Name: [英語對話／中英字幕] 黃國昌 3/23 板橋演講解析！道盡政府貪腐雙標！#看政治學英語 [ 國際可能不瞭解臺灣，靠你我的轉發，為真相找出口！]#看政治學英語 @KC-Huang ([英語對話／中英字幕] 黃國昌 3/23 板橋演講解析! 道盡政府貪腐雙標！#看政治學英語 [ 國際可能不了解台灣，靠你我的轉發，為真相找出口！]#看政治學英語 ⁨@KC-Huang)
Uploaded: 2025-03-28T05:31:28.000Z
Duration: 15 min 52 s

程度副詞

All right, so for this deep dive, we're going to really try to unpack the key arguments and the specific examples that Huang Guochang laid out in this speech.

好了，在這次深入探討中，我們將嘗試解讀黃國昌在講話中提出的關鍵論點和具體事例。

And you know, we'll consider how similar situations might be viewed and handled in more established democracies.

你知道，我們會考慮在更成熟的民主國家如何看待和處理類似情況。

轉承詞

Yeah, because that's the thing that really gets you thinking, right?

是啊，因為這才是真正讓你思考的東西，對嗎？

Like, how would this play out in, say, the U.S. or the U.K.?

比如說，這在美國或英國會如何發展？

那麼，讓我們來看看這份記錄稿吧。

So Huang Guochang, he starts his speech by really emphasizing Taiwanese identity and this core principle that in a democracy, the people hold the ultimate power.

是以，黃國昌在演講一開始就強調了臺灣的身份認同，以及 "在民主國家，人民掌握最終權力 "這一核心原則。

It's a strong opening that sets the stage for his criticisms of the current administration.

這是一個強有力的開場，為他責備現任政府奠定了基礎。

And it's smart because he's appealing to a shared sense of identity and democratic values before he launches into his critique.

這很聰明，因為他在開始批判之前，就在呼籲一種共同的認同感和民主價值觀。

And then he quickly pivots to criticizing the DPP.

然後，他又迅速轉向責備民進黨。

He basically argues that the DPP has become what it once opposed.

他的基本論點是，民進黨已經變成了它曾經反對的東西。

So he's suggesting this disconnect between their steady commitment to democracy and their actions in power.  And he points to this belief within the DPP that, you know, once they're in power, they shouldn't be subject to the same level of scrutiny.

是以，他是在暗示他們對民主的堅定承諾與執政行動之間的脫節。  他還指出，民進黨內部認為，一旦他們掌權，就不應該受到同樣程度的監督。

And that there shouldn't be this rigorous parliamentary scrutiny of how taxpayer money is being spent.

議會不應該對納稅人的錢是如何花的進行嚴格審查。

And a key part of this critique is the idea that the government might be using public funds to influence public opinion through favorable media outlets.

這種責備的一個關鍵部分是，政府可能在利用公共資金通過有利的媒體管道影響公眾輿論。

It's like using the people's money to control what they see and hear.

這就像是用人民的錢來控制他們的所見所聞。

And to illustrate this misuse of public funds, he gives some specific examples.

為了說明這種濫用公共資金的行為，他舉了一些具體的例子。

Well, he mentions the Employment Security Fund, which he claims was used for things like the labor minister's photo sessions and extravagant office decorations for a labor development agency head.  So using public money for personal gain, basically.

他提到了就業保障基金，聲稱該基金被用於勞工部長的攝影會和勞工發展機構負責人的奢華辦公室裝飾等。  基本上就是用公款謀取私利。

And he also alleges that these funds were channeled to support pro-DPP media organizations like Sanli and FTV.

他還聲稱，這些資金被用於支持親民進黨的媒體機構，如三立和 FTV。

And what's striking is how he directly challenges President Lai Ching-te and Premier Cho Jong-tae demanding transparency about the whereabouts of these funds.

引人注目的是，他直接挑戰賴清德總統和趙鍾泰總理，要求這些資金的去向透明化。

He even uses that line, is this Lai Ching-te's money?

他甚至用了那句話：這是賴清德的錢嗎？

It's a very pointed way to remind everyone that this is public money we're talking about.  And this then leads into his broader criticism of budget oversight.  He argues that in any real democracy, the parliament must have the power to scrutinize the budget.

他用非常尖銳的方式提醒大家，我們談論的是公共資金。  這就引出了他對預算監督的更廣泛的責備。  他認為，在任何真正的民主制度中，議會必須有權審查預算。

I mean, how else can you hold the government accountable for how they're spending taxpayer money?

我的意思是，你還能怎樣讓政府對如何使用納稅人的錢負責呢？

And to emphasize this point, he compares Taiwan to China and North Korea.

為了強調這一點，他將臺灣與中國和北韓相提並論。

So he's really drawing a line in the sand there.

He's essentially saying that resisting scrutiny of government spending is undemocratic.

他實質上是在說，抵制對政府開支的審查是不民主的。

And he takes it further by arguing that the DPP, a party that historically championed democracy, now allegedly opposes any meaningful questioning or oversight of government spending.

他還進一步指出，民進黨是一個歷史上擁護民主的政黨，現在卻據稱反對對政府開支進行任何有意義的質詢或監督。

So he's accusing them of hypocrisy, basically.

所以，他基本上是在指責他們虛偽。

And he presents it as this fundamental betrayal of their original ideals.

他認為這從根本上背叛了他們最初的理想。

And then he moves on to the issue of increased government spending.

接著，他談到了增加政府開支的問題。

He says that the central government's total budget has grown from about $2 trillion NT in 2017, when Tsai Ing-wen first took office, to around $2.924 trillion NT currently.

他說，中央政府的預算總額已從 2017 年蔡英文剛上任時的約 2 萬億元新臺幣增長到目前的約 2.924 萬億元新臺幣。

And he asks a simple but important question.

他提出了一個簡單而重要的問題。

Has this increase in spending led to a corresponding 50 percent improvement in public services?

支出的增加是否使公共服務相應改善了 50%？

Or is it just a sign of fiscal irresponsibility?

或者這只是對財政不負責任的表現？

It's a question that every government should be asking themselves.  Then he turns his attention to the defense budget, another area that has seen increased spending.

這是每個政府都應該捫心自問的問題。  然後，他將目光轉向國防預算，這是另一個支出增加的領域。

He mentions the figures going from about $320 billion NT in 2017 to around $470 billion NT currently.

他提到的數字從 2017 年的約 3 200 億新臺幣到目前的約 4 700 億新臺幣。

And he directly addresses the accusation that the opposition is against defense spending.

他直接回應了反對派反對國防開支的指責。

He's saying, look, the money is there, but is it being used effectively?

他是說，錢是有了，但是否得到了有效利用？

It's not about opposing defense spending in principle.

這與原則上反對國防開支無關。

It's about accountability and making sure the money is being well spent.

這關乎問責制，關乎確保錢花得其所。

And this leads into a very serious allegation.

這就引出了一個非常嚴重的指控。

The alleged procurement of substandard bulletproof vests from China.

據稱從中國採購了不合格的防彈背心。

That's a huge accusation, especially given the current political climate.

這是一個巨大的指控，尤其是考慮到當前的政治氣候。

And he claims that the head of Little Ing's Free Association was connected to the company involved.

他還聲稱，小英自由協會的負責人與相關公司有聯繫。

So suggesting a possible conflict of interest.

And he emphasizes that no one face consequences because of the statute of limitations.

他還強調，沒有人會因為訴訟時效而面臨後果。

And he really highlights the contradiction with the DPP's resist China, protect Taiwan stance.

他確實凸顯了與民進黨抵制中國、保護臺灣立場之間的矛盾。

How can you be so vehemently against China and then allegedly buy faulty equipment from them for your own soldiers?

你們怎麼能如此強烈地反對中國，卻又聲稱要為自己的阿兵哥從中國購買有問題的裝備？

And it raises serious questions about the government's priorities.

這也讓人對政府的優先事項產生了嚴重的疑問。

[英語對話／中英字幕] 黃國昌 3/23 板橋演講解析！道盡政府貪腐雙標！#看政治學英語 [ 國際可能不瞭解臺灣，靠你我的轉發，為真相找出口！]#看政治學英語 @KC-Huang ([英語對話／中英字幕] 黃國昌 3/23 板橋演講解析! 道盡政府貪腐雙標！#看政治學英語 [ 國際可能不了解台灣，靠你我的轉發，為真相找出口！]#看政治學英語   ⁨@KC-Huang)

字幕列表影片播放

potential

absolutely

basically

conflict