So let's start with a new report that was published in the Intercept.

讓我們從《攔截》雜誌發表的一份新報告開始。

They took a look at coverage in three ostensibly liberal outlets.

他們查看了三家表面上是自由派媒體的報道。

The word slaughter was used to describe the killing of Israelis on October 7th 60 times.

屠殺一詞被用來描述 10 月 7 日殺害以色列人的事件達 60 次之多。

Yet when it came to Palestinians, many thousands more of whom have been killed only a single time.

然而，在巴勒斯坦人面前，成千上萬的巴勒斯坦人只被殺害過一次。

As more Palestinians were killed, they were actually mentioned less and less.

隨著越來越多的巴勒斯坦人被殺害，他們被提及的次數實際上越來越少。

We witnessed this in real time.

我們親眼目睹了這一切。

How invented university antisemitism scandals and whatever the hell is going on with Bill Ackman.

如何發明大學反猶太主義醜聞，以及比爾-阿克曼（Bill Ackman）到底在搞什麼鬼。

How that took the place of coverage of the increasingly undeniable horrors that Palestinians are being subjected to.

這些報道如何取代了對巴勒斯坦人所遭受的日益不可否認的恐怖的報道。

And when the history is written, how the West looked on with approval and rushed to supply the bombs that were dropped on the babies of Palestine.

當歷史被書寫的時候，西方國家是如何讚許地看著，並急忙提供投向巴勒斯坦嬰兒的炸彈。

These charts will need to be shown because a vital part of that story is how the Western press did their absolute damnedest to hide from citizens the horrors that their own taxpayer dollars are paying for.

我們需要展示這些圖表，因為這個故事的一個重要部分就是西方媒體是如何竭盡所能向公民隱瞞他們自己的納稅人的錢所支付的恐怖費用的。