字幕列表 影片播放 由 AI 自動生成 列印所有字幕 列印翻譯字幕 列印英文字幕 a bizarre, unfounded, malicious conspiracy theory has shifted from the message boards to the mainstream. 一個奇怪的,沒有根據的,惡意的陰謀論 已經從留言板轉移到主流。 Que non has really moved from what was a bunch of kind of misinformation in general to actually planning different types of violence in the real world. 闕非真的已經從原來的一堆一般的錯誤信息,轉變成了真正的策劃現實世界中不同類型的暴力。 Now the world's most popular platform is trying to stop it, but can cure a non be contained well. 現在世界上最受歡迎的平臺正在試圖阻止它,但可以治療一個非被控制好。 First, let's deal with what it iss Q. 首先,讓我們來處理它是什麼Q。 And owns a conspiracy theory movement built around two central false beliefs. 並擁有一個陰謀論運動 圍繞著兩個核心的錯誤信念。 One that Q is a powerful person, perhaps even President Trump, who post clues to guide followers towards the truth. 一個是,Q是一個強大的人,甚至可能是總統特朗普,他發佈線索,引導追隨者走向真相。 And to that, President Trump is waging a war against Satan worshiping pedophiles among the world's elite. 而對此,特朗普總統正在對世界精英中的撒旦崇拜戀童癖者發動戰爭。 A complete lack of evidence hasn't stopped queuing on. 完全沒有證據,並沒有停止排隊上。 It began on the message boards four. 它開始在留言板上四。 Chan and Chan Before rapid expansion on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit and YouTube on during the pandemic, interest has surged. 陳和陳之前在Facebook、Instagram、Twitter、Reddit和YouTube上迅速擴張在大流行期間,興趣已經激增。 In response, we've seen the platforms take action in July. 對此,我們已經看到各平臺在7月份採取了行動。 Twitter ban thousands of accounts. 推特禁止數千賬戶。 Now Facebook is doing the same, it says are dangerous organizations. 現在Facebook也在做同樣的事情,它說是危險組織。 Operations team will proactively detect content for removal and note the name of that team. 營運團隊會主動檢測內容進行刪除,並註明該團隊的名稱。 Facebook considers Q and on dangerous. Facebook認為Q和上危險。 Twitter says it wants to prevent Q and on causing offline harm. Twitter表示要防止Q和上造成線下傷害。 But what danger and harm are we talking about? 但我們所說的危險和危害是什麼? Well, that brings us to the crux of this issue. 好吧,這就涉及到這個問題的關鍵。 How Cunanan's misinformation connects to democracy and violence well on violence here we have the FBI in 2019 saying Q and On is occasionally driving both groups and individual extremists to carry out criminal or violent acts. 庫南的錯誤信息是如何與民主和暴力聯繫在一起的好關於暴力,2019年我們有FBI表示,Q和安偶爾會推動團體和個人極端分子進行犯罪或暴力行為。 One man barricaded himself to a bridge near the Hoover Dam with an armored vehicle, another shot dead in New York mob boss he scrawled que on his hand in court. 一個人用裝甲車把自己堵在胡佛大壩附近的一座橋上,另一個人在紐約黑幫老大中被槍殺,他在法庭上手寫闕。 There are other examples, too. 還有其他的例子。 Then there's democracy, and in particular, Cunanan's impact on the US election. 還有就是民主,特別是庫南對美國大選的影響。 A great deal of people who are not particularly political may have been converted via Facebook or other social media. 大量不是特別政治化的人可能通過Facebook或其他社交媒體被轉化。 Groups on now have very bizarre ideas about the Democratic Party. 現在的團體對民主黨有很奇怪的想法。 Certainly, Q and on is often visible when Trump supporters gather. 當然,在特朗普支持者聚集時,經常可以看到Q和上。 It's also influential in protest against Kobe restrictions around the world. 在世界各地抗議科比限制的活動中也很有影響力。 Cunanan's misinformation is definitely impacting America's democratic discourse. 庫南的錯誤信息無疑影響了美國的民主話語權。 But containing it well, that looks close to mission. 但包含它好,這看起來接近任務。 Impossible. 不可能的。 You suspect Facebook is well aware of this. 你懷疑Facebook很清楚這一點。 It's statement on closing Q and on account says this work will take time and will continue in the coming days and weeks. 它在關閉Q和賬戶的聲明中說,這項工作需要時間,並將在未來幾天和幾周內繼續。 I'd add months and years to that for four reasons. 我還要加上月和年,原因有四。 First, Cunanan's messaging and location constantly evolves. 首先,庫南的資訊和位置不斷變化。 Honestly, they're up against the idea, and it's gonna be a bit of a whack. 說實話,他們是反對的,這會是一個有點捶胸頓足的想法。 Um, all I think, all across social media for quite a while. 嗯,所有我認為,在相當長一段時間內,所有的社交媒體。 Second, there's no agreement on what online content is okay. 其次,對於什麼網絡內容是可以的,並沒有達成一致。 In May, Mark Zuckerberg said. 5月,馬克-扎克伯格表示。 I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online. 我只是堅信,Facebook不應該成為人們在網上所說的一切真相的仲裁者。 And the Internet is full of people saying things that are false, whether it's realistic or even desirable, to try and stop. 而網絡上有很多人說的都是假話,不管現實不現實,甚至理想不理想,都要設法阻止。 That is not a settled issue on Facebook or elsewhere. 這在Facebook或其他地方都不是一個解決的問題。 Online 0.3. 在線0.3。 Well, that concerns the very nature of the Web. 嗯,這關係到網絡的本質。 This is the journalist James Ball. 這是記者James Ball。 Across the open web, there are millions of sites, and it's much more complex tackling them. 在整個開放的網絡上,有數以百萬計的網站,處理這些網站要複雜得多。 Clearly, the tech giants could do mawr, but we can't expect them to police the entire Internet. 顯然,科技巨頭們可以做到毛毛雨,但我們不能指望他們來監管整個互聯網。 On the fourth point is this. 第四點是這樣的。 It became sort of a whirlpool of all conspiracy theories that sort of collected other conspiracy theories about the Illuminati and the Kennedys on the mortar Q. 它成為了所有陰謀論的漩渦,算是收集了其他陰謀論,關於光明會和肯尼迪的迫擊炮Q。 And On becomes a whirlpool, a catchall for spiraling distrust in authority the harder it is to contain. 而《安》則成了一個漩渦,是對權威的不信任感越是難以遏制就越是螺旋式上升的總稱。 Meanwhile, the Q and A on story has reached this perhaps inevitable moment. 與此同時,關於故事的問答也到了這個或許不可避免的時刻。 The New York Times reports Q and on believers say being banned from Facebook is proof off the conspiracy, which, of course it isn't. 紐約時報》報道,Q和上的信徒說,被禁止從Facebook是證明關閉的陰謀,這,當然不是。 But the ban on their reaction to it is proof of the strength of their convictions and is another reason why containing their movement remains profoundly difficult. 但對他們反應的禁令證明了他們的信念的力量,也是遏制他們的運動仍然深感困難的另一個原因。
B2 中高級 中文 陰謀論 暴力 信息 網絡 民主 漩渦 Facebook刪除QAnon頁面--但這是什麼?- 英國廣播公司新聞 (Facebook deleting QAnon pages - But what is it? - BBC News) 7 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2020 年 10 月 24 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字