Now I've used this the DRI T 10 30 a few times in the past, mainly to upgrade aging desktops with weak power supplies.

It doesn't okay, job, but as you know, we've recently seen the release of a new GT 10 30.

A few variants, in fact, with DDR four memory a slower alternative to G d.

D R.

Five.

I made a speculation video regarding the performance of said cut down cards.

But today it's time to look at a few performance benchmarks on After watching tech by matter.

Video on this card are just had to see for myself the apparent terrible cut down performance off these new DDR four options.

So let's cut the lengthy intro and get straight into it because these new 10 thirty's really don't deserve that much air time.

For example, starting with Overwatch here and I'm using a mix of medium settings with a couple of high options thrown in, let's also not forget that the DDR 4 10 30 has an almost three times slower memory bandwidth, the effects of which can be blatantly seen here as the DDR four card can't quite hold a steady 30 frames per second.

I've tested but matches online matches, different capture methods to see if some software somewhere was causing an issue.

But it appears no when you compare this to the results of a standard G DDR 5 10 30 a card I still really like you're seeing pretty much half the performance.

The same goes for Fortnight's, which will run just fine on the standard 10 30.

But a DDR four version of the card will see a sub 30 F.

P.

S average with a mix of medium and low settings.

Just like with Overwatch.

Setting everything too low and reducing the resolution will improve performance.

But what I really wanted to achieve with this test is show you just how much of a difference there is between the two cards.

On point out that the Jew DDR 5 10 30 can handle increased settings, whereas the DDR four version will struggle.

I don't want any of you buying it by mistake and being disappointed, especially considering how I praised the Judy DDR 5 10 30 many times in the past in far Cry five, which I found to be a pretty well up to my eyes title that will even run on Andy's rise in AP, use the DDR 4 10 30 struggle to maintain or even achieve a playable frame rate.

Now, what was strange here is that I saw a different results both times I fired this game up, so I'm showing you the footage from my slightly worse experience.

With a standard 10 30 you can expect to stay above 30 f P s most of the time, with a few dips here in there as you approach slightly denser forest areas.

Finally, it's pub G 27 was the average from right here, a 10 80 p with the very low preset again, A drop in resolution may help you achieve a more playable 30 F PS plus average.

So you will still experience a few frame drops here and there, especially when venturing into busier built up areas.

And even here I'm running around a pretty empty area where most of the benchmarking took place compared to a standard G d.

D l five card.

These results are, in total, quite disappointing.

This isn't entirely because of the poor performance, but because this DDR four card shares the GT 10 30 name.

And, of course, the standard GT 10 thirty's are actually quite a sensible, cheap option for budget gamers.

Thes DDR Four cards, on the other hand, should be on offer for at least half the price or just be called something different.

At least then any controversy over performance could be avoided.

So, guys, there we have it.

This has been a little look at the DDR four g d 10.

30.

I don't really want to make a long video on this subject because I have discussed the cut down performance off this car before.

But it's nice to actually show you a few benchmarks here today off this card in actress, So it's always leave a like on this video.

If you enjoyed it, leave a dislike.

If you didn't please avoid this card.