字幕列表 影片播放
- [Narrator] The U.S.
is the world's largest producer of nuclear power,
but it depends on Russia
for about 24% of its enriched uranium,
a key ingredient for nuclear fuel.
Even with enrichment facilities owned by friendly countries,
- We still don't have enough
if Russian supply was not available in the marketplace.
- [Narrator] That's why nuclear fuel
is one of the few Russian energy sources
not banned by the West
as a result of the war in Ukraine, but
- Russia is incredibly willing to use energy as a weapon.
- [Narrator] Here's how the U.S.
is working to revive domestic production
to reduce the risk of a critical fuel shortage
in the future.
Nuclear reactors generate nearly 20% of U.S. electricity,
but demand is quickly rising
as the U.S. races to meet its clean energy goals.
- We're seeing it from our utilities.
We're seeing it from oil, gas, chemical companies,
big tech firms.
- [Narrator] But more nuclear energy
requires more nuclear fuel,
and the U.S. currently lacks the capacity
to produce its own.
That's because uranium ore goes through four main processes
to become nuclear fuel,
and the U.S. relies on other countries
for three of those steps.
First, raw uranium is mined out of the ground and milled.
Then it's converted into a gas and enriched,
increasing the percentage of the radioactive isotope.
Finally, the uranium is fabricated into fuel pellets
that are stacked inside metal fuel rods
and loaded into a nuclear reactor.
The U.S. gets most of its uranium ore
from Canada and Kazakhstan.
Even though Russia isn't a leader,
it is substantially involved
in Kazakhstan's mining operations.
There's only one U.S.-owned converter,
and there's no U.S.-owned enricher
for the current fleet of nuclear reactors.
Meanwhile, Russia dominates both of those steps.
- We've seen that Russia is willing
to use its energy resources as a tool of leverage.
The sooner we can move ourselves away
from that potential vulnerability,
the better off we're all gonna be.
- [Narrator] In an effort to reshore
as many steps of this supply chain as possible,
a number of U.S. companies are ramping up capacity.
For example, mining company Energy Fuels
is restarting this conventional uranium mine
in La Sal, Utah, after signing long-term contracts
with two nuclear utilities in 2022.
- La Sal Complex, as we call it,
is a mine that dates back to the '50s
and operated for 20, 30 years,
and then it really kind of went dormant
for a number of years.
- [Narrator] The last commercial production
of uranium at La Sal was in 2014.
- Now with increasing uranium prices,
we're going back into full production in 2024.
- [Narrator] Energy Fuels
is currently hiring about 50 miners,
purchasing and refurbishing equipment,
and doing maintenance work.
- Our plans are to restart mining
about 70,000 tons of uranium per year, at least initially,
not quite enough for a single large-scale nuclear reactor.
- [Narrator] Chalmers says
he doesn't expect uranium mining in the U.S.
to replace larger producers like Canada.
Instead, he sees it as a way
to diversify the country's sources of raw uranium.
- With the contracts that we have, we can make nice margins,
but we're gonna need higher uranium prices
that justify restarting production,
because every time we restart a mine,
they get more expensive.
- [Narrator] Along with its mines,
Energy Fuels also plans to restart White Mesa Mill in 2024,
the only operating conventional uranium mill in the U.S.
This is where uranium ore goes after it's mined
and before it goes to a conversion facility.
- This came from La Sal Complex, and that's Utah.
This came from New Mexico.
- [Narrator] On the enrichment front,
Centrus Energy launched
the only U.S.-owned uranium enrichment plant
earlier this year.
It made its first delivery
of high-assay, low-enriched uranium, or HALEU,
to the U.S. Department of Energy in November.
HALEU will be used
in the next generation of advanced reactors.
Because these reactors are still being developed,
many proponents of nuclear energy
see the HALEU supply chain as an opportunity
for the U.S. to become a global leader.
- When these advanced reactors
were initially coming to market,
their plan was to buy from Russia,
which is the only commercial supplier
of that fuel type today.
In light of the Russian assault on Ukraine,
those plans have changed.
- [Narrator] As part of the Inflation Reduction Act,
$700 million was invested to support the development
of a domestic supply chain for HALEU.
Russia's dominance in the uranium supply chain
can be traced back to a program
called Megatons to Megawatts.
The goal of this program was for Russia
to downgrade the uranium from its nuclear weapons
to levels needed for nuclear reactors,
and then sell that fuel to the U.S. for cheap.
- Since 2013 when that program expired,
we've still had a lot of commercial activity with Russia
because of those strong commercial relationships
that had been built up.
- [Narrator] In the '90s,
the U.S. also privatized its uranium enrichment operations.
But without federal support,
the country's two enrichment facilities
eventually had to be shut down.
Kotek says one of the biggest challenges
of building up domestic capability
is giving companies the confidence
that their investments will pay off.
- Federal support, we think, is crucial.
- There's no such thing as a nuclear fuel cycle
without some level of government support.
Russia is really operating as a state-owned enterprise.
- [Narrator] Kotek says
the industry needs federal investment in both infrastructure
and long-term contracts with utility companies.
Utilities are the owners and operators of nuclear reactors
that pay for each step of this process.
In October,
the Biden administration sent a proposal to Congress
to invest around $2 billion
to improve long-term domestic enrichment capabilities.
- We requested this as an administration
because it is a high priority.
In the long-term, we would like to see
this commercial industry stand on its own,
without consistent and forever federal investment.
- [Narrator] A bipartisan group in Congress
is also pushing legislation
to ban U.S. use of Russian uranium.
- Nothing happens quickly in the nuclear fuel cycle.
When you lose your capabilities
like we've done in the United States,
you're looking at probably 10 to 15 years plus
to reestablish those capabilities.
- It's important to invest quickly
so that it's an aggressive expansion,
and we don't run out of uranium before we need it.
- Meeting the fuel demands
for both today's plants and new plants
are gonna require a lot of investment
in all of those technologies.
(bright upbeat music)