字幕列表 影片播放
I think the only thing that people in the United
States and politicians can agree about on
immigration is that the system is broken.
I think it's gotten more broken, if that's
possible, in the 30 years that I've been working on
the issue.
2023 saw record-breaking numbers of migrant
crossings at the southwestern border, with
Border Patrol reporting nearly 250,000 encounters
in December alone.
They're poisoning the blood of our country.
That's what they've done.
I will not demonize immigrants saying they are
poisoned in the blood of our country.
The migration that we're seeing happening at the
border right now is unsustainable. We are not
managing it, and it is overwhelming our existing
immigration systems.
There's broad consensus that it needs to be fixed.
They just can't agree on what that way might be and
how to think about that question.
So why is the immigration system in the U.S.
so broken and can it ever be fixed?
When people say that the immigration system is
broken, they mean different things.
If you're on the left, you typically mean that
the system does not accommodate as many people
as you would like to be able to come here legally.
And when people use it from the conservative
side, they mean that the system allows in far too
many people who should not be here under any
definition of the law.
The U.S. has more foreign born residents than any
other country, with immigrants accounting for
about 13.7% of the entire population.
But today, less than 1% of those looking to reside
permanently in the U.S.
can do so legally.
We often hear, 'my grandparents came to the
country illegally. Why can't people come
illegally to the country now? And the fact is, when
the grandparents came to the country is much more
possible, especially for European immigrants.
But there's no line to stand in anymore.
In general, there are four pathways to obtaining
legal immigration: the diversity lottery, refugee
program, family sponsorship, and
employment-based sponsorships. Just 0.2% of
applicants for the diversity lottery end up
with a green card.
Incoming refugees face even more daunting odds,
having less than a 0.1% chance of being selected
for resettlement.
Meanwhile, family-sponsored
immigrants are capped at just 226,000 every fiscal
year. That has led to about 8.3 million
relatives of citizens and legal residents waiting
for a family-sponsored visa in 2022.
I don't know if it's a problem to let in a lot of
people based on family relationships. That's a
strong value of the United States and our
immigration system, and a long standing value that
family reunification is important.
At the same time, it does seem like we haven't
accommodated the level of employment-based
immigration that would benefit our country and
our economy.
Almost all employment-based green
cards require a sponsorship from an
employer, but just one out of every 1,500 new
hires in the U.S. receive a green card this way.
I think the limitations that were last updated,
the numbers of annual immigrants, was last
updated in 1990, when our population was smaller,
when the kinds of work that we did in this
country was different.
A big issue is the mismatch between the
current policies and the actual needs of the
workforce.
Most other developed nations in the world have
a much higher percentage of their immigration
system based on economics. Somebody who's
coming for an economic purpose to their country
than we do.
For instance, Canada granted permanent
residency to 255,680 economic immigrants,
compared to just 97,355 sponsored family members
in 2022.
What I would like to see are reforms to make the
majority of people who come here legally as
immigrants come because our economy needs them,
come to do jobs that our economy wants.
Some of this is not just a question of categories,
but a question of the administrative delays and
costs.
The system is under-resourced, so
employers who want to sponsor a worker have to
go through multiple steps.
Some of those steps are quite repetitive.
And then the agencies that have to look at those
applications, the Department of Labor, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, the
State Department, they all take their time to
process applications because they either
haven't found the efficiencies or don't have
enough staff.
Border control challenges are another indicator of a
broken system.
If your goal is that every person should be allowed
to come here, you will never meet that goal.
The demand is in the hundreds of millions, if
not billions, and the supply is simply not that
high. There's nothing we could do to so-called fix
the system so that it could accommodate 10, 20,
50 million people a year into the United States.
In 2023, encounters at the southwest border saw a
more than 100% increase compared to 2019.
I think we saw so many migrants at the border
last year for a variety of reasons.
One is that our economy is really strong.
A lot of employers are looking for workers.
When the U.S. economy is booming, we know that
immigration tends to be higher.
Complementing that is all of the many, many push
factors all around the world.
We're seeing a lot of migrants coming from
countries like Venezuela and Cuba and Nicaragua
with repressive governments and really
failed economies.
We're also seeing a lot of migration from parts of
Mexico that have a lot of gang violence.
I think there's also a perception that it's a
good time to come, that it's fairly easy to come
into the United States.
In the past, Democrats and Republicans both disagreed
about what the law should be, but they agreed that
it should be enforced.
The Biden administration essentially decided they
would not enforce the law, and they released the
majority of people that were encountered illegally
crossing into the country. They created
parole programs to bring in hundreds of thousands
more. And the word got out.
Parole refers to policies that allow certain
noncitizens to enter or temporarily remain in the
U.S., usually for urgent humanitarian or
significant public benefit reasons.
The Department of Homeland Security told
CNBC that working within the constraints of
outdated immigration laws, the administration
has implemented an approach that combines the
largest expansion of lawful pathways in years,
with significantly strengthened consequences
for those who cross unlawfully. And for
decades, Republican and Democratic administrations
alike have used parole authority on a
case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian
reasons or significant public benefit.
The number of paroled migrants increased by
nearly four fold between fiscal year 2019 and 2022.
That number has more than doubled again in the first
ten months of fiscal year 2023, to about 301,000
paroled migrants.
In 2024, the Committee on Oversight and
Accountability also reported that Border
Patrol had caught and released over 75% of
undocumented migrants encountered in December
2023, the same month that set a new monthly record
of migrant crossings.
Parole has been part of our immigration system
since the 1950s.
It has been used by every president since Eisenhower
to bring groups of people who otherwise wouldn't be
able to come to the United States.
It was a loophole created just, you know, in case,
just for emergencies.
And never was it envisioned that it would
be used on a mass basis for tens of thousands of
people from multiple countries.
I think the Biden administration is using
this authority to try to address the arrivals any
way he can, because the alternative that a lot of
conservatives are asking for is to detain
everybody. But we don't have the capacity to
detain everybody either.
Congress would have to allocate a whole lot more
money.
In recent years, organizations like the
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, responsible
for containing the crisis, have seen millions
of dollars in budget shortfall.
Another system that has been overwhelmed as a
result is the immigration courts.
Our law says you are allowed to ask for asylum
no matter how you enter.
Now, that doesn't mean you get it, but we have to
let you ask, and we have to give you a process to
hear that case and decide.
The immigration court backlog surpassed 3
million as of January 2024, with each
immigration judge handling an average of
4,500 pending cases.
It used to be in the late '90s and early 2000s that
people would come to the border and they would try
to sneak into the United States and live in the
shadows and work under the table.
Now people are coming to the border and they're
asking for humanitarian protection.
Then they're put into removal proceedings in
immigration court. And then that is taking a
long, long time. And the backlog is just building
up and building up as more people come to the
border. We haven't seen the increase in
immigration judges and other immigration court
staffing that would be needed to keep pace with
the rising number of arrivals and people being
put into removal proceedings.
Right now, instead of deterring people from
crossing in, detaining them as the law requires
when they get in, and then deporting them if
they are here illegally or if they fail in their
claim for asylum or other protection.
We are processing them, paroling them, punting
them into this endless backlog where sometimes
they're not even showing up to immigration court
for 5 or 10 years.
Let me be absolutely clear.
We are not going to solve the issues at the border,
the issues with our legal immigration system, unless
Congress enacts legislation.
Political polarization is making any progress
difficult to achieve.
30 years ago, when I started working on
immigration policy, immigration was a very
bipartisan issue.
Over the period of the last 20 years, it's become
much more the Democrats are seen as supporting
immigration, and Republicans are very much
pro enforcement, stiff enforcement.
Even most recently with the presidency of Donald
Trump starting in 2016, he's the president who
expressed a lot of skepticism of legal
immigration as well.
There are so many competing interests that
takes careful negotiation and balance to find some
kind of solution.
With the increasing polarization we're seeing
in the country and the parties moving further and
further away from each other on immigration and
other topics, it just makes it so difficult to
even have the conversations that can
build toward that compromise.
The priorities for the parties are very
different. The priorities for Democrats often are
about legalization of the undocumented population
that's here, including dreamers and others who've
been long-term residents of the United States.
69% of Democrats and Democrat-leaning
independents believed more legal immigration
options could help the crisis at the border,
compared to 43% of Republicans and
Republican-leaning independents.
The priority for Republicans is on
immigration enforcement, particularly at the
border, even though a lot of Republicans would be
perfectly happy to legalize long-term
residents, not without securing the border.
77% of Republicans and Republican-leaning
independents believed increasing deportations of
illegal immigrants would help the crisis, and 72%
supported expanding the wall at the southern
border, compared to just 30% and 15% for Democrats
and Democrat-leaning independents.
However, the current state of the immigration
system requires more than just one solution.
There's a tendency, especially in worlds of
politics, to promise a quick fix, but this is
something that took multiple generations to
come into being as a problem, and it's going to
take long, firm thinking to start to fix it.
I get asked a lot, what single thing could we do?
There's not a single thing.
There's different problems that have to be
tackled. There's the border situation that has
to be tackled. There's our legal immigration
system that has to be tackled. There's the
status of the undocumented that has to
be tackled. They all need solutions.
So there's not one problem, so there's not
one solution.
Nonetheless, experts emphasize that immigration
is a crucial issue that needs immediate attention.
Ultimately, every town is a border town and every
state is a border state.
The future of our country really depends on
immigration, given our demographics, given that
we're aging and that our population and our young
population isn't going to grow without immigration.
Any nation, any country, is really made up of the
people who live there.
How they make up society.
And our broken immigration system is affecting all of
us, really. It's affecting who's in our
city and what rights they have, it's affecting our
workplaces, it's affecting our economy.
Immigrants are just such a big part of our country
that what affects immigrants and immigration
affects all of us.