字幕列表 影片播放
- You can't have this conversation on CNN or Fox.
You can't do it, right?
Because if you are only talking about
how the Israeli Defense Forces are responsible
for these brutal killings,
or if you're only talking about
what Hamas did on October 7th,
and you don't talk about the broader context, right, you are
absolutely not understanding what's happening
in this war right now.
- Today on Big Think, we're gonna be talking to Ian Bremmer,
president and founder of Eurasia Group
and GZERO Media about the ongoing conflict
between Hamas and Israel.
Ian, thank you so much for joining us today.
- It's great to be back with Big Think.
- This region has been embroiled in turmoil for thousands
of years, so there's many historical
factors we could discuss.
But I would like to know from your standpoint,
is it more helpful to focus on recent history
to better understand this conflict?
- Both the Jews and the Palestinians have long,
long running and legitimate claims to live
on this territory.
Palestinians, some 700,000 plus were
kicked off these territories
after 1948 post-Holocaust.
The Jews had lived on these territories for millennia,
and a number of empires have kicked them off.
We can talk about that.
There are people that are far more expert on those histories
than I am, but the reality is that for the Jews
and the Palestinians that are fighting over this land today,
they've been living there for their lifetimes and,
and so it's really not about who has a right
to live on the territory.
It's rather that they need to find a way
to live together in peace.
And what has happened over the past years is that
everyone in the world has basically given up
on finding a peaceful solution
because they've tried for decades, it's too hard or
because they're not interested;
they have other things that they would rather do.
That's where we are today.
The last time that the Americans
who are not an honest broker for peace in the region,
the United States, a principle ally in the entire Middle East
is Israel.
So you can't say, "Oh, well, you know, they're the ones
that can broker peace between Israel and the Palestinians,
because they're equally trusted."
That's not true. But they do have the dominant military
presence in the region, and they also have the dominant
diplomatic capability on the region.
So they've been the ones
that have played the most significant role.
And the last time an American senior diplomat was
really invested on trying to figure out a way to bring peace
to this region was when John Kerry was Secretary of State
in the first couple of years
of the Obama administration.
And he did shuttle diplomacy between the Israelis,
the Palestinians, the Jordanians, the Egyptians, I mean,
all the time, for 18 months
this was his top priority.
He wanted a Nobel Peace Prize for it. He failed.
And after that, basically the Americans gave up.
It was the pivot to Asia.
It was no longer focusing as much on the Middle East.
And then when the Russians invade Ukraine, it's
focusing on Europe too.
But no one's spending real time on the Palestinians,
the Gulf States, who had been providing so much money
for humanitarian support
for Palestinians living in the West Bank,
and particularly Gaza, as well as refugees in other places
that they were saying there could be no peace
in the Middle East unless the Palestinian-Israel
issue is resolved.
Well, it turned out they were willing
to make peace with Israel.
They're, they're willing
to engage open diplomatic relations, allow Jewish tourists
to come to their country, trade
and investment, technology cooperation, security cooperation.
But what about the Palestinians?
Well, too hard to resolve, and Israel,
and particularly this far-right,
Netanyahu-led government has been willing to not only
expand illegally, the settlements in the West Bank, reducing
the territory that the Palestinians can live on,
and making it harder for them to get to work, go to school,
you know, have a possibility for a viable future.
But also, Netanyahu's government was engaging more
with Hamas in Gaza at the expense
of the Palestinian authority,
because they never wanted to pursue a two-state solution.
So they forgot about the Palestinians too.
So when you look at everyone around the world
that was committed to the Palestinians, finding a way
to live viably on their territories,
the answer is this has not been a priority for anyone
for a long, long time.
And their own government in the West Bank that
recognizes Israel's right to exist, as opposed to Hamas,
which does not, they were corrupt.
They were divided.
They couldn't speak for Palestinians in Gaza,
and they were being weakened by the Israeli government.
So, I mean, this was a long introduction
to talk about the history,
but the point is that if you are looking for people
that are responsible, historically,
for why we are in the mess that we are in today,
and it is an unholy mess,
and I use that term very literally, you know,
you can look everywhere
and you have people to blame that
that is where we are today.
- Thank you for that. I'm, I'm curious, you know,
to talk about some of the domestic politics within Israel,
because that's something that I think has not been paid
enough attention to
and specifically the actions of the Netanyahu government
and the people who they are partnering with as it relates
to this conflict, but also just internally inside of Israel.
What does it look like in terms of the partnerships
and the dynamics that are happening there?
What has been the lead up to this conflict in terms
of the internal politics with Israel,
and how has that had an effect on just the general
relationship between Israel
and the Palestinians in the various places?
- You know, Israel is a very political society.
The average Israeli citizen reads
a lot about news and politics.
If you go to a cafe in Tel Aviv or in Jerusalem
or Herzliya, you're gonna hear a lot
of people talking about politics.
It's also a very fragmented society.
There are a lot of different political parties.
And, and in order
to get a government together in the Knesset,
you can't govern by yourself
because you'd never get a majority.
You have to find a coalition with other partners.
And Netanyahu, who has, you know, faced all sorts
of internal corruption scandals and,
and who's Likud party has also been painted
with a lot of those challenges.
The only way he could form a government this last time
around was with a hard-right group.
A party that specifically has, you know, said some
of the most horrible things about wanting
Palestinians removed from the West Bank, about wanting
to take over their territories.
In some ways, the hard-right partners
of Netanyahu have been as unyielding
and aggressive about the Palestinians not having rights in
the occupied territories as Hamas has been
about the Jews not having the right
to have an Israeli state.
Now, that does not reflect the opinions
of the Israeli people as a whole, but it has meant that
before the events of October 7th,
the terrorist events against the people of Israel, you had
enormous domestic instability.
That domestic instability was the people of Israel