Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • With the universe of Middle Earth, J. R. R. Tolkien crafted a setting rooted in an elegant

  • simplicity. The Lord of the Rings is derived in large part from classical mythology and

  • it finds itself fixated on clear thematic dichotomy - good vs evil, natural vs technological,

  • love and light vs hate and darkness.. As one would expect for the story that set the stage

  • for fantasy fiction to come, it is not something that breaks the mold, because there really

  • wasn't much of a mold to break back then. However, that does not mean that Tolkien has been exempt

  • While the relevancy of comments like this is up for debate due to the context of Tolkien's

  • era, there is a definite lack of detail, subtlety, and moral greyness in parts of the series.

  • This is not a criticism from me as I adore this story, just an observation of

  • the style and approach. Interpersonal conflicts usually only exist as a result of external

  • corruption, pseudo-racism is overcome through togetherness, common causes and friendship,

  • Aragorn, despite personal difficulty, overcomes all and rules as a great king and everyone

  • lives happily ever after. And there is a definite merit to this simplicity as it provides a

  • richness and resonance that elevated Lord of the Rings to an almost fairytale-like status.

  • However, as discussions go on through the years, impressions change, broad strokes grow

  • bolder, things gets exaggerated and certain topics fall by the wayside. And in this case,

  • it is a shame, because one of the The Lord of the Rings' greatest triumphs is a character

  • that not only offers a counterargument to those that criticize the series for lacking

  • in nuance and human realism on an all-encompassing scale, but one that also just gets far too

  • little attention.

  • Boromir is comfortably one of the most nuanced and layered characters in the series, and

  • arguably the most human. He is absolutely vital to not just the Fellowship of the Ring,

  • but the entire series, as his narrative and thematic echoes resonate until the very end.

  • But to understand exactly why he's so important, we must first examine his position in the

  • narrative. Now, In Fellowship of the Ring, there are two main depictions and representations

  • of the race of men. Aragorn and Boromir. Both are burdened by the sins of their ancestors

  • and looking for a way to restore pride to their race, and both see an avenue toward

  • doing so through Frodo's quest. But there is a huge contrast between these two in thematic

  • and psychological terms.

  • By the end of his journey, Aragorn is the idealization and the optimal outcome of man.

  • He's not perfect and he does have internal strife, but he is able to overcome all and

  • strive past temptation to be the hero that everyone needs, for very important reasons

  • that we'll touch on later. When Frodo offers him the ring, he knows that he cannot be trusted

  • with it and declines using his better judgment. He pains, he struggles, and he ultimately

  • succeeds to reach the light by the end.

  • Boromir is the flip side of that because his weakness ends up being.. insurmountable. But

  • before getting there, an important facet of his character must be discussed - his compassion. He has as

  • much care as anyone and a knack for understanding people. There is a distinct

  • charisma present in Boromir that stems from his deep connection with human sentiment - he

  • just seems to understand how to touch the hearts of men and this draws people to him

  • He finds it easy to bond with others, he has

  • their backs from the outset, and cares not for doing what

  • should be done when it supersedes doing what he believes is right.

  • A significant contrast between these two men is displayed after Gandalf dies. While our

  • duty-bound king Aragorn must put up a front to raise spirits, Boromir sees more value

  • in taking a moment and allowing the others to grieve.

  • This is not to chastise either character in any way, but to illustrate a key difference

  • between the two. Boromir just prioritizes the human heart above all, it seems. But unfortunately,

  • along with the extreme pressure on his shoulders to rescue his homeland, this makes him most

  • vulnerable to anything that seems key to achieving his near impossible dream.

  • While the pressure on Aragorn is indeed immense, Boromir is always crippled by it. While Aragorn

  • has spent the past number of years wandering, Boromir has been exposed to the trials of

  • men and as such, he is terribly afraid of seeing all that he loves torn apart. He has

  • great burden and expectations placed upon his shoulders by his father and, by extension,

  • his people, and it is something that never leaves his mind. Sean Bean portrays this extremely

  • well with just the tiniest of anxious glances in key scenes, the smallest hints of a tremble

  • in his voice. It's clear that no matter how at ease he might appear, he can never

  • truly feel peace in his mind. He is tortured by the pressure. His home is on the brink

  • of doom and as a result, He shows a susceptibility to corruption - a gateway to the darkness

  • that has plagued mankind both in Middle Earth and in reality for all of time. While relatability

  • itself isn't necessary for crafting great storytelling and characters, he particularly

  • hits home because he represents the part of mankind that succumbs, stumbles and gives

  • into temptation. The familiar part of mankind. He wants more than anything to bring joy and happiness to the kingdom

  • of Gondor, to see his people smile.. and he fails. This is the more personal depiction

  • of man more focused on realism and poignancy.

  • Boromir is so important for balance, for adding grit, deep flaws and true failure

  • to this cast. While Frodo ultimately succumbs to the Ring's power and while the possibility

  • is there for Aragorn, Galadriel and Gandalf, it took Frodo far longer to crack and the

  • latter three have the control to reject it. It's clear that Boromir has a far weaker

  • will than anyone due to the stresses and strains on him. He thirsts for the power due to the

  • high hopes being placed on him. He cracks under the pressure and he is corruptible.

  • It is a nice thematic twist here, as the themes associated with the villains of the story

  • - powerlust, scheming, corruption - take root in one of our heroes to just show that

  • maybe the story is not so purely black and white. After attempting to steal the ring

  • from Frodo, Boromir immediately realizes his mistake, but is far too late to take back the damage

  • done.

  • Don't mistake me for someone who downplays the fear and tribulations that Aragorn experiences.

  • He undoubtedly has a lot of baggage that comes with being Isildur's heir and he deals with

  • a burden comparable to Boromir's. But experience and personality differences between the two

  • mean that he is much better suited to dealing with the burden. Where Aragorn feels determination,

  • Ever the most genuine depiction of the beauty and tragedy of man until the very end, Boromir's

  • role in the story and his final moments leave an impact that cannot be understated. Many

  • thanks for watching.

With the universe of Middle Earth, J. R. R. Tolkien crafted a setting rooted in an elegant

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 美國腔

The Most Human Character in The Lord of the Rings

  • 24 2
    林宜悉 發佈於 2023 年 07 月 19 日
影片單字