Ah, lot of people on Social Media Act as though they didn't even know what was the rule.

啊，很多人在社交媒體上的行為，好像連規則是什麼都不知道。

But the reality of it is it is a rule many of us have been complaining about for a very long time.

但現實的情況是，這是我們很多人抱怨了很久的一個規則。

Orlowski.

奧洛斯基

Your reaction is a stupid rule in the NFL needs to change it.

你的反應是一個愚蠢的規則在NFL需要改變它。

I get it like everyone goes well, give me an alternative.

我明白了，就像大家去好，給我一個選擇。

Well, here you go.

好了，在這裡你去。

Listen, in the NFL, when you fumble the football to recover, there needs to be a clear and obvious recovery.

聽著，在NFL裡，當你失球回收的時候，需要有一個清晰明顯的回收。

Well, when it goes out of bounce, there is no clear and obvious recovery number one, so the ball would naturally go back to the offensive that was in the middle of the field.

好吧，當它失去彈跳力的時候，並沒有明確而明顯的追回一號球，所以球自然會回到中場的進攻中去。

Number two.

二號

When you fumble the football forward and it goes out of bounce without a clear and obvious recovery, it goes back to the spot of the fumble.

當你把足球往前一丟，足球出了彈跳，沒有明顯的回收，就會回到丟球的地方。

Now, if we want to penalize 10 yards when that situation happens and it's got to go back to 11 yard line, that's fine.

現在，如果我們想罰10碼，當這種情況發生時，它必須回到11碼線，這很好。

But to sit here and constantly penalize a team for fumbling at the one yard line and stop everybody telling me that, like Bill Belichick made up this rule where you could only do it on.

但坐在這裡，不斷地懲罰一支球隊在一碼線上的失誤，並阻止每個人告訴我，就像比爾-貝利奇剋制定的這個規則，你只能在。

Every coach says that guys, every coach in the NFL, in college football teaches their players not to do it.

每個教練都說，夥計們，在NFL，在大學橄欖球中，每個教練都會教他們的球員不要這樣做。

I've seen Patriots do it.

我見過愛國者這樣做。

I've seen a ton of guys do it.

我見過很多人這樣做。

So the fact that we have to constantly penalize offenses for being aggressive or playing with effort in that situation is stupid in the NFL needs to rectify this rule, to stop rewarding the end that the defense and not and constantly penalizing the offense Go ahead and see.

所以，事實上，我們必須不斷地懲罰進攻的積極性或努力打在這種情況下是愚蠢的NFL需要糾正這個規則，停止獎勵結束，防守和不和不斷地懲罰進攻去看看。

I mean, can we get rewarded for something at some point?

我的意思是，我們能不能在某些時候得到一些獎勵？

By some rule?

按照某種規則？

First off and Dan of all people in America, I thought you would know that the end zone is sacred.

首先和丹在美國所有的人，我想你會知道，端區是神聖的。

You know, the end zone, this Sacred Dan way.

你知道的，末梢區域，這種聖丹的方式。

Treat the end zone differently.

對待末梢區域要區別對待。

It's the one place, and it's the one place in the world where if you hold, it's a safety.

這是一個地方，也是世界上唯一的一個地方，只要你守住了，就是安全。

It's the one place in the world where if it's intentional grounding, it's a safety.

這是世界上唯一的一個地方，如果是有意接地氣，那就是一種安全。

Everything is different where it's painted.

畫的地方一切都不一樣。

That's where it's painted.

這就是畫的地方。

It's a special, it's a sacred place, and it's either we.

這是一個特殊的，是一個神聖的地方，不是我們。

It's either to make a decision to keep the rules toe where fumbles are ruled a certain way or where fumbles are treated a certain way.

要麼是做出一個決定，讓規則保持在失誤被判定為某種方式的地方，要麼是失誤被處理為某種方式。

Or we continue the tradition of the end zone being sacred, and I get it.

或者我們繼續傳統的端區是神聖的，我明白了。

It's terrible if you play offense.

如果你玩進攻，那就太可怕了。

You drove 90 yards, you tried to show a lot of effort and the ball went through the end zone.

你開了90碼，你試圖表現出很多努力，球穿過了終點區。

So hold on to it.

所以要加快腳步。

So I'm not going to sit here and wine.

所以我不會坐在這裡喝酒。

I'm not going to say, Oh, we should change the rule because like I said, Dan, if anybody knows in the world the end zone is sacred, Well, first you have a rebuttal to that.

我不會說，哦，我們應該改變規則，因為就像我說的，丹，如果世界上有人知道端區是神聖的，那麼，首先你要反駁一下。

Go ahead.

去吧

First of all, you know what used to be special and sacred, our friendship.

首先，你知道什麼曾經是特別的、神聖的，我們的友誼。

You know what it is no longer friendship.

你知道嗎，這已經不是友誼了。

After that 60 seconds we are done right.

過了這60秒，我們就完成了對。

Let me come to you on the rule because I have a whole other thought.

讓我來跟你說說這個規則，因為我有另外一個想法。

Go ahead.

去吧

The rule.

規則：

Well, I think when you look at it, obviously this rule should be changed.

好吧，我認為當你看它，顯然這個規則應該被改變。

I mean, we look at this thing four or five times a year.

我是說，我們每年都要看四五次這東西。

I'm saying, Look, I'm just telling you Coward, Thio time.

我說，看，我只是告訴你懦夫，Thio時間。

If you want to put the ball back to the 20 that's fine.

如果你想把球放回20碼處，那沒問題。

But the offense and I could see something like that.

但進攻和我可以看到這樣的事情。

I believe this rule will change.

我相信這個規則會改變。

Alright, nobody.

好吧，沒有人。

I've never had a problem and dance right.

我從來沒出過問題，跳得很好。

When he talks about every single team in the league, you show videos of it.

當他談到聯盟中的每一支球隊時，你就會播放視頻。

You don't do this type of stuff because of the stupid rule, all right?

你不做這種事是因為愚蠢的規則，好嗎？

And so you know, it's not just a Bill Belichick thing, but I can't, you know, as a defense coach.

所以你知道，這不僅僅是比爾-貝利奇克的事情，但我不能，你知道，作為一個防守教練。

Yeah, you absolutely love it, but it makes no sense.

是的，你絕對喜歡它，但它沒有意義。

Okay, I want to talk about the Brown season in a moment.

好吧，我一會兒想談談布朗的賽季。

But I would also ask the question here very quickly because there were two pieces of that play that were controversial yesterday.

但是我在這裡也想很快地問一個問題，因為昨天那部戲有兩塊是有爭議的。

There's the rule which was correctly.

有規則這是正確的。

No one is arguing that it wasn't correctly interpreted, but clearly the defender launches with his helmet on that play, which is against the rules and the first words out of your mouth are well, that's not reviewable.

沒有人爭論它的解釋不正確，但很明顯，那場比賽中，防守者用頭盔啟動，這是違反規則的，你說的第一句話就是好，那是不能複議的。

And the question I continue to ask on this show on the radio and I will never stop asking is why is anything not reviewable?

而我在電臺這個節目中繼續問的問題，我永遠不會停止問的是，為什麼任何東西都不能審查？

Anything that is that clear and obvious, clear and obvious can be reviewable.

任何事情，只要是那麼清晰明瞭，清晰明瞭的，都是可以審查的。

Coaches have a limited number of plays they can challenge.

教練員可以挑戰的劇本數量有限。

So if you want to allow them to challenge something that was clearly if they could have challenged that play, that clearly would have been over.

所以，如果你想讓他們挑戰一些東西，顯然如果他們能挑戰那場比賽，那顯然就已經結束了。

Yeah, absolutely.

是的，絕對的。

But here's the thing.

但事情是這樣的

If you're in official, the number one job you have is not to officiate the game.

如果你是官員，你的首要工作不是主持比賽。

It's to protect the players, right?

是為了保護玩家吧？

So what the hell are you looking at?

那你到底在看什麼？

Don't tell me how he's got this to look at.

別告訴我，他怎麼會有這個樣子。

What?

什麼？

I mean, Yeah, I don't understand it.

我的意思是，是的，我不明白。

Your number one jobs protect our players.

你的首要工作是保護我們的球員。

All right, that's what it should be.

好吧，應該是這樣的。

And why the hell you miss this?

你為什麼會錯過這個？

I don't know.

我不知道。

It's beyond May.

已經過了五月了。

So clearly he did dive in our see again.

所以很明顯，他確實又潛入了我們的見。

I feel like I have to ask the safety in this conversation.

我覺得在這次談話中，我不得不問安全問題。

Is there any question but that the way the rules are currently officiated in the NFL, that should've been a penalty.

有什麼問題嗎，但NFL目前的裁判規則，那應該是一個點球。

Yeah, with the way the rules are, it's a penalty.

是啊，按照規則，這是一個懲罰。

I mean, I think the intention of Dan Sorenson there is to make contact with the shoulder.

我的意思是，我認為丹-索倫森在那裡的意圖是使接觸的肩膀。

Obviously, the anatomy and the physiology of the body make that impossible in that in that moment, but with the way the rules are written, if we're gonna be, if we're gonna go by the letter of the rule, if we're going to try to protect the players, no matter the situation, no matter the game, no matter what it means, that call has to be made.

很明顯，身體的解剖學和生理學使得在那一瞬間不可能，但以規則的寫法，如果我們要，如果我們要按照規則的文字去做，如果我們要試圖保護球員，無論情況如何，無論比賽如何，無論這意味著什麼，都必須做出這個決定。

And so that's one that they missed.

所以，這就是他們錯過的一個。

I I agree with you, greeny.

我... 我同意你的說法，綠毛。

That's something that they should be able to review their because that's truly a game changing play before the matters of player, health and safety.

這是他們應該能夠檢討他們的東西，因為那是真正改變遊戲規則的玩法，在玩家、健康和安全的事項之前。

That's something they're trying to take out of the football game.

這就是他們想從足球比賽中剔除的東西。

100%.

100%.

Thank you for watching ESPN on YouTube for live streaming sports and premium content.

感謝您在YouTube上觀看ESPN的體育直播和優質內容。