Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • Today we're going to um work on a whole new concept and that is

  • the concept of electric flux. We've come a long way.

  • We started out with Coulomb's law.

  • We got electric field lines. And now we have electric flux.

  • Suppose I have an electric field which is like so

  • and I bring in that electric field a surface,

  • an open surface like a handkerchief or a piece of

  • paper. And so here it is.

  • Something like that. And I carve this surface up in

  • very small surface elements, each with size DA,

  • that's the area, teeny weeny little area,

  • and let this be the normal, N roof, the normal on that

  • surface. So now the local electric field

  • say at that location would be for instance this.

  • It's a vector. The electric flux D phi that

  • goes through this little surface now is defined as the dot

  • product of E and the vector perpendicular to this element

  • which has this as a magnitude DA.

  • Now our book will always write for NDA simply DA.

  • So I will do that also although I don't like it but I will

  • follow the notation of the book. So this vector DA is always

  • perpendicular to that little element DA and it has the

  • magnitude DA. And so this since it is a dot

  • product is the magnitude of E times the area DA times the

  • cosine of the angle between these two vectors,

  • theta. And this is scalar.

  • The number can be larger than zero, smaller than zero,

  • and it can be zero. And I can calculate the flux

  • through the entire surface by doing an integral over that

  • whole surface. The unit of flux follows

  • immediately from the definition. That is newtons per coulombs

  • for the units of this flux, is newtons per coulombs times

  • square meters. But no one ever thinks of it

  • that way. Just SU SI units.

  • I can give you a some intuition for this flux by comparing it

  • first with an airflow. These red arrows that you see

  • there represent the velocity of air and you see there a black

  • rectangle three times.

  • In the first case notice that the normal to the surface of

  • that area is parallel to the velocity vector of the air and

  • so if you want to know now what the amount of air is in terms of

  • cubic meters per second going through this rectangle it would

  • be V times A, it's very simple.

  • However, if you rotate this rectangle ninety degrees so that

  • the normal to that rectangle is perpendicular to the velocity

  • vector, nothing goes through that

  • rectangle and so it's zero. And so now the flux -- the air

  • flux is zero, and if the angle is sixty

  • degrees then it is of course V times A times the cosine of

  • sixty degrees. Now think of these red vectors

  • as electric fields. So now the electric flux going

  • in the first case through that surface is now simply E times A.

  • In the second case it's zero. And in the last case it is EA

  • times the cosine of sixty degrees.

  • So you can sometimes think of this as airflows.

  • We also saw that when we dealt with field lines that can come

  • in sometimes very handy. I now take a surface which is

  • not open as this one is, this is an open surface.

  • Can come in from both sides. But now I choose one that is

  • completely closed. Like a potato bag or a balloon.

  • I'll draw, put this line in here to give you a feeling

  • there's a completely closed surface.

  • So you can only get inside if you penetrate that surface from

  • the outside. And so now I can put up here

  • and here these normals, DA and there's another normal

  • here, maybe in this direction DA, in this case by convention

  • the normal to the surface locally to the surface

  • is always from the inside of the surface to the outside world.

  • It's uniquely determined because it's a closed surface.

  • Here it was not uniquely determined.

  • I arbitrarily chose this one but I could have flipped it over

  • a hundred eighty degrees since it's an open surface it's

  • ill-defined. Here it's never ill-defined.

  • So the normal is always chosen to go from the inside to the

  • outside. And now I can calculate the

  • total flux going through this closed

  • surface. Locally multiplying E with DA,

  • dot product over the whole surface, out comes a certain

  • number, and that is now therefore the integral of E dot

  • DA integrated over that closed surface and since it is a closed

  • surface we put a circle here to remind us that it is a closed

  • integral and here in this case it is a closed surface.

  • And this now is the total flux through that surface.

  • It could be larger than zero. It could be smaller than zero.

  • It's a scalar, it's not a vector.

  • It could be equal to zero. If it's equal to zero then you

  • can think of it whatever flows in if you think of it as air

  • also flows out. If more flows out than flows in

  • then it is positive. If more flows in than flows out

  • it is negative. So let's now calculate the flux

  • for a very simple case where I have a point charge.

  • So here I have a point charge and I'm going to put a bag

  • around this point charge and the bag is a sphere.

  • It is a sphere and the sphere has radius capital R.

  • And let this charge be plus Q. Just for simplicity.

  • Well, I pick a small element DA here.

  • And at element DA is radially outward.

  • DA. This is the normal to that

  • surface so that this radial. The electric field at that

  • point is also radial. We have dealt with that before.

  • So DA and E not only here but anywhere on the surface of this

  • sphere are parallel. For the cosine of the angle

  • equals one. I can also introduce here the

  • unit vector R roof which is the unit vector going from capital Q

  • to that element where I evaluate the teeny weeny little amount of

  • flux. So if now I want to know what

  • the total flux is through this

  • sphere that's very easy because since this is a sphere the E

  • vector in magnitude is everywhere the same because the

  • radius is the same, the same distance to this

  • charge, and DA and E are parallel, so it's simply the

  • surface four pi R squared of that sphere times E.

  • And so now I have that the total

  • flux through that closed surface is simply four pi R

  • squared times E. Well what is E?

  • The electric field at this distance R equals Q divided by

  • four pi epsilon zero R squared times R roof.

  • That gives me the direction and so if I know that the flux is

  • four pi R squared times E I put the four

  • pi R squared here, I lose the four pi R squared,

  • and I find that the E vector, at least the magnitude of the

  • electric field -- uh excuse me, that the flux phi,

  • that's what I want to calculate, I multiply this by E,

  • equals Q divided by epsilon zero.

  • And this is independent of the distance R.

  • And that's not so surprising because if you think of it as

  • air flowing out then all the air has to come out somehow whether

  • I make the sphere this big or whether I make the sphere this

  • big. So the flux being independent

  • of the size of my sphere, the flux is given by the charge

  • which is right here at the center divided by epsilon zero.

  • Now if I had chosen some other shape, not a sphere,

  • but I have dented it like this, it's clear that the air that

  • flows out would be exactly the same.

  • And so I don't have to take a sphere to find this result.

  • I could have taken any type of strange closed surface around

  • this point charge and I would have found exactly the same

  • result. And if I put more than one

  • charge inside this potato bag then clearly since I know that

  • electric fields from different charges can be added,

  • should be added vectorially, it is clear that the relation

  • should also hold for any collection of charges inside the

  • bag and therefore we now arrive at our first milestone in eight

  • oh two, which we call Gauss's law.

  • And Gauss's law says that the flux, the electric flux,

  • going through a closed surface, being

  • the closed surface of E dot DA is the sum of all charges Q

  • which are inside the bag that you may choose at any time you

  • pick that bag divided by epsilon zero.

  • And this is the first of four equations of Maxwell which are

  • at the heart of this course. So the electric flux through

  • any closed surface is always the

  • charge inside that closed surface divided by epsilon zero.

  • And if that flux happens to be zero, it means there is no net

  • charge inside the bag. There could be positive,

  • there could be negative charges, but the net is zero.

  • Gauss's law always holds. No matter how weird the charge

  • distribution inside the bag. No matter how weird the shape

  • of this bag. It always holds.

  • But Gauss's law won't help you very much if you don't have a

  • situation whereby the charges are distributed in a very

  • symmetric way. Gauss's law holds but it

  • doesn't do you any good if you want to calculate the electric

  • field. In order to calculate

  • successfully the electric field you do need forms of symmetry,

  • and there are three forms of symmetry that we will deal with

  • in eight oh two. One is of course spherical

  • symmetry. Another one is cylindrical

  • symmetry. And a third one is flat planes

  • with uniformly charged distributions.

  • Then we also have situations of symmetry.

  • And so now I would like to as a first example use an application

  • of Gauss's law and I will start with a situation of spherical

  • symmetry. And I use a thin shell,

  • a hollow sphere, which is thin,

  • and so this radius is R and I put charge Q on here but it is

  • uniformly distributed. That's crucial.

  • If it's not uniformly distributed I have no symmetry,

  • I can't do the problem. So it's uniformly distributed.

  • We will learn later in the course that it's very easy to do

  • this because any conductor of this shape if you bring charge

  • on it will automatically distribute itself uniformly.

  • So we have the charge plus Q on there uniformly distributed,

  • that's a must, and I would like to

  • know now what is the electric field here at a distance R from

  • the center and what is the electric -- electric field here

  • at a distance R from the center. In other words I want to know

  • what is the electric field everywhere in space.

  • Just due to this charged -- uniformly charged sphere.

  • And with Gauss's law it just goes like that.

  • You now have to choose your Gauss surface.

  • And if you don't choose it in a clever way you get nowhere.

  • In a case like this I would think it

  • is rather obvious that the Gauss surface that you would

  • choose are themselves spheres, concentric spheres.

  • If you want to know what the electric field is at this point

  • you choose a sphere with this radius R going through that

  • point and if you want to know what it here is you choose a

  • sphere going through that point. All the way enclosed.

  • It's a concentric sphere. And now you have to use

  • symmetry arguments. And the symmetry arguments are

  • the following.

  • Since this is spherically symmetric, this problem,

  • if you were here, whatever the electric field is

  • here in magnitude must be the same as it is there and it must

  • be the same as it is there. Because of the symmetry of the

  • problem, it couldn't be any larger here than it could be

  • here. That's obvious.

  • That's a symmetry argument because the charge here is

  • uniformly distributed. That's symmetry argument number

  • one. Now comes another symmetry

  • argument. And that is the electric field

  • if there is an electric field must

  • be either radially pointing outwards or radially pointing

  • inwards. So either it has to be like

  • this or it has to be like this and here the same.

  • Either like this or like this. Because we already know if this

  • is a positive charge then it's going to be pointing outward.

  • It cannot go like this or like this because nature could not

  • decide in this spherically symmetric problem to go like

  • this or like this. It can only go radially.

  • That's the second symmetry argument.

  • So now if we go to this sphere now and we know that E is

  • radially outwards apart from a plus or a minus sign,

  • apart from the fact that the angle between DA and E could

  • either be zero degrees or a hundred eighty degrees,

  • we know now that the surface area of that sphere,

  • which is four pi R squared, times the magnitude of the E

  • vector right here, I can do that now because DA

  • and E are either parallel or antiparallel.

  • That must be equal to Q inside divided by epsilon zero.

  • There is no Q inside, so E must be zero.

  • That's an amazing result. You say well uh there's no

  • charge inside. Still an amazing result.

  • Because it means that anywhere inside here no matter what

  • radius you choose the electric field equals exactly zero.

  • And it means that if some crazy conspiracy of all these charges

  • that are uniformly distributed here which

  • each individually contribute to the electric field inside

  • through Coulomb's law that all those together can for through a

  • conspiracy make the E field everywhere inside zero.

  • It's a nontrivial result. All right.

  • So now we know that the E field inside is zero.

  • So this is for R smaller than R.

  • Let's now go R larger than R. Everything I told you holds for

  • the sphere which is outside this

  • hollow sphere. Everything holds.

  • The E field here must be the same everywhere on the surface.

  • DA and E are either parallel or antiparallel.

  • So I can write down again that four pi R squared which is the

  • surface area times the electric field vector must be the Q

  • inside divided by epsilon zero but this Q is that Q.

  • It's not zero. There is charge inside.

  • And so now I know that the electric field E

  • in terms of its magnitude is Q divided by four pi R squared

  • epsilon zero. And we know the direction if it

  • is positive of course it is radially outwards and if this is

  • negative it's radially inwards. And this is a nontrivial

  • result. We have seen this before.

  • If I have put all the charge right here at the middle at the

  • center we would have gotten exactly the same answer.

  • We've seen that before. In other

  • words whether the charge is uniformly distributed over a

  • sphere or whether the charge is all of it exactly at the center

  • of the sphere, that makes no difference for

  • the E field as long as you're outside the sphere.

  • If you plot the electric field as a function of R and if here

  • is capital R and if this is the -- the field strength,

  • then you would get that the electric field is zero

  • inside, jumps to a maximum value and this falls off as one

  • over R squared proportional to one over R squared.

  • If I go back to the situation that the charge -- that the

  • electric field inside is zero, you may say isn't that a little

  • bit of a cheat. Because yeah there is no charge

  • inside. But have you really used the

  • charge outside. And if you have used it how did

  • you use it.

  • Well I have used it. I use it through my symmetry

  • arguments. The symmetry arguments take

  • into account that the charge is uniformly distributed.

  • If the charge on the sphere had not been uniformly distributed I

  • could not have used the symmetry argument and therefore the

  • electric field inside would in fact not have been zero.

  • If there is more charge on the sphere here than there is there

  • the field inside the sphere is not zero.

  • So I have used all that charge by using my symmetry argument.

  • Gauss's law and Coulomb's law in a way are the same law.

  • They both link the electric field with the charge Q.

  • Key is the fact that the electric force falls off as one

  • over R square. If the electric field strength

  • did not fall off as one over R square Gauss's law would not

  • even hold. And the electric field inside

  • this uniformly charged sphere would

  • not be zero. So it is the immediate

  • consequence of the fact that electric forces fall off as one

  • over R squared. Gravitational forces also fall

  • off as one over R squared. Therefore if you take a planet

  • if it existed which is a hollow spherically spherical planet

  • with hollow inside it means there would be no

  • gravitational field inside that hollow planet.

  • So if you were there there would be no gravitational force

  • on you. If it is spherical.

  • If that planet were a cubical planet then the gravitational

  • field inside would not be zero. You say well big deal,

  • with eight oh one we always take a planet and then it's not

  • as far as we're outside the planet we put all the mass and

  • we consider it as a point. Yeah indeed.

  • It's not a big deal for you and it

  • is not a big deal for me but it was a big deal for Newton.

  • He intuitively sensed that it was correct that if you have a

  • planet of uniform mass distribution that you can

  • consider it as a point mass as long as you're outside the

  • planet. But it took him twenty years to

  • prove it and he finally published his results.

  • It would take us now thirty seconds.

  • He didn't have access to Gauss's law.

  • Came about a hundred years later.

  • But the net result is that you see here in front of you that if

  • you have uniformly charge distribution,

  • and you can draw the parallel with gravity,

  • that it's you get the same electric field outside that you

  • would have gotten if all the charge is at one location.

  • At the center. This is spherical symmetry,

  • number one. That's the easiest symmetry

  • that we have in eight oh two. Now I will present you with a

  • second form of symmetry which is a

  • flat horizontal plane. And I want you to work out most

  • of it but I'll help you a little bit to set it up.

  • Suppose we have a plane which is very very large.

  • Think of it for now as infinitely large.

  • That doesn't exist of course infinitely large.

  • And I put on this plane charge. And I put a certain amount of

  • charge density which I call sigma.

  • Sigma is an amount of charge Q per area A.

  • So it is a certain number of coulombs per square meter.

  • And it's uniformly distributed, so the whole plane everywhere

  • has the same number of coulombs per square meter.

  • Or microcoulombs or nanocoulombs,

  • whatever you prefer. And this is a plane which is

  • huge and you are being asked what is the electric field

  • anywhere in space, just like we before we ask what

  • is the electric field anywhere

  • inside the sphere and anywhere outside the sphere.

  • Now I want to know what it is anywhere in the vicinity of this

  • plane. If now you pick a clever Gauss

  • surface the answer pops out very quickly.

  • If you would choose a sphere as a Gauss surface you're dead in

  • the waters, you get nowhere because there's no spherical

  • symmetry. I will define for you that

  • Gauss surface but I want you to work out at

  • home how you get the electric field.

  • Suppose I want to know what the electric field is at a distance

  • D above the plane. What I do now is I choose this

  • as my Gauss surface. Watch me closely.

  • This is the intersection with the plane.

  • This is my Gauss surface. It is a closed surface.

  • Three conditions have to be met for you to be able to calculate

  • what the E vector is at that location D.

  • The first one is that this is a flat plane here and this is the

  • same flat plane. Must be parallel to this plane.

  • That's a must. If you don't do that you can't

  • use Gauss's law. The second one is that these

  • vertical walls that you have here are indeed perpendicular to

  • that plane. In other words these are

  • parallel and these are ver- exactly vertical.

  • If you don't make them vertical if you do this you're dead in

  • the waters. Can't use Gauss's law very

  • effectively. And then the third argument

  • which is very important that this flat surface is a distance

  • D above the plane and that this flat surface is

  • exactly the same distance below the plane.

  • And you can already smell why that is important.

  • Because if you ever want to use a symmetry argument if this

  • plane is uniformly charged the electric field vector here in

  • terms of magnitude obviously must be the same as there in

  • terms of magnitude, maybe not in terms of

  • direction, as long as this D is the same as that D.

  • So that's why it's important that the two Ds are the same.

  • And the only charge that you have inside when you apply

  • Gauss's law is the charge which is of course here.

  • That's the only charge inside that closed box.

  • If you work this out at home you will find an amazing result.

  • You will find that the electric flux through these vertical

  • walls is zero. Nothing comes out through the

  • vertical walls. Think about it.

  • Why that is. Use symmetry arguments.

  • But something comes out here or comes in here if it is a

  • negative charge and something goes out here.

  • And so you only have two contributions from those two end

  • plates. You'll work on that and you

  • will find perhaps to your amazing result that the electric

  • field equals sigma divided by two epsilon zero and that it is

  • independent of how far you are from that plane.

  • Whether you're very far away or whether you're close it's the

  • same. So if this is that plane and if

  • the plane is positively charged

  • then E would be like this here and E would be like this here

  • and it would be independent of distance and if it is negatively

  • charged E would be like so and it would be like -- like so

  • pointing towards the plane and in all cases would the magnitude

  • be sigma divided by two epsilon zero.

  • Does it mean if I go very far away

  • from that plane that it is still independent of the

  • distance? Yeah, if that plane is

  • infinitely large. But if the plane is only as

  • large as the lecture hall here then clearly it would hold very

  • accurately as long as I stay relatively close to the plane.

  • In other words if my distance to the plane is small compared

  • to the linear size of the plane. But if I go miles away,

  • well of course then that plane is charged looks like a point

  • charge if I'm five miles away from

  • twenty-six one hundred if the plane is only as large as this

  • lecture hall then it looks like a point charge and obviously the

  • electric field will then fall off as one over R squared.

  • So when I say the E field doesn't change with distance it

  • means of course that you have to be relatively close to the

  • surface relative to the linear size of that surface.

  • So you are going to prove this and I'm going to use this now to

  • calculate for you a much more complicated configuration of

  • two charged planes but I use that result.

  • That's very important. And suppose I have here a -- a

  • plate, very large, nothing is infinitely large of

  • course, and it has a surface charge density plus sigma and I

  • have here a plate which has surface charge density minus

  • sigma and the separation between these two

  • plates happens to be D. And the question now is what is

  • the electric field anywhere in space.

  • Here, here and here. And we'll think of them as

  • being infinitely large, each plate.

  • And I now use the superposition principle.

  • I say to myself aha. This plate alone,

  • forget this one, this plate alone would give me

  • an E vector oh stick to my colors,

  • give me an E vector like so and that is sigma divided by two

  • epsilon zero, this one is also pointing away

  • from this, sigma divided by two epsilon zero,

  • and here it's also sigma divided by two epsilon zero

  • because it's independent of the distance to this plate.

  • What is the negative charge doing?

  • Well, the negative charge has E vectors pointing towards it.

  • So here I have an E vector which is

  • sigma divided by two epsilon zero.

  • Here I have one that is sigma divided by two epsilon zero and

  • I have one that is pointing towards the plate,

  • which is sigma divided by two epsilon zero.

  • I use the superposition principle, I can add electric

  • vectors and when I do that I find that these two cancel each

  • other out so the electric field here is zero.

  • The electric field here is sigma divided by epsilon zero.

  • The two support each other. They are both in the same

  • direction. And the electric field here is

  • again zero. And that is an amazing result.

  • Of course it's only accurate if these plates are extraordinarily

  • large and so if I have to draw the field lines in the situation

  • like this then the field lines would be like so.

  • If the upper plate is positive and the field in here would be

  • the same everywhere, would be outside zero and

  • outside zero here. Now clearly this cannot be true

  • if you get into this area here where you are near the end of

  • these plates. That is not possible.

  • Why not? Well you can't use your

  • symmetry arguments so Gauss's law is not going to help you if

  • you get anywhere near this area. And it is very difficult to

  • calculate the electric field configuration when you are near

  • the edges, which we call the -- the fringe field.

  • Maxwell of course was a clever man and he knew how to do that.

  • Today we can also do that very easily with uh computers.

  • But I'll show you from Maxwell's original publications

  • that in a situation like that he was already perfectly capable of

  • calculating these electric field lines and you have these two

  • horizontal plates, which one is plus and which one

  • is minus doesn't matter, he doesn't put arrows in there,

  • and what you see is an extremely strong field inside

  • the two plates, and remember that the density

  • of field lines tells you something about the strength of

  • the [inaudible] very strong field

  • but when you get near the edge the field is not really zero.

  • The field strength drops very rapidly because look the density

  • is very low. But it is not zero.

  • And the electric field is not zero here either and is not zero

  • there. In our assumption in our

  • simplification we have however assumed that the plate is so

  • large that we don't have to worry about any end effects and

  • in that case the electric field is only existent in

  • between the plates but not anywhere else.

  • I now want to demonstrate to you some of the things that we

  • have learned today. And the first thing that I want

  • to demonstrate is that the electric field outside a large

  • plane is more or less constant. Doesn't matter how far away you

  • are. Now the way I'm going to do

  • that is of course I don't have an infinite large plane,

  • the plane that you're going to see

  • only a few square meters in size.

  • And so with only something like one by one meter,

  • then it would only be true that the electric field is very close

  • to constant if I stay very close to that plane.

  • The moment that I go out as far as a meter of course it's no

  • longer true. So it's very qualitative,

  • what I'm going to show you. But you're going to see very

  • shortly there a very large plane.

  • I'm going to get it in a few minutes.

  • And let's assume that we look at that plane edge on.

  • So here is that plane. Look at it from edge on,

  • it will be put here. It will block your view,

  • that's why we don't have it up now.

  • And what I will do now is I will connect that with the

  • VandeGraaff which is behind it. If you wait a few minutes then

  • class will pay attention to me and not to you.

  • Uh here is the VandeGraaff, we're going to attach it to the

  • VandeGraaff and then we use this interesting fishing rod which is

  • a small Mylar balloon which we will charge with the same charge

  • as the VandeGraaff, the same charge as the plate,

  • and we will hold that in front of the plane.

  • And then of course there will be a force.

  • So here is my glass rod. This is the vertical.

  • And because there will be a repelling force on this

  • air-filled balloon, there will be an angle.

  • There's an electric force on it because the two have the same

  • charge. And this is the angle theta

  • that I will show you projected on that wall.

  • And when I move this away from this plane you will see that the

  • angle theta becomes smaller. Yes of course because look how

  • small that plane is. No matter what I do if I go

  • from twenty to forty centimeters you can't really say that the

  • plane is infinitely large compared to forty centimeters.

  • But you will see that the angle of theta will change very

  • slowly. And then we will remove that

  • plane and then we will do exactly the same experiment but

  • we will use only the VandeGraaff which produces now an

  • electric field. And that electric field now

  • falls off as one over R squared. It's not constant as a function

  • of distance but it falls off as one over R squared.

  • This is a hollow sphere. So you can think of it as all

  • the charge right at the center. As we demonstrated,

  • it's on the blackboard still here.

  • You know, you get that amazing result.

  • And so now if I place this -- if I place this fishing rod,

  • this balloon, near the spherical

  • VandeGraaff you will see that this angle theta drops very fast

  • when I start moving my hand away.

  • Extraordinarily fast. If I double the distance to the

  • center the force on that little object will become four times

  • smaller. It's inverse R square.

  • So let's first do the plane and then we'll try to do the -- the

  • uh single VandeGraaff. And we'll try to optimize the

  • light conditions.

  • We have a projection here. There's a carbon arc.

  • Which will hopefully produce some light in that direction.

  • If the carbon arc works. [laughter] Marcos oh I forgot

  • to turn on the power. Thank you.

  • So this carbon arc is coming on now and you'll see there the

  • shadows on that wall. See my hand,

  • here is that plane, and it is far from infinitely

  • large, that plane. If I were this far away from

  • it, four centimeters, very close approximation,

  • it would be infinitely large. But if I'm here and there and

  • that's where I will be, of course it is not infinitely

  • large anymore. So let's uh start the

  • VandeGraaff. You can see that I turned it

  • on. It's rotating now.

  • I have to put charge on here so I'll touch it with the

  • VandeGraaff and so this is now charged.

  • It has the same charge as the plane.

  • The plane is being charged. And here you see the angle.

  • Try to remember that angle. It's hard to estimate,

  • maybe fifteen degrees. You see the vertical and if now

  • I -- it's about um thirty centimeters away from the plane.

  • And if now I go back to fifty centimeters, which is where I am

  • now, you see the angle hasn't changed very much.

  • If I go further out, to sixty centimeters,

  • yeah, the angle goes down a little.

  • Of course it does. But not very much.

  • And if I go far away, all the way to Mass Avenue,

  • of course the force on this little object would be inversely

  • R squared because then the whole plane would behave like a point

  • source. So I've shown you that very

  • close to this plane the electric field stays approximately

  • constant. So if now we remove this,

  • Marcos if you can yeah, you'll have to take this also

  • off. Thank you very much.

  • So now we have the VandeGraaff alone.

  • So now we know that the electric field falls off as one

  • over R squared. It's a very good approximation

  • now. We can think of the charge as

  • being right at the center. I will give it a little bit of

  • charge. Oh, it is already charged.

  • [laughter] OK. So look at the projection.

  • The uh the balloon is now uh oh maybe thirty centimeters away

  • from the center, maybe forty,

  • boy, the angle is almost forty-five degrees.

  • And now I go, I double the distance,

  • I go to about ninety centimeters, and look at that

  • angle theta. The angle theta is now down to

  • oh maybe ten degrees. I will go back where I was.

  • This angle is about forty degrees.

  • And now it's very small and when I go here which is about a

  • meter-and-a-half you can hardly see that there is any angle.

  • It's only a few degrees. And so I've shown you only

  • qualitatively that the electric field falls off very rapidly.

  • In the vicinity of a hollow uniformly charged sphere.

  • And that it doesn't fall off very fast if you are in the near

  • vicinity of a plane. The second thing I want to show

  • you has to do with the fact that the electric field inside a

  • uniformly charged sphere is zero.

  • Here I have a sphere which is not entirely closed.

  • I can't make it closed because I want to demonstrate to you

  • that there is no electric field inside when I charge it

  • uniformly. And since I have to get inside

  • I need an opening. There's nothing I can do about

  • it. Since there is an opening,

  • the electric field is not exactly zero inside.

  • It's only true if this is a complete closed surface and if

  • the charge is uniformly distributed.

  • But it's a good approximation. The opening is quite small.

  • And what I'm going to do is I'm going to charge this sphere.

  • I'm putting charge outside. I use a device that we have not

  • used before, but that's not so important, but here is now that

  • hollow sphere. I'm going to put charge on

  • there. Let's suppose it is positive

  • charge. So this will be positively

  • charged. Since it is a -- a conductor,

  • as we will learn I think the next

  • lecture or at least this week, that the charge will

  • automatically distribute uniformly, only does that on a

  • conductor, and now to demonstrate to you that there is

  • an electric field here, I will use induction.

  • I have two Ping Pong balls painted with conducting paint.

  • They touch each other. Under influence of this

  • electric field this one will become negative and this one

  • will become positive, we have discussed that last

  • time, you create a dipole. Not important that it is a

  • dipole. I separate the two.

  • I have negative charge here and positive charge there.

  • I will touch any one of these two balls, it doesn't matter

  • which one, with the electroscope.

  • And you will see that there is charge there.

  • So I have demonstrated then that there is an electric field

  • outside that sphere. Now I will do exactly the same

  • demonstration, but now I put these two

  • conducting balls inside,

  • so here they are. I touch them,

  • you just have to t- trust me that I really will touch them,

  • and then I will take them out. And if I didn't make a mistake,

  • if I didn't touch the rim by accident, then I will show you

  • that there is no electric field inside, it means there is no

  • induction, so these balls did not pick up charge.

  • I show you with the electroscope that indeed there

  • is no charge on it. So that is the way I want to do

  • this. So there is the electroscope.

  • Here is the sphere. And the way I'm going to charge

  • it has a nice name, it's called electrophorus,

  • hard to pronounce, I first rub a glass plate with

  • cat fur. Then I take a metal plate.

  • I put on top. And I touch it with my finger.

  • And now I transfer charge and you think about it why that is.

  • I put it on here again, touch it again with my finger.

  • I'm again charging it. Put it on top,

  • touch it again with my finger. I want a little bit more

  • charge. So I'm rubbing this again.

  • Put this on top. Touch it with my finger.

  • Every time I do that I feel a little shock.

  • Put it on there. Touch it with my finger.

  • OK. Let's hope that's enough.

  • So now comes demonstration number one.

  • These two spheres conducting completely discharged,

  • I bring them close to this sphere.

  • There they are. I separate them.

  • And now they must have picked up charge.

  • Shall I use this one or this one to touch the electroscope?

  • The same to me. My right hand or my left hand,

  • who wants right? Who wants left?

  • The right ones have it. There's the charge.

  • So I've shown you that there is an

  • electric field there. Through induction I have

  • created charge on here. Now I'll do the same inside.

  • It's always tricky because if I hit -- if I hit the rim then

  • it's not zero. This one has to go in first

  • because the opening is too small.

  • Then the second one has to come in.

  • Now I have to touch them, and I really do.

  • I wouldn't cheat on you. Not this time.

  • They are now in contact with each other.

  • And now I take one out. And I take the other out.

  • Which one shall I touch it, there shouldn't be any charge

  • on either one of them. We had left before or we had

  • right before? Well let's do this one.

  • This one? Who is for left?

  • Who is for right? The lefts have it.

  • Oh. [laughter] What happened?

  • I must have touched the side. There's no way around it.

  • I'll make sure that there is enough

  • charge on it. I'll charge it once more.

  • Discharge them. OK.

  • We'll do it again. Go inside.

  • Go inside. I touch them.

  • Take it out. Take it out.

  • Nothing. Nothing.

  • Maybe a teeny weeny little bit, well, the electric field inside

  • is not necessarily exactly zero. But it's extremely close.

  • The last thing I want to show you has to do with the fringe

  • field that we have seen here. I have here two parallel plates

  • which I'm going to charge with an instrument that we have not

  • seen before which is called the uh -- a Wimshurst.

  • If I rotate this crank I can produce positive and negative

  • charge. And this plate becomes

  • positively charged and the other plate automatically becomes

  • negatively charged. And I'm going to show this to

  • you right there. That's the idea.

  • Yeah. We will make it uh.

  • So there you see these two plates.

  • And you see a Ping Pong ball. And this Ping Pong ball is a

  • conductor, we put conducting paint on it.

  • And remember when I did the demonstration with the balloon

  • which bounced between my head and the VandeGraaff and every

  • time that it bounced on the VandeGraaff it took all the

  • charge of the VandeGraaff and when it bounced on my head it

  • took my charge, and so it went back and forth,

  • along the field lines. And that is what I want to show

  • you now. That this Ping Pong ball will

  • start to probe that field first outside the capacitor or I

  • shouldn't use the word capacitor with these plates,

  • and then I will bring the Ping Pong ball inside and then you

  • will see that the field is much stronger there.

  • So let's first get some charge on there.

  • And listen to the sounds. Every time that it h- hits it

  • bangs. So it's following almost those

  • field lines. And in doing that it's actually

  • transferring charge every time from one plate to the other.

  • It's nicely going around in an arc

  • the way you see it there. So it's clear that there is an

  • electric field outside. I've proven that to you.

  • Otherwise it would never do what it's doing.

  • So the electric field outside is not exactly zero,

  • of course not. This plate is not infinitely

  • large. And now I will bring this Ping

  • Pong ball inside, I have to open up the -- the

  • gap a little, and I will bring it inside.

  • And you see the field is much stronger.

  • Now it's going back and forth between those very high-density

  • field lines, very strong electric field,

  • going back and forth each time that it hits the plate it c- it

  • changes polarity and this is not too different from the

  • experiment I did with the balloon when I bounced it back

  • from the VandeGraaff to my head and back to the VandeGraaff.

  • OK. Start working on that

  • assignment. It's not an easy assignment

  • this week. See you Wednesday.

Today we're going to um work on a whole new concept and that is

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

Lec 03: Electric Flux and Gauss's Law | 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 (Walter Lewin) (Lec 03: Electric Flux and Gauss's Law | 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 (Walter Lewin))

  • 52 6
    Cheng-Hong Liu 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字