No, I don't.

不，我不知道。

And I understand that James just a better athlete than Drew Brees, the better athlete than Drew Brees in terms of his ability to be somewhat mobile and run with the football.

而我明白，詹姆斯只是一個比德魯-布里斯更好的運動員，比德魯-布里斯更好的運動員，在他的能力方面，他有一定的機動性和帶球跑動的能力。

While we never have to worry about that with Drew Brees, but accuracy does matter, and it's paramount at the quarterback position.

雖然我們從來沒有擔心過德魯-布里斯，但準確度確實很重要，在四分衛位置上是最重要的。

And let's face reality, even though the man through 33 touchdowns he still gave new meaning for 30 for 30 when he threw 30 interceptions as well and as a quarterback was a candidate for defensive player of the year because of how much he gave away, Uh, toe opposing defense is the bottom line is that he's got to make amends for that.

讓我們面對現實，即使這個男人通過33次達陣，他仍然給30次達陣帶來了新的意義，當他扔出30次攔截時，以及作為四分衛是年度防守球員的候選人，因為他給了多少，呃，腳趾對手的防守是底線是，他必須彌補這一點。

And until he E, I don't think anybody could sit up there.

而在他E之前，我不認為有人能坐在上面。

Well, listen, I'm just calling what you listen.

好吧，聽著，我只是叫你聽什麼。

I listen, I'm here doing my job.

我聽著，我在這裡做我的工作。

They asked me the question.

他們問我這個問題。

I answered it.

我回答了。

Okay.

好吧，我知道了

I didn't wake up this morning trying to start trouble for Jamis Winston.

我今早醒來並不是為了給Jamis Winston找麻煩的

I'm just calling it like I see.

我只是隨口說說而已。

The bottom line is, is that there's no way you can convince me that the offense is gonna be Mawr explosive, because the reason why it's explosive to begin with is the accuracy of Drew Brees.

最重要的是，你不可能說服我，進攻會有莫大的爆發力，因為一開始就有爆發力的原因是德魯-布里斯的準確性。

Two guys like Michael Thomas, primarily.

主要是邁克爾-托馬斯這兩個人。

And, of course, to a lesser degree, the Emmanuel Sanders and and and and and and Smiths and all of those guys.

當然，在較小的程度上，伊曼紐爾-桑德斯和和和史密斯和所有這些傢伙。

So that's how I'm looking at it.

所以我是這麼看的。

I don't see him being the passer that Drew Brees is and having the chemistry with those receivers that Drew Brees does.

我不認為他是德魯-布里斯那樣的傳球手，也不認為他能像德魯-布里斯那樣與那些接球者產生化學反應。

And as a result of that, I cannot say that it's gonna be more explosive just, well, you're wrong.

是以，我不能說它會更有爆發力只是，好吧，你錯了。

But let me tell you why Drew Brees will keep the chains moving his most accurate quarterback of all time.

但是，讓我告訴你為什麼德魯-布里斯會保持鏈子移動他有史以來最準確的四分衛。

That's not Jamis Winston, but if we're talking about sex, yeah, right.

那不是Jamis Winston，但如果我們在談論性，是的，沒錯。

If we're talking about explosive right, that's the can.

如果我們說的是爆炸性的權利，那就是可以。

And that's look James Jamis Winston, not only through 33 touchdowns last year but led the league in passing yards, had over 5000 yards, led the league, obviously, in passing yards per game, Right, if you look at Drew Brees is average yards per attempt this year and I've been making the argument look no Michael Thomas.

這就是看詹姆斯-賈米斯-溫斯頓，不僅通過33個達陣，去年，但領先聯盟的傳球碼，有超過5000碼，領先聯盟，顯然，在傳球碼每場比賽，右，如果你看看德魯-布里斯是平均碼每嘗試今年，我一直在做的論點看沒有邁克爾-托馬斯。

No Emmanuel Sanders.

沒有艾曼紐爾-桑德斯。

Maybe it's not that bad, but it's in decline.

也許沒有那麼糟糕，但它正在衰退。

At the very least, Jameis Winston's coming out of the system.

最起碼，傑米斯-溫斯頓是從系統中走出來的。

No risk it.

沒有風險吧。

No biscuit.

沒有餅乾。

This dude, as you said.

這位老兄，正如你所說。

Meaning 2 30 30 Stephen A.

意義 2 30 30 Stephen A.

When we were kids.

當我們還是孩子的時候

30 30 meant Bobby Bonds, Barry's daddy.

30 30是指鮑比-邦茲，巴里的爸爸。

Remember that?

記得嗎？

Bobby Bonds?

鮑比-邦茲？

Ugo 30 30 home runs, 30 steals.

烏戈30號30支全壘打，30次搶斷。

But But Jane, this is 33 touchdowns.

但是但是簡，這是33次觸地得分。

30 I nt is 112 points the other way.

30英特是112點另一種方式。

He's gonna be explosive.

他將是爆炸性的。

Both ends of the ball.

球的兩端。

Ryan.

萊恩

Clark, Correct me if I'm wrong, I believe it was you who said he's the one doing in NFL history.

克拉克，如果我說錯了，請糾正我，我相信是你說他是NFL歷史上做的那個人。

Get offensive and defensive player in the game every game, right?

每場比賽都讓攻守兼備的球員上場吧？

It could be a candidate.

它可能是一個候選人。

Drew Brees is Drew Brees.

德魯-布里斯就是德魯-布里斯。

Is better with a unique chance to win.

是更好的獨特的贏利機會。

Yeah, but more explosive mawr Explosive is Jamis.

是的，但更有爆炸性的是Jamis。

Winston, listen, I'm with Max, man and and and Stephen A.

溫斯頓，聽著，我和麥克斯在一起，夥計，還有Stephen A.

I think you're looking at this thing the wrong way, you know?

我想你看錯了，你知道嗎？

I mean, you woke up this morning and you didn't want to start trouble for Jamis Winston.

我的意思是，你今天早上醒來 你不想給Jamis Winston惹麻煩

And you wanted to start so much trouble for him.

你還想給他惹這麼多麻煩。

that you couldn't focus on what the question was.

你不能專注於問題是什麼。

The question wasn't where they gonna be better this offense, Is it explosive?

問題不是他們這次進攻要好在哪裡，是爆發力嗎？

This office has one truly explosive skill player who is Alvin Kamara, and you could get the ball to him in different spots and those turning to big plays.

這個辦公室有一個真正有爆發力的技術球員，他就是阿爾文-卡馬拉，你可以在不同的位置上把球傳給他，而那些轉為大動作。

But when you look at what this offense has been the last two or three years, it has been dink and dunk, and it's been so much.

但你看看這兩三年來的進攻，都是扣籃，都是如此。

Drew Brees understands what's going on like that when you watch the stripe of Drew Brees is helmet.

德魯-布里斯明白這樣是怎麼回事，當你看著德魯-布里斯是頭盔的條紋。

Anytime they run the pass route, it's Bam bam bam!

每次他們走傳球路線，都是咣噹咣噹的!

Right to my my third option because he understands it.

對我的我的第三個選擇，因為他懂。

But now you got Jared Cook, who can stretch the field.

但現在你得到了賈裡德-庫克，他可以延伸領域。

Michael Thomas, who is a great 50 50 ball catcher.

邁克爾-托馬斯，他是一個偉大的50 50球捕手。

Emmanuel Sanders, who is one of the best route runners in the league.

伊曼紐爾-桑德斯，他是聯盟中最好的路線跑者之一。

And now you could start pushing the ball down the field with those guys.

現在你可以和這些人一起把球推到場上了。

If you think to yourself, though, that could cause trouble.

不過，如果你自以為是，那可能會引起麻煩。

We don't want Jamis Winston dropping back too many times and making the wrong decision or throwing the ball into places that he shouldn't.

我們不希望賈米斯-溫斯頓後撤太多次，做出錯誤的決定，或者把球投到不該投的地方。

That's part of it.

這也是一部分。

So you gotta have enough of old Jamie's right enough of no risky Nobis Key and then also help him understand that you don't have to take every shot.

所以你要有足夠的老傑米的權利足夠的沒有風險的諾比斯鑰匙，然後也幫助他了解你不需要每一個鏡頭。

You take that shot when you have the opportunity when it's one on one in a favorable matchup.

當你有機會的時候，當這是一對一的有利對決時，你就會出手。

And if all that fails, you have Alvin Camaro to dump the ball down to that wasn't the coaching you got with Bruce Arians.

如果所有這些都失敗了，你還有阿爾文-卡馬羅可以把球扔給那不是你在布魯斯-阿里安斯那裡得到的教練。

This is gonna be different with Sean Payton.

肖恩・佩頓的情況會有所不同。

I think James Winston understands he's auditioning to be the New Orleans Saints quarterback of the future, and I do expect expect more explosion out of this offense.

我認為詹姆斯-溫斯頓明白自己是在試訓未來的新奧爾良聖徒隊四分衛，我也確實期待這支球隊的進攻能有更多的爆發力。

Well, listen, you could say that, but in all due respect, I know how to answer questions.

好吧，聽著，你可以這麼說，但恕我直言，我知道如何回答問題。

I'm not like some people.

我不像某些人。

I know that dance around stuff like Fred Astaire, Michael Jackson.

我知道，舞蹈周圍的東西 像弗雷德・阿斯泰爾，邁克爾・傑克遜。

I answer questions.

我回答問題。

Question was about explosiveness, and I for and I firmly, firmly, firmly believe that I answered the question.

問題是關於爆發力的，我為和我堅定地、堅定地、堅定地認為我回答了問題。

I don't think it's going to be more.

我想不會再多了。

Do you believe this team is watching this?

你相信這個團隊在看這個嗎？

And I did.

而我也做到了。

Yeah.

是啊。

Well, listen, I don't I don't I'm not saying that they don't have weapons that they can't do something.

好吧，聽著，我不，我不，我不是說他們沒有武器，他們不能做一些事情。

But what I'm saying is I'm comparing breeze to Jamis Winston, the absence of breeze, the advent of Jamis Winston, what is this offense going to look like?

但我想說的是，我把微風和賈米斯-溫斯頓相比，沒有微風，賈米斯-溫斯頓的出現，這個進攻會是什麼樣子？

Is it gonna look mawr off?

會不會看起來不舒服？

What we've seen from it with Drew Brees?

我們從中看到了德魯-布里斯的什麼？

Or less?

還是更少？

And I'm saying less average possible up or down e with that?

我說少平均可能的漲跌e與？

That's not the question.

這不是問題所在。

Your explosive, Ryan, You positive words.

你的爆發力，萊恩，你的積極話語。

I know in your pasta work more or less explosive.

我知道在你的麵食工作中或多或少會有一些爆炸性。

No, they're not gonna be Mawr explosive, Regina, for attempts.

不，他們不會是莫爾的爆款，雷吉納，對於企圖。

Gonna be explosive.

將會是爆炸性的。

Is that Jordan person?

那是喬丹的人嗎？

You down, Stephen?

你下來了，斯蒂芬？

A average yards per attempt.

每次嘗試的平均碼數。

Gonna go up or down average yards per attempt.

會上升或下降平均每次嘗試的碼數。

We're gonna go up or down per attempt.

我們每次嘗試都會有漲跌。

Purpose?

目的？

Is that gonna go up or down?

是會漲還是會跌？

E per attempt?

E每次嘗試？

E o incomplete.

E或不完整。

How about this?

這個怎麼樣？

How about this?

這個怎麼樣？

How about this?

這個怎麼樣？

Y'all answer that I answer it.

你們都回答我回答。

Yes, Max, The yards gonna completion is gonna go up.

是的，麥克斯，完成的碼數會增加的。

But you're But in terms of the accuracy, the percentage how much you want to make a better dips by about explosives to my game plan.

但你但在準確度上，百分比多少你想讓我的遊戲計劃有更好的浸染，大約炸藥。

Jamie's might blow it up with the guys going the other way for a pig six.

傑米的可能會炸燬它的傢伙去另一個方向的豬六。

That's explosive.

這是爆炸性的。

To blow the whole thing.

要炸掉整個事情。

I'll sit.

我坐吧

I don't see it, man.

我不明白，夥計。

They don't do it, man.

他們不這樣做，男人。

This is what you're doing.

這是你在做什麼。

No, this Listen, I'm sorry, Charlie, but this is what happens when you sign a big contract and is your show.

不，聽著，我很抱歉，查理，但這是你簽下大合同的結果，是你的節目。

You start changing the question midstream so you could be correct because questions were they're gonna be more explosive.

你開始改變問題的中游，所以你可以正確的，因為問題是他們會更爆炸。

Ah, lot of your music could be good.

啊，你的很多音樂可能是好的。

Or it could be bad.

也可能是壞事。

I said no.

我說不行

Stephen A.

Stephen A.

You were explosive.

你是爆炸性的。

Changed everything.

改變了一切。

Mid question.

中問題。

He blew it all up.

他把一切都搞砸了。

Thanks for watching ESPN on YouTube for live streaming sports and premium content.

感謝您在YouTube上觀看ESPN的體育直播和優質內容。

Subscribe to ESPN, plus.

訂閱ESPN，加。