Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • In the last video, we took our first look

  • at the epsilon-delta definition of limits, which essentially

  • says if you claim that the limit of f of x as x approaches C

  • is equal to L, then that must mean by the definition

  • that if you were given any positive epsilon that it

  • essentially tells us how close we want f of x to be to L.

  • We can always find a delta that's

  • greater than 0, which is essentially telling us

  • our distance from C such that if x is within delta of C,

  • then f of x is going to be within epsilon of L.

  • If we can find a delta for any epsilon,

  • then we can say that this is indeed

  • the limit of f of x as x approaches C.

  • Now, I know what you're thinking.

  • This seems all very abstract.

  • I want to somehow use this thing.

  • And what we will do in this video is use it

  • and to rigorously prove that a limit actually exists.

  • So, right over here, I've defined a function, f of x.

  • It's equal to 2x everywhere except for x equals 5.

  • So it's 2x everywhere for all the other values of x,

  • but when x is equal to 5, it's just equal to x.

  • So I could have really just written 5.

  • It's equal to 5 when x is equal to 5.

  • It's equal to itself.

  • And so we've drawn the graph here.

  • Everywhere else, it looks just like 2x.

  • At x is equal to 5, it's not along the line 2x.

  • Instead, the function is defined to be

  • that point right over there.

  • And if I were to ask you what is the limit of f

  • of x as x approaches 5, you might

  • think of it pretty intuitively.

  • Well, let's see.

  • The closer I get to 5, the closer

  • f of x seems to be getting to 10.

  • And so, you might fairly intuitively make the claim

  • that the limit of f of x as x approaches 5 really

  • is equal to 10.

  • It looks that way.

  • But what we're going to do is use

  • the epsilon-delta definition to actually prove it.

  • And the way that most of these proofs typically go

  • is we define delta in the abstract.

  • And then we essentially try to come up with a way

  • that given any epsilon, we can always come up with a delta.

  • Or another way is we're going to try

  • to describe our delta as a function of epsilon,

  • not to confuse you too much.

  • But maybe I shouldn't use f again.

  • But delta equals function of epsilon

  • that is defined for any positive epsilon.

  • So you give me an epsilon, I just

  • put into our little formula or little function box.

  • And I will always get you a delta.

  • And if I can do that for any epsilon that'll always give you

  • a delta, where this is true, that if x is within delta of C,

  • then the corresponding f of x is going to be within epsilon

  • of L. Then the limit definitely exists.

  • So let's try to do that.

  • So let's think about being within delta of our C.

  • So, let's think about this right over here is 5 plus delta,

  • this is 5 minus delta.

  • So that's our range we're going to think about.

  • We're going to think about it in the abstract at first.

  • And then we're going to try to come up

  • with a formula for delta in terms of epsilon.

  • So how could we describe all of the x's that are in this range

  • but not equal to 5 itself?

  • Because we really care about the things

  • that are within delta of 5, but not necessarily equal to 5.

  • This is just a strictly less than.

  • They're within a range of C, but not equal to C.

  • Well, that's going to be all of the x's that satisfy x minus 5

  • is less than delta.

  • That describes all of these x's right over here.

  • And now, what we're going to do, and the way these proofs

  • typically go, is we're going to try

  • to manipulate the left-hand side of the inequality,

  • so it starts to look something like this,

  • or it starts to look exactly like that.

  • And as we do that, the right-hand side

  • of the inequality is going to be expressed in terms of delta.

  • And then we can essentially say well, look.

  • If the right-hand side is in terms

  • of delta and the left-hand side looks just

  • like that, that really defines how we can express delta

  • in terms of epsilon.

  • If that doesn't make sense, bear with me.

  • I'm about to do it.

  • So, if we want x minus 5 to look a lot more like this, when

  • x is not equal to 5-- in all of this, this whole interval,

  • x is not equal to 5-- f of x is equal to 2x,

  • our proposed limit is equal to 10.

  • So if we could somehow get this to be 2x minus 10,

  • then we're in good shape.

  • And the easiest way to do that is

  • to multiply both sides of this inequality by 2.

  • And 2 times the absolute value of something,

  • that's the same thing as the absolute value of 2 times

  • that thing.

  • If I were to say 2 times the absolute value of a,

  • that's the same thing as the absolute value of 2a.

  • So on the left-hand side right over here,

  • this is just going to be the absolute value of 2x minus 10.

  • And it's going to be less than on the right-hand side,

  • you just end up with a 2 delta.

  • Now, what do we have here on the left-hand side?

  • Well, this is f of x as long as x does not equal 5.

  • And this is our limit.

  • So we can rewrite this as f of x minus L is less than 2 delta.

  • And this is for x does not equal 5.

  • This is f of x, this literally is our limit.

  • Now this is interesting.

  • This statement right over here is almost

  • exactly what we want right over here,

  • except the right sides are just different.

  • In terms of epsilon, this has it in terms of delta.

  • So, how can we define delta so that 2 delta is essentially

  • going to be epsilon?

  • Well, this is our chance.

  • And this is where we're defining delta as a function of epsilon.

  • We're going to make 2 delta equal epsilon.

  • Or if you divide both sides by 2,

  • we're going to make delta equal to epsilon over 2.

  • Let me switch colors just to ease the monotony.

  • If you make delta equal epsilon over 2,

  • then this statement right over here

  • becomes the absolute value of f of x minus L

  • is less than, instead of 2 delta,

  • it'll be less than 2 times epsilon over 2.

  • It's just going to be less than epsilon.

  • So this is the key.

  • If someone gives you any positive number epsilon

  • for this function, as long as you make delta equal epsilon

  • over 2, then any x within that range,

  • that corresponding f of x is going

  • to be within epsilon of our limit.

  • And remember, it has to be true for any positive epsilon.

  • But you could see how the game could go.

  • If someone gives you the epsilon,

  • let's say they want to be within 0.5 of our limit.

  • So our limit is up here, so our epsilon is 0.5.

  • So it would literally be the range I want to be between 10

  • plus epsilon would be 10.5.

  • And then 10 minus epsilon would be 9.5.

  • Well, we just came up with a formula.

  • We just have to make delta equal to epsilon

  • over 2, which is equal to 0.25.

  • So that'll give us a range between 4.75 and 5.25.

  • And as long as we pick an x between 4.75 and 5.25,

  • but not x equals 5, the corresponding f of x

  • will be between 9.5 and 10.5.

  • And so, you give me any epsilon, I

  • can just apply this formula right over here

  • to come up with the delta.

  • This would apply for any real number.

  • I mean, especially any positive number.

  • For any epsilon you give me, I just

  • get a delta defined this way, and then I

  • can go through this arc.

  • If the absolute value of x minus 5 is less than delta,

  • if delta is defined in this way, which

  • I could define for any epsilon, then it

  • will be the case that f of x will

  • be within epsilon of our limit.

In the last video, we took our first look

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 美國腔

16-4 限制的正式定義第 4 部分:使用定義(Formal definition of limits Part 4: using the definition | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy)

  • 4 1
    yukang920108 發佈於 2022 年 07 月 05 日
影片單字