字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 Ladies and gentleman, distinguished guests, good afternoon. This is a TV debate jointly sponsored by Tianjin TV Station and Phoenix Satellite TV. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. I’m Hu I-Hu from Phoenix TV. Well, I was reminded back to September the 15th, 2008. At that time that was the financial crisis… went bankrupt. Well, precisely, we are two years later from that date. Seems like today we are in two years anniversary. However, I think we should divide today’s issues into opportunities and challenges and we are talking about post-crisis age. What are the challenges in front of us? Well, we’re already encountered challenges but we have more to come. So one of the issues in front of us is, are we welcoming a brighter future or a darker future? Before we invite our five panelists, let’s watch the big screen and look at the current status of our economy. Having come through rescue plans it seems that the worldwide economy is now in a recovery road. This also includes the four trillion RMB in economics dues, luminous package of the Chinese governments at the end of 2008 which contributed to 8.7 percent of China’s GDP growth in 2009. In the first half of 2010, China’s GDP grew by 11.1 percent leading to a robust economic growth. It is true that the signs of economic recovery are already there in some countries. However, United States and other western economies still grew in a slow way. Take the U.S. as an example. In the first quarter of this year, GDP grew by 3.7 percent, in the second quarter 1.6 percent, and as of July its unemployment rate reached 16.5 percent. It is fair to say that the concerns for a second economic dip is over and countries are looking for new growth points. However, the world economy is still facing many challenges including new issues in China’s economic recovery such as resistance in export overheating in investment, slow growth in domestic demand, a vague picture in the real estate market and concerns about stimulus policy and inflation after two years anniversary of economic crisis looking back on the global economic recovery. Is China already on this recovery road? In today’s context how can China facilitate its own economic growth? Welcome to TV Debate of Tianjin TV and Phoenix TV. Well, we’ve all heard of these questions from the video clips. That is precisely why we are having this TV debate. Let us once again warmly welcome the five distinguished panelists. First, Mr. Cheng Siwei, Chairman of International Finance Forum. Second, Professor Li Daokui, Director from Center for China in the World Economy Tsinghua University. Mr. Liu Changle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from Phoenix Satellite TV Hong Kong SAR. Mr. Jack Ma Yun, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Alibaba Group, People’s Republic of China. And Mr. Yu Rumin, Chairman of the Board, Tianjin Port Company. Welcome in our TV debate. So to start with, let me have an interaction with you. Before we ask our questions on our distinguished panelists, let me give you a test. Two years ago we heard a saying that confidence is more important than gold at any times. In today’s context, what’s your confidence about the worldwide economy? Do you think that in the short round, is it possible for the world economy to fall into a second dip? Please raise your hands. Three, two, one. Second dip. Others seem to be more optimistic so where does the concern come from? Mr. Cheng, we noticed that five and six of the audience are still concerned. They are still afraid of a second round of economic dip. But I think that two years ago you’ve mentioned at a global forum that the international financial crisis will be over after another two to three years. So you think that 2011 will show a new start? Now, two years later, do you still hold the same view? Yes, we all know that China’s economy is growing in a robust way and this year we are transforming from a special state out of financial crisis into a normal stage. If we look around the world, I am a cautious optimist. In my view the world economy is right now in a challenging and testing road of recovery. In other words, there are still uncertainties, but, on the whole, the world economy will return back to recovery. Now, the biggest challenge in front of us is, of course, first, that crisis, sovereignty debt crisis in European countries, but, in my view, that would not lead to a second global economic dip. However, as some countries need more borrowing, that will slow down the rate of European of recovery. Second, there are still uncertainties and instabilities in the U.S. economy. Of course, U.S. is under debt pressure but U.S. is a large economy and people are still borrowing money to the U.S. So it seems to be that there is not such a huge debt crisis for the U.S. However, its unemployment rate and other issues are yet to be resolved and coupled with political factors and the issues of middle term election, there are still uncertainties in the U.S. economy. All of these add up to certain global economic recovery. Thank you. Thank you, Chairman Cheng. Chairman Cheng said that in the future he is confident but he’s still observing. Apart from the U.S. economic recovery he is also interested in what are European Union has gone through its economic crisis. And before raising the question to Professor Li, let’s look at the big screen. People say that statistics matter most. So can you conclude from the statistics that we can be confident the economy is really getting better? Through these statistics, I think Professor Li knows better than I do. This is a PMI comparative diagram that we noticed that on this diagram there are figures of China, E.U., U.S., and Japan. Almost all of them have a PMI of over 50 percent. Can that give us confidence? Definitely. It is a clear proof that confidence from consumers and investors is getting back. However, there is one regret about this diagram because it only talks about China, but China is not the only one on the recovery road. China and a large number of emerging markets are already on healthy road of development which was quite rare in the previous ten years. Those countries will be strong motive behind global economic recovery for the next five to ten years. I noticed that six or seven people of the audience are still concerned about the possibilities of a second round of economic dip. The second dip is a new word. It indicates the overall economic slowdown and presumably back to the bottom. Well, does that exist such a possibility? I think there’s little likelihood because this round of financial crisis is completely different from the last round of Asian financial crisis because it is the crisis that originated from the balance sheet of private companies. Looking back on the previous two years, developed countries are already taking up proper measures which prevent the possibility for a second dip. However, it cannot change the fact that developed countries are already suffering from this crisis. So perhaps we should be more interested in the issue of some architectural changes after this crisis. And I saw the face of Jack Ma Yun. He seems to be quite relaxed. But I remember that you mentioned that knowing will not make you cold, but you mentioned that while snow is being melt you will feel very cold, bitterly cold. Do you have different views from the previous two speakers? For me, crisis when they would be over, if you’re always afraid of crisis, you will be living in a constant state of fear. Crisis will come more often. As a company, as an individual, we should be more adaptive to crisis. It is true this is a sizeable crisis, but I think people are more adaptive to crisis. In the case of China, China needs to leverage this opportunity to restructure our industries, our industrial mix. Having worked out of the crisis we’ve got to initiate new measures and China was not as hard hit as quite a number of developed economies such as U.S. during the crisis. However, during the crisis, the impact on China was relatively limited, but the difficulties involving restructuring are far greater than expected. Yes, that brings us to the business perspective on the need for restructuring. So the goods, import and exports, are forerunning indicator for the state of the economy. And yesterday Warren Buffet said that he had every confidence in the U.S. economy without any prospect for double dip recession. Do you agree with the optimism of Warren Buffet and do you have confidence in all statistics as well? Despite a lot of difficulties going forward, I don’t think there is a prospect for double dip recession, and the world economy is firmly on the trajectory of recovery. There’s no mistake about it. And the port, through ports, has increased by 17 percent in China, and all those indicators are pointing to the path of recovery. And the Baltic Shipping Index reached eleven thousand plus points before the financial crisis. Now, it is still lingering around three thousand points, which shows the world economy has not yet recovered, but for eleven thousand seven hundred and ninety three points prior to the crisis, it was abnormal. And we’re not going to return to that high level. And now the current Baltic Shipping Index is roughly at the level of 2003 and the breakeven point for shipping companies between twenty seven hundred points and three thousand points, therefore, it’s rather a reasonable point. And for CCFI, for container exports, for China the index reached twelve hundred and two points before the crisis. Now, it has gone above the previous peak indicating robust economic growth in China including exports. Therefore, we are definitely on the path of recovery. I don’t think there’s a prospect for double dip recession. And in order for us to leave the crisis completely behind still takes time before full-fledged recovery is achieved. So we have heard cautious optimism but they have the consensus that there’s not going to be a second dip. What about you, Chairman Liu? You’ve talked about Warren Buffet’s remarks this morning. The remarks were made yesterday and his remarks were covered by TV this morning. And he believed that there’s one-third likelihood of a second dip while the two-thirds of the chances are that it’s not going to happen. So I think there’s going to be a mild recovery. Talking about recovery, there are extreme recoveries, complete recoveries, and mild -- versus mild recoveries. And I think if we use the word mild recovery, it is more pertinent in describing the current situation and which means two-thirds of the chance that there’s not going to be a second dip. And I want to say something to the friends from the media. Many media friends are hyping the notion of a double dip recession. There is something right in saying so because they are sending some warning signals to us. And there’s something good for us to hear some warning, alarms from the media. Whenever the alarm sounds, it is helpful instead of being harmful according to an old Chinese saying. And the global financial crisis started from sectorial crisis. Later it spread to a global worldwide crisis impacting all the sectors. Therefore, I think it’s a very healthy thing for us to be reminded by the media. So with precautions taken, then we will take every precaution against a second dip then that truly will not happen. Now, I’d like to ask anyone from the audience to challenge the panelists if you have any different view from theirs or if you have any question for them, if you have any comments to make. Please raise your hands. And I think some of you do believe in the prospect of a second dip. Please raise your hands again. Please raise your hands again those who believe in double dip recession. Please share your view with us. Microphone please. I still believe in the prospect of a second dip. When the crisis came around in the first instance, those root causes has not been addressed. And at that time everybody believed that the financial sector and the policies and institutions in the west were very good, were very sound, but then there came the crisis, so given that, it is still likely that we’re going to go through a second dip. What are those factors which are yet to be exhausted? I’m not an economist. I’m a chemist. But pursuing a scientific point of view you’ve got to prove that all the likelihood for a second dip can be truly ruled out. Without that I’m not going to believe in the exclusion of the prospect of double dip recession. Dr. David Li, how can you convince the chemist? Oh, I think it’s also a philosophical challenge against our views. Let me address your question in an equally philosophical way. Philosophically speaking, this crisis erupted as a result of accumulation of many factors that had been building up over the years and after its eruption with numerous forceful measures, the symptoms of the disease had been cured, but not the root causes. But in the near future, it’s not likely that another major malaise, major disease, is going to break out. But we’ve got to change the structure of the world economy. To make it more specific United States should rectify its trade deficits. And it is still blaming on the currency exchange rate policies of other countries instead of taking the real structural measures. And also, we have heard fresh controversy over the regimes of free trade and the Doha round has not yielded intended results. And we need to do more on that as well. Is there a chemical reaction, Mr. Chemist? Talking about the United States I have an extra point to make about the United States. I think the United States is quite problematic given a high unemployment rate and interim election is coming. And President Barack Obama has talked about a lot of changes but the changes enacted are so limited. And if the republicans are going to win the interim election in the congress, they will prevent Obama from adopting further changes and reforms. So those deep-seated concerns and issues will give rise to a second dip. You’re not only a chemist but also an expert on international relations. I’m also an expert on chemistry and later I became an economist. So for possibility of a second dip whether we are on the track of recovery or not or whether we are going to slip into recession again, we need to define it first. If there are three consecutive quarters of a negative growth, it is recession. If there are three consecutive quarters of positive growth, it is recovery. So let’s define them first. Not we’re talking about probabilities. We’re talking about probabilistic chances of a second dip mathematically speaking. That’s the second point I want to make. And there’s a great deal of complexity involved involving the U.S and because political factors are meddled into its overall picture of economic recovery especially after the interim election and maybe the checks and balances between the executive branch and the legislative branch will make recovery harder in the United States. But, in general, I don’t think there’s going to be a second dip, although we cannot rule out the possibility completely. Thank you very much, Chairman Cheng. Let’s stop talking about chemistry. Let’s return to our topic of economics and let’s rely more on triggers and statistics. Now, this figure, this number gives me some worry. Let’s take a look at the CPI. In 2009, July 2009 to August 2010, we have a 3.5 percent CPI growth, a new high in 24 months. So after reading such a figure you might wonder that there are hidden perils in the road ahead. With higher CPI it might give rise to inflationary trends, even inflation. So what are the policy responses that are appropriate under such a context? Well, let’s return to the fundamentals of doing business. I’m never worried about things that our Premier worries about, because I’m doing my business. Let’s return to fundamentals of business. I always focus on the performance of my company. For second dip or even a triple dip recovery going higher or going lower, how big is the impact on us? With the second dip not all businesses are to suffer. You should be well prepared. And with the elevation of the CPI not everybody will suffer, likewise, not everybody will benefit. Doing your own job well is always the most important thing. Higher CPI is not going to cure everybody. And all the rallies of economic growth are short lived and crises and disasters are always there to await you. So, yes, those figures are important, but you just listen to the reports. You just take a look at it. You don’t have to worry about it. You don’t have to do anything. What else you can do. You only have to take care of yourself. Well, I think that an indicator more or less will lead you some concerns because having taken the four trillion on the stimulus package, definitely, the…will see increasing liquidity and the result of increasing liquidity is rising prices. If the price grows up to a certain extent that will threaten the normal economic operation and then the government will take deflationary measures. And now the government is in a dilemma. The economic recovery is not yet a firmly defined trend and they ask… in the process if the government takes up a tighter policy and that will be different from its previous policies. However, if the government simply allows the commodity prices to go all the way up, that will threaten economic development. So I guess, the corrective policy is to ensure consistency and continuity, moderate adjustment, for instance, moderate control of liquidity. I guess that will make things at least a little bit better. Some people are talking about increasing interest rate but I think we have to be very cautious about that. Interest rates change at this moment will affect consumption. Once consumption is affected economic development will be affected. And investment will be affected as well. Adding up these impacts together we will have negative impacts for fast economic recovery. Thank you. Chairman Cheng, although Ma Yun said micro issues are more practical but perhaps we should be more interested in macroeconomic issues. Is it already the time for the interest rate to go up? Ma Yun’s words will lead all of the macroeconomists out of jobs. Well, of course, for a businessman it should be interested in its own business but it also should be interested in the overall economic situation. Indeed, China sees the risk of inflation. As I mentioned in… last year, first growing liquidity will cause inflation as normally defined. And inflation is the growing of the currency price due to excessive currency supply. That’s an important cause for inflation. We’ve seen that happening that is why compared with last year currency supply is on the decline. And moderate level second commodity price, if you look at what is happening this year, commodity price, in particular, food price is going up. This is evident to all of us. And the CPI figure is a comparison relative to the same period of last year. We have to look at the comparative figure relative to last month. Second, international factors, geologic stand, oil price, and grain price. Those are important factors to be considered. Combining these three factors together and in the first half of this year 3.3 percent and this was quite a large increase than the previous period. However, those two factors containing inflation such as the telling effect, however, such a fast growth rate, I think it is already a reasonable credit for China to control its inflation to below five percent not necessarily three percent. As to the issue of increasing interest rate, well, back to inflation rate, below five percent and now back to increasing interest rate that is another dilemma. Last year we are growing our liquidity and increasing investment. This year, you cannot have fast break all of a sudden because that one activity affect the society and the companies. So we have to do it slowly. The central government made it clear this year’s GDP growth rate which would be eight percent last year and the goal was 9.1 percent, so we are trying to have a step by step slow down in terms of investment. Last year’s growth was 13.1 percent, in the first half of this year, 24.8 percent, so this is a gradual process. As I’ve mentioned, this year is a year of change from economic crisis back to normal growth trajectory. So this year policy changes will be very complicated and there will be many scenarios of dilemma such as increasing interest rate. As I’ve mentioned, increased interest rate will control inflation. But, on the other hand, it will add to the pressure of enterprises and contain consumption. And increasing interest rate will attract hot money inflows into China leading to risk-free increase of profits. That will not be a good thing for reducing liquidity. So those are issues in front of us. But in the long term I think increasing interest rate is a necessary choice. But as to the accepted timing, I guess I’m not so sure. As Chairman has rightly mentioned, this is a dilemma, but we all know that we have to make the most advantageous decision. Well, I am a scholar and I’ve studying in this are by following my own principles and have been observing the macroeconomic development for a long time, although macroeconomic policies may not be as important to some successful companies, but they certainly are to lesser successful companies. At this critical point, I think this figure deserves our attention in two ways. First, there is an impact of tail of effect. Well, I do not think that we should be over panicked. I think that the overall inflation rate can be controlled within 2.9 percent and at the end of the third quarter it will be… to 3.7 percent. …too panicked. And if we look at the reason behind the rising commodity price, I think it’s largely because of infrastructure. That’s a good thing. Second, increasing caused in agriculture which will transfer to the price of agriculture produce. And third, increasing price international materials. So combining these factors together in the next five to ten years or even longer period of time, this state of economic development will become a regular state. And if we increase a little bit the deposit interest rate, then the Chinese people will be able to have a correct expectation. In other words, they will still have their interest while saving their money into the banks. Such a policy change may help us stabilize economic development and financial system. Thank you. Right now we are having a TV debate. I noticed that perhaps one of the most intensive debate is about the macro versus micro. Back to Jack Ma Yun. I don’t think there is a differentiation of successful businessman and unsuccessful businessman. I think that all of them should listen to the words of Professor Li and Chairman Cheng because they are the correct economists. But you know that 90 percent of Chinese companies are small-medium sized enterprises. If they listened to those so-called economists, then they will find themselves in big trouble. It looked like our company we have people making judgments for us on a daily basis. They give us different kinds of policy advices and leaving us... However, I think that the genuine economists are really very few. We have too many economists that are not real economists. Unfortunately, we are not expanding the debate of this topic into wider debate. Back to Mr. Liu. Chairman Cheng was talking about dilemma. We also noticed CPI issue and the potential issues from inflation. But I think that there’s another dilemma, for instance, in terms of four trillion RMB, a faster break, a slow break, or no break. While making these decisions, we have to consider China’s employment issue. Premier Wen has made it clear to us that China has over ten million migrant workers, 20 million unemployment workers, so the 40 million people are yet to be employed. The U.S. also has three biggest issues, first, severe unemployment issue, second, proper rate and property market, and third, virtual economy. So I think the same is true to China. If we look from a larger picture, if we take a more aggressive approach, perhaps that will affect China’s economic growth. And we should not ignore the resulting social impacts. I do agree with some scholars in that we should not take extremely aggressive firm measures in addressing overheating issues and simply… away - take more aggressive measures in addressing overheating issues. I think, rather, we need to have a more sustained way of development and develop more sustained strategies. Some statistics may be important but they are not so important as to affect the long term decision making. Thank you. Thank you. Now, the floor is open to questions. Good afternoon from China Economic Weekly. In the morning, Mr. Ma, in a closed session was talking about the small and big issue, smallest beautiful issues, how can you connect small with the bigger globalization? Other questions? We’ll answer the questions all together. Good afternoon. I have a question. A rationale we are all talking about quantitative growth, but what about the quality of growth, in particular, shortening world gap, do you have any suggestions? As an individual, as a company, and as a government, what can we do to bridge the world gap while maintaining robust economic growth? Thank you. Thank you for the questions. Any one from the middle? Any one from the center? And anyone from the right? I think the theme of our discussion is economic sustainability. I think the economy is getting better. Panelists all have their views on second dip. Economy is like four seasons. In the short run we may have different kinds of challenges, but in the long run we’re always in a good state. I hope that our panelists can give us more confidence and I thank them for their speech. Ma Yun, could you answer this question about smallest beauty? I think that the crisis issue is not about economic crisis. It’s more of a crisis of development and it involves environment and poverty. I think that the world must learn from this crisis and the world must be more optimistic. The world must know that it has to create a better future and adjust today’s issues such as environmental issues and poverty issues. If companies want to get above the crisis and move to a better future, they have to do more in environmental protection and poverty reduction. And the biggest difference in the 21st century from the 20th century is that in this century, the century will be dominated by smaller and more flexible companies. I think one of the issues we are all interested in is to adjust the short term issues, the existing issues, and the long term issues. At the moment we need to facilitate sustainable economic growth, however, which does not satisfy the long term interest of human development, for instance, resource population and environment. Those are our fundamental issues. Without resolving them all of our sustainability can only be achieved in the short run. And we’re all talking about industrial upgrading, increasing the high tech content, of course, those are important issues, but we’ll have to talk about facilitating greater employment rate. That is the major way to address poverty and to address world gap. And just now we talked about quality of economic growth. I think there are two issues, first is social just, second, sustainable development. Sustainable development involves consideration of development cost. If our cost of growth exceeds our rate of growth, then I do not think that is a correct way. We made a study of our environmental cost in 2005. In other words, thanks to environmental deterioration and the environmental pollution contributed to even 13 percent of our GDP growth. If we continue to do so, then we’ll have to leave the environmental debt to our future generations. That is hardly a sustainable way of growth. That’s one aspect of the quality of growth and second is divide between the rich and poor. And I think there are two sub-issues in China. First, the world gap between urban and rural regions, the urban residents have an income three times that of rural residents and four times more a purchasing power than that of the rural residents and they’re enjoying much better education, health care, and other public services. We need to help increase the income earned by the rural residents and also at the same time, within urban China we need to decrease income disparities. And in the primary distribution we should fill the highlight, the… and I think, also, should constantly improve productivity to help generate more income for workers. Otherwise, increasing income has no basis to start with. So we need to pursue more social justice and sustainability. Doctor Li. I’m also an alumni of Miss Cho who asked the question. It’s very important question. It best sound the social foundation of the economic sustainability of China. Let’s be very clear that in the process of economic development and growth there is a stage at which the income distribution mechanisms should be optimized. For example, in the present day China, for the migrant workers from rural China into urban China, the income growth rate for them is much faster than that of the urban white collar professionals. So the market is playing its due role here. The market is working. We should not artificially interfere in the workings of the market by artificially raising the salaries and wages for some sectors in the labor force. We should pursue genuine reforms instead of making much ado about nothing. Chairman Liu. It’s a very concrete issue which is a fostering and expansion of the middle class in China. Can the middle class in China reach a critical mess? According to some statistics between now and 2030 throughout the world the middle class will expand from 1.8 billion to almost 4 billion people worldwide and that purchasing powers are going to grow from a 2.9 billion U.S. Dollars to over five billion U.S. Dollars and most of the emerging middle class will come from Asia, and those experts to believe that a bulk of them, lion share of them, will come from China and India. But will China initiate policies to foster the growing middle class or the growth of the middle class? And without middle class, we will continue to confront it by those social issues such as economic unsustainability and the gap between the rich and poor. So we should be very vocal in advocating policies encouraging olive shaped society with most people being middle class and there are two small tips at both ends. So we’ve got to cultivate the middle class further in all sectors like the property sector, because they need to own their properties. And I think the olive should be the right shape of a society. Now, Chairman Liu represents olive shaped men, right? Yeah, I do believe we should pursue genuine reforms. I think our personal income tax regime should be reformed. And at present, China’s personal income tax regime is a crackdown on the middle class, precisely speaking. Therefore, I think the labor income and the capital gains income should be combined into a composite tax while lowering the rate of personal income tax. We’re also talking a lot about the low cost housing, low rent housing. The Singaporean motto is very good one. And with that policy many people have owned properties in Singapore. Then they are no longer anti-government so there is no opposition, almost no opposition, in Singapore, because the middle class accounts for the largest part of the population. That’s just my view. Whenever I talk about reform, you know, Jack Ma becomes interested, right? Well, I ‘m learning. If we want to develop ourselves we need to extend ourselves. Dang Chaoping [phonetics] has talked about the need for five decades of ongoing reform. It’s not a case that the rich people are too many, there are too many rich people in China, but that we have two few rich people in China. If we can ensure the long term stability and sustainability for the rich including the text regime, you know, everybody will aspire to become a rich person. And if you focus too much on the poor, that might be counterproductive as well. So we need to focus on both the rich and the poor. Thank you. Thank you very much to our five panelists. Now, I’ve another key question from Ing Chang. It’s a relay race and it’s a relay race about the crisis, unfortunately. But everybody is here to discuss the crisis, not only an economic crisis but also confidence crisis, moral crisis, and crisis of the ecosystem. What lessons have we drawn from this crisis? Jack has said that Jack regards the crisis like when a French go to a café, you will be either drinking café or on the way to drinking café. So, therefore, I’m going to address the question first to Jack. Well, the crisis erupted two years ago. Have we resolved all the issues related to the crisis or not? Well, every day we’re talking about the prevention of a second dip. That is a very pessimistic note. We are not going to restore what we were like tomorrow. No, we should not take pride in yesterday. We should not do everything to restore what we were like yesterday. We should focus more on the environment. We should focus more on the young people. We should focus more on the future. That should be the bright attitude. All the past experience, most of the past experience was not good, and with the crisis you’ve got to confront everything which is part of reality. And I think the opportunity has just begun for me. I haven’t missed any major opportunity. The most important thing is for us to transform ourselves and in five years’ time we’ll become different from what we are like today. And within the next five years I don’t think we want to miss any opportunity. But what’s the pain out of the crisis? Well, the crisis was a painful experience for so many people especially last year and the year before last. People were so fearful. Why do you have to fear? It’s no use. There’s no point. I have a small brain. I cannot remember so many things. I am not living in yesterday. I’ve forgotten about yesterday. I’ve forgotten yesterday’s pleasures and so much more about yesterday’s pains. And for those lessons, both macro level lessons and the micro level lessons, Doctor Li, David Li, you’ve talked about how to measure the macro economy and we tend to quantify the economy. But in the Chinese culture we tend to use more vague metric which is due to measure the state of things. Well, I think this crisis has taught us an important lesson in how to be good at using more vague and qualitative measure or qualitative metric to judge the economy. We’ve talked about the risks, the overconsumption, the excessive expansion of credit in the United States for many years, and everybody said that no, it wasn’t a problem. But then, you know, later all those problems are not accumulative basis came about in an overwhelming way that took everybody by surprise. But Alibaba was so great, was so successful that it was spared in the crisis. But that is not the case with regard to most other companies. Whenever you see any economic imbalances, you should take immediate measures to remedy them. Otherwise, the crisis will come back to you in one year, in two years, or in decade with a vengeance. So it’s not only a capitalistic or a western civilization crisis, but also a crisis of consumerism by, you know, spending tomorrow’s money for today’s consumption. Talking about the virtues of the Chinese nation and we do things very different. We would like to advocate kind of modesty and frugality. And all your Chinese names, those characters, do suggest those virtues, like always thinking of the perils although you are living. In the case of Chairman Cheng, your name means that always think about adversities and crisis even when living in prosperity and peace. And your father’s name is even more interesting like sacrificing myself. And the middle way is a very important tenet of the Chinese philosophy. In May last year, when I was giving a speech in D.C., I talked about the interrelationship between saving and consumption, internal demand and external demand, innovation and deregulation in the financial sector, the physical economy and the virtual economy and growth and sustainability, economic globalization and regionalization. I talked about the six pairs of relationships and the right balance between all those six sets of concepts. Like most other countries, China resorted to a stimulus investment to boost economic growth. We talked about four trillion RMB Yuan, however, the actual spending was much larger than four trillion and the government intended to invest 1.18 trillion in 2008 and the 0.5 trillion last year and this year, but that was not the case. Last year there was 9.6 trillion additional bank credit on top of a 0.5 trillion RMB Yuan government investment. Therefore, it was far more, far greater than expected, than planned. But relying on a stimulus package also has its negative repercussions as well, as Premier Wen Jiabao has pointed out, like X capacity, overstocking, less efficiency investment, deteriorating pollution, inflationary worries, and the worsening of… quality at the local level paving the ground for potential crisis. So the important thing for us is to change our way of economic growth which not simply rely on investment and export to ensure our economic growth. And perhaps more importantly, we should rely on consumption. To do that, an important way is to increase the purchasing power of the people, in other words, to raise people’s income. Otherwise, you will not be able to stimulate consumption. I talked about three institutional arrangements. First, economic growth and people’s income increase should go in a parallel way. Second, salary and price index should be linked together. Third, productivity and people’s income should increase at the same time. If we can do these three together, we’ll be able to stimulate domestic consumption and investment. What if no one is ready to consume? For instance, Mr. Ma Yun, can I ask how much do you shoes cost? Is it part of the modesty of the Chinese virtue? Well, I thought so. We’re also talking about whether consumption and environment issues will fall into contradictory issues or are we going to do what the American are doing and to use the money of tomorrow, but you simply cannot save all money to the banks because that will not stimulate economic growth. So you have to consider the appropriate limit on this material cost. The second is non-material cost. Perhaps, Mr. Yun Ma spends a lot in the so-called non-material consumption. What do you mean by non-material consumption you do not spend on goods? Like service, the service type consumption, Alibaba, taobao.com. Those are service based consumption. And talking about Chinese virtues in the process of economic recovery, we’ve noticed that positive impacts of Chinese virtue, as Chairman Cheng has rightly mentioned, the middle way, but we have to be cautious. In other words, we should not or simply turn our Chinese virtues into non-burdens, for instance, being economy, practice economy. The Chinese people saves a lot of money into the banks causing burden on the banks. And consumption is the same issue, how to stimulate consumption that we need to change peoples’ mindset. So on those issues, if we oversize too much on practicing economy which is part of the Chinese traditional culture, that will not be a good thing for our planned consumption growth and economy growth. And we also, while we are talking about the profound historical and cultural roots, perhaps we may ignore the necessity of innovation. So now we are talking about transforming from Made in China into Designed in China. Ma Yun was also talking about transforming the four thousand years of Chinese culture into a platform for future growth. So innovation is another new challenge in front of us in this new era. Mr. Liu, talking about innovation and creativity of culture industry, we all know that United States, although facing consumption crisis, sees a large percentage of contribution from the cultural industry, for instance, 25 percent. Take Phoenix TV as an example, how can you translate Chinese virtue into its contribution to GDP growth? In China, culture industry contributes little to its GDP growth. In 2008, 2.6 percent but the U.S. is 25 percent, U.K. 17 percent, Japan over 15 percent. I used to tell a story that Beijing was hoping that in the 11th five year plan culture contribution to its GDP growth would be increased to 15 percent from five percent. I’m not sure if that objective can be delivered but, anyway, that shows an expectation for the contribution of China’s culture industry to be increased to 15 percent of its GDP growth. Culture is no longer a culture issue. It, itself, is an important factor behind economic growth or an important factor of economic development. If its contribution can be raised to 15 percent, that will be a great stimulus behind economic growth. Now, the baton is back to Mr. Yu. You’ve mentioned Mr. Ma’s shoes, well, that was exactly the pair of shoes I was wearing when I was growing up. When I was on a business trip to London, I noticed that there were different -- shoes was different price tags such as ten thousand sterlings or one thousand sterlings. So I asked the shop assistants why so expensive. They told me it was purely handmade. So I said, well, all of my shoes were made by my mother but how can your shoes be so expensive? So where is the difference? Where does the difference come from? Where does our difference come from relative to our difference with the U.S., E.U., and other western countries? Not only in technological difference but also brand difference and also expertise, of course, the shoes made by my mother will not cost one thousand sterlings because it’s not made of good expertise. Therefore, while accelerating in technological growth, we should be more interested in increasing employment. China is a large country with a sizeable population and limited resources. How can we translate our population resource into more useful resources? We should be more focused on handmade, not on the traditional shoes like Mr. Ma Yun is wearing, but rather the luxury shoes that are on the shelves of the London stores. So we are not simply talking about increasing high tech contents, but rather, we’re talking about expanding brand awareness and expertise to create more values. Now, we are talking about indigenous innovation and indigenous brand, but that is not limited to IT industry and internet. Shoes industry can also facilitate economic growth. So back mother made shoes, one thing that may be a little bit weird to you in transforming from Made in China into Invented in China or Designed in China, if China is still purchasing coals or oils with the money it has, then China will not be able to have products designed in China. The most valuable resources for China is the brains of the 1.3 billion people. So the issue in front of us is culture and education. We should be more interested in the young people. We should make sure that they are more inclusive. The traditional Chinese culture talks about caring for the elderly people and the young people. If we can respect the talents and take care of the elderly people then, definitely, China will have a better growth. The reason for us to have the five panelists, actually, is a long story. We’re talking about the issues. Will there be the next round of dip? First, you have to remember the names of the panelists. Cheng Siwei, Siwei means think about the future and potential dangers and take precautionary measures. Daokui, Daokui means to be modest, to have humility. And Shing-Shing means confidence. If you have confidence, you’ll be able to be Mr. Ma Yun wearing the mother made shoes and walking across the world. Changle means everlasting happiness. Thank you.
B1 中級 天津2010--(電視辯論會天津電視臺)反思全球復甦。來自中國的觀點 (Tianjin 2010 - (TV Debate Tianjin TV) Rethinking the Global Recovery: The View from China) 170 4 iepavb 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字