humans have had on the world around us for a solid 50 years.

And while it's hard to get a handle on exactly how

the choices we make every day affect the environment,

there's no question that our lifestyles,

our cars, our need for more farmland,

and our love of all kinds of plastic stuff,

are putting the hurt on ecosystems all over the world.

Human activity all by itself, just people doing what they do,

could be responsible for the extinction of nearly a thousand

plant and animal species to date, most of them over the last century.

And even if you don't particularly care about the Barbary lion

or the Saint Helena olive, or the passenger pigeon,

or anything else we've driven into extinction, the thing is,

we need these other organisms.

The ecosystems of the world are working very hard for us, every day:

filtering water, sucking carbon dioxide out of the air,

producing all the food we eat,

all very important ecosystem services,

benefits that the natural world provides us for free.

So, having ecosystems and keeping them intact is important,

not only for the organisms who live in them, but also for us,

the animals who rely on them for thousands and thousands

of things that we could never do for ourselves.

Over the next two episodes,

we're going to look at these systems and how our actions are

affecting the ecosystems that we need for our survival.

Basically, we're messing up the environment 6 ways from Sunday.

But to make it easy on ourselves, let's start with the top 5.

We often hear about all the different ways

that our behavior is affecting the biosphere.

Extinctions, climate change, deforestation, acid rain,

desertification, pollution and more.

But you're asking, "Well, why are all those things bad?

What's going on?

How is this stuff turning the earth into sausage?

I don't understand."

Well I do understand, which is why I'm qualified to make this video.

So, let me lay it on you.

The services that ecosystems provide for us, all the dirty work

they do, can be broken up into four different categories.

They're things that we could never, ever, ever duplicate or work around,

no matter what kind of smarty-pants technology we come up with:

First, healthy ecosystems provide support services that create

and replenish the foundation of the earth's biological systems.

These services include recycling all of the compounds that are

necessary for life, through the carbon, water,

nitrogen and phosphorous cycles.

They also include other processes we've talked about before,

like forming new soils and producing atmospheric oxygen.

Some ecosystems contribute more to these services than others, but

none of them can get these basic jobs done unless they are intact.

Two: Ecosystems also perform provisioning services,

giving us the raw materials we need to live.

Like, the ocean provides food in the form of fish sticks and stuff.

And rivers, aquifers and other freshwater sources give us water.

Plants and animals also yield all kinds of fiber

that we use for clothing and shelter.

And all around us we find sources of fuel, whether it's biomass

in the form of grasses or wood, hydropower in the form of flowing

water, or the carbon locked in millions-of-years-old trees

that we're now re-releasing into the atmosphere.

But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Ecosystems also perform super-important regulating services,

moderating many of the earth's systems that

can get dangerous if they get out of whack.

Like as we learned in Biology: fungi and other organisms take on

the task of decomposing dead things and poop.

Meanwhile, plants help filter the water you drink

and the air you breathe, and provide flood control.

And they also absorb all that carbon you exhale and that your

car belches out, which in turn, helps regulate the climate.

And finally, number four, ecosystems are just kind of awesome.

It's nice to be surrounded by happy plants and critters,

doing their business.

Nice, robust ecosystems give us places to play,

scenes to inspire us, and things to just discover and learn about.

These are their less tangible, but still important cultural services.

An interesting thing about ecosystem services is that

economists actually can, and do, calculate the monetary value

they provide for humanity.

If, for example, we had to do all of the things that ecosystems

do for us, it would cost us 46 trillion dollars per year.

Which is a lot, considering that the output of the global economy

is 66 trillion dollars per year.

So, yeah, we should be happy that we don't have to pay for all that.

But you'll notice that I keep saying that ecosystems

can only serve up all this awesome sauce if they are "intact."

By that I mean they specifically have to have

their biodiversity intact, because ecosystems are just

a bunch of living and nonliving things working together,

so unless their living parts are healthy,

they're basically just rocks and weather.

The main reason biodiversity is so important is that

it makes ecosystems more resilient to that never-ending change

we talked about a few weeks ago.

Ecosystems with high biodiversity are way more resilient

to disturbances than those with low biodiversity.

In a high-biodiversity system, if you take one species out

of the mix, it's less likely that the ecosystem will collapse.

Take a hectare of Amazonian rainforest: in that little patch

of land, there are more different species of plants and animals

than there are in all of Europe.

So if a species of insect goes extinct, there's less risk

that the whole house of cards will fall than, say,

in the Sonoran Desert, where there are very few organisms, so the

disappearance of one species could affect the entire ecosystem.

So the best way to understand our impacts on the environment

is through how we affect biodiversity.

Unfortunately, it turns out that we've been doing a really

bang-up job of endangering some of the highest biodiversity

ecosystems on the planet.

In some cases, we're having impacts on the organisms

themselves directly, in other cases, we're affecting biodiversity

indirectly, by creating one or two changes in that ecosystem

that cascade into all kinds of problems for living things.

First, let's look at that hectare of Amazonian rainforest again,

because even though it's one of those super-resilient ecosystems,

we're having a serious impact on it. How?

Well, first by removing a lot of what makes a forest a forest: trees.

According to some estimates, we're clear-cutting around

8 thousand hectares of trees a day to provide land to graze cattle on,

and to harvest wood to make coffee tables or whatever.

When you cut down a hectare of rainforest, suddenly a place

where a few thousand species used to live turns into a place

where just a handful of species live: some grass, some weeds,

maybe some rats or mice, some insects and, you know, some cows.

Because man, we love cows.

And when you take out so many of the living things

on that hectare of land, a bunch of things happen.

For starters, you're not just affecting that ecosystem,

but neighboring ecosystems as well.

For instance, all those trees that were cut down provided

the service of regulating the flow of all that rain

that rainforests get, not only by absorbing some of it

but also by slowing down runoff, letting the water seep

into the soil, before slowly making its way into streams

and rivers and ultimately the ocean.

But when those trees are gone, the water hits the land

and shoots off into the nearest stream, causing erosion

and washing minerals and chemicals all the way to the sea,

where it affects marine ecosystems.

And when I say "affect," I don't mean in a good way.

This, my friends, is what's called a cascade effect,

in this case caused by deforestation,

one of the most obvious, observable human impacts.

In addition to causing more flooding and changes in water quality,

deforestation on a large scale can lead to another impact:

desertification, or the spread of dry, unproductive landscapes.

But cutting down trees doesn't automatically turn a forest

into a desert, desertification is driven along by

additional factors, like overgrazing by cattle, and over-irrigation.

So how can over-watering something make it turn into a desert?

Well, when we use groundwater to irrigate crops,

the natural salts in the groundwater build up in the soil,

eventually making it so salty that nothing wants to live there.

Over time, fertile land near desert ecosystems becomes overtaxed,

and the desert spreads.

And this is exactly what has happened in China over the past century,

where overgrazing and the cities' unquenchable thirst for water have

caused the Gobi Desert to grow by 3,600 square kilometers every year.

Now, these two impacts by themselves clearly limit

the biodiversity of otherwise lush ecosystems.

But because they also result in fewer trees that provide

the all-important services of releasing oxygen and absorbing CO2,

you know what domino's gonna fall next: the climate.

Carbon dioxide: the principle greenhouse gas.

It insulates the Earth.

So it stands to reason that the more CO2 there is in the atmosphere,

the warmer the earth will be.

And the thing is, we're reducing the size of forests

at the same time as we're unleashing all kinds of

greenhouse gases by burning fossil fuels.

This double-whammy is much of what's driving global warming.

As a result, we're seeing decreases in the levels of polar sea ice,

which means less habit for polar bears, seals and sea birds.

More temperate animals are moving closer to the poles, and hotter,

drier conditions are causing more grass fires and forest fires.

And while the climate has changed many times in the past,

those changes usually took place over centuries or even millennia,

giving organisms time to adapt or move,

these changes are taking place within our lifetimes.

And it's kind of a huge deal. And it's complicated.

It'd take me at least, like, 10 minutes and 52 seconds

to explain it all in detail.

Which is why I did that in another video.

By now hopefully you can see how one human impact

can lead to another, and how, even indirectly,

they can end up reducing biodiversity.

But it's hard to overlook the more immediate impacts

we can have on ecosystems.

One of the more in-your-face ways we affect biodiversity

is by introducing nonnative species,

either intentionally or unintentionally.

Again, there are so many examples of this

that you can learn more about it in another video I did.

But suffice it to say: whether it's kudzu in North America,

or cane toads in Australia, invasive species have a knack

for out-competing or outright eating native species

to the point that it rocks the world of an entire ecosystem.

And finally, probably the most direct impact we have

on biodiversity is simply over-harvesting certain organisms.

We're overfishing the oceans to meet growing demand

for popular fish species, like tuna,

while on land we're exterminating important predators,

like wolves, to protect livestock...those cows again.

And the less diverse those ecosystems are,

the more vulnerable they become to disturbances,

including those other 4 impacts I just mentioned.

And the fact is, there's a bunch more where those came from.

Because there's a whole separate set of effects that humanity

has on the biosphere that stems simply from us putting the wrong

amounts of certain stuff in the wrong place at the wrong time.

That's what we call pollution, so tune in next time

when we'll explore what it really is, where exactly

it's coming from, and what we can do about it.

Thank you for watching another kind of depressing

episode of Crash Course Ecology.

And thanks to everyone who helped us put it together.

There's a table of contents over there

if you want to click to review anything.

Or the links are down below in the description.

And if you have any questions or comments or ideas for us,