on weather patterns will become less effective.

  • Areas such as Indonesia where the main crop consists of rice will be more

  • vulnerable to the increased intensity of ENSO effects in the future of climate

  • change. University of Washington professor, David Battisti, researched

  • the effects of future ENSO patterns on the Indonesian rice agriculture using

  • [IPCC]'s 2007 annual report and 20 different logistical models mapping out

  • climate factors such as wind pressure, sea-level, and humidity, and found that

  • rice harvest will experience a decrease in yield. Bali and Java, which holds 55%

  • of the rice yields in Indonesia, will be likely to experience 9–10% probably of

  • delayed monsoon patterns, which prolongs the hungry season. Normal planting of

  • rice crops begin in October and harevest by January. However, as climate change

  • affects ENSO and consequently delays planting, harvesting will be late and in

  • drier conditions, resulting in less potential yields.

  • Impact of agriculture on climate change The agricultural sector is a driving

  • force in the gas emissions and land use effects thought to cause climate change.

  • In addition to being a significant user of land and consumer of fossil fuel,

  • agriculture contributes directly to greenhouse gas emissions through

  • practices such as rice production and the raising of livestock; according to

  • the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the three main causes of the

  • increase in greenhouse gases observed over the past 250 years have been fossil

  • fuels, land use, and agriculture. = Land use =

  • Agriculture contributes to greenhouse gas increases through land use in four

  • main ways: CO2 releases linked to deforestation

  • Methane releases from rice cultivation Methane releases from enteric

  • fermentation in cattle Nitrous oxide releases from fertilizer

  • application Together, these agricultural processes

  • comprise 54% of methane emissions, roughly 80% of nitrous oxide emissions,

  • and virtually all carbon dioxide emissions tied to land use.

  • The planet's major changes to land cover since 1750 have resulted from

  • deforestation in temperate regions: when forests and woodlands are cleared to

  • make room for fields and pastures, the albedo of the affected area increases,

  • which can result in either warming or cooling effects, depending on local

  • conditions. Deforestation also affects regional carbon reuptake, which can

  • result in increased concentrations of CO2, the dominant greenhouse gas.

  • Land-clearing methods such as slash and burn compound these effects by burning

  • biomatter, which directly releases greenhouse gases and particulate matter

  • such as soot into the air. Livestock

  • Livestock and livestock-related activities such as deforestation and

  • increasingly fuel-intensive farming practices are responsible for over 18%

  • of human-made greenhouse gas emissions, including:

  • 9% of global carbon dioxide emissions 35–40% of global methane emissions

  • 64% of global nitrous oxide emissions Livestock activities also contribute

  • disproportionately to land-use effects, since crops such as corn and alfalfa are

  • cultivated in order to feed the animals. Worldwide, livestock production occupies

  • 70% of all land used for agriculture, or 30% of the land surface of the Earth.

  • See also Aridification

  • Biochar Desertification

  • Environmental issues with agriculture Fisheries and Climate Change

  • Food security Global warming and wine

  • International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development

  • addressing the links between climate change & agriculture

  • Land Allocation Decision Support System – a research tool that is used to test

  • how climate change may affect agriculture

  • Retreat of glaciers since 1850 Slash-and-char

  • Terra preta Water crisis

  • Climate resilience Notes

  • References Annex I NC, 6th national communications

  • from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention including those that are also

  • Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate

  • Change . Archived 2 August 2014. Battisti, David; Naylor, "Historical

  • warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat", Science

  • 323: 240–4, doi:10.1126/science.1164363, PMID 19131626, retrieved 13 April 2012

  • Cline, W.R., "Global Warming and Agriculture", Finance and Development 45

  • . Archived 17 August 2014. HLPE, Food security and climate change.

  • A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition

  • of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture

  • Organization of the United Nations . Archived 12 December 2014.

  • Hoffmann, U., ed., Trade and Environment Review 2013: Wake up before it is too

  • late: Make agriculture truly sustainable now for food security in a changing

  • climate, Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Conference on Trade and

  • Development, ISSN 1810-5432 . Archived 28 November 2014.

  • IPCC AR5 WG2 A, Field, C.B.,; et al., eds., Climate Change 2014: Impacts,

  • Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects.

  • Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press .

  • Also available at IPCC Working Group 2. Archives: Main IPCC website: 16 December

  • 2014; IPCC WG2: 5 November 2014. IPCC AR5 WG3, Edenhofer, O.,; et al.,

  • eds., Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working

  • Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on

  • Climate Change, Cambridge University Press . Also available at

  • mitigation2014.org. Archives: Main IPCC website: 27 November 2014;

  • mitigation2014.org: 30 December 2014. Lobell, David; Burke, Tebaldi,

  • Mastrandrea, Falcon, Naylor, "Prioritizing climate change adaptation

  • needs for food security in 2030", Science 319: 607–10,

  • doi:10.1126/science.1152339, PMID 18239122, retrieved 13 April 2012 .

  • Lobell, D.; et al., Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food

  • security - Policy Brief, Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford

  • University CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.. Archived 27 September 2014.

  • Non-Annex I NC, Non-Annex I national communications, United Nations Framework

  • Convention on Climate Change . Archived 13 September 2014.

  • US NRC, Climate Stabilization Targets: Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts

  • over Decades to Millennia, Washington, D.C., USA: National Academies Press

  • Further reading Fischer G., Shah M. and van Velthuizen

  • H. "Climate Change and Agricultural Vulnerability". International Institute

  • for Applied Systems Analysis. Report prepared under UN Institutional Contract

  • Agreement 1113 for World Summit on Sustainable Development. Laxenburg,

  • Austria Climate change pushing coffee to

  • extinction? 17 October 2011 Rosenzweig, Cynthia and Daniel Hillel ed

  • "Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems: The Agricultural Model

  • Intercomparison and Improvement Project Integrated Crop and Economic

  • Assessments. Imperial College Press/ World Scientific Publishing.

  • External links Climate change on the Food and

  • Agriculture Organization of the United Nations website.

  • A comprehensive report on the relationship between climate change,

  • agriculture and food security by the International Food Policy Research

  • Institute. See also an overview of IFPRI's climate change research.

  • Climate Change, Rice and Asian Agriculture: 12 Things to Know Asian

  • Development Bank LADSSClimate Change and Agriculture

  • Are we asking the right questions? Food Security of Women in the Context of

  • Climate ChangeOnline Discussion Forum The Guardian's [climate change coverage

  • http:www.guardian.co.ukclimate-change] often includes discussions about food

  • security, including the 30 June 2005 article,One in six countries facing food

  • shortage How is climate change threatening

  • agriculture? section of official popularized version of IAASTD synthesis

  • report Impacts of Climate Change on European

  • Forests and Options for Adaptation Report to the European Commission

  • Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development; report written by

  • European Forest Institute with University of Natural Resources and Life

  • Sciences, Vienna, Institute of Forest Entomology, Forest Pathology and Forest

  • Protection, INRAUMR Biodiversité Gènes et Communautés and Accademia

  • Italiana di Scienze Forestali) Climate Change and Agriculture in the

  • ECA region a regional look by the World Bank at climate change and agriculture

  • in countries in Europe and Central Asia. Climate Change, Agriculture and Food

  • Security Global scientific research program that seeks to overcome the

  • threats to agriculture and food security in a changing climate, exploring new

  • ways of helping vulnerable rural communities adjust to global changes in

  • climate. Meat Eater's Guide to Climate Change +

  • Health Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions associated with

  • 20 types of meat, fish, dairy and vegetable proteins, as well as these

  • foodseffects on health. Climate | Farming First

Climate change and agriculture are interrelated processes, both of which

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

氣候變化與農業 (Climate change and agriculture)

  • 389 32
    richardwang 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字