Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • So what did you eat for breakfast-

  • jam sandwich, yeah

  • You had a sandwich? Yeah A jam sandwich? Yeah

  • yeah I always loved mathematics as a kid, so

  • one of my earliest memories is when I was like

  • two years old and my grandma was

  • cleaning the windows in our home,

  • and I was insisting that she put

  • numbers on the- she put the detergent on

  • windows in the form of numbers so I always

  • liked numbers and patterns and logic

  • and so forth, things are very

  • black-and-white where there's one right

  • answer and everything else is wrong. I didn't

  • like so subjective shades of grey type

  • questions, I would work on math workbooks

  • for fun you know my parents wanted to

  • shut me up she just give me a workbook

  • and I'll just go do sums and so forth so I

  • always liked mathematics, math

  • competitions- doing that was very

  • different from doing research

  • mathematics, the type of problems that

  • that you've given in a problem book and so forth

  • these are very canned problems,

  • things you can do in five minutes or ten minutes

  • and they don't prepare you completely

  • for a research problem where, you know,

  • you have to spend six months, you have to

  • read the literature, talk to people, try

  • something, doesn't work, modify, try it

  • again, and it's a very different

  • experience doing research but I like it a lot

  • better actually thanthan

  • all the puzzles I used to do as a kid I

  • don't do these things very much any more.

  • My mother was a high school math

  • teacher when she was younger so she did

  • help me a little bit you know you know

  • when I was a kid you know,

  • just talking numbers with me and then I had a lot of

  • very good mentors when I was like 10 or

  • 11 there was a retired maths professor

  • in Adelaide which I'd go visit on the

  • weekends, we'd have tea and cookies and you know

  • he would just discuss some some

  • recreational maths problem, and so forth, which was a

  • lot of fun. He would tell me stories

  • about how he'd use maths during World War Two, and so forth, you know,

  • to do ballistics and so forth. It was kind

  • of fun to actually see maths actually being used for something

  • "He had a PhD in maths from Princeton at

  • 20 and was appointed professor of

  • mathematics at UCLA at 24"

  • I enjoyed it I mean

  • when I was a kid I mostly enjoyed

  • doing math and geeky things and so forth, and

  • you know, being accelerated and

  • going to going to uni that early, I was

  • around people who are older than me

  • but had similar backgrounds so we were

  • at sort of the same level mathematically so

  • you know these people five years older

  • maybe but we're both stuck on the same homework assignments,

  • we both like to talk about various math concepts and so

  • forth so I felt at home you know so I

  • did miss out on maybe sort of the

  • regular high school experience you know

  • sort of– I didn't go to many, you know,

  • high school social events and so forth I did a

  • lot of that actually once I was in grad

  • school in Princeton. So then I

  • hung around people my own age and you

  • know, then I partied and so forth,

  • so I sort of had a slightly reorganized

  • childhood but it worked out well for me

  • "And I have to say Terence Tao was

  • competing there and he only got one out

  • of seven. Let's actually cut

  • Terrence Tao some slack, the fields medalist, the guy

  • who's like coming close to solving the

  • twin prime conjecture. It's actually

  • pretty awesome because he was only 13 years old.

  • He holds the record as the

  • youngest person to ever have won a gold medal."

  • - It was this question six. - Oh yeah yeah yeah

  • it's a famous question yes.

  • What's your recollection of it now and why

  • you didn't get it right? - No I did not get it right

  • - How do you feel about that? - I well you know you win some

  • you lose some. I -- oh boy -- I have --

  • it was so long ago now I don't remember much

  • about it. I do remember once the Olympiad

  • was over I found out that some

  • Romanian woman had solved

  • the question and I remember searching

  • out for her, because it was really bugging me that

  • that I did not know how to solve the

  • question. There's a special trick to

  • solve it, which at the time was not a

  • standard trick that was taught to you. You have to use a

  • method of descent -- you had to... I forget the

  • exact question. You had to show that

  • something could not be a perfect square --

  • was always a perfect square, and show

  • that if it wasn't you could find a

  • smaller counter-example and a smaller one

  • and a smaller one. I think nowadays it's

  • become part of standard training in

  • its -- they all know the trick

  • now, but...

  • - Were you competitive? Were you the sort of boy

  • that would get upset about it or was it

  • just a fascination? "I just want to know

  • that, I want to know the answer" or

  • when you like angry you didn't get it?

  • - I think I was more obsessive than

  • competitive, yeah, I mean certainly I was

  • a bit angry at myself for not getting it

  • but I wanted more to know the answer

  • than to win, I think. - There's this

  • famous image of you with Erdős. - Yes.

  • - It was a great photograph. People want

  • to know what you're discussing in that

  • picture what's going on there. - Yes, I

  • think he was giving me a maths problem

  • which I did -- I think I even know which -- what it is

  • because he did send me a postcard

  • afterwards with what may be the same

  • problem. I have it somewhere. Yeah I think

  • it was it was some maths conference in

  • Adelaide, yeah I was like 10 or something

  • I don't know why I was there maybe

  • some math professor at

  • the University of Adelaide told me to come.

  • I understand, he was always very good at

  • at speaking to mathematically gifted kids and I don't remember much

  • about our conversation except that

  • I remember I really felt

  • like I was being treated like an equal

  • like it wasn't condescending or anything

  • like you know. It was a very

  • pleasant conversation you know I mean

  • now Erdős has passed you know I

  • mean it does have some sentimental value

  • for me I mean it's... Yeah, I mean I

  • certainly wish I'd paid more attention

  • to him, actually you know I mean like I'd

  • heard of him you know as a child for

  • but you know Erdős is someone...

  • ...to me he was just someone who would

  • like talking math to me, and that was great. He did

  • write me a letter of recommendation for

  • Princeton later on so he did help my

  • career directly. - Did you ever have people

  • you looked up to and thought they were...

  • they were the top guns? Not really I mean, you

  • know, I would learn about Euler and

  • Gauss, and Newton, but these are

  • largely just names. I think I didn't

  • really have a sense of... you know so I'd learn

  • all these theorems and tricks and so forth

  • but I didn't really ever have a

  • good sense of what was the most

  • important, or what was the... yeah I

  • didn't learn the why of mathematics until

  • a lot later. I remember when I was

  • learning calculus, I thought that the

  • most important mathematician in the world must be

  • be Taylor, because Taylor's name appears

  • everywhere in

  • undergraduate calculus. Taylor

  • expansion, Taylor's rule and so forth and,

  • you know he was a good mathematician, but

  • you know, there were many other

  • people who did good stuff which is not

  • taught as much at an undergraduate level.

  • When you're doing mathematics do you use

  • any kind of visualization in your head?

  • What does it look like in your head when

  • you're doing math?

  • It's a bit hard to explain. It's always always a combination of

  • thinking inside your head and speaking

  • out loud and working on the board. You do

  • try to isolate sort of the simplest

  • metaphor or something for for your

  • problem... How can I explain it... So you know,

  • for instance, I do a lot of estimates

  • I always want X less than Y and

  • sometimes it helps to think of a sort of

  • an economics problem, like "you have a

  • budget of Y, and can you afford X?" and

  • that way you start thinking economically

  • like so the way you work with

  • inequalities like X less than Y is that

  • normally you maybe try to first bound

  • x by z and z by w and then w by y and

  • so forth and this is like you know

  • trading in you know one item for another

  • item and you get a sense of sort of what

  • inequalities are sort of good

  • deals for you that you're getting you're

  • getting you bang for your buck and which

  • ones are really wasting your money. Sometimes

  • utilizing sort of your financial

  • intuition can be helpful.

  • Algebra and topology... Those

  • have always been my my weakest areas.

  • I've only been able to get a handle

  • on these areas generally by translating

  • them into other types of mathematics,

  • geometry or analysis, I have better

  • handle on... I certainly don't claim

  • any mastery of all of mathematics. I think nobody can do that

  • not since Hilbert. (David Hilbert)

  • The work I'm proudest of is almost all

  • joint work and I think

  • nowadays most of my work is

  • joint. It is really fun to talk over a

  • math problem at a really high level with

  • a co-author who who is really on your

  • wavelength, understands what you're

  • thinking. It's actually... saying

  • things out loud, it almost forces

  • you to think, like, at a more organized level

  • than in your head where it can be

  • a bit jumbled and vague, and it's just

  • more fun, you know you can go back and

  • forth and if you're stuck maybe your

  • co-author has a suggestion if he or she is

  • stuck you can make suggestions. You at

  • least guarantee one other person is

  • interested in what you're doing. You know

  • when you write something, when you write

  • a paper by yourself you know there's

  • always somehow the nagging fear at the

  • back of your mind that maybe you know no

  • one will care about this... but you know

  • you at least have one person to talk about it

  • with. What do you think or feel, what's

  • your impression of those mathematicians

  • that go the opposite way, Andrew Wiles

  • is an obvious example, the mathematician who

  • works in solitude. What do you...

  • how does that impress you? What he did

  • was very impressive... you need both.

  • You need people who focus very very hard

  • on one very narrow problem working for

  • years, become a very deep expert. But then

  • you need the people who can connect

  • things in fragmented fields. I make

  • my living you know by understanding one

  • field X and taking some ideas from that

  • and applying it to field Y, but I couldn't

  • do that if there weren't people who are

  • very deeply working in in field X, and

  • so forth, so I think it's great that

  • there's a huge diversity in

  • mathematics you know if we all thought

  • the same way we all had similar

  • philosophy it would be a much poorer

  • environment.

  • You know you can't really call

  • your shots in mathematics. Some problems,

  • the tools are not

  • there. It doesn't matter how

  • smart or quick you are. The analogy I

  • have is like climbing, if you

  • want to climb a cliff that's 10 meters

  • high you can what we do it with the

  • right tools and equipment, but you know

  • if it's a sheer cliff face, you know,

  • a mile high and there's no handholds

  • whatsoever, you know just forget it. It

  • doesn't matter how strong you are or

  • whatever, you have to wait until there's

  • some sort of breakthrough, like some

  • opening occurs like halfway through,

  • halfway up the cliff and now you have

  • some easier sub-goal. You know

  • there's some speculation, there's some

  • possible ways to attack the conjecture

  • but nothing is really promising

  • currently. You're not climbing that

  • cliff, but if few foot holes appear you

  • might run and try and climb it as well?

  • Yeah, yeah yeah! You know it would... this is

  • the way it works, whenever there's an

  • exciting breakthrough like everyone

  • just sort of nearby in the area just sort of

  • takes a look at their favorite list of

  • open problems, "okay maybe this new trick

  • can give you some advance". It's very hard

  • to rule out that there's some major

  • breakthrough in something which seemed

  • impossible suddenly becomes very very

  • feasible. This has happened many times.

  • ...that is not the same thing as the full

  • Kakeya problem because maybe as the

  • direction varies smoothly, maybe the pole

  • would have to jump around.

So what did you eat for breakfast-

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

A2 初級

世界上最好的數學家 (*) - Numberphile (The World's Best Mathematician (*) - Numberphile)

  • 5 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字