Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

由 AI 自動生成
  • A common misconception in statistics is to think that correlation implies causationlike,

    統計學中一個常見的誤區是認為相關性意味著因果關係--比如。

  • if more tall people have cats, you might think that means being tall makes people more likely

    如果更多高個子的人養貓,你可能會認為這意味著高個子的人更有可能養貓

  • to get a cat.

    以得到一隻貓。

  • However, simply knowing a correlation between height and cat ownership can't tell us which

    然而,僅僅知道身高和養貓之間的關聯性,並不能告訴我們哪種

  • way the causality goesit may instead be that having a cat causes people to grow

    因果關係--可能反而是養貓會讓人長個子。

  • talleror perhaps the real cause is something else altogether, like that the people and

    更高--或者真正的原因是完全不同的,比如人和人之間的關係。

  • cats live on two separate islands, one a lush paradise with enough food for growing tall

    貓咪生活在兩個獨立的島嶼上,一個是鬱鬱蔥蔥的天堂,有足夠的食物可以長高

  • and feeding pet cats, and the other a wasteland that limits both height and cat ownership.

    和餵養寵物貓,另一個是限制身高和養貓的荒地。

  • The point of examples like this is that noticing a correlation between two things doesn't

    這樣的例子的意義在於,注意到兩件事情之間的關聯性,並不意味著

  • imply that one of those things causes the other.

    意味著其中一件事導致另一件事。

  • Hence the common refrain: correlation doesn't imply causation.

    是以,人們常說:相關性並不意味著因果關係。

  • And it's trueit doesn't!

    而且是真的--沒有!

  • But this oft-repeated mantra leads to another common misconceptionthe idea that you

    但是,這個經常重複的口號導致了另一個常見的誤解--認為您

  • can't infer any causality from statistics.

    不能從統計學中推斷出任何因果關係。

  • You can!

    你可以的!

  • I mean, it's quite reasonable to think that, if two things are correlated, there's likely

    我的意思是,這是很合理的想法, 如果兩件事情是相關的,有可能是

  • some reason, , even if a single correlation can't tell you.

    某種原因, ,即使單一的相關性也無法告訴你。

  • Sometimes you can infer the causality from additional informationlike knowing that

    有時,你可以從額外的資訊中推斷出因果關係--比如知道

  • one thing happened before the otherbut you can also infer causality directly from

    一件事發生在另一件事之前--但你也可以直接從以下方面推斷出因果關係。

  • correlations – you just need more than one, together with something called causal

    相關性--你只需要一個以上,再加上所謂的因果關係

  • networks.

    網絡。

  • Like, in our cat-height-island example, we know that cat ownership and height are correlated,

    就像,在我們的貓高島例子中,我們知道養貓和身高是相關的。

  • but we don't know what the cause of that correlation is.

    但我們不知道這種相關性的原因是什麼。

  • If we don't know anything else, then there are 19 – yes 19! – different causal relationships

    如果我們什麼都不知道,那麼就有19個--是的,19個!- 不同的因果關係

  • that could explain the situation.

    這可以解釋這種情況。

  • 20 if you think the correlation is just an accident.

    如果你認為這種關聯只是一個意外的話,20。

  • However, perhaps we know two other things: first, suppose people born on a particular

    然而,也許我們還知道另外兩件事:第一,假設在某一天出生的人。

  • island stay there, so their height doesn't influence what island they live on, and we

    島嶼停留在那裡,所以他們的身高不會影響他們住在什麼島上,而我們。

  • can rule out the relationships where height influences island.

    可以排除高度影響島的關係。

  • Second, suppose that on either island, taken by itself, there isn't any correlation between

    其次,假設在任何一個島嶼上,就其本身而言,兩者之間沒有任何相關性。

  • height and cat ownership; then we can rule out all the options where height and cats

    身高和養貓;那麼我們就可以排除所有身高和貓咪的選項。

  • influence each other directly . This leaves us with just two options: either the islands

    互相直接影響。這就給我們留下了兩個選擇:要麼是這些島嶼

  • are the causal explanation for both height and cat ownership (maybe, as before, one island

    是身高和養貓的因果解釋(也許像以前一樣,一個島嶼

  • is a lush, healthy paradise for both people and cats), or else cat ownership is the causal

    是人和貓咪的鬱鬱蔥蔥的健康樂園),否則養貓就是因果。

  • explanation for the islands which are the causal explanation for height, (like, maybe

    島嶼的解釋,這是身高的因果解釋,(比如,也許。

  • an abundance of cats turned the island into a paradise, thereby influencing the height

    大量的貓咪讓這個島變成了天堂,從而影響了這個島的高度。

  • of future cat owners).

    的未來貓主)。)

  • So, starting with 19 possible causal relationships, we used correlations to narrow things down

    所以,從19種可能的因果關係開始,我們用相關性來縮小範圍。

  • to just 2 optionsnot bad!

    只有2個選擇--不錯

  • Of course, this is just a simple example, but for any group of things, you can use the

    當然,這只是一個簡單的例子,但對於任何一組事物,你都可以使用

  • various correlations between them (or lack of correlations) to eliminate some of the

    它們之間的各種關聯性(或缺乏關聯性),以消除一些。

  • possible cause-and-effect relationships.

    可能的因果關係;

  • And that's how correlations CAN imply causation.

    而這就是相關性可以暗示因果關係的原因。

  • There is one problem, thoughsome experiments in quantum mechanics have correlations that

    不過有一個問題... 量子力學中的一些實驗的相關性是...

  • rule out ALL possible cause and effect relationships.

    排除所有可能的因果關係。

  • We'll have to save the details for a later video, but until then, may I suggest a new

    我們將不得不把細節保存在以後的視頻中,但在那之前,我可以建議一個新的。

  • version of the famous refrain?

    名句的版本?

  • Correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, but it can if you use it to evaluate

    "相關性不一定意味著因果關係,但如果你用它來評估,它可以

  • causal models.

    因果模型。

  • Except in quantum mechanics.”

    ......除了在量子力學中。"

  • I've got a little more about statistics and causality after this, but first I'm

    在這之後,我還有一些關於統計學和因果關係的內容,但首先我是

  • excited to introduce the very relevant sponsor for this video: Brilliant.org.

    很高興為大家介紹這個視頻的相關贊助商。Brilliant.org。

  • Brilliant is a problem solving website designed to help you practice and learn math and science

    Brilliant是一個解題網站,旨在幫助你練習和學習數學和科學。

  • via guided problems, puzzles and quizzes: I know that sounds kind of nerdy, but the

    通過引導問題,拼圖和測驗。我知道這聽起來有點書呆子,但...

  • truth is that the only way to truly learn and understand much of math and physics is

    事實是,真正學習和理解許多數學和物理學的唯一途徑是。

  • to actively work through the material yourselfvideos only get you so far.

    自己積極地通過材料--視頻只能讓你走得更遠。

  • And Brilliant does a brilliant job of making that easy, sneakily enticing you into doing

    而Brilliant做的很出色,讓人很輕鬆,偷偷的誘導你去做

  • math and physics problems by means of intriguing questions structured for all ability and knowledge

    數學和物理問題,通過引人入勝的問題,為所有的能力和知識結構。

  • levels.

    級別。

  • I say this from experience, because if you haven't done a problem for a few days, Brilliant

    我是根據經驗說的,因為如果你幾天沒做一道題,Brilliant

  • will send you an attention-grabbing puzzle , and I've been sucked in by quite a few

    會給你送來一個引人注意的謎題 ,我已經被不少謎題吸進去了

  • of them.

    其中。

  • If you want to try out Brilliant (which I recommend), heading to brilliant.org/minutephysics

    如果你想試試Brilliant(我推薦),前往Brilliant.org/minutephysics。

  • will let them know you came from here, and you can check out their courses on Probability,

    會讓他們知道你是從這裡來的,你可以看看他們的概率課程。

  • the Physics of the Everyday, Classical Mechanics, Gravitational Physics and so on.

    日常物理學》、《經典力學》、《引力物理》等。

  • Hey, glad you're still herein case you're interested, there's a footnotes

    嘿,很高興你還在這裡 - 如果你有興趣,有一個腳註。

  • video covering a few things that got cut out of this one, like feedback loops and correlations

    視頻涵蓋了一些被剪掉的東西,比如反饋循環和相關性。

  • that arise just by chance.

    偶然出現的。

  • The link's on screen and in the video description.

    鏈接在螢幕和視頻描述中。

A common misconception in statistics is to think that correlation implies causationlike,

統計學中一個常見的誤區是認為相關性意味著因果關係--比如。

字幕與單字
由 AI 自動生成

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋