designed a test for children who were struggling in school in France.

Designed to determine which children required individualized attention,

their method formed the basis of the IQ test.

Beginning in the late 19th century,

researchers hypothesized that cognitive abilities like verbal reasoning,

working memory, and visual-spatial skills

reflected an underlying general intelligence, or g factor.

Simon and Binet designed a battery of tests to measure each of these abilities

and combine the results into a single score.

Questions were adjusted for each age group,

and a child's score reflected how they performed relative to others their age.

Dividing someone's score by their age and multiplying the result by 100

yielded the intelligence quotient, or IQ.

Today, a score of 100 represents the average of a sample population,

with 68% of the population scoring within 15 points of 100.

Simon and Binet thought the skills their test assessed

would reflect general intelligence.

But both then and now,

there's no single agreed upon definition of general intelligence.

And that left the door open for people to use the test

in service of their own preconceived assumptions about intelligence.

What started as a way to identify those who needed academic help

quickly became used to sort people in other ways,

often in service of deeply flawed ideologies.

One of the first large-scale implementations

occurred in the United States during WWI, when the military used an IQ test

to sort recruits and screen them for officer training.

At that time, many people believed in eugenics,

the idea that desirable and undesirable genetic traits

could and should be controlled in humans through selective breeding.

There were many problems with this line of thinking,

among them the idea that intelligence was not only fixed and inherited,

but also linked to a person's race.

Under the influence of eugenics,

scientists used the results of the military initiative

to make erroneous claims that certain racial groups

were intellectually superior to others.

Without taking into account that many of the recruits tested

were new immigrants to the United States

who lacked formal education or English language exposure,

they created an erroneous intelligence hierarchy of ethnic groups.

The intersection of eugenics and IQ testing influenced not only science,

but policy as well.

In 1924, the state of Virginia created policy

allowing for the forced sterilization of people with low IQ scores—

a decision the United States Supreme Court upheld.

In Nazi Germany, the government authorized the murder of children

based on low IQ.

Following the Holocaust and the Civil Rights Movement,

the discriminatory uses of IQ tests

were challenged on both moral and scientific grounds.

Scientists began to gather evidence of environmental impacts on IQ.

For example, as IQ tests were periodically recalibrated over the 20th century,

new generations scored consistently higher on old tests

than each previous generation.

This phenomenon, known as the Flynn Effect,

happened much too fast to be caused by inherited evolutionary traits.

Instead, the cause was likely environmental—

improved education, better healthcare, and better nutrition.

In the mid-twentieth century,

psychologists also attempted to use IQ tests

to evaluate things other than general intelligence,

particularly schizophrenia, depression, and other psychiatric conditions.

These diagnoses relied in part on the clinical judgment of the evaluators,

and used a subset of the tests used to determine IQ—

a practice later research found does not yield clinically useful information.

Today, IQ tests employ many similar design elements and types of questions

as the early tests,

though we have better techniques for identifying potential bias in the test.

They're no longer used to diagnose psychiatric conditions.

But a similarly problematic practice using subtest scores

is still sometimes used to diagnose learning disabilities,

against the advice of many experts.

Psychologists around the world still use IQ tests

to identify intellectual disability,

and the results can be used to determine

appropriate educational support, job training, and assisted living.

IQ test results have been used to justify horrific policies

and scientifically baseless ideologies.

That doesn't mean the test itself is worthless—

in fact, it does a good job of measuring the reasoning and problem-solving skills

it sets out to.

But that isn't the same thing as measuring a person's potential.

Though there are many complicated political, historical, scientific,

and cultural issues wrapped up in IQ testing,

more and more researchers agree on this point,

and reject the notion that individuals can be categorized

by a single numerical score.