字幕列表 影片播放
-
The debate between determinism and free will is a longstanding and central theme in philosophy,
決定論和自由意誌之間的爭論是哲學中一個長期存在的中心主題，
-
engaging numerous thinkers over the centuries.
幾個世紀以來吸引了許多思想家。 決定論和自由意誌
-
The longstanding philosophical debate between
之間長期存在的哲學爭論
-
determinism and free will exemplifies the fallacy of affirming the disjunct.
例證了肯定選言的謬誤。
-
This discourse questions whether human actions are
這個論述質疑人類的行為是否是
-
predetermined or if individuals have the freedom to choose independently.
預先決定的，或是個人是否有獨立選擇的自由。
-
A common misinterpretation is the oversimplified argument: "Either actions are determined,
一個常見的誤解是過於簡單化的論點：“要么行動是決定的，
-
or they result from free will. Since causality exists, free will does not."
要么是自由意志的結果。既然因果關係存在，自由意志就不存在。”
-
This binary perspective fails to consider the potential coexistence
這種二元觀點未能考慮
-
or complex interaction of these concepts. Enlightenment thinkers like David Hume and
這些概念的潛在共存或複雜的相互作用。大衛·休謨和伊曼紐爾·康德等啟蒙思想家
-
Immanuel Kant played pivotal roles in this debate. Hume's compatibilism suggested that
在這場辯論中發揮了關鍵作用。休謨的相容論顯示
-
causality's existence doesn't negate free will, while Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason"
因果關係的存在並不否定自由意志，而康德的《純粹理性批判》則
-
proposed that free will could exist within moral actions, even in a deterministic physical world.
提出自由意志可以存在於道德行為中，甚至存在於決定論的物理世界中。
