This is the 32 inch model here, and with this, just like my other reviews, I'm going to get into the specs first.

這是一款 32 英寸的機型，和我其他的評測一樣，我將首先介紹這款機型的規格。

I'll talk about the things that I like about the monitor, the things that I don't like about the monitor, and then something different.

我會談談我喜歡監視器的地方、不喜歡監視器的地方，然後再談一些不同的地方。

It won't be very long, but I do want to briefly cover the differences between the G5 here and then the more expensive G7, and then we'll finally wrap everything up.

這篇文章不會很長，但我想在這裡簡要介紹一下 G5 和更昂貴的 G7 之間的區別，最後我們將對所有內容進行總結。

So with that being said, let's go ahead and get into the specs.

說了這麼多，讓我們來了解一下它的規格。

The G5 is a 1440p LED VA panel with 144Hz refresh rate, 1000R curve, and HDR 600.

G5 是一款 1440p LED VA 面板，具有 144Hz 刷新率、1000R 曲線和 HDR 600。

It has 16.7 million colors, with a 2500 to 1 contrast ratio, a 1ms moving picture response time, and FreeSync.

它擁有 1670 萬種色彩，對比度為 2500:1，1 毫秒動態影像響應時間，以及 FreeSync 技術。

This covers 125% of the sRGB scale, and 90% of the NTSC scale.

這涵蓋了 125% 的 sRGB 比例和 90% 的 NTSC 比例。

This has 93 pixels per inch, as that is standard with any 32 inch 1440p monitor.

每英寸 93 像素，這是所有 32 英寸 1440p 顯示器的標準配置。

On the back, you will find 1 HDMI 2.0 port, 1 DP 1.2 port, and then a headphone jack.

背面有 1 個 HDMI 2.0 端口、1 個 DP 1.2 端口和一個耳機插孔。

The stand doesn't have height or swivel adjustment, but it can tilt negative 2 to 18 degrees, and has a small cable management hook.

支架沒有高度或旋轉調節功能，但可以負 2 至 18 度傾斜，並有一個小型線纜管理掛鉤。

You do also have the option to VESA mount this if you want, but we'll talk about that again here pretty soon.

如果你願意，還可以選擇 VESA 安裝，但我們很快就會在這裡再次討論這個問題。

Retail price is $369.99 for the 32 inch model, and $279.99 for the 27 inch model.

32 英寸機型的零售價為 369.99 美元，27 英寸機型的零售價為 279.99 美元。

So now that we've covered the specs, let's go ahead and get into the things that I like about this monitor.

既然我們已經介紹了規格，下面就讓我們來談談我喜歡這款顯示器的地方。

So the biggest draw for this monitor is going to be the price point and what you get with it compared to its more expensive sibling, the G7, which retails for $800.

是以，與售價 800 美元的 G7 相比，這款顯示器最大的亮點在於它的價位以及它能給你帶來什麼。

So with this, the 1000R curve and the 144hz refresh rate are a big plus, and the coloring is solid on this monitor.

是以，1000R 曲線和 144hz 刷新率是這款顯示器的一大亮點，其色彩表現也非常出色。

The 1000R curve isn't as noticeable for me until I go to a flat panel, and then I wonder how I ever played on a flat panel.

對我來說，1000R 的曲線並不明顯，直到我用上平板電腦，我才知道我是如何在平板電腦上玩遊戲的。

Now it's not as noticeable if you've played on a 1500 or 1800R curved monitor, but I personally think it looks great at my viewing angles and distance, which is usually about 2-3 feet straight on.

如果你在 1500 或 1800R 的曲面顯示器上玩遊戲，就不會感覺那麼明顯，但我個人認為，在我的觀看角度和距離（通常是 2-3 英尺直視）下，它看起來很棒。

The G9 on the other hand would be the big reason to go for a 1000R curve, because it literally wraps around you, but $1600 is a steep asking price, and I just can't afford something like that.

另一方面，G9 是我選擇 1000R 曲線的主要原因，因為它可以將你包裹起來，但 1600 美元的要價太高了，我實在負擔不起。

The panel does work with G-Sync compatibility, and I haven't had any issues with screen tearing or flickering like I had with the G7, which, side note on that, I know that's been fixed with firmware updates for a lot of people, I'm still hearing some people say that they're still having issues, but overall I think it has improved with not only the firmware updates, but the manufacturing side as well, so if you do have the cache, and that's something you do want to look into, if you've seen my other videos on that, that may be solved at this point, but I didn't experience any issues so far with this monitor with any of the flickering or anything like that.

面板與 G-Sync 兼容，我沒有遇到過像 G7 那樣的螢幕撕裂或閃爍問題，這也是題外話，我知道很多人的問題已經通過固件更新解決了，但我還是聽到一些人說他們仍然有問題、但總的來說，我認為它不僅在固件更新方面有所改善，而且在製造方面也有所改善，所以，如果你確實有緩存問題，這也是你想要解決的問題，如果你看過我的其他視頻，這一點可能已經解決了，但到目前為止，我在這款顯示器上沒有遇到任何閃爍或類似的問題。

Sharpness out of the box is a bit off for some reason with this monitor though, so you'll need to turn that way down on the panel, but after it's set, everything looks great on screen, and coloring is very, very good.

不過，由於某些原因，這款顯示器開箱時的銳度有些偏差，是以需要將面板上的銳度調低一些。

Blacklight bleed isn't horrible with this monitor by the way, I have noticed that it does depend on the angle that you're looking at the monitor when it's going to showcase any blacklight bleed, which is interesting just because that goes back to that 1000R curve, and you do actually notice it more depending on the angle that you're at.

順便說一下，這款顯示器的黑光漂移並不可怕，我注意到它的黑光漂移確實取決於你觀察顯示器的角度，這很有趣，因為這又回到了 1000R 曲線，你確實會根據你所處的角度注意到更多的黑光漂移。

But if I'm looking dead on, it's actually pretty minimal compared to the other monitors that I've had, and I think that's a plus with this.

但如果我仔細觀察，與我使用過的其他顯示器相比，它的影響其實很小，我認為這是這款顯示器的優點。

I personally have my monitor on an arm also, which makes it more functional for me, but that's an extra cost if you do want to add any height or swivel or rotation to the monitor outside of just the tilt, so that is something to consider, but that goes back to the price point, this is cheaper, so it wasn't something that I was actually expecting with this.

我個人還將顯示器安裝在懸掛臂上，這樣對我來說功能性更強，但如果你想在傾斜之外為顯示器增加任何高度、旋轉或轉動，那就需要額外的費用，所以這是需要考慮的，但這又回到了價位上，這款產品更便宜，所以這並不是我對這款產品的期望。

The menu button is a single button on the bottom of the monitor, which is the same for the other Odyssey monitors, and I like the ease of use with that.

菜單按鈕是顯示器底部的一個單獨按鈕，與其他奧德賽顯示器相同，我喜歡它的易用性。

The menu itself is also very user-friendly, which is a huge plus.

菜單本身也非常方便用戶使用，這是一大優點。

So overall my gaming experience has been great, and I don't notice any problems, but I did do a video on ghosting with this monitor as there have been reports of people having issues with that.

總的來說，我的遊戲體驗很好，沒有發現任何問題，但我還是做了一個關於這款顯示器重影的視頻，因為有報告稱有人遇到過重影問題。

I'll make sure a link for that video pops up here so you can watch that if you want to.

我會確保在這裡彈出該視頻的鏈接，如果你想看，就可以看。

I don't want to take up a ton of time with the review, so to summarize it, there is ghosting, and you will find it to some degree on most panels, unless you're going to go to some of the newer ones that are the 0.5ms response time, and they're more of the 240-360Hz panels with this.

我不想花太多時間做評測，所以總結一下，大多數面板都會在一定程度上出現重影，除非你選擇一些較新的 0.5ms 響應時間的面板，它們更多是 240-360Hz 的面板。

Something to point out too, I'm going to make sure it pops up, this is the 1ms moving picture response time, and it's not the G-to-G, which is the gray-to-gray, gray-to-gray is actually quicker than the MPRT, so something to keep in mind.

還需要指出的是，我要確保它顯示出來，這是 1 毫秒的動態影像響應時間，而不是灰度到灰度（G-to-G），灰度到灰度實際上比 MPRT 更快，是以需要牢記。

Even though it is 1ms, it's not the fastest pixel response time, because it's not G-to-G, gray-to-gray.

即使是 1 毫秒，它也不是最快的像素響應時間，因為它不是 G 到 G，而是灰到灰。

But with this, I'm going to make sure that it actually pops up, and it showcases my Samsung G5 here, versus the MSI Ultrawide, which is also a 1ms response time, MPRT panel, so you guys can kind of compare.

但有了這個，我將確保它真正彈出，並在這裡展示我的三星 G5 與微星 Ultrawide（同樣是 1 毫秒響應時間的 MPRT 面板）的對比，這樣你們就可以進行比較了。

They're basically the same.

它們基本上是一樣的。

I don't notice it in most games.

我在大多數遊戲中都沒有注意到這一點。

So it's there, but personally I don't think you will notice it unless you're a hardcore enthusiast playing a competitive first-person shooter, where every edge essentially counts and you're looking at the screen to a degree that most people just aren't.

所以它是存在的，但我個人認為你不會注意到它，除非你是一個玩第一人稱射擊競技遊戲的鐵桿發燒友，在這種遊戲中，你的每一點優勢都很重要，而且你對螢幕的關注程度是大多數人所不及的。

Now I will say the one area that I do notice it, I don't really notice it in games much, but it's when I'm actually moving the window around with Premiere Pro, and I don't notice it when I'm moving just regular windows on my desktop.

現在我要說的是，有一個地方我確實注意到了，那就是在遊戲中我並不太注意到它，但在實際使用 Premiere Pro 移動窗口時卻注意到了，而在桌面上移動普通窗口時我卻沒有注意到它。

I don't know if it's the gray background, for whatever reason, that's where I actually notice ghosting the most.

我不知道是不是因為灰色背景的緣故，不管出於什麼原因，那是我最容易注意到重影的地方。

Outside of that, like I said, I really just don't notice it that much.

除此之外，就像我說的，我真的沒怎麼注意到。

So now that we've covered what I like about this monitor, let's go ahead and get into the things that I don't like about this monitor.

既然我們已經介紹了我喜歡這款顯示器的地方，下面我們就來談談我不喜歡這款顯示器的地方。

So the big thing to consider when you're looking at buying this monitor is that it's the G7 essentially without all the extras.

是以，當你想購買這款顯示器時，最重要的一點是，它基本上就是沒有所有附加功能的 G7。

So obviously you don't get the 240Hz with this, that's going to be one of the big differences, but there's no RGB lighting, there's no extra USB ports, there's no height and swivel adjustment to the stand, and personally I have my monitor on an arm, which makes the monitor more functional for me, but it's an extra cost if you want to add height, swivel, and rotation to the And this is the autonomous monitor arm, I will make sure that there is a link for my video on that, and you can even click on the link in the description of that video to get, I think it's 5 or 10% off.

很明顯，這款顯示器沒有 240Hz 的頻率，這將是最大的區別之一，但它沒有 RGB 燈光，沒有額外的 USB 端口，沒有高度和旋轉調節支架，我個人將顯示器安裝在支架上，這讓顯示器對我來說更實用、但如果你想在支架上增加高度、旋轉和轉動功能，則需要額外的費用。

So it ended up being about $51, but that's still an extra cost, so that $370 now jumps up to $420, so if you don't want that stuff, this is going to be something that's going to be an easy choice if you're on a budget and you don't need all the extras, but something to be very very mindful of.

所以，如果你不想要這些東西，如果你的預算有限，不需要所有的額外費用，這將是一個很容易的選擇，但還是要非常非常注意。

Now my main complaint here is going to be the ports, as they're older ports, so you HDMI 2.0, not 2.1, and DP 1.2, not 1.4, which means the bandwidth shouldn't support HDR, yet it has HDR, but with a little extra digging, and that was one of the issues that I ran to in with the unboxing video, I was actually able to find out why DP 1.2 can play HDR, so I'm going to pull up this quote that I found in regards to this.

現在，我主要抱怨的是端口，因為它們都是老式端口，所以是 HDMI 2.0，而不是 2.1，DP 1.2，而不是 1.4，這意味著帶寬不應該支持 HDR，但它卻支持 HDR，不過，只要稍加挖掘，這也是我在開箱視頻中遇到的問題之一，我就能找到為什麼 DP 1.2 可以播放 HDR，所以我要調出我在這方面找到的這段話。

It says that HDR extensions were defined in version 1.4 of the DisplayPort standard.

它說，HDR 擴展是在 1.4 版 DisplayPort 標準中定義的。

Some displays support these HDR extensions, but may only implement HBR2 transmission mode if the extra bandwidth of HBR3 is unnecessary, for example on 4K 60Hz HDR displays.

有些顯示器支持這些 HDR 擴展，但如果不需要 HBR3 的額外帶寬，例如在 4K 60Hz HDR 顯示器上，可能只實施 HBR2 傳輸模式。

Since there is no definition of what constitutes a DisplayPort 1.4 device, some manufacturers may choose to label these as DP 1.2 devices despite their support of DP 1.4 HDR extensions.

由於沒有定義什麼是 DisplayPort 1.4 設備，一些製造商可能會選擇將這些設備標記為 DP 1.2 設備，儘管它們支持 DP 1.4 HDR 擴展。

As a result, DisplayPort version numbers should not be used as an indicator of HDR support.

是以，DisplayPort 版本號不應作為支持 HDR 的指標。

So this would explain why this monitor, although it has DP 1.2, can actually support HDR.

這也就解釋了為什麼這款顯示器雖然採用了 DP 1.2 技術，卻能真正支持 HDR。

I will make sure that a link for the website that I got this information from is in the description so you guys can kind of comb through that as well.

我將確保在說明中提供我獲取這些資訊的網站鏈接，這樣你們也可以瀏覽一下。

Now, I'm kind of going back and forth with these pros and cons a little bit.

現在，我對這些利弊有點反反覆覆。

Even though I'm talking about HDR and the DisplayPorts being older, but with this quote it's saying, hey, it still can support the HDR that this monitor has, I will say that HDR with this monitor has been the easiest to set up, and it's looked the best for me.

雖然我說的是 HDR 和 DisplayPorts 比較老，但這句話的意思是，嘿，它仍然可以支持這款顯示器所擁有的 HDR，我想說的是，這款顯示器的 HDR 設置最簡單，對我來說也最好看。

I think part of that is because I'm now messing with HDR with these reviews, so I'm getting a little bit more accustomed to tinkering with settings.

我想部分原因是我現在通過這些評論來處理 HDR，所以我越來越習慣於調整設置。

And Doom looked great, I've played No Man's Sky with HDR, and it's all looked phenomenal for me.

毀滅戰士》看起來很棒，我用 HDR 玩過《無人駕駛飛機的天空》，我覺得一切都非常棒。

I still am not using it on a daily basis.

我仍然沒有每天使用它。

It's not something that I just turn on and leave on and turn it on in Windows and kind of run every program with it.

它不是我打開後就不管了的東西，在 Windows 中打開它，然後用它運行所有程序。

It's still not where I think it should be.

它仍然沒有達到我認為應該達到的水準。

That's just my personal opinion in terms of HDR as a whole.

這只是我個人對 HDR 整體的看法。

I'm waiting maybe a couple years before it's more standardized, and then at that point, yeah, I'll have HDR kind of turned on all the time.

我想再等幾年，等它更加標準化，到那時，是的，我會一直打開 HDR。

The good news is, I'm just quicker to tinkering with these settings, so it doesn't take as long, but it's one of the complaints that I've had in general with HDR.

好消息是，我對這些設置的調整比較快，所以不需要那麼長時間，但這也是我對 HDR 的普遍抱怨之一。

If it's not supported across the board, you're going to have to tinker with these settings individually within these games, and it just takes away from playtime essentially with this, especially if you're limited on time like I am with as busy as I am.

如果不支持全局設置，你就必須在這些遊戲中對這些設置進行單獨調整，這就從根本上剝奪了遊戲時間，尤其是像我這樣時間有限又很忙的人。

So that's just something to consider, but I will say tinkering with everything, getting everything set up on this display has been the easiest for me out of all the monitors that I've used so far.

是以，這只是需要考慮的問題，但我想說的是，在我使用過的所有顯示器中，這款顯示器是最容易設置的。

So at this point, these feel more like a gray area than a true negative as the lack of extras can be expected with most monitors at this price point.

是以，在這一點上，這些感覺更像是一個灰色區域，而不是一個真正的負面，因為缺乏額外功能是這個價位的大多數顯示器都會遇到的問題。

And after doing more research, I was able to find out that the DP 1.2 port can support HDR, and it's easy to set up versus my initial impression with it.

經過進一步研究，我發現 DP 1.2 端口可以支持 HDR，而且與我最初的印象相比，它很容易設置。

So if I had to find one solid negative with it, I think that the ghosting for some people would be a dealbreaker.

是以，如果非要找出它的一個明顯缺點，我認為重影對某些人來說是個致命傷。

I also want to mention real quick that I haven't had any weird text or texture morphing towards the edge of the 1000R curve, like some people reported that they had with the G7.

我還想快速提到的是，我在使用 1000R 曲線時沒有遇到任何奇怪的文字或紋理向邊緣變形的情況，有些人說他們在使用 G7 時遇到過這種情況。

I do think that some people aren't going to like this extreme of a curve, so maybe that could be a negative for some people.

我確實認為有些人不會喜歡這麼極端的曲線，所以這對有些人來說可能是個負面影響。

So definitely know what you're getting into with this monitor.

所以，一定要了解這款顯示器的性能。

I also should mention for those looking for a good monitor for the Xbox Series X, this would be a good fit.

此外，我還想提一下，如果您正在為 Xbox X 系列尋找一款合適的顯示器，這款產品將是您的不二之選。

But as of last week, Sony has announced that there is no native 1440p support for the PS5, so unfortunately this might not be a good option for PlayStation players.

但截至上週，索尼已宣佈 PS5 不支持原生 1440p，是以對於 PlayStation 玩家來說，這可能不是一個好的選擇。

Which that's actually the question I got asked the most on the unboxing video, so I just wanted to clarify that Xbox Series X, yes, if you're a PlayStation 5 owner, this probably isn't going to be the best option for you.

實際上，這是我在開箱視頻中被問到最多的問題，所以我只想澄清一下，Xbox X 系列，是的，如果你是 PlayStation 5 的用戶，這可能不會是你的最佳選擇。

So, with all of that being said, let's get into the G5 to G7 comparison here.

說了這麼多，讓我們來看看 G5 和 G7 的對比。

Alright, so I'm actually on the Samsung website here, we're going to look at the comparison this way.

好吧，我現在正在三星的網站上，我們這樣來比較一下。

We have the G5, we have the G7 here.

我們有 G5，我們有 G7。

This one, it's only going to show the 27 inch model, it's not until you click on it that you can then choose the 32 inch model.

這個只會顯示 27 英寸的型號，點擊後才能選擇 32 英寸的型號。

Right now on their website, $70 off, I don't know how long that's going to last, but this is normally $800.

現在在他們的網站上，有 70 美元的折扣，我不知道這個折扣會持續多久，但這通常是 800 美元。

The G5 is $370, so that's a big difference, right?

G5 的售價是 370 美元，差距很大吧？

You're looking at a difference of $430 more for the G7.

G7 的差價為 430 美元。

Scrolling down, just looking at the specs, everything should be the same between the 27 and 32 inch model outside of the pixels per inch, right?

向下滾動，只看規格，27 和 32 英寸機型除了每英寸像素不同外，其他都應該相同，對嗎？

That pixel density, which is going to be greater on the 27 inch model.

像素密度在 27 英寸機型上會更高。

So that's why I'll just leave this like this.

所以，我就不多說了。

So, they're both 1440p.

所以，它們都是 1440p。

First big difference outside of below this is going to be obviously the refresh rate. 240hz for the G7, and then 144 for the G5 here.

除此以外，最大的區別顯然是刷新率。G7 為 240 赫茲，而 G5 為 144 赫茲。

Now I had the G7, I'm not in any AAA games hitting 240hz.

現在我有了 G7，但我沒有玩過任何達到 240hz 的 AAA 級遊戲。

Most likely you're actually going to have to downgrade the resolution to 1080p to actually hit that.

實際上，你很可能需要將分辨率降到 1080p 才能達到這個效果。

So in 1440p, maybe if you're running a 3090 now, which I don't have.

是以，在 1440p 下，如果你現在使用的是 3090（我沒有 3090），也許可以。

Very few people have those, right?

很少有人擁有這些，對嗎？

For the average gamer, you're just not going to hit the 240hz in 1440p.

對於普通玩家來說，在 1440p 下是無法達到 240hz 的。

But 144 is more my gold standard right now, so that's going to be a difference.

但 144 更像是我現在的黃金標準，所以這將是一個區別。

And then we talked about the response time here.

然後，我們談到了這裡的響應時間。

So you have the 1 MPRT versus the 1 millisecond MPRT versus the 1 millisecond G2G.

是以，就有了 1 MPRT 與 1 毫秒 MPRT，以及 1 毫秒 G2G。

The G2G is going to be faster.

G2G 的速度會更快。

The greater gray is going to be faster, so that is better on the G7.

灰度越大，速度越快，是以在 G7 上效果更好。

And then with this, the difference in color support.

然後是顏色支持的差異。

So 16.7 million colors on the G5 versus 1.07 billion on the G7.

是以，G5 的色彩數為 1670 萬，而 G7 為 10.7 億。

So greater color with the G7 versus the G5.

是以，與 G5 相比，G7 的色彩更豐富。

Next, we're going to find down here, they're both, and this is where Samsung on their website does some weird stuff, HDR10 for the G5, but it's HDR600.

接下來，我們將在這裡發現，它們都是三星在其網站上做了一些奇怪的事情，G5 的 HDR10，但它是 HDR600。

And then VESA display HDR600 over here, but they're both HDR600.

這裡是 VESA 顯示器 HDR600，但它們都是 HDR600。

I did mention that this is mountable with the VESA mount there.

我確實提到過可以用 VESA 支架安裝。

This is a 75 by 75 for the G5, and then 100 by 100 for the G7 here.

這裡是 75×75 的 G5，然後是 100×100 的 G7。

And then it'll tell you the height adjustment right here.

然後它會告訴你這裡的高度調節。

Obviously with the G5, you don't have that.

而 G5 顯然不具備這種功能。

The G7 is going to have the height adjustment.

G7 將具有高度調節功能。

You can swivel it, so you can rotate it, things like that.

你可以轉動它，這樣你就可以旋轉它，諸如此類。

Both have eye saver mode.

兩者都有護眼模式。

Both have flicker free.

兩者都沒有閃爍。

Picture by picture.

逐張圖片

You can do that with the G7.

G7 就能做到這一點。

You cannot do that with the G5.

而 G5 卻無法做到這一點。

FreeSync, yes.

FreeSync 是的。

Say not available over here.

說這裡沒有。

It does have FreeSync.

它具有 FreeSync 功能。

It has FreeSync premium, I believe.

我相信它具有 FreeSync 高級功能。

And then with that, the G-Sync compatibility with both of these, but the G7 is certified G-Sync compatible where the G5 is not.

此外，這兩款產品都兼容 G-Sync，但 G7 通過了 G-Sync 認證，而 G5 沒有。

Quantum dot color.

量子點顏色

That's going to go back to that 1.07 billion colors versus the 16.7 million.

這又回到了 10.7 億種顏色與 1670 萬種顏色的對比。

So with this, the G7 has the quantum dot color.

是以，G7 擁有了量子點色彩。

The G5 does not.

G5 卻沒有。

Both have screen size optimizer, black equalizer, low impact lag, refresh rate optimizer, Super Arena Gaming UX.

兩者都有螢幕尺寸優化器、黑色均衡器、低延遲影響、刷新率優化器、超級競技場遊戲用戶體驗。

And then we'll see the normal stuff, power consumption, things like that.

然後我們會看到正常的東西，如功耗等。

And then we will keep scrolling down.

然後，我們將繼續向下滾動。

And that's going to be it for this.

就這樣吧。

And this is going to tell you in terms of tilt, negative two to negative 18, or negative two to 18, negative nine to 13, stand simple, has pivot more than 100 millimeters, swivel, non, pivot, non, and then we'll look at what this actually has over here.

這將告訴你傾斜度，負 2 到負 18，或負 2 到 18，負 9 到 13，站立簡單，有超過 100 毫米的樞軸，旋轉，非，樞軸，非，然後我們來看看這裡的實際情況。

So looking at the ports, also, we scroll down on the G7 right here.

是以，在查看端口時，我們還可以向下滾動 G7。

DisplayPort right here, it does have 1.4 with the G7.

這裡是 DisplayPort，G7 採用的是 1.4 接口。

Remember, we only have 1.2 with the G5 here.

請記住，我們這裡的 G5 只有 1.2 版。

And then HDMI, you have the 2.0, has two USB ports, and then it's 3.0 for that.

然後是 HDMI，有 2.0，有兩個 USB 端口，然後是 3.0。

The G5 doesn't have any extra USB ports on it.

G5 上沒有任何額外的 USB 端口。

So something like I said, all the extras that you're going to get with this also are just gone.

所以，就像我說的那樣，你將得到的所有額外功能也都消失了。

And we can see on the back of this, you actually have the RGB lighting, right, with the logo and then the ring right here.

我們可以在背面看到 RGB 燈光，右邊是徽標，右邊是圓環。

And then actually in the front, in the bottom corners right here, you have lighting and the G5 isn't going to have that.

實際上，在正面的底角，你可以看到照明燈，而 G5 則沒有。

So that's actually going to be the comparison here.

是以，這實際上就是這裡的比較。

Like I said, what are you looking for?