Name: 英國航空公司，女權主義者的航空公司。 (British Airways, The Airline For Feminists)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T05:11:45.000Z
Duration: 5 min 51 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

.....I got a ticket for the policeman's ball,

but it turned out it wasn't a party, it was a raffle.

Hi, I am Hugh Jass, and I'm joined by award-winning feminist author,

You want to talk about British Airways, and why both men and women shouldn't use their

it's about the new trend for women that is taking the western world by storm, so much so,

The trend of falsely accusing a man of rape, it is now so common, it has become the

Because women get victim status, attention, and the chance to ruin a man's life, with the

It is about British Airways, and the way they are guilty of gender discrimination, against

Let us focus on the grotesque discrimination against men first, as it is far more horrendous

British Airways has a rule that states a man can not be seated next to an unaccompanied child

on a plane, to ensure the child does not get abused,

So a woman can sit next to a child who is flying alone, but a man can't?

British Airways have their head stuck firmly up their stupid, fat, feminist ass.

You see, women are the number one abusers, neglectors, and murderers of children, not men, so

to have a rule like this not only shows that British Airways have a feminist agenda, but

shows they are completely ignorant, and have a serious brain deficiency in their

That all men, including the head of British Airways, most of their engineers, mechanics,

a lot of their cabin crew, and most of their customers, would abuse a child if given

nor does the maker of this video, but British Airways clearly think that.

Not only that, they blindly put faith in the very people who are the most guilty of abusing,

neglecting, and murdering children, those people being women.

Probably now that they have lost in court.

They were successfully sued by a man recently,

for mistreating him due to their sexist, man hating policy,

they lost and then said the policy will be under review.

So they are so devoid of intelligence, it took a court to make them understand

They said it was not meant to cause offence to men, which is just pathetic beyond belief,

it's like shooting someone with fifty bullets, and then saying you didn't mean to cause them

remember I said they discriminate against women as well?

They obviously had some explaining to do after the court case, and in the most pathetic,

condescending, patronising manner possible, they actually tried to convince men that

this policy was beneficial for them, because it meant they would be protected from false

How is that shooting themselves in the foot?

Because they've now given the green light for more lawsuits,

Because they have clearly stated that they protect men from false allegations of child

abuse, and yet women, who are the number one abusers, neglectors, and murderers of children,

are not given the same protection from false allegations.

This is clearly preferential treatment based on gender.

So they horribly discriminate against men,

hate, and low intelligence, and when they try to weasel out of it, they stupidly admit to

by not providing them with the same protection they give to men?

If they want to protect men from false allegations of abuse, then they should also seat them away

from women, as it's become a common practice for women to falsely accuse men of rape,

far more popular than children falsely accusing them of child abuse.

字幕列表影片播放

英國航空公司，女權主義者的航空公司。 (British Airways, The Airline For Feminists)

intelligence

court

guilty

utterly