字幕列表 影片播放
Smack dab in the middle of the Hollywood Renaissance, William Friedkin's 1971 police thriller
titled The French Connection captures the gritty reality of a true crime story like
few films can. Over the years, detective films have certainly not been in short supply. Today,
we take an in-depth look at what The French Connection teaches us about filmmaking to
see if we can figure out why it always seems to tower above the rest.
The French Connection was adapted from a non-fiction novel that recounts a real narcotics case
that took place between 1960 and 1962 in New York City. The film was released on October
9th, 1971 to great acclaim and ended up winning Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Film Editing,
Best Actor, Best Director, and was the first R-rated movie to win Best Picture at the Academy
Awards (wiki). The story follows detectives Jimmy 'Popeye' Doyle and Buddy 'Cloudy'
Russo as they try to find a large heroin supply being snuck into New York City from France.
The characters Popeye and Cloudy were played by Gene Hackman and Roy Sheider respectively
and they were based on real detectives Eddie Egan and Sonny Grosso who actually have small
roles in the film. Grosso plays Klein and Egan, with a speaking part, plays Lieutenant Simonson.
After leaving the police force, both Grosso and Egan went on to have careers in the entertainment
industry—Grosso became a technical advisor and a film and television producer for everything
from Night Heat to even Pee-wee's Playhouse. He also continued to act in small roles including
a police officer in The Godfather and Detective Blasio in Friedkin's 1980 film Cruising.
Eddie Egan became a sort of celebrity because of his fearless brazen attitude and his extremely
large amount of arrests and acted in several movies and TV shows during the 70s and 80s.
Sonny Grosso: “The French Connection meant: there were street connections, there were
Spanish connections, there were Black connections, there were Italian connections; the ultimate
connection in the drug world was the French connection.”
So, what can we learn?
First, Character Introduction.
The characters in The French Connection are introduced in a very exciting, eloquent, and
economic way. William Friedkin was quoted saying, “I have a theory about thrillers.
If you open with a murder in the first two minutes, the audience will hang around for
15 minutes of exposition without getting bored,” (Film Quarterly) which is utilized here, but
our heroes are also introduced in an exciting way. The first time we see Popeye and Cloudy,
they are about to make a bust. We don't see their home life, getting ready for work,
or hanging out at the police station—we are immediately thrust into the action. They
are cops; the film is about busting drug dealers, so why not introduce them busting a drug dealer?
This goes for the introduction of all of the main characters—the classy French antagonist
classes it up, the killer kills, and the cops bust.
Action films often start out with an action setpiece of some sort with little weighing
on the plot, but what The French Connection does is offer up just a short foot chase for
action. This is brilliantly done because it isn't meant to be sheer spectacle. What
it does is it gives us a chance to see how well Popeye and Cloudy work together and sets
up the interesting details of the job as well as the little quirks they both have.
Every single choice that is made in this opening sequence sets up the characters including
everything from dialogue to wardrobe and setting. The first time we see Popeye, he is dressed
as Santa Claus—it shows us that he is a little 'out-there,' but it also shows
us that he is willing to do whatever it takes to get his man (including running around dressed
as Santa) and the image of Popeye chasing a drug dealer down the street in the Santa
outfit is a memorable way of doing that. You won't see any other officer in the film
do anything similar.
What follows is a short interrogation scene in an empty lot, which was actually the location
of the real Sonny Grosso's childhood home. In the screenplay, this scene takes place
inside Popeye's car, but this was changed to a much more intriguing location that is
in keeping with the gritty presentation of New York City. It almost conjures images of
bombed out buildings in Europe during World War II. This scene could just as easily taken
place down at the precinct in an interrogation room, but instead it is on the street, which
shows us that Popeye and Cloudy are more comfortable out on the streets of the city. They aren't
eager to get back to the safety of the precinct. They are unafraid of the jungle that is New
York City. And we'll see how this mentality affects their decisions throughout the rest
of the film.
The production hired the writer of Shaft who adapted the screenplay for a small amount
of money. The script also contained fairly different dialogue in this scene except, of
course, for the Poughkeepsie exchange.
Friedkin: “The Roy Scheider character, Buddy Russo, would always ask the suspect specific
questions about specific things while the Eddie Egan or the Popeye Doyle character would
ask him non-sequiturs like if he ever sat down on the edge of the bed and picked his
feet. And so the suspect was caught in the middle between these two techniques. He was
more afraid to answer Doyle's nonsensical questions than Russo's questions that made
sense because he didn't know really how much trouble he was in.”
Hackman: “I heard Eddie do the 'do you pick your feet in Poughkeepsie' thing a
number of times when we were out in the streets in Harlem and all over the place. And I never
understood it and people on the street to this day come up to me and ask me if I pick
my feet in Poughkeepsie.”
Friedkin: “'Pick your feet in Poughkeepsie' was a phrase Eddie Egan used on almost every
suspect he ever interrogated just to unsettle them. It's just a non-sequitur to unsettle someone,
but it's asked very straight and forcefully and it's a very hard question to answer,
as you might imagine. And so it would cause the suspect to freeze up and wonder if he
had, in fact, done something in Poughkeepsie that he should be arrested for.”
However, the one who was really unsettled in this scene was Hackman who had a lot of
trouble roughing up the actor playing the dope peddler. The scene was shot in the first
week of production and they did 22 takes, but it wasn't working.
Hackman: “And so, I did, I went to him and said, 'I don't think I can do this.'
And to his credit, or maybe because he was in a bind, he decided not to let me go and
I will be eternally grateful that he didn't because it was certainly the start of my career.”
They went ahead and kept shooting the rest of the film and came back and shot this scene
much later when Hackman was in the right mindset to go through with the scene.
Scheider: “I mean, for instance, the first scene in the film, when we're chasing Alan
Weeks and we're slapping the hell out of him in that alley, well, that was the first
day of shooting and Gene and I were not very good. We weren't very convincing. We just
didn't have the fluidity and the speed and the routine of a 'good cop, bad cop'
We didn't have it down yet. So Billy said, 'alright, look, we'll scrap this. We'll
come back at the end of the movie and we'll do this. We came back and we did it in an
afternoon. It was a piece of cake, but by that time, we felt like cops.”
This seems like good advice. Much of a film hinges on the character introductions and
it might be a good idea to shoot the first scenes later in the production—especially
if it an intense scene—so that the actors have had more time to better get into the
rhythm and mindset of their character.
This scene introduces Popeye's anger and really relies on Hackman's ability to convey
the motivation Popeye has to catch the bad guys and get the information he needs to make
a big bust.
Friedkin: “I knew that he hated his father, so in order to produce anger in him, the anger
that was necessary for the character, I became like a harsh father. And so, the point of
that story is that, with every actor, the director works like a psychologist.”
So in a sequence lasting less than five minutes, we get a perfect introduction to Popeye and
Cloudy's working and personal relationship, what their motivation is, and the lengths
they'll go to complete their goal.
Number 2: building a character externally.
A character isn't just confined to the actor and the words on the page, it extends way
beyond that. We talked a bit about what wardrobe says about a character, but let's go even
further away from the physical embodiment of the character. For instance, Friedkin mentioned
that he chose Popeye's apartment building because it kind of looked like a prison.
Occasionally Popeye will toss a white straw hat in the back seat window of his car signifying
to other officers that they are undercover and on duty. I believe this hat was a nod
to Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, which was released a few years earlier. In Butch
Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, the outlaws are chased by a determined lawman named Joe
Lefors who would stop at nothing to catch them. In the film, he is recognized by his
white straw hat— very similar to the one used in The French Connection. Popeye is also
incredibly determined and relentless to catch the bad guys and this visual nod does a great
job regardless of whether it is noticed.
The cold says a lot about world that Popeye inhabits. New York City itself feels hostile
and uncaring in the French Connection and, for Popeye specifically, it seems as though
he is navigating a harsh world where there isn't any protection from those who live
outside the law. As it turns out, this aspect was a lucky accident.
Friedkin: “By the time the studio said, 'okay, make that film,' all of the guys
who said, 'go make it' were fired. If I had waited another month it would have never
have been made. So when we made it, it was the coldest winter on record in New York City
and it was literally freezing cold and that's when we had to make it.”
Popeye also has a bit of a fetish for girls in tall boots, which is briefly set up once
and then later we see him intrigued by a girl wearing boots who's riding a bike. This
adds to the characteristic of Popeye being a hunter—always watching and waiting to
pounce on his prey.
The aspect I really want to talk about is motivated action. The reason why the car chase
in The French Connection is considered one of the greatest in cinema history is that
it reveals more about Popeye's character than anything else in the film and yet, it
is an action-packed setpiece. Nowadays, it seems big spectacular setpieces only go as
far as furthering the plot and often not even that. What The French Connection does is it
uses the chase scene as a literal and metaphorical representation of Popeye's obsession with
catching the perp—no matter the cost. People's lives are at risk, but still he is determined
to let nothing stand between him and catching this man. In a way, the chase is a metaphor
for the dynamic between the police and the criminals responsible for perpetuating the
drug epidemic. These criminals literally have the higher ground, able to coast along while
Popeye must stay grounded dodging a multitude of obstacles in his path just to keep up,
and the only way he can catch up to his man is to break the rules that the criminals aren't
obligated to follow.
The chase (and the sniper) didn't actually appear in the script initially and Friedkin
said that the original script had everything you could want from a police thriller except
a big setpiece like this. Friedkin had the same people who made the famous chase scene
for Bullitt and wanted to do something different.
Friedkin: “I should tell you, the origin of the chase was, you mentioned Hickman and
Phil D'Antoni, they had done Bullitt. And I saw Bullitt and I said, 'I can't do
the same thing they've done. The've done the car chase about as good as it could be
done then, I've got to do something different.' And D'Antoni and I started walking the streets
of New York and while we were talking about what we could do, I hear the subway rumbling
beneath my feet. The idea came to me right off the streets—what about a car chasing
a train?”
Another good example of this dynamic is the scene where Popeye waits outside of the fancy
restaurant. This scene builds upon the characters in such a way that shows that crime, in fact,
does pay and the police are burdened by the same civility that separates them from those
who break the law. A side note: it was so cold while they were making this scene that
the cast and crew would have to go into the shoe store Popeye was standing in front of to warm up
in between takes.
Number 3: Documentary Style.
On another level, the 'French Connection' seems to unintentionally refer to the influence
that French filmmaking was having on the American film industry during the 60s and 70s. The
Hollywood Renaissance was rooted in the principles of the French New Wave and Auteur Theory that
had started a decade earlier.
Friedkin: “Then the next change in cinema was Godard's 'Breathless,' which changed-
À bout de soufflé—which changed the way films were made. All of a sudden, a guy could
go out with a small crew, very few lights—or no lights—and shoot with hand-held cameras
and tell a story that people would see in a theater and it was not formal in any way.
It was informal. It was like jazz music. And that changed cinema to this day.”
Because the story was based on actual events, Friedkin wanted to evoke a sense of realism
to the film. He had the actual narcotics detectives who cracked the case (Eddie Egan and Sonny
Grosso) working on the film as advisors and it was the cooperation of Egan and Grosso
as well as their friends in the police department that allowed the film to achieve this level
of realism.
Scheider: “And we just tried to make it as real as we possibly could. That was the
fun of it. The fun of it was making it real. We had all those mornings of coming back from
the night work and talking about these scenes and what was happening and what was being
said and how could we say it more interestingly than what's written in the script.”
Grosso has stated that the film is ninety percent accurate to what happened in real
life. Egan and Grosso were on the set at all times making sure that the actors were following
procedure and behaving as real narcotics detectives would. So, before every scene, Friedkin would
ask Egan and Grosso if what the actors were doing was the right thing to do.
To prepare for their roles, Hackman and Sheider would go out with Egan and Grosso on busts
and other police activities, which not only helped their performances but the story as well.
Scheider: “About two weeks we went out almost every night—Sonny and Gene and myself and
Egan doing all the stuff that you've heard about. And then after we worked at night,
we would report the next morning to the French Connection office and we'd sit down with
Billy and transcribe everything that we heard or seen or experienced that night and we used
it to create scenes in this movie.”
Hackman: “The sequence in the bar with all the drug users and pushers, I don't think
I could have ever done that scene if I hadn't actually scene Eddie Egan do that.”
Hackman: “He went into a bar one night and he did the scene that's in the film now
where Popeye comes in and yells out, 'Popeye's here, get your hands on the bar.' He did
that, but he did it for real. I mean, there were real bad dudes in there. And so I could
see that was possible. If a guy was tough enough, strong enough, a real police officer
could get away with that.”
Egan and Grosso were also very well known in the NYPD and had a lot of their police
friends work on the film. For example, in the scene where Popeye busts up the bar, all
of the extras in this scene were played by actual police officers and it was the same
for the first bar as well. And to add to the realism, some parts were played by people
who actually worked on the case—most notably, the police mechanic who pulls apart the car
looking for the heroin was the real mechanic who did this in the actual case. Similarly,
in the scene where they test the heroin, this was filmed using real heroin and the real
chemistry test that the police use.
Despite this being a studio picture, the budget was only 1.5 million dollars and they ended
up going 300 thousand dollars over budget. Friedkin said that they agreed to do the film
with a million and a half dollars knowing they couldn't. So, they ended up employing
a great deal of guerrilla filmmaking techniques as a way to deal with the budget, but also
when they didn't need to, so that they could keep the documentary style that Friedkin wanted
for the film.
One of the crazier things they did was for the scene with the traffic jam on the Brooklyn
Bridge. They didn't have any permits to close down the bridge, so they just had some
people intentionally stop their cars at the other end of the bridge and created a real
traffic jam.
For the scene where Popeye follows Charnier into the subway, they didn't have any permits
or permission and they just had a small crew and a wheelchair for dolly shots. This way
the shots also wouldn't bee too smooth and would have that realistic hand-held appearance.
And this sequence is something that actually happened to Eddie Egan during the case, most
notably, the part when Charnier waves to Popeye. The real suspect waved to Egan letting him
know that he knew he was being followed.
This scene was shot on a platform in Grand Central Station and since they didn't have
permits to shoot, there wasn't any way to close off the location to the general public.
Egan and Grosso got their friends in the police force to come and help manage the location,
so they could shoot without too many interruptions. Now, because they were shooting the scene
this way they didn't use any special lighting or extras. Instead they shot the location
more or less as it was and this was similar for many of the other scenes in the film.
As far as I can tell, there wasn't even a light attached to the camera in this scene
because you would be able to see the glow as it moves closer to objects and glare when
it comes right up to the train window.
In an interview with the International Cameraman's Guild, Cinematographer Owen Roizman talks
about shooting in low lighting conditions, he said: “When you were shooting commercials
in those days, everything was high-key. We hardly ever shot at night or interior car
shots. You never wanted to make anything look grainy, low-key or realistic. It was all stylized.
In our early conversations, Billy said he wanted the picture to have almost a documentary
look. He wanted it to be very real looking. I just started thinking about that and I decided
to underexpose and force develop the film and then print it up. That gave a very grainy
look” (International Cameraman's Guild).
Back then pretty much all motion picture film stock was 100 ISO (or ASA), which refers to
the sensitivity of the film itself to light. 100 is a low ISO, so it isn't very sensitive
and therefore, you need a lot of light to get a proper image. What Roizman did in situations
with very little light was to either, in the developing process, 'push' the film to
be brighter than it normally would be or use a film stock that had a higher ISO, which
hadn't been done before on a studio film (Roizman Interview). And the higher the ISO,
the more grain there is, which is why The French Connection has a really gritty look
and feel to the film.
At this point, Friedkin had a background in documentary filmmaking and he took his experience
capturing events as they happened and applied it to The French Connection. Friedkin almost
never did more than one or two takes for every shot, which helped with the feeling of spontaneity
and realism. This wasn't just tricky for the actors, but the crew as well. Friedkin
didn't storyboard his shots and, to take it even further, he often didn't rehearse
the scenes with the crew. He would run through the scene with the actors without the camera
crew on the set and have Roizman light the set as if the action could take place anywhere
in the room.
Friedkin: “So, and then the camera operator was a guy named Ricky Bravo who had photographed
the Cuban revolution at Castro's side. He was in the mountains with Castro when they
came down and took Havana and he was a great documentary cameraman and so, I used to say
to him—he had a very thick Hispanic accent—and I'd say, 'Ricky don't stop the camera
no matter what happens.' 'Okay, okay, chief.' I said, 'Don't stop, just keep
going.' And very often we would do a scene like that where he had no rehearsal. He just
had to follow the people as best he could and at the end of a take, I'd say to him,
'So how was it, Ricky?' and he'd say, 'It was all completely blocked. I couldn't
I couldn't see anything.' I said, 'Why didn't you tell me?'
He said, 'You told me not to stop!”
Roizman's goal was to light the scenes in such a way that they didn't look lit.
He would base his lighting set-ups on a practical light—
a lamp or whatever source light was in the room—
and then light the scene as if that was the only light there was,
which worked perfectly to fool the audience into thinking that the scenes were shot with whatever light was available.
Roizman said, “We sometimes shot in available light and low-key situations, and stretched the exposure latitude of the film.
Everybody thought I shot The French Connection in available light.
I always joke and say yes, I shot in whatever light was available from the truck.
The goal was to make it look like it wasn't lit, which was a radical notion in those days” (Roizman Interview).
Friedkin encouraged improvisation wherever he could and nearly all of the surveillance scenes were improvised.
Part of what makes The French Connection such a realistic portrayal of detectives working a case
is that it shows the downtime and waiting involved in watching or tailing a suspect.
For these scenes, Friedkin would break them up by shooting them in
between other scenes whenever they found a good location to shoot in.
Roizman attained the moody feel of the night stake-out scenes in the car by experimenting with lighting set-ups
in his dark garage. You can see how some of these low-light scenes feel totally
realistic while the subjects still maintain plenty of definition.
In a separate article for Panavision.com, Roizman talks about shooting the scene where Popeye
talks to the informant in the bar's bathroom. He said, “There was one light
bulb; we changed the bulb, used some hairspray to tone down the hot spot on it and shot with
just the one light…. In the bar area, there was a row of lights over the bar, but it wasn't
enough to get a proper exposure, so I simpl[y] added some extra bulbs to the existing ones.”
The article goes on to say that “[t]he film stock they used was a slower film stock, Kodak
5254, and Owen underexposed it.”
Roizman says this was [quote] “because I wanted it to look gritty, and it created the
look I wanted. Fortunately, nobody questioned me. I did what I felt was necessary – it
was a style I had in mind – and I baked the look into the negative, so there was very
little extra information that could be pulled from the shadows.”
This was to ensure that the look of the film couldn't be altered when it reached television
and other mediums.
Some other noteworthy films to use Kodak 5254 are
The Godfather,
Barry Lyndon,
Cabaret,
and Bound for Glory.
A lot of sequences rely on the tempo of the action. All the characters are constantly
up to something. Charnier and the other antagonists are always on the move and Popeye and Cloudy
watch and follow to keep up almost like a dance. This is where the brilliant editing
comes into play. Friedkin said that he wanted the film to “dictate its form” to him,
so he was open to any and all ideas from editor Gerald B. Greenberg whether or not it was
noted in the script. So in a way, the editing of the film was treated more or less the way
you would assemble a documentary from raw footage. And the results were sequences that
flow beautifully. Watching and tailing suspects has the potential to be very boring, but we
the audience are constantly getting new visuals to follow ourselves. For example, in this
clip, we cycle between four good guys and three bad guys. We become more involved with
what is going on because we feel like we are keeping track of everyone just like the police
are. It also builds up the audience's spatial awareness by expanding the scene outward,
inviting the city to play a bigger part than if we had one cop following one suspect.
The French Connection is one of those films where everything just perfectly came together
and is as much a part of American history as it is a part of cinema history. The cooperation
of the real-life subjects of the film and their friends in the NYPD combined with a
hungry cast and crew (many of whom were fairly new to feature films) provided a new and fresh
perspective that has since become a preserved slice of 1970s New York City and a well of
inspiration that filmmakers continue to return to.
Thanks for watching! The location video should be up soon, so stay tuned for that one. If
you would like to help this channel grow, you can support me on Patreon. Any pledge
you can give would be greatly appreciated. And if you're new here, please hit that
subscribe button now because there are plenty more videos on the way for cinephiles like you.
Thanks again for watching!