An Important update for T Series....

But most importantly of all...

puddles [?]

*Chair Fail*

[Pew News Intro]

Good Evening!

I'm Poppy Harlow

The most NEWS person,

In the NEWS

Our first story comes from Battlefield 5.

This is an update from last week.

Apparently Battlefield 5 had a really bad amount of pre-orders

-lagging 85% behind Call of Duty

*Pewds Groan* That sucks...*yes it does*

Some people-

A bunch of Idiots- (yeah)

I'm not supposed to add my opinion but...

said this was because Red Dead Redemption was coming out.....

.......is because Call of Duty is coming out

It's just over saturated in October

MMMHMMMHMMMM

The true chads knew what the reason was behind this...

and of course it was because

...the chief design officer of battlefield said

"If you don't like our trailer,

you are uneducated!"

*Meme review clap*

and then he mysteriously left the company,

as you do, two months before a release...

and I try to explain in the video

why I think people didn't like the trailer,

myself included.

Okay? . . .

they have done really bad at- job at

marketing battlefield so far

and I broke that down

but I still saw a lot of people commenting.

sssss...

"I don't know It doesn't look like a bionic arm, just like a prosthetic."

I called it a bionic arm,

It's a prosthetic a-arm

I know the difference. I just misspoke. Ok.

*Skkksss*

We don't get our education about how wars were from games. Sure, they can do that, but it's not their job

It's a school's job. I couldn't give less F's about what's in Battlefield.*Christian channel pewds*

I wasn't at the war and I wouldn't play to relive it either. Yes, the trailer just being a statement is kind of dumb

However, people going numb over that just as dumb. So-the-basically you're calling me dumb for saying this trailer is dumb

*Pewds thinking about his channel * *Pewds thinking about his life*

Anyway, it seemed like so many people didn't understand what I was talking about. So I will reiterate just to make this point

Crystal-clear. Okay. This is important. Stop. Okay. I'm not even gonna pretend that the battlefield 5 trailer

is not the most important thing in the entire universe

You have to understand, companies aren't mortal beings. Okay, they will say and do whatever that will bring them more sales. *$399!*

They don't think like human beings, because they're not humans. The problem I have and a lot of people have with the trailer is not

the fact that there's a woman in it people aren't going

RRREEEEEEEEEEEEE

There's a woman. No one cares. Okay, and to be 100% clear. I don't have a problem with women in power

In fact, I encourage it, okay? You want to do that, great! Good for you

But when you're simulating a war, okay, they know that they have to work within a certain framework

Okay, if they didn't people would get pissed off and that's what happened here

yes, you can say oh, well, there were no flamethrowers in the Battle of Shvacobol and

No one cares about that. Yes, you're talking about objects here. We're talking about people we're talking about human beings

We're talking about history if battlefield 5 said they're doing a world war game where Swedes are fighting Nazis in the trenches

People would comment about it in the same way saying well that didn't really happen did it and then their response would be oh well

actually

8,000 Swedish people did fight in the war so checkmate. It's like that's not the point

Yes, there were women in World War two, but it's not a plausible scenario

so if you want to make the statement or having a woman in power as the cover of the game and in the trailer as

The main focus I think it's great

It's annoying that I have to call it a statement

but it's a statement because it's done so

Painfully obviously and so poorly if you wanted to put a female soldier on the cover

Why not use something that was actually, I don't know plausible. Okay.

Let me just acknowledge: good intention, terrible execution. That's what this is.

Now apparently EA

Delayed the release of battlefield until November. I think it's probably a good move be honest

this did cost the stocks of EA to drop a lot and

and uhh...

I'm gonna keep developing the story and see how it goes because it's a-- it's interesting to me *and you get content*

PewDiePie-- my favourite YouTube channel. I'm not supposed to give my opinion

I'm just Poppy Harlow

But my favourite YouTube channel is being overtaken by this channel T series

You probably heard about this already

But later this year PewDiePie will no longer be the biggest channel on YouTube

It will be overrun by the channel T series

Now Pewdiepie bravely

Challenged T series to a fight to the death and they have yet to respond to his request

What a bunch of cowards. PewDiePie has gathered a lot of support by Mr. Beast

For example, Leon Lush: We don't stand a chance against the population of India

Sometimes is not about who's going to win

It's about being on the right side of history

The all-inclusive channel... or the Indians. Huh!?

War... war is coming, T-series

Be aware.

Now, this was covered uuhh by... of course...

*giggle*

The verge. The VERGE AND the POLYOGN, same company! It's the same company owned by Vox, interesting.

They're the only ones covering this

Now. Okay, firs-- let it be clear. I don't care. Ok.

I know that's a

false statement because if I say I don't care I am saying I care enough to say that I care and then just go on

And it doesn't make any sense. I know. The thing is I have expressed that

I don't want to be the number one channel on YouTube for a long time

Okay. I would prefer if someone else passes me if T-- if T series was an actual individual and not a company

I would gladly congratulate them on becoming number one. It genuinely doesn't bother me

There are ARE already channels bigger than me, but no one's talking about that.

You have Music, Gaming, Sports and YouTube Movies

I'm technically the fifth biggest YouTube *laugh*

Now, of course!

Polygon EHH They always know how to grind my gears *incoherent cry*

So instead of talking about this I wanted to bring up the point that they bring up in this

Uhhhh

article where polygon brings up this video from MatPat, which says

Ironically, what helped Kjellberg become the "King of YouTube" as explained by Matt Patrick in the video

Kjellberg managed to reach audiences in countries like Sweden, Italy, France--

France! Ok.

And the UK while also building up a fan base in the United States

And I've heard this argument so many times. It's just one of those

Things that people keep saying and then it's so-- it suddenly takes on a truth on its own

Because Matt did this video which is a really good video

I still hate it and I think he should delete it because he made this speculation:

but why this Let's Play channel?

There's thousands out there. Well, there's one other reason the algorithm loves PewDiePie

He's international. You see YouTube promotes channels locally

If you live in California

Your videos will be served up in California

More frequently than in other areas of the US and if you live in the US your videos will stay in the US

Until you gather enough views from other countries to merit them sharing your stuff there

PewDiePie has a unique advantage over most other channels because YouTube considers his channel

Swedish since he started it when he was living in Sweden. Makes sense. Since then he's moved

Meaning that he lives and uploads from Italy, but he also speaks English

So since YouTube promotes locally, he was able to gather a strong Swedish following in a market where there was less competition

But now that he uploads from Italy he gets promoted there. And since YouTube is most heavily used in english-speaking nations

He had a much easier time crossing into the US and UK

Than a channel from here would have doing the reverse.

Ok, Matt. You had no idea what you were talking about *slams headphones*

This is such a dumb video and I hate- I'd-- like i-if you want to piss me off just say "Oh well pewdiepie

he just grew because he moved countries"

The reason this annoys me especially is because it's the complete opposite

When I started off doing YouTube

There was a lot of ways to poke through the system

There was a lot of ways you can deliberately do to make your channel grow quicker

that was... uh...

Technically not allowed but YouTube didn't really stop anyone from doing it.

One of those things would be that you can set your channel

Country in your setting you can set your country to anything

and YouTube will acknowledge your channel as that

It wasn't location-based. It was purely based on the settings and back in 2013

The front page of YouTube was a big part of growing your channel. It was probably how you

Gather the most subscribers if you got on the front page of YouTube, that was a massive deal

And yes, each front page on each country was different

so a Swedish-- so Sweden did have their own front page just like

America has their own front page. Just like there was also a worldwide front page

So what people did was they would set their channel as Swedish

Even though they were American so the front page of Sweden was nothing but American channels

Abusing the system so they would get views from Sweden when they weren't even from Sweden

While people who were Swedish

DIDN'TGROWFROMIT *little chuckle*

It annoys me because I was so frustrated by a-- by this back in 2013

I kind of pride myself that I've never abused youtube's system to grow my channel.

It's one of those things where I've seen

while growing my own channel a lot of other people do