Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • Ladies and gentleman, distinguished guests, good afternoon.

  • This is a TV debate jointly sponsored by Tianjin TV Station and Phoenix

  • Satellite TV. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon.

  • I’m Hu I-Hu from Phoenix TV.

  • Well, I was reminded back to September the 15th,

  • 2008. At that time that was the financial crisiswent bankrupt.

  • Well, precisely, we are two years later from that date.

  • Seems like today we are in two years

  • anniversary. However, I think we should divide

  • today’s issues into opportunities and challenges and we are talking about

  • post-crisis age. What are the challenges in front of us?

  • Well, were already encountered challenges but we have more to come.

  • So one of the issues in front of us is, are we welcoming a brighter future

  • or a darker future? Before we invite our five panelists,

  • let’s watch the big screen and look at the current status of our economy.

  • Having come through rescue plans it seems that the worldwide economy is now

  • in a recovery road. This also includes the four trillion

  • RMB in economics dues, luminous package of the Chinese governments at the end

  • of 2008 which contributed to 8.7 percent of China’s GDP growth in 2009.

  • In the first half of 2010, China’s GDP grew by 11.1 percent leading to

  • a robust economic growth. It is true that the signs of economic

  • recovery are already there in some countries.

  • However, United States and other western economies still grew in a slow

  • way. Take the U.S. as an example.

  • In the first quarter of this year, GDP grew by 3.7 percent, in the second

  • quarter 1.6 percent, and as of July its unemployment rate reached 16.5 percent.

  • It is fair to say that the concerns for a second economic dip is over

  • and countries are looking for new growth points.

  • However, the world economy is still facing many challenges including new

  • issues in China’s economic recovery such as resistance in export

  • overheating in investment, slow growth in domestic demand, a vague picture in

  • the real estate market and concerns about stimulus policy and inflation

  • after two years anniversary of economic crisis looking back on the global

  • economic recovery. Is China already on this recovery

  • road? In today’s context how can China

  • facilitate its own economic growth? Welcome to TV Debate of Tianjin TV

  • and Phoenix TV. Well, weve all heard of these

  • questions from the video clips. That is precisely why we are having

  • this TV debate. Let us once again warmly welcome the

  • five distinguished panelists. First, Mr. Cheng Siwei, Chairman of

  • International Finance Forum. Second, Professor Li Daokui,

  • Director from Center for China in the World Economy Tsinghua University.

  • Mr. Liu Changle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from Phoenix

  • Satellite TV Hong Kong SAR. Mr. Jack Ma Yun, Chairman and Chief

  • Executive Officer, Alibaba Group, People’s Republic of China.

  • And Mr. Yu Rumin, Chairman of the Board, Tianjin Port Company.

  • Welcome in our TV debate. So to start with, let me have an

  • interaction with you. Before we ask our questions on our

  • distinguished panelists, let me give you a test.

  • Two years ago we heard a saying that confidence is more important than gold

  • at any times. In today’s context, what’s your

  • confidence about the worldwide economy? Do you think that in the short round,

  • is it possible for the world economy to fall into a second dip?

  • Please raise your hands. Three, two,

  • one. Second dip. Others seem to be more optimistic so

  • where does the concern come from? Mr. Cheng, we noticed that five and six

  • of the audience are still concerned. They are still afraid of a second

  • round of economic dip. But I think that two years ago youve

  • mentioned at a global forum that the international financial crisis will be

  • over after another two to three years. So you think that 2011 will show a new

  • start? Now, two years later, do you still hold

  • the same view? Yes, we all know that China’s economy

  • is growing in a robust way and this year we are transforming from a special

  • state out of financial crisis into a normal stage.

  • If we look around the world, I am a cautious optimist.

  • In my view the world economy is right now in a challenging and testing road

  • of recovery. In other words, there are still

  • uncertainties, but, on the whole, the world economy will return back to

  • recovery. Now, the biggest challenge in front of

  • us is, of course, first, that crisis, sovereignty debt crisis in European

  • countries, but, in my view, that would not lead to a second global economic

  • dip. However, as some countries need more

  • borrowing, that will slow down the rate of European of recovery.

  • Second, there are still uncertainties and instabilities in the U.S. economy.

  • Of course, U.S. is under debt pressure but U.S. is a large economy and people

  • are still borrowing money to the U.S. So it seems to be that there is not

  • such a huge debt crisis for the U.S. However, its unemployment rate

  • and other issues are yet to be resolved and coupled with political factors and the

  • issues of middle term election, there are still uncertainties in the U.S.

  • economy. All of these add up to certain global

  • economic recovery. Thank you.

  • Thank you, Chairman Cheng. Chairman Cheng said that in the future

  • he is confident but he’s still observing.

  • Apart from the U.S. economic recovery he is also interested in what are

  • European Union has gone through its economic crisis.

  • And before raising the question to Professor Li, let’s look at the big

  • screen. People say that statistics matter most.

  • So can you conclude from the statistics that we can be confident the

  • economy is really getting better?

  • Through these statistics, I think Professor Li knows better than I do.

  • This is a PMI comparative diagram that we noticed that on this diagram there

  • are figures of China, E.U., U.S., and Japan.

  • Almost all of them have a PMI of over 50 percent.

  • Can that give us confidence? Definitely.

  • It is a clear proof that confidence from consumers and investors is getting

  • back. However, there is one regret about this

  • diagram because it only talks about China, but China is not the only one on

  • the recovery road. China and a large number of emerging

  • markets are already on healthy road of development which was quite rare in the

  • previous ten years. Those countries will be strong motive

  • behind global economic recovery for the next five to ten years.

  • I noticed that six or seven people of the audience are still concerned about

  • the possibilities of a second round of economic dip.

  • The second dip is a new word. It indicates the overall economic

  • slowdown and presumably back to the bottom.

  • Well, does that exist such a possibility?

  • I think there’s little likelihood because this round of financial crisis

  • is completely different from the last round of Asian financial crisis because

  • it is the crisis that originated from the balance sheet of private companies.

  • Looking back on the previous two years, developed countries are already

  • taking up proper measures which prevent the possibility for a second dip.

  • However, it cannot change the fact that developed countries are already

  • suffering from this crisis. So perhaps we should be more

  • interested in the issue of some architectural changes after this

  • crisis. And I saw the face of Jack Ma Yun.

  • He seems to be quite relaxed. But I remember that you mentioned that

  • knowing will not make you cold, but you mentioned that while snow is being melt

  • you will feel very cold, bitterly cold. Do you have different views from the

  • previous two speakers? For me, crisis when they would be over,

  • if youre always afraid of crisis, you will be living in a constant state of

  • fear. Crisis will come more often.

  • As a company, as an individual, we should be more adaptive to crisis.

  • It is true this is a sizeable crisis, but I think people are more adaptive to

  • crisis. In the case of China, China needs to

  • leverage this opportunity to restructure our industries,

  • our industrial mix.

  • Having worked out of the crisis weve got to initiate new measures and China

  • was not as hard hit as quite a number of developed economies such as U.S.

  • during the crisis. However, during the crisis, the impact

  • on China was relatively limited, but the difficulties involving

  • restructuring are far greater than expected.

  • Yes, that brings us to the business perspective on the need for

  • restructuring.

  • So the goods, import and exports, are forerunning indicator for the state of

  • the economy. And yesterday Warren Buffet said that

  • he had every confidence in the U.S. economy without any prospect for double

  • dip recession. Do you agree with the optimism of

  • Warren Buffet and do you have confidence in all statistics as well?

  • Despite a lot of difficulties going forward, I don’t think there is

  • a prospect for double dip recession, and the world economy is firmly on the

  • trajectory of recovery. There’s no mistake about it.

  • And the port, through ports, has increased by 17 percent in China,

  • and all those indicators are pointing to the path of recovery.

  • And the Baltic Shipping Index reached eleven thousand plus points before the

  • financial crisis. Now, it is still lingering around

  • three thousand points, which shows the world economy has not yet recovered,

  • but for eleven thousand seven hundred and ninety three points prior to the

  • crisis, it was abnormal. And were not going to return to that

  • high level. And now the current Baltic Shipping

  • Index is roughly at the level of 2003 and the breakeven point for shipping

  • companies between twenty seven hundred points and three thousand points,

  • therefore, it’s rather a reasonable point.

  • And for CCFI, for container exports, for China the index reached twelve

  • hundred and two points before the crisis.

  • Now, it has gone above the previous peak indicating robust economic growth

  • in China including exports. Therefore, we are definitely on the

  • path of recovery. I don’t think there’s a prospect for

  • double dip recession. And in order for us to leave the

  • crisis completely behind still takes time before full-fledged recovery

  • is achieved.

  • So we have heard cautious optimism but they have the consensus that there’s

  • not going to be a second dip. What about you, Chairman Liu?

  • Youve talked about Warren Buffet’s remarks this morning.

  • The remarks were made yesterday and his remarks were covered by TV this

  • morning.

  • And he believed that there’s one-third likelihood of a second dip while the

  • two-thirds of the chances are that it’s not going to happen.

  • So I think there’s going to be a mild recovery.

  • Talking about recovery, there are extreme recoveries,

  • complete recoveries, and mild -- versus mild recoveries.

  • And I think if we use the word mild recovery, it is more pertinent in

  • describing the current situation and which means two-thirds of the chance

  • that there’s not going to be a second dip.

  • And I want to say something to the friends from the media.

  • Many media friends are hyping the notion of a double dip recession.

  • There is something right in saying so because they are sending some warning

  • signals to us. And there’s something good for us to

  • hear some warning, alarms from the media.

  • Whenever the alarm sounds, it is helpful instead of being harmful

  • according to an old Chinese saying. And the global financial crisis

  • started from sectorial crisis. Later it spread to a global worldwide

  • crisis impacting all the sectors. Therefore, I think it’s a very healthy

  • thing for us to be reminded by the media.

  • So with precautions taken, then we will take every precaution against a second

  • dip then that truly will not happen.

  • Now, I’d like to ask anyone from the audience to challenge the panelists if

  • you have any different view from theirs or if you have any question for them,

  • if you have any comments to make. Please raise your hands.

  • And I think some of you do believe in the prospect of a second dip.

  • Please raise your hands again. Please raise your hands again those

  • who believe in double dip recession. Please share your view with us.

  • Microphone please.

  • I still believe in the prospect of a second dip.

  • When the crisis came around in the first instance, those root causes has

  • not been addressed. And at that time everybody believed

  • that the financial sector and the policies and institutions in the west

  • were very good, were very sound, but then there came the crisis, so given

  • that, it is still likely that were going to go through a second dip.

  • What are those factors which are yet to be exhausted?

  • I’m not an economist. I’m a chemist.

  • But pursuing a scientific point of view youve got to prove that all the

  • likelihood for a second dip can be truly ruled out.

  • Without that I’m not going to believe in the exclusion of the prospect of

  • double dip recession. Dr. David Li, how can you convince the

  • chemist? Oh, I think it’s also a philosophical

  • challenge against our views. Let me address your question in an

  • equally philosophical way. Philosophically speaking, this crisis

  • erupted as a result of accumulation of many factors that had been building up

  • over the years and after its eruption with numerous forceful measures,

  • the symptoms of the disease had been cured, but not the root causes.

  • But in the near future, it’s not likely that another major malaise,

  • major disease, is going to break out. But weve got to change the structure

  • of the world economy. To make it more specific United States

  • should rectify its trade deficits. And it is still blaming on the

  • currency exchange rate policies of other countries instead of taking the

  • real structural measures. And also, we have heard fresh

  • controversy over the regimes of free trade and the Doha round has not

  • yielded intended results. And we need to do more on that as

  • well. Is there a chemical reaction,

  • Mr. Chemist? Talking about the United States I have

  • an extra point to make about the United States.

  • I think the United States is quite problematic given a high unemployment

  • rate and interim election is coming.

  • And President Barack Obama has talked about a lot of changes but the changes

  • enacted are so limited. And if the republicans are going to

  • win the interim election in the congress, they will prevent Obama from

  • adopting further changes and reforms. So those deep-seated concerns

  • and issues will give rise to a second dip. Youre not only a chemist but also an

  • expert on international relations. I’m also an expert on chemistry

  • and later I became an economist. So for possibility of a second dip

  • whether we are on the track of recovery or not or whether we are going to slip

  • into recession again, we need to define it first.

  • If there are three consecutive quarters of a negative growth, it

  • is recession. If there are three consecutive quarters

  • of positive growth, it is recovery. So let’s define them first.

  • Not were talking about probabilities. Were talking about probabilistic

  • chances of a second dip mathematically speaking.

  • That’s the second point I want to make. And there’s a great deal of complexity

  • involved involving the U.S and because political factors are meddled into its

  • overall picture of economic recovery especially after the interim election

  • and maybe the checks and balances between the executive branch and the

  • legislative branch will make recovery harder in the United States.

  • But, in general, I don’t think there’s going to be a second dip, although we

  • cannot rule out the possibility completely.

  • Thank you very much, Chairman Cheng. Let’s stop talking about chemistry.

  • Let’s return to our topic of economics and let’s rely more on triggers

  • and statistics. Now, this figure, this number gives me

  • some worry.

  • Let’s take a look at the CPI. In 2009, July 2009 to August 2010,

  • we have a 3.5 percent CPI growth, a new high in 24 months.

  • So after reading such a figure you might wonder that there are hidden

  • perils in the road ahead. With higher CPI it might give rise to

  • inflationary trends, even inflation. So what are the policy responses that

  • are appropriate under such a context? Well, let’s return to the fundamentals

  • of doing business. I’m never worried about things that

  • our Premier worries about, because I’m doing my business.

  • Let’s return to fundamentals of business.

  • I always focus on the performance of my company.

  • For second dip or even a triple dip recovery going higher or going lower,

  • how big is the impact on us? With the second dip not all businesses

  • are to suffer. You should be well prepared.

  • And with the elevation of the CPI not everybody will suffer, likewise,

  • not everybody will benefit. Doing your own job well is always the

  • most important thing. Higher CPI is not going to cure

  • everybody. And all the rallies of economic growth

  • are short lived and crises and disasters are always there to await

  • you.

  • So, yes, those figures are important, but you just listen to the reports.

  • You just take a look at it. You don’t have to worry about it.

  • You don’t have to do anything.

  • What else you can do. You only have to take care of

  • yourself. Well, I think that an indicator more or

  • less will lead you some concerns because having taken the four trillion

  • on the stimulus package, definitely, thewill see increasing liquidity

  • and the result of increasing liquidity is rising prices.

  • If the price grows up to a certain extent that will threaten the normal

  • economic operation and then the government will take deflationary

  • measures. And now the government is in a dilemma.

  • The economic recovery is not yet a firmly defined trend and they askin

  • the process if the government takes up a tighter policy and that will be

  • different from its previous policies. However, if the government simply

  • allows the commodity prices to go all the way up, that will threaten economic

  • development. So I guess, the corrective policy is to

  • ensure consistency and continuity, moderate adjustment, for instance,

  • moderate control of liquidity. I guess that will make things at least

  • a little bit better. Some people are talking about

  • increasing interest rate but I think we have to be very cautious about that.

  • Interest rates change at this moment will affect consumption.

  • Once consumption is affected economic development will be affected.

  • And investment will be affected as well.

  • Adding up these impacts together we will have negative impacts for fast

  • economic recovery. Thank you.

  • Chairman Cheng, although Ma Yun said micro issues are more practical but

  • perhaps we should be more interested in macroeconomic issues.

  • Is it already the time for the interest rate to go up?

  • Ma Yun’s words will lead all of the macroeconomists out of jobs.

  • Well, of course, for a businessman it should be interested in its own

  • business but it also should be interested in the overall economic

  • situation. Indeed, China sees the risk of

  • inflation. As I mentioned inlast year,

  • first growing liquidity will cause inflation as normally defined.

  • And inflation is the growing of the currency price due to excessive

  • currency supply. That’s an important cause for

  • inflation. Weve seen that happening that is why

  • compared with last year currency supply is on the decline.

  • And moderate level second commodity price, if you look at what is happening

  • this year, commodity price, in particular, food price is going up.

  • This is evident to all of us. And the CPI figure is a comparison

  • relative to the same period of last year.

  • We have to look at the comparative figure relative to last month.

  • Second, international factors, geologic stand, oil price, and grain

  • price.

  • Those are important factors to be considered.

  • Combining these three factors together and in the first half of this year 3.3

  • percent and this was quite a large increase than the previous period.

  • However, those two factors containing inflation such as the telling effect,

  • however, such a fast growth rate, I think it is already a reasonable credit

  • for China to control its inflation to below five percent not necessarily

  • three percent. As to the issue of increasing interest

  • rate, well, back to inflation rate, below five percent and now back to

  • increasing interest rate that is another dilemma.

  • Last year we are growing our liquidity and increasing investment.

  • This year, you cannot have fast break all of a sudden because that one

  • activity affect the society and the companies.

  • So we have to do it slowly. The central government made it clear

  • this year’s GDP growth rate which would be eight percent last year and the goal

  • was 9.1 percent, so we are trying to have a step by step slow down in terms

  • of investment. Last year’s growth was 13.1 percent,

  • in the first half of this year, 24.8 percent, so this is a gradual process.

  • As I’ve mentioned, this year is a year of change from economic crisis back to

  • normal growth trajectory. So this year policy changes will be

  • very complicated and there will be many scenarios of dilemma such as increasing

  • interest rate. As I’ve mentioned, increased interest

  • rate will control inflation. But, on the other hand, it will add to

  • the pressure of enterprises and contain consumption.

  • And increasing interest rate will attract hot money inflows into China

  • leading to risk-free increase of profits.

  • That will not be a good thing for reducing liquidity.

  • So those are issues in front of us. But in the long term I think

  • increasing interest rate is a necessary choice.

  • But as to the accepted timing, I guess I’m not so sure.

  • As Chairman has rightly mentioned, this is a dilemma, but we all know that we

  • have to make the most advantageous decision.

  • Well, I am a scholar and I’ve studying in this are by following my own

  • principles and have been observing the macroeconomic development for a long

  • time, although macroeconomic policies may not be as important to some

  • successful companies, but they certainly are to lesser successful

  • companies.

  • At this critical point, I think this figure deserves our attention in two

  • ways. First, there is an impact of tail of

  • effect.

  • Well, I do not think that we should be over panicked.

  • I think that the overall inflation rate can be controlled within 2.9

  • percent and at the end of the third quarter it will beto 3.7 percent.

  • too panicked.

  • And if we look at the reason behind the

  • rising commodity price, I think it’s largely because of infrastructure.

  • That’s a good thing.

  • Second, increasing caused in agriculture which will transfer to the

  • price of agriculture produce. And third, increasing price

  • international materials. So combining these factors together in

  • the next five to ten years or even longer period of time, this state of

  • economic development will become a regular state.

  • And if we increase a little bit the deposit interest rate, then the Chinese

  • people will be able to have a correct expectation.

  • In other words, they will still have their interest while saving their money

  • into the banks.

  • Such a policy change may help us stabilize economic development

  • and financial system. Thank you.

  • Right now we are having a TV debate.

  • I noticed that perhaps one of the most intensive debate is about the macro

  • versus micro.

  • Back to Jack Ma Yun.

  • I don’t think there is a differentiation of successful

  • businessman and unsuccessful businessman.

  • I think that all of them should listen to the words of Professor Li

  • and Chairman Cheng because they are the correct economists.

  • But you know that 90 percent of Chinese companies are small-medium

  • sized enterprises. If they listened to those so-called

  • economists, then they will find themselves in big trouble.

  • It looked like our company we have people making judgments for us on

  • a daily basis. They give us different kinds of policy

  • advices and leaving us... However, I think that the genuine

  • economists are really very few. We have too many economists that are

  • not real economists.

  • Unfortunately, we are not expanding the debate of this topic into wider debate.

  • Back to Mr. Liu.

  • Chairman Cheng was talking about dilemma.

  • We also noticed CPI issue and the potential issues from inflation.

  • But I think that there’s another dilemma, for instance, in terms of four

  • trillion RMB, a faster break, a slow break, or no break.

  • While making these decisions, we have to consider China’s employment issue.

  • Premier Wen has made it clear to us that China has over ten million migrant

  • workers, 20 million unemployment workers, so the 40 million people are

  • yet to be employed.

  • The U.S. also has three biggest issues,

  • first, severe unemployment issue, second, proper rate and property

  • market, and third, virtual economy. So I think the same is true to China.

  • If we look from a larger picture, if we take a more aggressive approach,

  • perhaps that will affect China’s economic growth.

  • And we should not ignore the resulting social impacts.

  • I do agree with some scholars in that we should not take extremely aggressive

  • firm measures in addressing overheating issues and simplyaway - take more

  • aggressive measures in addressing overheating issues.

  • I think, rather, we need to have a more sustained way of development

  • and develop more sustained strategies. Some statistics may be important but

  • they are not so important as to affect the long term decision making.

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you. Now, the floor is open to questions.

  • Good afternoon from China Economic Weekly.

  • In the morning, Mr. Ma, in a closed session was talking about the small

  • and big issue, smallest beautiful issues, how can you connect small with the

  • bigger globalization?

  • Other questions?

  • Well answer the questions all together.

  • Good afternoon. I have a question.

  • A rationale we are all talking about quantitative growth, but what about the

  • quality of growth, in particular, shortening world gap, do you have any

  • suggestions? As an individual, as a company, and as

  • a government, what can we do to bridge the world gap while maintaining robust

  • economic growth? Thank you.

  • Thank you for the questions. Any one from the middle?

  • Any one from the center? And anyone from the right?

  • I think the theme of our discussion is economic sustainability.

  • I think the economy is getting better. Panelists all have their views on

  • second dip.

  • Economy is like four seasons. In the short run we may have different

  • kinds of challenges, but in the long run were always in a good state.

  • I hope that our panelists can give us more confidence and I thank them for

  • their speech.

  • Ma Yun, could you answer this question about smallest beauty?

  • I think that the crisis issue is not about economic crisis.

  • It’s more of a crisis of development and it involves environment

  • and poverty. I think that the world must learn from

  • this crisis and the world must be more optimistic.

  • The world must know that it has to create a better future and adjust

  • today’s issues such as environmental issues and poverty issues.

  • If companies want to get above the crisis and move to a better future,

  • they have to do more in environmental protection and poverty reduction.

  • And the biggest difference in the 21st century from the 20th century is that

  • in this century, the century will be dominated by smaller and more flexible

  • companies. I think one of the issues we are all

  • interested in is to adjust the short term issues, the existing issues,

  • and the long term issues. At the moment we need to facilitate

  • sustainable economic growth, however, which does not satisfy the long term

  • interest of human development, for instance, resource population

  • and environment. Those are our fundamental issues.

  • Without resolving them all of our sustainability can only be achieved in

  • the short run. And were all talking about industrial

  • upgrading, increasing the high tech content, of course, those are important

  • issues, but well have to talk about facilitating greater employment rate.

  • That is the major way to address poverty and to address world gap.

  • And just now we talked about quality of economic growth.

  • I think there are two issues, first is social just, second,

  • sustainable development. Sustainable development involves

  • consideration of development cost. If our cost of growth exceeds our rate

  • of growth, then I do not think that is a correct way.

  • We made a study of our environmental cost in 2005.

  • In other words, thanks to environmental deterioration and the

  • environmental pollution contributed to even 13 percent of our GDP growth.

  • If we continue to do so, then well have to leave the environmental debt to

  • our future generations. That is hardly a sustainable way of

  • growth.

  • That’s one aspect of the quality of growth and second is divide between the

  • rich and poor. And I think there are two sub-issues in

  • China. First, the world gap between urban

  • and rural regions, the urban residents have an income three times that of rural

  • residents and four times more a purchasing power than that of the rural

  • residents and theyre enjoying much better education, health care,

  • and other public services. We need to help increase the income

  • earned by the rural residents and also at the same time, within urban China we

  • need to decrease income disparities. And in the primary distribution we

  • should fill the highlight, theand I

  • think, also, should constantly improve productivity to help generate more

  • income for workers.

  • Otherwise, increasing income has no basis to start with.

  • So we need to pursue more social justice and sustainability.

  • Doctor Li.

  • I’m also an alumni of Miss Cho who asked the question.

  • It’s very important question. It best sound the social foundation of

  • the economic sustainability of China.

  • Let’s be very clear that in the process of economic development and growth

  • there is a stage at which the income distribution mechanisms should be

  • optimized. For example, in the present day China,

  • for the migrant workers from rural China into urban China, the income

  • growth rate for them is much faster than that of the urban white collar

  • professionals.

  • So the market is playing its due role here.

  • The market is working. We should not artificially interfere

  • in the workings of the market by artificially raising the salaries

  • and wages for some sectors in the labor force.

  • We should pursue genuine reforms instead of making much ado about

  • nothing. Chairman Liu.

  • It’s a very concrete issue which is a fostering and expansion of the middle

  • class in China. Can the middle class in China reach

  • a critical mess? According to some statistics between

  • now and 2030 throughout the world the middle class will expand from 1.8

  • billion to almost 4 billion people worldwide and that purchasing powers

  • are going to grow from a 2.9 billion U.S. Dollars to over five billion U.S.

  • Dollars and most of the emerging middle class will come from Asia, and those

  • experts to believe that a bulk of them, lion share of them, will come from

  • China and India. But will China initiate policies to

  • foster the growing middle class or the growth of the middle class?

  • And without middle class, we will continue to confront it by those social

  • issues such as economic unsustainability and the gap between

  • the rich and poor. So we should be very vocal in

  • advocating policies encouraging olive shaped society with most people being

  • middle class and there are two small tips at both ends.

  • So weve got to cultivate the middle class further in all sectors like the

  • property sector, because they need to own their properties.

  • And I think the olive should be the right shape of a society.

  • Now, Chairman Liu represents olive shaped men,

  • right? Yeah, I do believe we should pursue genuine reforms.

  • I think our personal income tax regime should be reformed.

  • And at present, China’s personal income tax regime is a crackdown on the

  • middle class, precisely speaking. Therefore, I think the labor income

  • and the capital gains income should be combined into a composite tax while

  • lowering the rate of personal income tax.

  • Were also talking a lot about the low cost housing, low rent housing.

  • The Singaporean motto is very good one.

  • And with that policy many people have owned properties in Singapore.

  • Then they are no longer anti-government so there is no opposition, almost no

  • opposition, in Singapore, because the middle class accounts for the largest

  • part of the population. That’s just my view.

  • Whenever I talk about reform, you know, Jack Ma becomes interested,

  • right? Well, I ‘m learning. If we want to develop ourselves we

  • need to extend ourselves.

  • Dang Chaoping [phonetics] has talked about the need for five

  • decades of ongoing reform. It’s not a case that the rich people

  • are too many, there are too many rich people in China, but that we have two

  • few rich people in China. If we can ensure the long term

  • stability and sustainability for the rich including the text regime,

  • you know, everybody will aspire to become a rich person.

  • And if you focus too much on the poor, that might be counterproductive as

  • well. So we need to focus on both the rich

  • and the poor. Thank you.

  • Thank you very much to our five panelists.

  • Now, I’ve another key question from Ing Chang.

  • It’s a relay race and it’s a relay race about the crisis,

  • unfortunately. But everybody is here to discuss the crisis, not only an economic crisis but

  • also confidence crisis, moral crisis, and crisis of the ecosystem.

  • What lessons have we drawn from this crisis?

  • Jack has said that Jack regards the crisis like when a French go to a café,

  • you will be either drinking café or on the way to drinking café.

  • So, therefore, I’m going to address the question first to Jack.

  • Well, the crisis erupted two years ago.

  • Have we resolved all the issues related to the crisis or not?

  • Well, every day were talking about the prevention of a second dip.

  • That is a very pessimistic note.

  • We are not going to restore what we were like tomorrow.

  • No, we should not take pride in yesterday.

  • We should not do everything to restore what we were like yesterday.

  • We should focus more on the environment.

  • We should focus more on the young people.

  • We should focus more on the future. That should be the bright attitude.

  • All the past experience, most of the past experience was not good, and with

  • the crisis youve got to confront everything which is part of reality.

  • And I think the opportunity has just begun for me.

  • I haven’t missed any major opportunity.

  • The most important thing is for us to transform ourselves and in five years

  • time well become different from what we are like today.

  • And within the next five years I don’t think we want to miss any opportunity.

  • But what’s the pain out of the crisis?

  • Well, the crisis was a painful experience for so many people

  • especially last year and the year before last.

  • People were so fearful. Why do you have to fear?

  • It’s no use. There’s no point.

  • I have a small brain. I cannot remember so many things.

  • I am not living in yesterday. I’ve forgotten about yesterday.

  • I’ve forgotten yesterday’s pleasures and so much more about yesterday’s

  • pains. And for those lessons, both macro level

  • lessons and the micro level lessons, Doctor Li, David Li, youve talked

  • about how to measure the macro economy and we tend to quantify the economy.

  • But in the Chinese culture we tend to use more vague metric which is due to

  • measure the state of things. Well, I think this crisis has taught us

  • an important lesson in how to be good at using more vague and qualitative

  • measure or qualitative metric to judge the economy.

  • Weve talked about the risks, the overconsumption, the excessive

  • expansion of credit in the United States for many years, and everybody

  • said that no, it wasn’t a problem. But then, you know, later all those

  • problems are not accumulative basis came about in an overwhelming way that

  • took everybody by surprise. But Alibaba was so great, was so

  • successful that it was spared in the crisis.

  • But that is not the case with regard to most other companies.

  • Whenever you see any economic imbalances, you should take immediate

  • measures to remedy them. Otherwise, the crisis will come back

  • to you in one year, in two years, or in decade with a vengeance.

  • So it’s not only a capitalistic or a western civilization crisis, but also

  • a crisis of consumerism by, you know, spending tomorrow’s money for today’s

  • consumption. Talking about the virtues of the

  • Chinese nation and we do things very different.

  • We would like to advocate kind of modesty and frugality.

  • And all your Chinese names, those characters, do suggest those virtues,

  • like always thinking of the perils although you are living.

  • In the case of Chairman Cheng, your name means that always think about

  • adversities and crisis even when living in prosperity and peace.

  • And your father’s name is even more interesting like sacrificing myself.

  • And the middle way is a very important tenet of the Chinese philosophy.

  • In May last year, when I was giving a speech in D.C., I talked about the

  • interrelationship between saving and consumption, internal demand

  • and external demand, innovation and deregulation in the financial sector,

  • the physical economy and the virtual economy and growth and sustainability,

  • economic globalization and regionalization.

  • I talked about the six pairs of relationships and the right balance

  • between all those six sets of concepts. Like most other countries,

  • China resorted to a stimulus investment to boost economic growth.

  • We talked about four trillion RMB Yuan, however, the actual spending was much

  • larger than four trillion and the government intended to invest 1.18

  • trillion in 2008 and the 0.5 trillion last year and this year, but that was

  • not the case. Last year there was 9.6 trillion

  • additional bank credit on top of a 0.5 trillion RMB Yuan government

  • investment. Therefore, it was far more, far greater

  • than expected, than planned. But relying on a stimulus package also

  • has its negative repercussions as well, as Premier Wen Jiabao has pointed out,

  • like X capacity, overstocking, less efficiency investment,

  • deteriorating pollution, inflationary worries, and the worsening ofquality at the local

  • level paving the ground for potential crisis.

  • So the important thing for us is to change our way of economic growth which

  • not simply rely on investment and export to ensure our economic growth.

  • And perhaps more importantly, we should rely on consumption.

  • To do that, an important way is to increase the purchasing power of the

  • people, in other words, to raise people’s income.

  • Otherwise, you will not be able to stimulate consumption.

  • I talked about three institutional arrangements.

  • First, economic growth and people’s income increase should go in a parallel

  • way. Second, salary and price index should

  • be linked together. Third, productivity and people’s

  • income should increase at the same time.

  • If we can do these three together, well be able to stimulate domestic

  • consumption and investment.

  • What if no one is ready to consume? For instance, Mr. Ma Yun, can I ask

  • how much do you shoes cost? Is it part of the modesty of the

  • Chinese virtue? Well, I thought so.

  • Were also talking about whether consumption and environment issues will

  • fall into contradictory issues or are we going to do what the American are

  • doing and to use the money of tomorrow, but you simply cannot save all money to

  • the banks because that will not stimulate economic growth.

  • So you have to consider the appropriate limit on this material cost.

  • The second is non-material cost. Perhaps, Mr. Yun Ma spends a lot in

  • the so-called non-material consumption. What do you mean by non-material

  • consumption you do not spend on goods?

  • Like service, the service type consumption, Alibaba,

  • taobao.com. Those are service based consumption. And talking about Chinese virtues in

  • the process of economic recovery, weve noticed that positive impacts of

  • Chinese virtue, as Chairman Cheng has rightly mentioned, the middle way,

  • but we have to be cautious. In other words, we should not or

  • simply turn our Chinese virtues into non-burdens, for instance,

  • being economy, practice economy. The Chinese people saves a lot of

  • money into the banks causing burden on the banks.

  • And consumption is the same issue, how to stimulate consumption that we need

  • to change peoplesmindset. So on those issues, if we oversize

  • too much on practicing economy which is part of the Chinese traditional

  • culture, that will not be a good thing for our planned consumption growth

  • and economy growth. And we also, while we are talking

  • about the profound historical and cultural roots, perhaps we may ignore

  • the necessity of innovation. So now we are talking about

  • transforming from Made in China into Designed in China.

  • Ma Yun was also talking about transforming the four thousand years of

  • Chinese culture into a platform for future growth.

  • So innovation is another new challenge in front of us in this new era.

  • Mr. Liu, talking about innovation and creativity of culture industry, we all

  • know that United States, although facing consumption crisis, sees a large

  • percentage of contribution from the cultural industry, for instance,

  • 25 percent. Take Phoenix TV as an example, how can

  • you translate Chinese virtue into its contribution to GDP growth?

  • In China, culture industry contributes little to its GDP growth.

  • In 2008, 2.6 percent but the U.S. is 25 percent, U.K. 17 percent, Japan over

  • 15 percent. I used to tell a story that Beijing

  • was hoping that in the 11th five year plan culture contribution to its GDP

  • growth would be increased to 15 percent from five percent.

  • I’m not sure if that objective can be delivered but, anyway, that shows an

  • expectation for the contribution of China’s culture industry to be

  • increased to 15 percent of its GDP growth.

  • Culture is no longer a culture issue. It, itself, is an important factor

  • behind economic growth or an important factor of economic development.

  • If its contribution can be raised to 15 percent, that will be a great

  • stimulus behind economic growth. Now, the baton is back to Mr. Yu.

  • Youve mentioned Mr. Ma’s shoes, well, that was exactly the pair of shoes I

  • was wearing when I was growing up. When I was on a business trip to

  • London, I noticed that there were different -- shoes was different price

  • tags such as ten thousand sterlings or one thousand sterlings.

  • So I asked the shop assistants why so expensive.

  • They told me it was purely handmade. So I said, well, all of my shoes were

  • made by my mother but how can your shoes be so expensive?

  • So where is the difference? Where does the difference come from?

  • Where does our difference come from relative to our difference with the

  • U.S., E.U., and other western countries?

  • Not only in technological difference but also brand difference and also

  • expertise, of course, the shoes made by my mother will not cost one thousand

  • sterlings because it’s not made of good expertise.

  • Therefore, while accelerating in technological growth, we should be more

  • interested in increasing employment. China is a large country with

  • a sizeable population and limited resources.

  • How can we translate our population resource into more useful resources?

  • We should be more focused on handmade, not on the traditional shoes like Mr.

  • Ma Yun is wearing, but rather the luxury shoes that are on the shelves of

  • the London stores.

  • So we are not simply talking about increasing high tech contents,

  • but rather, were talking about expanding brand awareness and expertise to create

  • more values.

  • Now, we are talking about indigenous innovation and indigenous brand,

  • but that is not limited to IT industry and internet.

  • Shoes industry can also facilitate economic growth.

  • So back mother made shoes, one thing that may be a little bit weird to you

  • in transforming from Made in China into Invented in China or Designed in China,

  • if China is still purchasing coals or oils with the money it has, then China

  • will not be able to have products designed in China.

  • The most valuable resources for China is the brains of the 1.3 billion

  • people. So the issue in front of us is culture

  • and education. We should be more interested in the

  • young people. We should make sure that they are more

  • inclusive. The traditional Chinese culture talks

  • about caring for the elderly people and the young people.

  • If we can respect the talents and take care of the elderly people then,

  • definitely, China will have a better growth.

  • The reason for us to have the five panelists, actually, is a long story.

  • Were talking about the issues. Will there be the next round of dip?

  • First, you have to remember the names of the panelists.

  • Cheng Siwei, Siwei means think about the future and potential dangers

  • and take precautionary measures. Daokui, Daokui means to be modest,

  • to have humility. And Shing-Shing means confidence.

  • If you have confidence, youll be able to be Mr. Ma Yun wearing the mother

  • made shoes and walking across the world.

  • Changle means everlasting happiness. Thank you.

Ladies and gentleman, distinguished guests, good afternoon.

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

天津2010--(電視辯論會天津電視臺)反思全球復甦。來自中國的觀點 (Tianjin 2010 - (TV Debate Tianjin TV) Rethinking the Global Recovery: The View from China)

  • 170 4
    iepavb 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字