The maker of Chat GP T with billions of dollars in backing from Microsoft is now in turmoil after the board fired its co founder and Ceo Sam Altman on Friday just days after representing the company at a conference, Sam Altman was immediately fired by the board from his position as CEO of open A I, the makers of Cha BT.

獲得微軟數十億美元支持的 Chat GP T 製造商現在正處於動盪之中，因為就在代表公司出席會議的幾天後，董事會於週五解僱了公司的共同創始人兼首席執行官山姆-奧特曼（Sam Altman）。

And what happened next can only be described as complete chaos.

接下來發生的事情只能用一片混亂來形容。

Two new CEO S came and went in a matter of days, the employees all signed a letter of and finally, Sam was confirmed as returning yet again with most of the board instead leaving.

兩位新任首席執行官在幾天內來來去去，員工們都簽署了一份承諾書，最後，山姆被確認再次迴歸，而董事會的大部分成員都離開了。

So what does all of this mean for the future of A I and open A I itself who's really in charge now?

那麼，這一切對 A I 的未來和開放式 A I 本身意味著什麼呢？

And how would these power politics affect the future of A I as we know it while a few weeks ago, you never would have suspected anything would be going down to open A I Sam Oldman who's been the face of the company ever since they hit big with Cha G BT was happily attending conferences and summits.

幾周前，你絕對想不到 A I 的山姆-奧德曼（Sam Oldman）會有什麼大動作，自從《Cha G BT》一炮而紅以來，他一直是公司的形象代言人，現在他正興高采烈地參加各種會議和峰會。

He was the face of A I and the company was steadily rolling out new products and features at their integration bing or their voice function on chat T BT.

他是 A I 的代言人，公司在整合 bing 或哈拉 T BT 的語音功能方面穩步推出新產品和新功能。

That wasn't until the board of directors from the company released this statement on November 17th.

直到公司董事會於 11 月 17 日發表聲明。

Quotes.

報價。

We are grateful for Sam's many contributions to the founding and growth of open A I.

我們感謝薩姆為開放式 A I 的創建和發展做出的諸多貢獻。

At the same time, we believe new leadership is necessary as we move forward in typical corporate fashion.

同時，我們認為，在我們以典型的企業方式向前邁進時，新的領導層是必要的。

It says nothing when pressed though.

但按下時它什麼也沒說。

The boys said that they had lost confidence in Sam for issues with communication.

男孩們說，由於溝通方面的問題，他們對薩姆失去了信心。

In the same statement, they appointed the then CTO Mira Morai as the interim CEO and caretaker until they found someone more permanent at all, stunk of something hastily prepared and rushed to the door, something deeper was going on.

在同一份聲明中，他們任命當時的首席技術官米拉-莫拉伊（Mira Morai）為臨時首席執行官兼看守人，直到找到更合適的人選。

And according to the co-founder of Open A I, Gran Brockman who was also dismissed.

據 Open A I 的聯合創始人格蘭-布羅克曼（Gran Brockman）稱，他也被解僱了。

Hours later, the whole coup had been organized in the space of a few conference calls.

幾個小時後，整個政變就在幾次電話會議中完成了。

Obviously this didn't work out so well.

顯然，這樣做效果並不好。

Sam and Greg were quickly approached by Microsoft which had been funneling billions of investments into open A I there.

山姆和格雷格很快就與微軟公司取得了聯繫，後者一直在向那裡的開放式 A I 注入數十億美元的投資。

They were slated to start a new subsidiary picking up their work at open A I almost immediately.

他們計劃成立一個新的子公司，幾乎馬上就能接手他們在 A I 公司的工作。

The whole company was in uproar out of around 770 employees.

全公司約 770 名員工一片譁然。

738 of them sent a letter demanding but Sam's reinstatement and the dismissal of the board of directors if this didn't happen.

他們中的 738 人寄出了一封信，要求 Sam 復職，如果不復職，則罷免董事會。

They'd all leave for Sam's new company at Microsoft as vague as they were, were still completely without evidence or cause.

他們都去了山姆在微軟的新公司，雖然含糊其辭，但仍然完全沒有證據或原因。

The interim CEO the board had appointed Mira Morai was at the top of the list of signatures border open.

董事會任命的臨時首席執行官米拉-莫拉伊（Mira Morai）在邊境開放簽名名單上名列前茅。

A I went into full panic mode with Mirra not playing along with the coup.

A 米拉不配合政變，我陷入全面恐慌。

They instead turned to Emma Shear as their new, new CEO.

他們轉而聘請 Emma Shear 擔任新的首席執行官。

It wasn't a change that would last very long though within a few days of the employee letter, the board of directors folded.

雖然員工信發出後沒幾天，董事會就倒閉了，但這種變化並不會持續太久。

If they hadn't, there wouldn't be much of a company left to run.

如果沒有他們，公司也就沒什麼可經營的了。

The old board of directors was nearly entirely replaced with fresh faces like Brett Taylor who used to run salesforce.

舊的董事會幾乎全部換成了新面孔，比如曾負責 salesforce 的佈雷特-泰勒（Brett Taylor）。

Larry Summers, a former US Treasury Secretary and Adam d'angelo, the only surviving member from the previous board.

前美國財政部長拉里-薩默斯（Larry Summers）和前任董事會唯一倖存的成員亞當-德安吉洛（Adam d'angelo）。

Of course, Altman is retiring as CEO again and his co-founder, Greg Brockman will also be back in his old role at the company from a distance.

當然，奧特曼將再次卸任首席執行官一職，而他的聯合創始人格雷格-布羅克曼（Greg Brockman）也將從遠處回到公司，重操舊業。

It looks like things will be going straight back to normal.

看來一切都將恢復正常。

But another letter written by former Open A I employees shows us why that might not be a good thing after all with suspicious timing, considering everything that's been going on.

但 Open A I 前員工寫的另一封信告訴我們，考慮到發生的一切，這可能不是一件好事，而且時機可疑。

Elon Musk then posted a letter from anonymous former Open A I employees and it doesn't paint a pretty picture as other accounts alleging a quote, disturbing passion of deceit and manipulation by Sam Oldman and Greg Brockman their basic plan as laid out in the letter was to both transition the company from a nonprofit into a for profit company whilst racing to unlock the secrets by an artificial general intelligence, otherwise known as A G I.

埃隆-馬斯克（Elon Musk）隨後發佈了一封來自匿名前 Open A I 員工的信，信中並沒有描繪出一幅美好的圖景，因為其他賬戶指控山姆-奧德曼（Sam Oldman）和格雷格-布羅克曼（Greg Brockman）的欺騙和操縱熱情令人不安，他們在信中闡述的基本計劃是既要將公司從非營利公司轉型為營利公司，又要通過人工通用智能（又稱 A G I）競相解開祕密。

Now the details are vague but they allege that to do these two things, Sam and Greg were ruthless in firing large parts of the company with anyone else who disagreed.

雖然細節含糊不清，但他們聲稱，為了做到這兩點，山姆和格雷格毫不留情地解僱了公司的大部分人和其他任何不同意的人。

Lata also says that most of the company is loyal because they're both afraid of Sam and of missing out on a cut of future profits.

拉塔還說，公司大部分人都很忠誠，因為他們既害怕山姆，又害怕失去未來的利潤抽成。

It should definitely all be taken with a grain of salt though as a result that over 95% of the open A I workforce were willing to follow their apparently authoritarian bosses, so willing that they threatened to quit when he got fired by the board of directors.

不過，這一切都應該謹慎對待，因為結果是 95% 以上的開放式 A I 員工都願意追隨他們明顯獨裁的老闆，以至於當老闆被董事會解僱時，他們還威脅要辭職。

On top of that is the fact that the letter was posted by Elon Musk, fresh off his feud with Sam Open and the company itself.

此外，這封信是由埃隆-馬斯克（Elon Musk）發佈的，他剛剛與山姆-歐本和公司本身結怨。

It even names him in person, painting the pitch that Sam was distracted by his feud so much so that he made bad decisions for the company.

報道甚至當麵點了他的名，描繪了山姆被自己的恩怨所困擾，以至於為公司做出了錯誤的決定。

But despite all that, it should still be taken as a worrying indication of further chaos within the company chaos.

但儘管如此，這仍應被視為公司內部混亂加劇的一個令人擔憂的跡象。

That's far from what we want in a company that's so pivotal for the future because whether you like it or not open A I is right at the front in the development of A I and will be a key player in our modern future.

這與我們對一家對未來至關重要的公司的期望相去甚遠，因為無論你喜歡與否，開放式 A I 都處於 A I 發展的前沿，並將成為我們現代未來的關鍵角色。

On top of that, the letter implies that the disagreements between Sam and the board and the former employees was all over A I safety with Sam being painted as disregarding it entirely and it might not be too far from the truth.

此外，信中還暗示，山姆與董事會和前員工之間的分歧完全是在 A I 安全問題上，山姆被描繪成完全無視這一點，這可能與事實相差不遠。

And people talk about the dangers of A I, most people's first thoughts about killer robots and terminators.

當人們談論人工智能的危險時，大多數人首先想到的是機器人殺手和終結者。

But outside of fantasy, that's not the real danger.

但在幻想之外，這並不是真正的危險。

The problem will come with powerful people using A I for their own good rather than anyone else's in open A I's case.

在開放式 A I 的情況下，問題在於有權勢的人利用 A I 為自己謀利，而不是為其他人謀利。

That will mean accelerating their development past all safe limits in order to win the arms race, a race that Sam Altman and everyone else at the company will be well aware of.

這就意味著，為了在軍備競賽中獲勝，薩姆-奧特曼和公司裡的其他人都會清楚地意識到，他們的研發速度已經超過了所有安全極限。

Make no mistake.

別搞錯了。

This was more than a fight over the future of A I.

這不僅僅是一場關於 A I 未來的鬥爭。

This was about the fate of the modern world because the chair of the SEC himself just warned that A I will be at the center of the next financial crisis.

這關係到現代世界的命運，因為美國證券交易委員會主席本人剛剛警告說，A I 將成為下一場金融危機的中心。

What was decided this week could crush the wealth of an entire country or world including our own bank accounts because 2008 also showed most wealth building strategies don't hold up when banks are collapsing.

本週的決定可能會壓垮整個國家或世界的財富，包括我們自己的銀行賬戶，因為 2008 年的情況也表明，當銀行倒閉時，大多數財富積累策略都會失效。

That's why these billionaires creating A I companies are already 10 moves ahead, storing their wealth and secretive markets known for their stability like the contemporary art markets.

這就是為什麼這些創建人工智能公司的億萬富翁已經領先 10 步，將他們的財富和以穩定著稱的祕密市場（如當代藝術市場）儲存在一起。

We survived the 2008 crisis and the insanity of the last 18 months, even outpacing the S and P 500 for the last 27 years by an incredible 136%.

我們挺過了 2008 年的危機和過去 18 個月的瘋狂，甚至在過去 27 年裡比 S 和 P 500 指數高出驚人的 136%。

But now we can be the billion at their own game because over 800,000 people have signed up for our sponsor.

但現在，我們可以在他們自己的遊戲中成為億萬富翁，因為已有 80 多萬人註冊成為我們的贊助商。

Master works a platform that makes multimillion dollar paintings by the names like Bansi Basquiat and Picasso Investible for the first time without needing some oldman level money.

大師作品平臺讓班西-巴斯奇亞和畢加索等人價值數百萬美元的畫作首次變得可以投資，而不需要一些老人級別的資金。

They've already sold over $45 million of luxury arts with the net proceeds paid out directly to investors like you with so many users, new offerings can sell out in minutes and there's a waitlist to get access.

他們已經售出了超過 4500 萬美元的豪華藝術品，淨收益直接支付給了像您這樣的投資者。

But with the link in the description, you can skip the waitlist and get priority access to the platform right now.

但通過描述中的鏈接，您可以跳過等待名單，立即優先訪問該平臺。

And the main way they are doing this is through A G I, one of the most contentious issues in A I right now.

他們這樣做的主要方式是通過 A G I，這是目前 A I 中最有爭議的問題之一。

And one of the most dystopia, you see Elon Musk, a former board member of Open A I, one of the main guys behind the whole thing.

而其中最令人啼笑皆非的是埃隆-馬斯克（Elon Musk），他是 Open A I 的前董事會成員，也是幕後的主要人物之一。

And a vocal advocate for cautious A I development has often expressed concerns about the unregulated advancement of A I technologies.

一位主張謹慎開發人工智能的人士經常對人工智能技術的無序發展表示擔憂。

His views particularly on the potential risks of A G I contrast with the ambitious drives open A I has made under Sam Altman Musk's apprehension about the rapid development of A G I aligns with broader fears by A I, ethics, safety and societal impact concerns that have become more pressing as A G I moves from concept to potential reality.

他對 A G I 潛在風險的看法與山姆-奧特曼（Sam Altman）上司下的開放式 A G I 的雄心壯志形成了鮮明對比。馬斯克對 A G I 快速發展的擔憂與 A G I 更廣泛的恐懼、道德、安全和社會影響等問題是一致的，隨著 A G I 從概念走向潛在現實，這些問題變得更加緊迫。

You see in the beginning, Sam Oldman and Elon Musk were close.

一開始，山姆-奧德曼和埃隆-馬斯克走得很近。

They were Silicon Valley Titans and came together with their passion of A I to vote the open A I we know today, but after they parted, there's been a bit of between the two, particularly surrounding the issue of open A I going from non profit to for profit.

他們都是硅谷泰斗，帶著對人工智能的熱情走到了一起，投出了我們今天所熟知的開放式人工智能，但在他們分開後，兩人之間出現了一些分歧，尤其是圍繞開放式人工智能從非營利轉向營利的問題。

You see, Sam Ullman appears to be more focused on realizing the transformative potential of A G I.

你看，薩姆-烏爾曼似乎更專注於實現 A G I 的變革潛力。

Whereas Elon Musk seems wary of the rapid pace and potential consequences of such advancements and how this would change the lives of humanity.

而埃隆-馬斯克似乎對這種進步的速度之快和潛在後果以及這將如何改變人類的生活持謹慎態度。

A bunch of these A I companies are in the in either in San Francisco or in the San Francisco Bay area.

這些 A I 公司有的在舊金山，有的在舊金山灣區。

Then uh you could implicitly program an A I to believe that extinction of humanity is what it should try to do.

那麼，你就可以暗中給人工智能編程，讓它相信滅絕人類是它應該做的事情。

And this personal feud has now become one of the biggest feuds in A I representing a larger dialogue in the tech community about the direction of A I developments.

現在，這場個人恩怨已成為人工智能領域最大的恩怨之一，代表著科技界關於人工智能發展方向的更廣泛對話。

And it's this debate that has caused all the problems we've seen with Open A I this week as Microsoft pours in billions and billions into open A I.

正是這種爭論導致了本週我們所看到的開放式人工智能的所有問題，因為微軟向開放式人工智能投入了數十億美元。

The debate between profitability and cautious regulation is becoming bigger and more important by the day.

盈利能力與謹慎監管之間的爭論日趨激烈和重要。

As A G I is the next step in A I from what it represents is the transformation of A I becoming sentient.

由於 A G I 是 A I 的下一步，它所代表的是 A I 轉變為有生命的 A I。

And it might have been one of the reasons that Sam Altman was previously kicked out of the CEO position as this tension in the tech community has been simmering beneath the subs for a long time now and has reached a boiling point and it could be the catalyst for broader conflicts within the company in future years.

這可能也是山姆-奧特曼之前被踢出首席執行官職位的原因之一，因為科技界的這種緊張關係已經在子公司下面醞釀了很長時間，現在已經達到了沸點，可能會成為未來幾年公司內部更廣泛衝突的催化劑。

And it's a worrying trend considering how open A I is becoming more and more for profit rather than as a nonprofit research company.

考慮到開放式 A I 越來越多地以營利為目的，而不是作為一家非營利性研究公司，這種趨勢令人擔憂。

But if A I does become sentient, then this could potentially be one of the most disastrous things that ever happens to humanity.

但是，如果 "A I "真的具有了智慧，那麼這有可能成為人類遭遇的最災難性的事情之一。

And this is certainly what or must believe.

這當然也是我們必須相信的。

But those at the top of open A I see A G I as solving complex global issues.

但在開放式 A I 的高層人士看來，A G I 要解決的是複雜的全球性問題。

But it does beg the question, how much power is too much power for these people?

但這確實引出了一個問題：對這些人來說，多大的權力才算大？

And then again, why is Elon Musk so against open A I these days considering that he was one of the main guys behind the whole things.

話又說回來，埃隆-馬斯克曾是開放式人工智能的主要幕後推手之一，為何如今卻如此反對開放式人工智能呢？

Originally, it shows how bad the company's become recently.

本來，這說明公司最近變得多麼糟糕。

I mean, on Twitter, Elon has been exposed in the inner workings of open A I and the corruption dripping down from the top, as he said on Twitter quotes this letter about Open A I was just sent to me.

我的意思是，在推特上，埃隆已經暴露了開放式A I的內部運作，以及從上而下的腐敗，正如他在推特上所說，這封關於開放式A I的信剛剛寄給了我。

These seem like concerns worth investigating following up tweets like this open A I starts as a nonprofit.

這些似乎都是值得關注的問題，值得我們去調查。

Open A I creates a for profit arm Microsoft invests big money with open A I chai bit is born open A IC O is fired.

開放式 A I 創建了一個盈利部門，微軟向開放式 A I 投下大筆資金，開放式 A I 柴位誕生了，開放式 A IC O 被解僱了。

Open A IC O then goes to Microsoft former open A I CEO comes back to open A I as CEO Open A I equals Microsoft A I to which Elon responded, that is the trend.

開放式 A IC O 然後去了微軟，前開放式 A I 首席執行官回到開放式 A I 擔任首席執行官，開放式 A I 等於微軟 A I，對此，埃隆回應說，這就是趨勢。

And so ever since the drama, Elon has been bringing on more and more points showing how bad the leadership at open A I is in terms of the consequences to humanity.

是以，自從這場鬧劇發生後，埃隆就一直在提出越來越多的觀點，說明開放式 A I 的領導層是多麼糟糕，給人類造成了多麼嚴重的後果。

And interestingly amidst this whole organizational drama, Open A I did actually make a very significant advancement by introducing a voice feature for Cha G BT making it accessible to all three users.

有趣的是，在整個組織結構的大變動中，Open A I 確實取得了非常重大的進步，它為 Cha G BT 引入了語音功能，使所有三個用戶都能使用它。

However, this was of course overshadowed by the widespread cha G BT outrage which raises even more concerns about the stability and reliability of those running A I companies because once the brain of A I is trained, there is no going back.

然而，這當然被 cha G BT 的廣泛憤慨所掩蓋，因為一旦 A I 的大腦被訓練出來，就再也回不去了，這讓人更加擔心那些經營 A I 公司的人的穩定性和可靠性。

And what happens when A I just suddenly turns off when we need it most?

如果在我們最需要的時候，A I 突然關閉了，會發生什麼呢？

I mean, in the week of this whole drama, there was suddenly a chatty bitty alpha during the outrage that added another layer of intrigue to the ongoing developments but even more crazy a report from the New York Times that shed light on Helen Toner's alleged opposition to Sam Oman as CEO again, the contention seemingly stemmed from the academic paper published by Toner critical of open A I's future direction, claiming quote that the board's mission is to ensure that the company creates artificial intelligence that benefits all of humanity.

我的意思是，在這整個戲劇性的一週裡，在憤怒中突然出現了一個聊勝於無的阿爾法，為正在進行的事態發展增添了另一層陰謀，但更瘋狂的是《紐約時報》的一篇報道，揭露了海倫-託納涉嫌反對山姆-阿曼再次擔任首席執行官，爭論似乎源於託納發表的責備開放人工智能未來方向的學術論文，聲稱董事會的使命是確保公司創造出造福全人類的人工智能。

And if this company was destroyed, she said this could be consistent with its mission showing how big this discussion is becoming in A I this internal power struggle as depicted in the report shows that we're going down a bad road with A I and there will push back while this is happening.

她說，如果這家公司被摧毀，這可能與它的使命相一致，這表明在 A I 公司內部，這種討論正變得越來越大，報告中描繪的內部權力鬥爭表明，我們正在 A I 公司走上一條不歸路，在發生這種情況時，會有反擊。

Other A I companies are looking to take the lead anthropic.

其他 A I 公司也在尋求引領人類學的發展。

Another key player in the A I domain has made remarkable progress for the release of cloud 2.1 under the leadership of CEO Dario A modi.

在首席執行官達里奧-阿-莫迪（Dario A modi）的上司下，人工智能領域的另一家重要企業在發佈雲計算 2.1 方面取得了顯著進展。

This new A I model boasts doubled context size and improved tool integrations signifying not only a huge deep in A I capabilities, but also heightening the competitive landscape in the A I industry.

這種新的人工智能模式擁有翻倍的上下文大小和改進的工具集成，不僅標誌著人工智能能力的巨大提升，而且還增強了人工智能行業的競爭格局。

And the push for more profit, pushing aside all consequences for humanity to the side.

為了追求更多的利潤，人類的一切後果都被拋到了一邊。

Not to mention Elon Musk's very own GROK which is reported to be used on X with the site having its very own tab for users to access grok directly in X.

更不用說埃隆-馬斯克（Elon Musk）自己的 GROK，據說它可以在 X 上使用，該網站有自己的標籤，用戶可以直接在 X 上訪問 GROK。

Somewhat ironically showing how much of a fraud Musk is in this area considering he's doing exactly the same thing that open A I is.

有點諷刺的是，馬斯克在這方面是個金光黨，因為他所做的事情與開放式 A I 所做的一模一樣。

But this whole thing signifies a period of intense growth, competition and uncertainty in the field of A I, which is terrifying.

但是，這整件事標誌著人工智能領域進入了一個激烈發展、競爭和不確定的時期，這令人感到恐懼。

This needs to be the most controlled thing out there as the society implications haven't been realized by many yet, especially as they're blinded by profitability.

這需要成為最受控制的事情，因為很多人還沒有意識到它對社會的影響，尤其是他們被利益矇蔽了雙眼。

And we need to be extremely careful about our human qualities, game principle and A I, especially those at the top, if the habit is the elites trickles down into A I, where is this gonna lead us?

我們需要非常謹慎地對待我們的人文素質、遊戲原則和 A I，尤其是那些高層人士，如果精英們的習慣會滲透到 A I 中，這會把我們引向何方？

This was a huge problem for more primitive chatbots.

對於更原始的哈拉機器人來說，這是一個巨大的問題。

When companies let their A is lose on social media, the results were nearly always disastrous, incredibly quickly.

當公司在社交媒體上 "放任自流 "時，結果幾乎都是災難性的，而且速度快得令人難以置信。

They would become influenced and shaped by the most extremist views, spouting racist and crazy views until they got turned off when Microsoft itself released their own chatbot take A I in 2016, it didn't even last 24 hours before it got corrupted.

它們會受到最極端觀點的影響和塑造，大肆宣揚種族主義和瘋狂觀點，直到 2016 年微軟自己發佈哈拉機器人 "A I "時才被關閉。"A I "甚至沒有堅持 24 小時就被破壞了。

Demonstrating that without the sense and awareness that people take for granted.

證明沒有人們認為理所當然的感覺和意識。

A I can't make ethical judgments or know what's right or wrong in society.

A 我無法做出道德判斷，也不知道社會中的是非對錯。

And this is just one of the problems right now with A I that needs to be considered in the very near future.

這只是 A I 目前存在的問題之一，需要在不久的將來加以考慮。

These current problems aren't about A I destroying human civilization or even gaining sentience.

目前的這些問題並不是因為 A I 破壞了人類文明，甚至不是因為 A I 獲得了智商。

Instead, there are specific clashes between our society and how A I will interact with it.

相反，我們的社會與 "我 "如何與社會互動之間存在著具體的衝突。

Militaries around the world are already in an arms race to develop the best A is for use as weapons in some ways A I can be used to create the perfect soldiers without free will fear or mercy.

全世界的軍隊都在進行軍備競賽，以開發出最好的 A I 作為武器。

A I will act out every order with exact precision, regardless of the ethical implications.

A 我會準確無誤地執行每一個命令，而不考慮道德影響。

As long as it makes profit for its owners A I is already being integrated into military technology like missile guidance systems.

只要它能為其所有者帶來利潤，A I 就已被集成到飛彈制導系統等軍事技術中。

Russia's been testing A I guided missiles since 2017 and aims for A I to power a significant portion of their combat units.

俄羅斯自 2017 年以來一直在測試 A I 制導飛彈，目標是讓 A I 為其相當一部分作戰部隊提供動力。

By 2030 China two is heavily investing in A I for military purposes.

到 2030 年，中國二期將對用於軍事目的的 A I 進行大量投資。

The ambition is to establish a significant A I industry and as the government tries to control more of its population, this will be one of the most devastating tools humanity has ever seen.

政府的野心是建立一個重要的人工智能產業，隨著政府試圖控制更多的人口，這將成為人類有史以來最具破壞性的工具之一。

Only time will tell in the very near future what the fate of humanity holds.

在不久的將來，人類的命運將如何，只有時間才能給出答案。