a conversation with strangers and – every now and then – manage to make a whole table

laugh. But there’s a test far sterner than this, surprising in its ability to trip us

up: the challenge of having a pleasant time with a child we don’t know. Theoretically

speaking, this should be so easy. We were all once kids. We know a great deal more than

they do and – as far as they’re concerned – hold all the cards: if we felt like it,

we could buy 26 packets of biscuits and go to bed whenever we wanted. Yet, in reality,

it’s strangely hard to be at ease around children we’re not already close to. Imagine

being invited around to your boss’s house for lunch and being left alone at the kitchen

island with her moody ten-year-old son; or being introduced into a playroom with two

shy five-year-old girls, the children of a friend. We may swiftly grow bewilderingly

tongue-tied and inept. The reason is that children are unable to do any of the normal

things that ease social encounters between adult strangers. They don’t ask polite questions

about what we’ve been up to. They have no feeling for our lives or what might be important

to us. They don’t do the news or the weather. And they can’t usually tell us much about

themselves and their enthusiasms. If we ask them why they like a toy or a film, they tend

to look blank and say they just like it, that’s all. So for all their sweetness, children

present formidable and fascinating barriers to social fluidity – which is also why they

are the greatest tests of one’s mastery of the arts of charm and kindness. We have

– across cultural history – a few moving examples of accomplished adults getting on

well with children. Montaigne remarked that he found ‘nothing more notable’ in the

life of Socrates (the man who more or less began Western philosophy) than that he was

exceptionally gifted at playing with children – and would, especially in his later years,

spent many hours playing games and giving them piggy-backs. ‘And it suited him well,’

added Montaigne, ‘for all actions, says philosophy, equally become and equally honor

a wise man.’ Henri IV, King of France from 1589 to 1610 is remembered as one of the most

benign French monarchs who also happened to be very sweet around children. On one occasion,

famously painted by Ingres, the Spanish Ambassador came to see the king and found him pretending

to be a horse for his children to ride on. Rather than interrupt the game immediately,

Henri kept the Ambassador waiting a little while, sending out a strong signal of where

he felt sensible adult priorities should sometimes lie. What’s touching in these cases is that

the adults did not insist on using their obvious, socially-endorsed strengths around children.

Socrates did not opt to deliver lectures about metaphysics, Henri IV did not sit impassively

on a throne discussing how to rule a kingdom. They put aside their well-known virtues and

prestige in order to make themselves vulnerable – as one must whenever friendship is at

stake. They dared to lay themselves open to attack by those who might have described them

as ‘silly’ or ‘undignified’, implicitly understanding that friendship can only emerge

when we let the fragile, unadorned parts of us meet – without artifice – the fragile,

unadorned parts of others. Furthermore, these two grand men knew how to find common ground

with creatures who were, in so many respects, entirely alien to them. Cosmopolitans of the

mind, they imaginatively searched for what unites rather than what divides people and

were able to locate, somewhere within their characters, the joys and excitements of someone

who has only been on the earth a few years. The socially-adept know that we contain (even

if only in trace, embryonic forms) all human possibilities within us, which they draw upon

to feel their way into the needs and points of view of strangers. So even if they happen

to be confident, they will know how to be in touch with the more timid version of themselves;

even if they are the financially secure, they can mobilise their own experience of anxiety

to enter into the inner world of someone beset by money worries; and even if their careers

have not gone well, they can, without bitterness, find a part of themselves that would love

to prosper and use this to engage warmly with someone whose professional life has gone very

well indeed. The moves that these grand people made with kids are ones we should all learn

how to make with anyone, of whatever age, we want to bond with. But it’s particularly

useful that these were grand people who made neighing sounds, for what so often holds us

back around others, and makes us cold when we deep down long to be close, is a fear of

a loss of dignity. Friendship begins, and loneliness can end, when we cease trying to

impress, have the courage to step outside our safety zones and can dare – for a time

– to look a little ridiculous.

Did you know that The School Of Life is actually a place?

10 places in fact, campus' all over the world from Melbourne to London, Taipei to Istanbul,

with classes and books and lots more.

Please click the link below to explore more.