Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

由 AI 自動生成
  • The business model is to keep people scrolling, right?

    商業模式就是讓人們不斷滾動,對嗎?

  • The minute you stop scrolling, they lose money.

    你一停止滾動,他們就會賠錢。

  • All their algorithms are designed with literally one goal.

    它們的所有算法都只為一個目標而設計。

  • What will keep you scrolling?

    什麼能讓你持續滾動?

  • That's it.

    就是這樣。

  • That's the goal, right?

    這就是目標,對嗎?

  • So as the algorithms and the AI were figuring out what keeps people scrolling, they bumped into, they uncovered a human quirk, which is not the intention of anyone at Facebook or YouTube or any of these places, which is called, it's a very well-documented psychological phenomenon called negativity bias, which is basically means we will stare at something negative longer than we will stare at something positive.

    是以,當算法和人工智能在研究是什麼讓人們不斷滾動時,他們發現了人類的一個怪癖,這並不是 Facebook、YouTube 或任何這些地方的人的本意,這就是所謂的 "消極偏差",它是一種非常有據可查的心理現象,基本上意味著我們盯著負面事物的時間會比盯著正面事物的時間長。

  • Anyone who's ever been driving down the motorway and passed a car crash knows exactly what I'm talking about.

    在高速公路上開車經過車禍的人都知道我在說什麼。

  • You stare at the car crash longer than you stare at the pretty flowers on the other side of the road, right?

    你盯著車禍的時間比盯著路邊漂亮花朵的時間還長,對嗎?

  • And this is, negativity bias goes very deep. 10 week old babies will stare longer at an angry face than a smiling face.

    這就是,負面偏見非常深刻。10 周大的嬰兒盯著生氣的臉看的時間會比盯著微笑的臉看的時間長。

  • But when this meets algorithms designed to maximize the harvesting of attention, this produces a catastrophic effect.

    但是,當這種情況遇到旨在最大限度地獲取注意力的算法時,就會產生災難性的後果。

  • And this was, this is not my view.

    這不是我的觀點。

  • This is what Facebook itself found in its own internal research, which we've now had leaked.

    這是 Facebook 自己在內部研究中發現的,現在我們已經得到了洩露的資訊。

  • Imagine a teenager, group of teenagers go to a party.

    想象一下,一個青少年、一群青少年去參加一個聚會。

  • One of them goes home and on the bus on the way home, they say, that was a really lovely party.

    其中一個人回家後,在回家的公車上,他們說,這真是一個可愛的聚會。

  • I enjoyed it.

    我很喜歡。

  • Everyone looked great.

    每個人看起來都很棒。

  • And they were so nice.

    他們人都很好。

  • Another teenager from the same party posts, God, Karen looked like a right slag tonight.

    天啊,凱倫今晚看起來就像個蕩婦。

  • Her boyfriend, Jim is a twat.

    她的男朋友吉姆是個混蛋。

  • What does the algorithm do?

    算法有什麼作用?

  • The second one is more like the car crash.

    第二個更像是車禍。

  • People will stare at it longer.

    人們會盯著它看更長時間。

  • The algorithm will promote it in the feed.

    算法會將其推廣到 feed 中。

  • It will put it much higher.

    這將使它變得更高。

  • The nice one, that's going to be way down if anyone sees it, right?

    漂亮的那個,如果被人看到就會很難看,對吧?

  • The algorithm select for anger because anger will keep you scrolling, right?

    算法會選擇憤怒,因為憤怒會讓你繼續滾動,對嗎?

  • This was inherent to the Facebook business model.

    這是 Facebook 商業模式的固有特點。

  • And the only alternative was for Facebook to abandon its business model and adopt what they called an anti-growth model where they said, we won't grow as a company, but we won't set the world on fire, right?

    唯一的選擇是 Facebook 放棄其商業模式,採用他們所謂的 "反增長模式",他們說,我們公司不會增長,但我們也不會讓世界著火,對嗎?

  • The Wall Street Journal who got leaked it.

    被洩露的《華爾街日報》。

  • They said, their new story said, after he received this report, Mark Zuckerberg asked that he never be brought any reports like this ever again, right?

    他們說,他們的新報道說,馬克-扎克伯格收到這份報告後,要求再也不要給他這樣的報告,對嗎?

  • So, you know, they know what they're doing.

    所以,你知道,他們知道自己在做什麼。

  • They're tied to their business model.

    它們與自己的商業模式息息相關。

  • They're only going to stop doing it when we make them.

    只有當我們逼他們的時候,他們才會停止這樣做。

  • But this machinery that is amping us up into anger, firstly, it destroys attention.

    但是,這種讓我們憤怒的機器,首先會破壞我們的注意力。

  • When you're angry, it's much harder to pay attention.

    當你生氣時,就更難集中注意力了。

  • We've all had that experience, but also it's devastating for the society.

    我們都有過這樣的經歷,但這對社會來說也是毀滅性的。

  • And we've got to deal with that.

    我們必須解決這個問題。

  • At the moment, if you've got all these smart engineers and they've got one incentive, how do I take Stephen's attention the absolute most I can, right?

    目前,如果你有這麼多聰明的工程師,而他們只有一個動機,那就是我怎樣才能最大限度地吸引斯蒂芬的注意力,對嗎?

  • They don't work for you, but they work for the advertiser.

    他們不為你工作,卻為廣告商工作。

  • You have to change the incentives and then they will do it.

    你必須改變激勵機制,然後他們才會去做。

  • When the incentives change, then obviously their behaviour changes, right?

    當激勵機制發生變化時,他們的行為顯然也會發生變化,對嗎?

  • If they want to please you rather than pleasing the advertiser, then of course the market will then provide all sorts of ways.

    如果他們想取悅你,而不是取悅廣告商,那麼市場當然會提供各種方式。

  • At the moment, the competition is how do I maximally invade your attention?

    目前,競爭的焦點是我如何最大限度地吸引你的注意力?

  • If we move to a new business model, the competition is what does Stephen actually want?

    如果我們轉向新的商業模式,那麼競爭的焦點就是斯蒂芬究竟想要什麼?

  • If Stephen wants to know where his friends are so we can have a drink with them, okay, give him that button.

    如果斯蒂芬想知道他的朋友們在哪裡,好讓我們和他們喝一杯,好吧,把那個按鈕給他。

  • What else does Stephen want?

    斯蒂芬還想要什麼?

  • Stephen wants to meditate.

    斯蒂芬想冥想。

  • Oh, we'll give him that button.

    哦,我們會給他那個按鈕的。

  • You can see how once they're figuring out what you want, not what the advertisers want, then of course the market begins to experiment and there'll be a thousand innovations.

    你可以看到,一旦他們弄清楚了你想要什麼,而不是廣告商想要什麼,市場當然就會開始嘗試,並出現無數創新。

The business model is to keep people scrolling, right?

商業模式就是讓人們不斷滾動,對嗎?

字幕與單字
由 AI 自動生成

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 中文 美國腔 算法 斯蒂芬 模式 注意力 廣告商 車禍

為什麼很多人變得越來越暴躁易怒? ► 約翰-哈里 Johann Hari 《金融時報》評為年度好書(中英字幕) (為什麼很多人變得越來越暴躁易怒? ► 約翰·哈里 Johann Hari 《金融時報》评为年度好书(中英字幕))

  • 34 1
    Cindy 發佈於 2024 年 10 月 21 日
影片單字