Name: 心理學速成班 #36（Biomedical Treatments: Crash Course Psychology #36）
Uploaded: 2022-02-18T07:00:54.000Z
Duration: 11 min 9 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

If you saw our last lesson on psychotherapy you might be wondering: What happened to Bernice?

Has she found a way to manage her depression? Is she still wracked with anxiety?

例外句型

Well it's really nice of you to ask. And I'll tell her you said, "hi." But for our purposes

as students of psychology, the bigger question arising from Bernice's case is "has psychotherapy

helped?" and just as important, "how can we tell?"

Well believe it or not, one of the main ways experts use is to simply ask the client, and

Is Bernice out of bed, and living her life? Did she make it through mid-terms without

spiraling into a crisis? And did she take that plane trip to Baja to party with her girls?

As a clinician, that would all be useful to know, right? But the key is that we want to

ask these questions in a scientifically rigorous manner, so that we really know a treatment

works, rather than just extrapolating from individual cases.

And there's also a whole other category of treatment that's pretty different from the

talking and listening that goes on in psychotherapy.

These are as much medical intervention as they are psychological science; the biomedical

treatments. These can be as common-place as medications like Zoloft or Lithium, or a bit

more unusual and invasive like magnetic stimulation, neural implants, or even electroshock therapy.

Healing a troublesome mind isn't like healing a broken arm. So one of the challenges that

psychologists face is simply knowing whether they're doing their job, and doing it well.

The methods psychologists use to assess how effective treatments are mostly involve client

and clinician perceptions along with outcome research. Client perceptions are just what

they sound like, you see a therapist, and someone asks you how you feel after your treatment.

It varies by treatment, but client perception tends to be pretty rosy. One study found that

89% of folks said that they were at least "fairly well satisfied" with their treatment.

But of course, perceptions are inherently subjective, and some believe that the therapeutic

relationship lends itself to a positive bias in client reviews. Basically, if you're sticking

to your treatment, you probably like your therapist.

Clinician perspectives can be similarly skewed, not only in terms of a self-serving bias,

but also because they may not be around to see a client's future relapses or setbacks

in mental health. A patient could see ten therapists over time, feel better at the end

of each treatment, but keep struggling over the long term, even though each

therapist thought the treatment was a success.

So, can we objectively measure how well psychotherapy works? Well, we have treatment

outcome research, a way of systematically measuring which therapies work best for which problems.

And the gold standard of treatment outcome research is the randomized clinical trial, or RCT.

If you will remember your research methods, you'll know that RCTs generally require randomly

selected and assigned participants, a control group, and at least one experimental group

that receives the treatment. This design accounts for individual differences between people

and other extraneous factors, so that we know that if people in the experimental group get

better and people in the control group don't,

it was truly the therapeutic intervention that made the difference.

And once enough researchers have run their own RCTs, you can gather data via meta analysis,

measuring results across multiple trials to see basically whether a treatment works, and

how well it does, across a variety of settings.

Two important terms you should know here are effectiveness and efficacy. Effectiveness

is whether or not a given therapy works in a "real-world setting," whereas efficacy is

whether a therapy works better than some other, comparable intervention, or a control. Both

terms matter, and you'll wanna get them straight, if you're tryin' to parse the research literature.

Dozens of studies have confirmed that psychotherapy is both effective and efficacious. While controls,

usually people who don't get any therapy, often do get better on their own, those in

psychotherapy usually improve faster, and with a significantly lower risk of relapse.

However, and try not to look too shocked when I tell you this, there is a lot of argument

In some cases, like phobias, there are clear winners, behavior therapy for instance. In

others, like major depressive disorder, there are cognitive, behavioral and psychodynamic

interventions that have all been successful in RCTs. And while a lot of psychologists

seem to get a kick out of arguing about which therapies are better than others, there do

seem to be some common factors that unite the more effective ones.

A big one is simply instilling hope, helping demoralized clients regain hope that things

can, and will get better. There is also the value of getting a new perspective, learning

that there is a plausible explanation for your troubles, and finding a new way of looking

at yourself, the world around you, and what your future might look like. And across the

board, any good therapist provides genuine empathy within a trusting, caring relationship.

They seek to listen, and understand and not judge, and offer clear and positive communication.

But psychotherapy, or talking it out, is just one way to treat psychological disorders.

Quite often, biomedical therapies are an option, sometimes for the more severe disorders, but

in many cases, in combination with psychotherapy. Biomedical therapies aim to physiologically

change the brain's electrochemical state with psychotropic drugs, magnetic impulses, or

even electrical currents and surgery. As you might expect, pharmacotherapy is by far the

most widely used, that's the one where you just take drugs. Psychotropic drugs are just

any pharmaceutical that affects your mental state, the most commonly used ones fall into

four major categories; antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, and mood stabilizers,

each aimed at a specific family of problems.

Antipsychotics are used to treat schizophrenia and other types of severe thought disorders.

Most of these medications alter the effects of the neurotransmitter dopamine in the brain

by blocking its receptor sites, and blocking its uptake. This is based on the assumption

that an overactive dopamine system contributes to schizophrenia, but, like many psychotropic

drugs, antipsychotics come with nasty side effects.

Anxiolytics, or anti-anxiety meds, usually work by depressing activity in the central

nervous system, much like a stiff drink might. For this reason, and others, it can be super

dangerous to mix certain anxiety meds with booze. Also, letting your nerves mellow out

can feel so good that patients may risk becoming addicted to some anxiolytics.

Antidepressants are used to treat depression, as you might expect, but also a number of

anxiety disorders. Each type is thought to work a bit differently, mainly by altering

the availability of various neurotransmitters, like serotonin and norepinephrine in the brain,

which in turn appears to help with mood and anxiety problems. Some of the most common

are selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, like Zoloft, Paxil, and Prozac,

which partially block the normal re-uptake of serotonin. This makes it more available

to the synapses, which, hypothetically at least, allows its mood-enhancing effects to

kick in. Current research suggests that the use of antidepressant medication is most effective

when combined with psychotherapy, which makes a lot of sense, and the same goes for a number

It's worth pointing out here that some meta-analyses suggest that antidepressants aren't any more

effective than psychotherapy when symptoms are mild to moderate. One meta analysis that

riled people up in recent years even suggested that antidepressants are no better than a

placebo in those cases. So psychotropic drugs can help, but sometimes you also need to start

exploring the root causes of your issues and reevaluate how you deal with them, which is

Bernice, for example, probably would have benefited from both talk therapy and a dose