Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • [cheering]

  • Welcome back to The Daily Show.

  • Our guest tonight is here to discuss the inaugural Obama

  • Foundation Democracy Forum, and how

  • he's training the next generation of young leaders

  • in the US and around the world.

  • Please welcome the 44th president of the United

  • States, Barack Obama.

  • [cheering]

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you very much.

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you.

  • Thank you very much.

  • Yeah, that's right.

  • I should have brought Michelle here, so that you could--

  • [cheering]

  • This is how I'd like to be greeted when I come home.

  • But I feel like Michelle's the star now, right?

  • Oh, absolutely, absolutely.

  • Mr. President, welcome to The Daily Show.

  • It is wonderful to see you.

  • Do you miss your name, by the way?

  • Because everyone calls you Mr. President, but like,

  • I feel like I would, like if people

  • called me like Mr. Daily, I would

  • miss just being called Trevor.

  • Do you miss your name sometimes?

  • My best friends call me Barack.

  • TREVOR NOAH: OK, OK. So, Barack.

  • You should call me Mr. President.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Oh, I knew it.

  • But--

  • You know, I was--

  • [laughs] welcome to the show.

  • Let's start with, I mean, the most pressing news.

  • The midterms just happened.

  • You know, America voted.

  • The House is flipping.

  • Democrats have held onto the Senate.

  • Many credit you for coming out and pushing

  • out people to vote.

  • I would love to know two parts to that.

  • Number one, do you do you feel pressure whenever

  • you're asked to come out?

  • It's like in the movies when they need

  • that home run and the bases are load and the team's losing

  • and they go, Barack, we need you

  • to hit this out of the park, we might lose everything.

  • Do you feel the pressure?

  • Does it get to you?

  • And second of all, what does it say

  • about the state of the Democratic party

  • that they always need you to come out and do

  • that before an election?

  • Look, I think that the reason we did better

  • than expected can be attributed to not me or anything I did,

  • but it has to do with A, we recruited

  • some excellent candidates.

  • You look like at a Wes Moore in Maryland, a Josh

  • Shapiro in Pennsylvania.

  • You look at our Senate candidates,

  • you know, John Fetterman and Mark Kelly.

  • They are committed, passionate, down to earth,

  • they connect with people.

  • And so I come in mainly to shine a spotlight on them.

  • So that's point number one.

  • And the second thing that happened in this Midterm,

  • and we've seen it now for three elections,

  • so I'm starting to feel pretty hopeful that this is a habit,

  • young people are voting.

  • And you've got higher, it has been many times

  • remarked how I got thumped during Midterms

  • during my presidency.

  • And part of it was that voting rates were really low.

  • People in some sense, I think a lot of Democrats felt,

  • all right, Obama's there, we'll be OK.

  • And if it turns out that McConnell and Boehner

  • and others suddenly have power, then

  • that greatly restricts what a president can do.

  • And I think that lesson was learned.

  • Trump comes in and suddenly 2018, 2020, and now this one,

  • you've seen young people come in

  • and they're typically voting at a rate of 70 to 30, 60 to 40

  • Democrat to Republican.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • And that makes a huge difference.

  • And so their--

  • TREVOR NOAH: But many of them are--

  • --enthusiasm I think is what really drove this election.

  • I agree with that in terms of the people who actually voted.

  • But young people don't seem to be turning out as much.

  • So the ones who did vote, voted overwhelmingly Democrat.

  • Yes.

  • But then the number of young voters

  • seems to be dwindling from election to election.

  • And many young voters are saying

  • they feel disillusioned.

  • They feel like America hasn't made a way for them.

  • They don't see a future for themselves.

  • Well, look, what is always true is young people are

  • going to vote at slightly lower rates than old people,

  • like me.

  • Because they've got better things to do.

  • Michelle and I are sitting at home, eating dinner.

  • We've kind of run out of things to say.

  • Well, let's go vote.

  • Young people, Malia and Sasha, they're out,

  • they got all kinds of stuff.

  • So that's always going to be the case

  • that young people voting rates are a little bit lower.

  • They are higher now than they were in the Midterms

  • when I was president.

  • And in such a polarized environment,

  • 1%, 2%, 3%, if they're turning out at 21% instead of 18%--

  • TREVOR NOAH: It makes a difference.

  • --that can make an enormous difference.

  • Right.

  • When you look at that tiny difference,

  • you still see the places where, I mean,

  • people got into power despite the fact

  • that they deny elections.

  • I think Republicans got 170 election deniers

  • into Congress, people who don't believe in the way America

  • is running its elections, people who don't believe Joe

  • Biden should be president or they'll

  • be vague about their answers. BARACK OBAMA: Yeah.

  • What do you what do you think it says

  • about American democracy that so many people are getting

  • elected to these positions when they seem to dismiss

  • the election itself?

  • Well, the interesting thing is, you notice,

  • election deniers don't deny their own election.

  • Funny how that works.

  • How many of them actually believe

  • some of the nonsense that circulates versus those who

  • think it's convenient or it's a way to own the libs

  • or it's a way to send a message or align themselves

  • with Trump?

  • That's hard to say.

  • But what is important is, that because of some really

  • concerted efforts in a lot of important states,

  • some of the most egregious, prominent, and potentially

  • dangerous election deniers--

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • --they got thumped.

  • They got beat.

  • And particularly in these Secretary of States races,

  • and in some cases, Governor's races,

  • where in the next presidential election,

  • you could have somebody who could really do some damage.

  • There, I think we held the line.

  • Now what it does say more broadly,

  • is the fact that not just here in the United States,

  • but around the world, the fundamental precepts

  • of democracy are being challenged.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • We're not having arguments about policy,

  • but we're having arguments about the rules of the game,

  • which previously we all agreed to, right?

  • There was a notion that all right,

  • we run elections, whoever gets the most votes actually wins.

  • The loser concedes, goes back and tries

  • to do better next time.

  • And what we've seen now for a whole host of reasons

  • is a creeping sense that if the outcome is not what we want,

  • then we can do whatever we want and say

  • whatever we want in order for us to win.

  • And that is profoundly dangerous.

  • And as I said, it's not unique to the United States,

  • but when it happens in the United States,

  • it sends a signal all around the world

  • that weakens democracy.

  • And that's why I think us getting our house

  • in order is so important.

  • When you look at the discourse in the country,

  • as well, and around the world, but again, I

  • think you're correct in that America is

  • a leader in what's happening right now,

  • the discourse has become so toxic.

  • Yeah.

  • TREVOR NOAH: You were in every single state.

  • You were meeting with people all the way from Iowa

  • through to California, wherever you were

  • meeting people on the ground.

  • They were listening to you.

  • There was an openness, even though people

  • had different political affiliations.

  • It seems like that has eroded over time.

  • And I wonder what you make of that.

  • Where do you think it's coming from?

  • Do you think it's social media?

  • Do you think it's the tenor of politicians in the capital?

  • Two things.

  • The biggest change that's taking place.

  • When I ran for let's say US Senate in Illinois,

  • you go down state, that's the South.

  • I mean, it's rural, it's conservative.

  • There aren't a lot of folks who look like you or me.

  • And certainly, there are more Trevors than there

  • are Baracks in these areas.

  • [laughs]

  • And so-- and I'm driving around, I've got a map.

  • For young people here, it's this paper thing.

  • You can't figure out how to fold it back,

  • but it's how you find your way on roads.

  • But I go into a town and it'd be 70% Republican, a lot

  • of evangelicals, et cetera.

  • But I could go to a diner or a VFW Hall or a county fair.

  • I could go to the local newspaper,

  • and the owner there is conservative,

  • and he's got a bow tie and buzz, cut

  • and he's kind of skeptical about my ideas.

  • But there wasn't the filter that

  • had been created by Fox News or the media infrastructure,

  • the sort of right wing conspiracy theory folks.

  • And so they came at me with an open mind.

  • And I could listen to them, and they could listen to me.

  • And at the end of the day, they might say, well,

  • he's a little liberal for our taste,

  • but we have something in common.

  • He talked about his mom getting sick.

  • I remember my mom getting sick.

  • You know, it seems like he loves his kids.

  • I love my kids.

  • There was some sense of connection.

  • And I think the filter now has become so thick.

  • It started I think with Fox News

  • and some of the other traditional media.

  • And now with social media, that's gotten turbocharged.

  • If you go into those same communities now,

  • they have so many preconceptions about what

  • somebody like me believes, cares about,

  • et cetera, that it's very hard to penetrate.

  • So I think the answer is both thinking about information

  • flow and media, and how can we break through that information

  • bubble that people are in.

  • That requires, by the way, progressives to get

  • out of their media bubble.

  • Because we've got some preconceptions that I

  • think create barriers as well.

  • And then working a lot more locally.

  • Because you notice that when you're

  • on the ground doing stuff, it's harder to stereotype people.

  • And the nationalization of our politics I think

  • has been damaging.

  • The more we can focus on grassroots efforts,

  • real world rather than just virtual meetings,

  • conversations, that's what over time I think

  • can help strengthen democracy.

  • And that's part of what our emphasis has been

  • at the foundation is, with young leaders who

  • are working on the ground--

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • --coming up with new ideas to create those connections.

  • Well, I definitely want to speak to you about that.

  • I want to speak to you about democracy worldwide.

  • I want to speak to you about disinformation

  • and what we can do to immunize ourselves from it.

  • But we've got to take a quick break.

  • We'll be right back after this with more

  • from President Barack Obama. - Very good.

  • Welcome back to The Daily Show.

  • We are still here with President Barack Obama,

  • chatting democracy, disinformation, and who

  • is better looking between us. I won.

  • Oh.

  • [laughter]

  • TREVOR NOAH: Let's start--

  • [laughs]

  • Listen.

  • The real question is, how will he look when he's 60?

  • [laughter]

  • 61.

  • You know, I mean, everybody's attractive when

  • they're in their 20s and 30s.

  • I mean, come on. - [laughs]

  • You know?

  • TREVOR NOAH: I'm almost 40, sir.

  • That's no feat. Almost?

  • TREVOR NOAH: Yeah, almost. - That doesn't count.

  • - Almost. - Still doesn't count.

  • Let's talk--

  • Live a little bit.

  • [laughs] Let's talk about--

  • I plan to.

  • Let's talk about your foundation.

  • Let's talk about what you're doing.

  • We see you out there.

  • We see you talking about democracy.

  • The world is in a really interesting place in that,

  • a few years ago, I think the world was at,

  • like, 49%, 50% of the world was-- you could say

  • the countries were democratic.

  • They had elections.

  • People won those elections.

  • There was an exchange of power, et cetera.

  • And now I think 70% of the world is living in a state

  • where they're either ruled-- where

  • it's a complete autocracy or it isn't a democracy.

  • Right.

  • Two things again.

  • One, why do you think the world has gotten there?

  • If democracy and freedom are things that everybody wishes

  • to have, why does it seem like the world

  • is moving away from that?

  • And then, secondly, what can we do, or why should we then try

  • to get back to this democracy?

  • If you look at the trend lines,

  • there are a bunch of factors, I think.

  • Globalization, the global economy disrupted a lot

  • of traditional societies.

  • TREVOR NOAH: What do you mean by disrupted?

  • Well, the global supply chain eliminates industries,

  • eliminates jobs--

  • TREVOR NOAH: Got it.

  • --increases the wealth gap not only between countries

  • but within countries, right?

  • So-- and then modernity challenges people's

  • traditional notions of religion and family and gender roles.

  • And you've got these culture clashes, right?

  • You're in some village in Yemen,

  • and suddenly your kid has a phone

  • and is looking at the Kardashians and--

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • And so you get this vertigo.

  • And what happened-- what you've seen happen, I think,

  • in a whole bunch of places is essentially

  • a pushback, a backlash to change that is happening

  • too fast for their comfort.

  • And when people are pushing back against change,

  • then they're vulnerable to politicians who say,

  • you know what?

  • I can make things just like it was back then, when you

  • were feeling more important.

  • You had higher status.

  • You didn't have people who don't look like you suggesting

  • somehow that you're doing something wrong,

  • that somehow your traditions are flawed.

  • And that appeal usually also involves

  • saying the problems you're feeling

  • are somebody else's fault. It's those folks there.

  • It's immigrants.

  • It's gays.

  • It's Hindus.

  • It's Muslims.

  • It's-- so forth and so on.

  • And that then gets turbocharged with the information issues

  • that we talked about.

  • And, look, democracy requires, by definition,

  • getting along with people who don't agree with you.

  • And the other thing that happens

  • is these countries are becoming less homogeneous, right?

  • And so you just had a right-wing party in Sweden,

  • which we always used to-- Swedes, right?

  • They're fun.

  • They're so chill--

  • [laughs] Yes.

  • --and democratic, right?

  • But if you've got a whole bunch of immigrants coming in,

  • suddenly people start getting nervous.

  • And so part of what I think we have to do

  • is to stand fast on the principles of equality

  • and self governance and representation,

  • and everybody gets a seat at the table.

  • But I think we have to also find a language and a story,

  • a way of telling the story about how we can get together

  • that does not threaten people who

  • are uncomfortable with change as much.

  • And that's going to be different

  • for different countries.

  • But I'll give you an example.

  • There's a young leader who we worked with from Slovenia--

  • she's part of our network--

  • who was an advocate for doing something

  • about domestic violence.

  • The laws of that country didn't have domestic violence.

  • It was a real problem.

  • Ran a referendum-- it got crushed.

  • And we worked with her and suggested,

  • well, maybe you want to talk to the people

  • who didn't vote for it.

  • So she goes out to these rural villages with these older,

  • traditional, rural, very religious, very conservative

  • women, and just interviewed them and listened to them

  • and talked to them.

  • And it's not that they agreed with domestic abuse.

  • It's that they thought their way of life

  • was being challenged.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • She adapted their language, ran

  • the referendum again a few years later,

  • and it passed, right?

  • Because she adopted the language that made them feel

  • as if, OK, this is not so much of a earthquake,

  • a huge change in how we live.

  • But it's rather affirming our best values.

  • And I think us finding ways to do that in a consistent way

  • will help.

  • But it's hard.

  • Yeah, look, for most of human history,

  • democracy is a relatively recent vintage.

  • TREVOR NOAH: It's a blip.

  • It's a blip, yeah.

  • Tribe, nation state, race, sect--

  • that's typically been how we organize things.

  • And it's always easy to say us versus them.

  • That's the easy politics.

  • Right.

  • What democracy demands is always

  • a little bit more difficult.

  • It also feels like when you observe it,

  • there are two elements that I often see is on the one hand

  • storytelling, as you said.

  • It's often easier to tell a story of blame.

  • Yes.

  • Why are things going wrong?

  • It's because of that person. It's simple.

  • There's the person. We've solved it.

  • Why are things going wrong?

  • Well, there's a confluence of factors, and you have this,

  • and you have the economy.

  • You got to understand the supply chain.

  • That's not an answer for many people.

  • Yes.

  • And when you sell freedom, they go, I can't eat freedom.

  • I can't buy a house with freedom.

  • I can't-- you know?

  • And then the second part is what you're talking about,

  • the us versus the them, the who is and who isn't.

  • Sometimes I think for many people it feels like--

  • it feels like the populists come in and just do, you know?

  • Whether it is in Brazil, you know, whether it's Bolsonaro,

  • whether it's in America with Trump,

  • they go, they're just going to do.

  • And whether they do or don't actually do it,

  • it feels like they're going to do.

  • But then some people go, oh, but when

  • we get the freedom people, they want to talk,

  • and they want to discuss.

  • And it seems incremental, and it seems

  • like things won't change.

  • Yeah.

  • Is there a way to combat that?

  • Because it is a feeling a lot of the time.

  • Well, yeah, look, if you want to be

  • a progressive, pluralist, tolerant democrat--

  • and I don't mean small d democrat.

  • I don't mean Democratic Party.

  • You can't be a wuss.

  • TREVOR NOAH: [laughs]

  • I mean, you've got to have a story with some swag.

  • You've got to be able to sell the future.

  • [cheering]

  • And deliver.

  • And also call out the fact that what

  • those folks say they're going to do, they almost never

  • do, right?

  • Because the truth of the matter is that when you look at--

  • we have experiments-- those countries

  • that have the ability to harness everyone.

  • And everybody participates, and there's consent,

  • and people feel like, all right,

  • this is working for us, versus places that are failed states.

  • The track record of democracy is pretty good.

  • But we have to be forceful in making our argument.

  • And what is true is that we can't just talk.

  • We got to walk the walk, which is why we're

  • having a forum in New York.

  • One of the topics that we're talking about

  • is inclusive capitalism.

  • People are-- when you think about,

  • let's say, here in the United States,

  • there's greater appeal of right-wing populism in a lot

  • of communities, rural communities,

  • that they're not wrong that the economy, the global economy,

  • has shifted away from them to urban centers,

  • even in their own states.

  • And so the opportunities in Austin, Texas

  • are different than in a rural community in East Texas.

  • And people notice that.

  • So we have to spend some time thinking about,

  • how are we delivering on behalf of people whose lives--

  • who used to work in a factory, who used to farm for a living,

  • and have dignity and worth and stability and security

  • in those lives, and now, suddenly, they don't feel

  • as if they've got the lottery ticket

  • in this existing economy?

  • That does have to be addressed.

  • And in places like Africa, you know, right now you have,

  • let's say, China coming in, heavy presence

  • in a lot of these countries, providing

  • a lot of foreign aid-- a lot of strings attached,

  • a lot of Chinese workers coming in to build big buildings.

  • Right, them owning the points, et cetera.

  • Et cetera.

  • But if we're not there, if we're not

  • helping build that road, if we're not there

  • to build that port, then naturally people

  • are going to start thinking, well, maybe

  • that's a recipe for bettering my life as

  • opposed to some flowery language,

  • but it has nothing behind it.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right, right.

  • I wonder, though, do you think inclusive capitalism

  • is somewhat of a paradox?

  • A few think it's possible.

  • It feels-- you think it's-- because it feels like, I mean,

  • capitalism is designed to extract as much

  • wealth as possible from every single

  • interaction that it can.

  • Yeah, but, look, I mentioned Sweden

  • and some of the problems they're having because.

  • Immigration on the other hand, you look

  • at Scandinavian countries.

  • They're capitalist countries, but--

  • But some people would argue--

  • --and those work very well.

  • But some people would argue that their foundation is more

  • socialist, and then they go with--

  • it's almost like they go, we're socialist first,

  • and then capitalism is our undercurrent.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Not really.

  • You don't agree with that?

  • Well, if you go there, essentially,

  • people are taxed more, and they have more common goods.

  • Right.

  • But you're still going around at a job, and you get paid,

  • and you can't-- it's not like you're going into the store,

  • just grabbing whatever you want [laughs] and walking out.

  • - But the question-- - All right, see you!

  • [laughs]

  • See you, Sven, you know?

  • No, but the reason--

  • No, you got to pay for it, right?

  • Right.

  • Then the guy at the cash register's checking,

  • did I make a profit here today? Right.

  • Right, but the reason I'm asking that is because--

  • and maybe it's the words that fail us sometimes.

  • I often-- I'll talk to my friends about this.

  • I go, it's interesting that we sort of stopped.

  • We went, oh, this is socialism.

  • There's this. There's the communism.

  • There's capital-- and then we just stopped.

  • We're like, this is it.

  • There's capitalism, and that's that.

  • I sometimes wonder, is there not something better?

  • Is there not something we could be moving towards?

  • Well, I think there is. The--

  • Maybe I should be asking, what is inclusive capitalism?

  • The reason I just used, let's say, a Denmark as an example

  • is not because it's going to work perfectly in India,

  • the United States, et cetera.

  • The point, though, is they've got some blend, some mix.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • Right?

  • There is an advantage in terms of efficiency

  • and also freedom to a market system.

  • TREVOR NOAH: OK.

  • You have a control system.

  • You have some guy in an office is deciding how many potatoes

  • we're going to grow this year.

  • That usually doesn't work.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • The flip side of it is that what we've also learned

  • is that if some guy in a boardroom is deciding,

  • I'm going to ravage the environment

  • to do whatever I want, that doesn't work either.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Right.

  • So we're going to have a blend of some sort.

  • We want some collective decision

  • making about the social good.

  • And we want something that's efficient and dynamic

  • and allows us to exercise our innovation and freedom.

  • And we don't need to worry so much about the labels as we do

  • about being practical and thinking about

  • what's working and what isn't.

  • And this is going back to the information issues.

  • This is part of why, to me, one of the biggest challenges

  • to democracy is not just the mechanics of elections

  • or the independent judiciary.

  • Those things are all important.

  • But this is why this information and media

  • issue is so important.

  • Because what we've seen here in the United States

  • and elsewhere is a abandonment of a commitment

  • to facts and reason and logic and stuff that is useful.

  • [laughter] And--

  • Some would say necessary.

  • Necessary.

  • And if we can't have a debate based on facts,

  • then we can't get to better solutions, right?

  • We start talking in slogans and nonsense.

  • And there's no reality check.

  • We just make stuff up.

  • I didn't lose an election.

  • You know, there's something broken over there.

  • And it doesn't-- and it's impervious to facts.

  • So part of what I think--

  • why I've been spending a lot of time thinking

  • about this disinformation issue is how do we--

  • in how we teach our kids in either industry standards

  • and/or regulation of these social media platforms--

  • how do we get back to the point where you can have opinions--

  • we all do-- but facts matter, and proof matters?

  • And our capacity to debate and say, you know what?

  • If we do things this way, it might work better.

  • And then you may disagree, but at least we

  • agree to a set of rules whereby we can

  • arrive at a better solution.

  • TREVOR NOAH: Do you think it's possible to get to that place

  • when almost half-- let's just talk about the United States--

  • where almost half the country says,

  • well, what are those rules?

  • And why are you even deciding them?

  • And why are we having this conversation?

  • You are not even a fact.

  • How do you-- I honestly mean, how

  • do you get to that place with people

  • where you can agree a little?

  • The interesting thing is even in those places that are just

  • inundated with what I consider to be nonsense and lies

  • and distortions, when people operate in their own lives,

  • they're still operating on facts, right?

  • On their jobs, when they're coaching their kid's

  • little league or their soccer game or football game,

  • they don't let the ref just kind of say, ah,

  • you know what?

  • This time, we're just going to get

  • 5 points for the touchdown.

  • It's like, wait, wait, wait.

  • Folks on the sidelines say, nope,

  • it's 6 points for the touchdown,

  • and then you get the extra point.

  • And so we abide by all kinds of facts in our own lives.

  • It's just this national story that is being told where

  • we allow lies to be told.

  • And we accept them mainly because it turns out

  • that when we tell a story about the other side,

  • it makes us feel better.

  • It's like, ah, you know, Trevor, he's a jackass.

  • You should see--

  • I don't know it has to be me who's the example.

  • Well, you happen to be sitting there.

  • I mean-- [laughs]

  • And so we enjoy the performative aspects

  • of making stuff up.

  • And part of that is because we don't think

  • there are consequences to it.

  • Now what we learned from the election of my successor,

  • from the pandemic, from the insurrection, is,

  • actually, the stories we tell do matter.

  • And having some baseline of sticking to the truth when

  • you're telling stories about our country, about policy,

  • but also about the other side, that matters.

  • And I like to think that part of what

  • happened in this election is people said,

  • OK, you know what?

  • Some of this stuff's getting a little too crazy.

  • It turns out that there is a majority of country that

  • does prefer normal, not crazy.

  • And that's a basis for hope.

  • [cheering]

  • I could talk to you for hours about this.

  • I know you don't have the time.

  • It has been wonderful having you here though.

  • It's also been wonderful seeing what you're getting up to.

  • Because after I had the pleasure of interviewing you

  • at the White House just before you left,

  • and then afterwards I saw you kite surfing.

  • And I loved it.

  • I loved it, by the way.

  • Great technique.

  • But I often wonder, like, what is Mr.

  • President going to do next?

  • Where does he go?

  • And you started producing shows about issues around the world.

  • And now you've got this forum.

  • I wondered if maybe you have any tips for me as-- you know?

  • Well--

  • Because, I mean, you and I, like,

  • we're basically the same. - We're the same.

  • We're basically the same.

  • You know, it's--

  • You know, I think--

  • [cheering]

  • I think you're going to have to really focus

  • on relearning things like driving, pressing

  • your own elevator buttons.

  • I think you have different ideas what was my job is

  • and what your job is.

  • When was the last time you were at the dry cleaners?

  • I was actually on 53rd Street.

  • Has it been-- OK.

  • That's where I go. I take it myself.

  • Yeah.

  • Yeah, we are very-- you--

  • like, you're very like, [grunts] you know?

  • Like I said, you're Mr. President forever.

  • You have Secret Service forever.

  • That's correct, right?

  • I do, and it--

  • I barely get to keep my hoodies after this.

  • I--

  • [laughter]

  • I still am in a bubble.

  • I thought I could escape it.

  • Quick story since we're in New York,

  • I used to say, oh, you know what?

  • Once I get out of here, I'm going to just be able to,

  • like, walk through Central Park, and--

  • TREVOR NOAH: Oh, wow.

  • --it's going to-- and I'll just put,

  • like, on a baseball cap, and it's going to be fine.

  • And Michelle's all like, yeah, OK.

  • [laughs]

  • Good luck with that.

  • And the first time I tried it, I got, like, half a block.

  • [laughter]

  • And then, suddenly, there was this swarm,

  • and there's phones and traffic stopping.

  • And it didn't work.

  • [laughter]

  • So, you know, I guess what I would say,

  • though, is that you will be missed here.

  • But--

  • [cheering]

  • But we were talking backstage.

  • You're already following one piece of advice

  • that I would have is leave when your poll numbers are high.

  • [laughter]

  • That's how they'll remember you.

  • So--

  • I'm actually-- yeah, I'm excited.

  • I'm going to go on the road.

  • Yes.

  • I mean, I've said this to you before.

  • Yeah.

  • You know, whether it's the White House Correspondents

  • Dinner, in Georgia when you're doing the speech,

  • you're a very funny guy.

  • So you want me to open for you.

  • [cheering]

  • I've got some shows in Chicago.

  • You know what? Not even open.

  • I wouldn't dare.

  • We could co-- you know?

  • You can't open for me.

  • You're still Mr. President.

  • - Banter. - We just do like a--

  • Just banter. Do a little banter.

  • Yeah, the coheadlining tour, you know what I mean?

  • We'll call it Half and Half.

  • You know what I mean?

  • [cheering]

  • [laughs]

  • - I like that. - We could do it.

  • - We can do it. - We'll talk.

  • We'll get our people in contact.

  • President Barack Obama, everybody.

  • We're going to take a quick break.

  • But we'll be right back after this.

  • [cheering]

  • Thank you so much.

[cheering]

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 美國腔

歐巴馬電視訪談(Barack Obama - Protecting Democracy and the Commitment to Facts | The Daily Show)

  • 33 1
    David Chang 發佈於 2023 年 11 月 19 日
影片單字