Name: 柏拉圖的《辯證法》中蘇格拉底的死亡觀與現代的不存在觀相比有何不同？ (How Does Socrates' View of Death in Plato's Apology Compare to Modern Notions of Non-Existence?)
Uploaded: 2024-06-26T15:13:26.000Z
Duration: 1 min

分詞構句

In The Apology of Socrates, written by Plato, Socrates addressed the court before being sentenced to death.

在柏拉圖撰寫的《蘇格拉底的申辯》中，蘇格拉底在被判處死刑前向法庭發表了演講。

Contemplating the nature of death, he presents two possibilities regarding the afterlife.

在思考死亡的本質時，他提出了關於來世的兩種可能性。

One possibility excites him, which is the migration of the soul into another existence, where he could engage in dialectic inquiry with great heroes and thinkers of the past.

有一種可能性令他興奮不已，那就是靈魂遷徙到另一個世界，在那裡他可以與過去的偉大英雄和思想家進行辯證的探究。

The other possibility is not as fond as the first one, but he also accepts with equanimity.

另一種可能性沒有第一種那麼喜歡，但他也平靜地接受了。

That is, death is a state of complete cessation of consciousness, akin to a deep dreamless sleep.

也就是說，死亡是一種意識完全停止的狀態，類似於深度無夢睡眠。

This ancient perspective resonates with modern exploration of eternal oblivion, also known as non-existent or nothingness, predominantly associated with religious skepticism, secular humanism, nihilism, agnosticism, and atheism.

這種古老的觀點與現代人對永恆遺忘（又稱不存在或虛無）的探索產生了共鳴，永恆遺忘主要與宗教懷疑論、世俗人文主義、虛無主義、不可知論和無神論有關。

 The concept posits that consciousness forever ceases upon death, kind of like being stuck in this death meeting that lasts forever with no chance of coffee.

這個概念認為，人死後意識會永遠停止，就像被困在這場死亡會議中，永遠沒有機會喝咖啡。

字幕列表影片播放

柏拉圖的《辯證法》中蘇格拉底的死亡觀與現代的不存在觀相比有何不同？ (How Does Socrates' View of Death in Plato's Apology Compare to Modern Notions of Non-Existence?)

perspective

stick

engage

concept