Every story comes with a clear breakdown of the political bias, factuality, and ownership of the sources reporting, all backed by ratings from three independent news monitoring organizations. Ground News provides a lot of extra information in a neat and organized way, and I really like how you can see how different news sites report on the same story, like this one about growing tensions between China and Taiwan. The trend details are here along the right-hand side. 22 news sites reported on this story, and Ground News shows the political bias, distribution, factuality, and ownership information. For this story, you can quickly see that 79% of news outlets have a high factuality, and only 5% are independent. I find it funny that the little old Winnipeg Free Press was the first to break this news story. Nice work, Canada. Ground News also makes it very easy to compare headlines to see how these biases might affect framing. For example, on the right, the New
每篇報道都有明確的政治偏見、事實真相和報道來源的所有權明細,所有這些都有三家獨立新聞監測機構的評級作為支持。Ground News 以整潔有序的方式提供了大量額外資訊,我非常喜歡它能讓你看到不同新聞網站是如何報道同一條新聞的,比如這條關於中國和臺灣之間日益緊張的新聞。右側是趨勢的詳細信息。有 22 家新聞網站報道了這則新聞,Ground News 顯示了新聞的政治傾向、分佈、真實性和所有權資訊。對於這條新聞,你可以很快看到,79% 的新聞機構具有較高的事實性,只有 5%是獨立的。我覺得有趣的是,溫尼伯自由