字幕列表 影片播放
Love this house.
It was our dream house from the beginning, even
thought it was over our heads, but we just worked
really hard and made it become our own.
And I love it. I have my horses here.
I have a 100 pound tortoise that I saved.
So yeah, I just love it. It couldn't be more
perfect for us.
But Allstate, who insured Darlene's house for 18
years, recently sent her a non-renewal notice.
You can't just say after 18 years of being okay,
all of us today, you're not okay.
And that's it.
Home insurance companies are saying homes like
Darlene's are too risky to insure.
The nation's largest homeowners insurance
company, State Farm, has decided they won't accept
new applications for property in California.
Household names like State Farm, Allstate are pulling
out of these markets. They know the risk is just
too high to be actuarily sound for their business.
There are companies saying there are too many
buildings being destroyed by catastrophes, inflation
is making it too expensive to rebuild, and
they can't protect their investments any longer.
Losses are increasing related to climate risk.
As that risk increases, so does the cost of
insuring those assets that people have on hand.
But without homeowners insurance, many homeowners
can find themselves in big financial trouble.
I've been trying to find another insurance.
I had one company step up and said they'd do it for
$12,000 a year.
I go from $2,000 to $12,000.
Yeah, we would have to move.
There's no way.
But selling the home might not even be possible.
The moment that an individual gets a
non-renewal letter from the private insurance
market, they essentially lose 12% of their property
value.
It's not just California.
Louisiana and Florida are contending with similar
issues due to flood risk.
Why are so many American houses becoming
uninsurable, and what will it mean for the
economy when so many homes lose some of their
value? Darlene bought her house for $420,000 at the
behest of one of her best friends.
My girlfriend that I've known for close to 40
years. She's the one that brought me to this.
She lives two doors down and she said, 'you have to
buy this house.' So I had really no choice, but it
was the best thing we ever did.
It's just a three bedroom, two bath, and
it's only probably 1,700 square feet.
It's just perfect. I'm an outside person anyway.
So what's the most perfect is the outside.
I have a huge pasture for the horses and the
backyard had an artist come and she painted all
my animals on my back fence.
So when I go sit in my little girl area where we
have a little glass of wine, all my animals, even
the ones I've lost, are all painted on the side of
the barn. It's just beautiful.
Darlene and her husband still owe about $360,000
on their mortgage. Most mortgage lenders require
home insurance as a prerequisite for the loan,
and 58% of Americans hold mortgages on their homes.
You are allowed to live in your home without
insurance. That would be called self-insurance.
It depends on your financial situation,
whether or not that is a good or risky choice.
Insurance acts as a risk transfer tool.
So in order to make sure that that investment that
the bank is making with you, should something
happen, a catastrophe of natural catastrophe or man
made catastrophe, if it happens, the insurance
allows the home to recover.
The insurance business model works like this.
Companies assess the risk of damage happening to a
home and collect a premium accordingly.
By insuring properties with varying levels of
risk, they are able to spread the liability for
the riskiest assets among the whole group.
They reserve some funds to pay out claims and
invest others.
They typically make their profits via safely held
investments.
The insurance rate is a reflection of the risk.
Insurance rates are the effect of the risk, not
the cause. So the insurance company, in
order to operate its business as it should in a
profitable manner, needs to do what it can to get
those insurance rates to better reflect the risk.
Though insurers are saying climate change, inflation
and the regulatory environment have created a
situation where it's difficult to operate a
profitable business in some locations across the
country.
Private insurance companies are withdrawing
insurance in high risk areas due to climate risk,
and people are seeing their premiums increase in
the public market.
Every state has seen an increase, but 12 states
have seen their average premiums more than double.
The insurance is regulated at the state level.
Some researchers refer to aspects of the regulation
as premium suppression, which may result in
climate risk not being fully priced into the
market. For example, look at Prop 103.
Proposition 103, in the state of California was
something that was passed all the way back in the
'80s. In California, due to the regulatory
policies, essentially don't allow climate to be
included in the calculation of insurance
premiums, but they also set a limit on what the
increase can be year over year.
So the current limit is about 7%.
Anything is 7% or higher.
Has to go in front of the insurance commissioner.
It has to be approved in front of the board.
That can take a long time. If they can't charge
the adequate rate for the insurance, it just simply
doesn't make sense to do business there.
Which leaves people like Darlene with non-renewal
notices and the remainder of their mortgage debt in
their hands. Individual homeowners have a few
options if traditional homeowners insurance
becomes unavailable.
If you receive a non-renewal notice, there
are always options to have more insurance.
Depending on where you live, you can go into
residual markets.
Excess markets these markets will have a higher
cost to the insurance.
The rates are not at regulatory approved like
the standard market would be.
However, it is an option.
I've been trying to find another insurance.
No one will even step up to the plate.
I had one company step up and said they'd do it for
$12,000 a year.
I go from $2,000 to $12,000.
Yeah, we would have to move.
There's no way. We're retired.
Some states also have government-assisted
insurance options as well.
A social welfare program, if you will.
32 states and Washington, D.C.
have created insurers of last resort.
The state fair program in California that is the
state-run insurer of last resort for properties that
have extreme wildfire risk, cannot get insurance
in the private insurance market.
Darlene's insurance agent told her that the fair
plan would be very expensive in her case.
The guy that was my guy for 18 years said that he
won't even recommend or quote with a fair plan
because he says unfair plan.
$12,000 is not really a fair plan in my estimation
either, because he was quoting even the
deductibles, even on the $12,000 a year, the
deductibles were like 15 grand.
If this happens, I'm like, well, what's the
point of that?
In the case of California, just for example, the
average cost of a state fair plan premium is about
$3,200.
Quite honestly, government does not do insurance
well, and even more so it extends the burden to the
taxpayer, or it puts it back on the insurers who
are operating in the individual states.
Darlene's insurance agent said that any wildfire
protection tactics that she tries to do won't
impact the insurers decision not to renew her
coverage.
On paper, they said, I'm in a fire area and we have
a wooden fence that's connected to the house
that has been connected to the house forever, and
they said, that's a, you know, so they they did
note some things like that.
So that's why I called and said, well, if I just
we'll just change the fence out.
You know, I just paid like $7,000 to have trees
trimmed. If they need to be trimmed more, I could
do that. I mean, what can I do?
And he absolutely said there's nothing I can do.
Meanwhile, climate change keeps getting worse.
When I first moved up here 18 years ago, we certainly
didn't have fires that we had.
We didn't have any fires this last summer.
It was wonderful. But I mean, the smoke came in
pretty bad there for two to three years, I guess,
and that was like upsetting me.
Since 2009, there has been a 270% increase in the
cost of wildfires and a 335% increase in the
number of structures destroyed by wildfires.
And for every additional building destroyed, there
is an associated 1.9 additional non-renewal
notices issued from an insurance company.
Florida is a state where the largest insurance
company in the entire state now is the state-run
Citizens Insurance Agency. So today, the the
most at risk properties are on that insurer of
last resort, and it's become the largest insurer
of the state, which is crazy to think about.
All of the risks that exist in the state is on
one single insurance company's role.
And if there were to be some issue with that, now
the state has to step in.
Communities may need to rethink how they use
insurance to account for climate risk.
If you look at some other states who are beginning
to look at ways that they can take a more collective
and communal approach to risk management, you're
seeing very different circumstances.
I think the state of Alabama is a very good
example of a state where the government and
policymakers have embraced the understanding
of what is causing this increased risk?
How can we help better manage that risk?
And they're allowing consumers to take grants
up to $40,000 for a government grant to make
yourselves more resilient. And we really
need to think about the behaviors in terms of
where we're developing, how we're living, so that
as a community, we can make it more resilient.
But in the meantime, all of this is going to have
big implications for the U.S.
real estate market and therefore the U.S.
economy.
The insurance mechanism is the first to really price
in climate.
How would I even sell my house if I can't get
insurance? How is the next person gonna, you
know, they're not going to want, they can't buy a
house if they can't get insurance. Well, I guess
unless they're coming in cash.
The insurance sector was 2.6% of U.S.
GDP in 2022.
Housing in general accounts for around 15% to
18% of the U.S.
GDP. As the insurance market starts to price in
climate risk, a good portion of the U.S.
economy will be impacted.
So you need insurance to have economic growth.
So hopefully we're beginning to see the
policy making community in the state of California
understand that some changes need to take
place. Insurers need to be able to charge for
risks like inflation, for risks like increased
climate with a population, an economy the
size of California, the insurance industry wants
to be there. You know, as much as the customers are
frustrated about their costs of insurance,
insurers are frustrated that they can't do
business there anymore.
So what we would argue is if we can get the
regulation in a better place, that better
reflects the risk in that state, insurers will be
back and wanting to do business there.
Communities need accurate data to understand where
the risk exists, understand what they're
most vulnerable, not necessarily populations,
but assets are in the community. What the most
vulnerable parts of their areas are, where they can
efficiently allocate resources to protect and
suppress the risks that exist in those areas.
What the insurance industry would also like
to see is more emphasis on physical infrastructure
resilience, because if we understand that climate
risk is increasing and we're living in places
that have increased climate risk, we've got to
find ways to live in a more resilient manner, and
the government can help incentivize that.
The tax system, for example, is a great
incentivization tool.
But also we've seen of late some investments
taking place.
Insurance companies say they have been trying to
adequately price in climate risk for years.
The insurance companies absolutely have their own
underlying models and maps that give them the
ability to understand which areas are most at
risk versus which areas are less at risk.
When we produced our model, we correlated it
with the data that comes out of the fair plan, that
comes out of the citizen plan in Florida and
Louisiana. And what we ended up finding were
really high correlations between our extreme
wildfire risk, wind risk and flood risk, and the
either the non-renewals or the increases in
premiums on those plans across those states.
Insurance experts say rethinking how we account
for climate risk is also key to keeping communities
safe.
Risk management does not come into play until it's
entirely too late when it comes to individual
personal property purchasing. It comes into
play when the mortgage provider needs you to go
get it, and that's the first time when a consumer
even begins to think about where they're living
and what risks might be.
The cost reflects that risk.
That should be an alarm to tell them that they're
living in a risky place and then ask themselves,
how could I reduce that risk?
Or do I need to think about living somewhere
else?
Like many Americans, Darlene said when she
purchased the house, fire—
No, it wasn't even a thought.
That's true.
But now she's struggling.
Even though she feels she did everything right.
We're doing the right thing.
We're doing everything we can. We retire.
You know, we worked hard, we retired, we got our, we
take good care of our house. I'm never late on
my bills. I've paid that for 18 years.
I've never, you know, we never missed making
everything right and paying everything.
And you just give me no choice? That's the part
that bugged me the most, I think, is give me a
list. Give me something to work with.
Raise it if you need to, you know, the price
reasonably. But don't just give me no choice.
That's not right.