In 2011, Cola-Colasurprisedtheworldwhentheyannouncedthattheywouldsharetheconfidentialformulaoftheirworld-famousdrinkwiththepublicduringanNFLcommercial.
Turnedout, itwasmerely a marketingploywherethecompanyteased a "comical" formulafor a fractionof a second.
結果那只是一種行銷策略,公司在極短的時間裡預告了一個「搞笑」配方。
In 1977, thecompanyevenpulledoutofIndiabecausetheywould'vebeenlegallyrequiredtodivulgetheiringredientlisttothegovernment.
1977 年時,這間公司甚至撤出印度市場,因為他們依法必須要向政府透露其成分表。
Inanothercase, theymanagedtostall a divorcecasewhentheysuspectedthatsomeoftheCoca-Colafounder's handwrittennoteswerebeingsharedas a partof a divorcesettlement.
Andwhydoesn't onejustfindoutthecomponentsofthedrinkin a labthroughscientificmethods?
為什麼沒有人乾脆在實驗室裡透過科學手法找出這個飲料的成分呢?
Quitecontrarytothese, in 2006, a formeremployeeofCoca-Colaattemptedtosellsomeconfidentialdocumentsthatpossiblyincludedthesecretformulaand a vialofunreleaseddrinktoPepsifor 1.5 Milliondollars.
TherealityisthattheCoca-Colasecretformulaisn't really a secret, sospendingmillionsofdollartogetthisdoesn't makesense.
現實情況是,可口可樂的祕密配方並不真的是祕密,所以花費數百萬美元來獲得它是沒有意義的。
Theexactformulaisknowntomanypeoplearoundtheworld, andanytalentedchemistcanrecreatetheformulatoanextentthat's indistinguishablefromtherealonein a blindtasteat a muchlowercost.
PeoplemaybuyfakeGuccibagsbecausetheoriginalonesmaycost a liverandkidney,
人們可能會購買假的 Gucci 包,因為正牌包包可能是天價,
butwhywouldanyonebuy a slightlycheaperCoca-Coladrinkfrom a namelessbrandwhenonecaneasilyaffordtherealone?
但如果能夠輕易地負擔正牌飲料時,為什麼會有人想要以稍微便宜的價格購買無牌可樂飲品?
Notmanypeoplewouldbuysomethingthattasteslike a Coca-Coladrinkin a Pepsibottle, either.
也沒有多少人會購買用百事可樂瓶子裝著、味道近似可口可樂的飲料。
Similarly, a newly-foundedSideNote's BigMacmayhavethesamerecipeasMcDonald's, but [it] doesn't giveyouthehappyclownguyandthebillionsofdollarsofmarketingpower.