The only frustrating thing of being on the council about the same d launches the fact that they're doing it in such like segments.

It's like some Computex actually.

Summit Yes, Summit Computex some eighth e three with availability in July.

So it's kinda like, Come on, just just just pour it out.

Let us have it.

Let us have all this Goodness, yeah, we're gonna talk about we're talking about their new processors.

Uh, the 39 50 x has finally been debuted and we'll talk about their new RD and technology on their graphics cards and there Nah, V architecture has finally been well unveiled.

Its going talk about Corsair is proud to present their new hydro X line of custom water cooling products.

The new XT revive Siri's radiators offer the perfect balance of Finn density and airflow to keep your loop cool and quiet.

The extra seven water blocks feature full coverage cooling Fergie Pew while also maintaining an aesthetically pleasing design while the XY seven and x C nine CP blocks keep all your modern CP is nice and cool to see the complete lineup of high directs cooling products from Corsair.

Click the link in the description below.

All right, So, um, we're just going to kind of go through processors quickly because I think there was a little bit less shown on processors than the new graphics card, which is obviously, we'll need Grafts Card Family, which is obviously everyone's favorite.

Ah, exciting thing, because we know that the CPU side has been competitive now for MD for several years.

It's the GPU side of things that has been kind of like a lackluster.

It's had a hard time getting the momentum going, in my opinion, but the 3900 X we've we've seen, obviously some of the teases and stuff about it.

We finally started seeing some performance figures.

Now, as you should with any company.

Whether being Intel in video or MD, you need to take these figures with a grain of salt you need to see and wait for independent testing.

You need to watch a bunch of different sources to kind of form a median performance figure.

I mean, everyone tests differently, so I am the obviously wants to put their best foot forward So you want to be leery of that?

Don't get caught up in hype trains and stuff waits for independent testing.

Unfortunately, that's not gonna be until July.

But the 3900 X, which is the 12 Corps 24 Thread part, which is designed to compete directly with Intel, 79 20 X, which is an ex to 99 part on Extreme Platform.

Remember the 1300 exes on mainstream running dual channel RAM and the Intel is running Quad Channel RAM.

They are boasting a 14% uptick in I P.

C versus 2000 Siri's Reisen or last series Rising.

So which is obviously based on, you know, the first Gen Risin?

Even it was not an 1800 Siri 1800 x 27 index.

That's the same architecture we're now seeing then, too, sourcing a 14% i p c uptick, which means that it's putting it pretty much in line directly with Intel in terms of I P.

C.

And we're seeing faster clocks across the board.

We still don't know yet exactly how many cores boost up to the up to 4.7 or 4.6 gigahertz, But if all the rumors hold true.

This is excellent because the 1300 X, with 12 course 24 threads, is showing that it's it's trading blows with the 9900 k, which is kind of always, you know, like right now, like Well, wait a minute, 900 k only has a throat.

Of course, wait a sec.

The 9900 k has always been touted as like the ultimate gaming CPU because high I peces hi clocks, which means less bottle necking, better late in C and all those things which give you better gaming experience.

Usually the higher court count.

Si, pues do not give you as good of a gaming experience because of multi threaded performance and leveraged the pews and all that sort of thing, and this is showing us that it is trading blows between the 9900 k when it comes to gaming.

Depending on the title, you could see a couple percent improvement of AMG over Intel and vice versa.

So if we're seeing it competing with the ultimate gaming, see few.

But also, if you look at the multi threaded performance against the 79 20 x in productivity where it's beating it pretty much across the board.

Well, if these figures hold up and all the independent reviewer see the same experience, you're gonna have $1000 CPU being beaten across the board by a $499 CPS.

So that's exciting, especially if the fact that we're seeing it in productivity outpacing the 79 20 x with half the memory channels.

Well, then, that makes it that much better, because you have to spend twice as much on memory and you're still getting a better overall experience.

We also saw the 39 50 x being debuted, which obviously has 16 cores and 32 threads, which is interesting because that now puts it directly competing with last Gen Thread Ripper on mainstream platform for significantly less $749 to be exact.

So, yeah, it's one of those things where it's like, and we'd wait till September for that.

Unfortunately, the 3900 X will be available in July, I think July 7th.

But not only is it running on the X 5 70 platform running PC Jen, for which we already talked about giving you good improvements in Io.

In terms of your raid cars and m 700.2 drives and any sort of PC, I express not necessary graphics card, but things that can saturate that type of bandwidth you're going to see up to 42% faster SSD performance.

I mean across the board.

This is just insane in terms of what we're seeing here, the fact that we're seeing the next gen product in terms of peace.

I expressing all that sort of stuff he launched on an aim.

The platform or not, Intel shows that the tides have certainly shifted.

Now we're gonna and also to the 3900 X has 70 megabytes of cash and 40 PC lanes with PC Eugen for and all that sort of stuff.

So that's pretty mind boggling.

You guys have seen the other guys talking about the motherboard quality of computation.

Usually you would see Intel motherboards having a better build quality, and MD was kind of like an even though they may have shared the same name like strict since tricks or, you know, like a the Oris card versus motherboard versus another Oris motherboard.

They just didn't have the same quality between them.

Now we're talking about build quality on Andy, motherboards outpacing and being better build quality than the Intel counterparts.

It's kind of insane, but moving on to graphics because that's where Andy has always sort of lacks for quite a long time.

They brought back the X T family, and they're doing that obviously with the knave, the architecture, the new our d n a.

Basically giving us a new mainstream graphics card.

But it's not higher performance than Radio on seven, which I think is gonna be disappointing to a lot of people because of the fact that when C.

S came out and we talked about around that time the 5 90 all that stuff being the mainstream card that was only competing with, like 9 80 or something like that when I needed See, I think it was Ah, lot of folks when Artie Ex came out were saying, Wait for Navid, Wait for nappy.

Wait for Navid.

Wait for Navy.

Unfortunately, this is not the knave e everyone was hoping for, and it's looking like a MME.

De is still staying with that mantra of competing with the mid range market.

So, for instance, the 5700 x t, which I think it's cool that it brought the X T name back.

It's kind of a throwback to the original radio on days where everything was X, t and all that, um, it's directly competing with Artie X 2070 and it's got eight gigabytes of GDR six.

So it's not running HB M to like.

A lot of people were thinking it was going to that still ready on seven, based on vague architecture, GCN or like a ultimate GCN architecture or whatever you wanna call it.

So if you were, which is competing with directly with 2080 so in video, still all by itself up there in the major leagues in terms of 20 t I performance and all that sort stuff, you're not going to see any competition coming for Andy occupying that price point.

But does it?

I mean, that's kind of a ridiculous price point to begin with, Most people don't need that type of of, uh, graphics power.

Now, the new shroud that they're showing this is pretty obvious that it's gonna be aboard partner card because people are gonna come out.

Obviously, your partner's gonna come out with multi fan coolers, vapour chambers and heat pipes and all that sort of stuff sticking with the gaming lines you're used to from all of your favorite board partners.

I like the way the new shroud looks like.

There's a lot of controversy on the Dent, the dent looking weird.

I just like the fact that it's something a little bit different thrown in there.

I like the sort of corner Rory look to it, apparently the 50th anniversary edition, where it with Lisa sews like signature on it in gold trim and all that sort of stuff just totally unnecessary.

But, I mean, if you're a huge fan of the MD probably interested in that.

But the 5700 X t and the 5700 are designed to compete with the 2070 and the 2060 now.

They did all the figures here at 14 40 p.

Gaming, which is what I saw.

A lot of people in the comment section on the Lifestream sort of commenting like, of course, not doing 10 80 because it just shows that there's seep.

You suck.

No, if you want a truly stress a graphics card you need to put the load on the graphics card.

Did you do that with higher resolutions?

And 14 40 makes sense because Fourcade gaming is still such a a small adoption rate in the in the industry.

I think 14 40 was the perfect sweet spot, but I think this was perfect because at the $449 price point, you're getting a 225 watt TB card using obviously TSMC seven Centimeter Navy our architecture and it's looking like it's beating the 2070 fairly across the board with a couple of like shadow, the Tomb Raider.

It looks like the 27 he was still beating it.

You see anywhere between a 2% to a 22% f PS game.

Rossi s across the board, various titles, and they tested everything from far cried a Tom Clancy to the division um, Assassin's creed.

Odyssey.

Have a weird time, I guess.

Andy Tunnel.

Right.

So we saw a huge, um, overall improvement over the 2070 at a the same price point.

So that's that.

That's one thing we're talking about, but there's another part of this I'm gonna talk about in just a sec.

If we look at the 27 5700 which is compared to the Arctic's 2060 um, it's anywhere from a 2% to 21% improvement across.

The board will put the same charts up that they showed again wait for independent testing.

Because we've seen these types of charts before then we find their very unique circumstances where these tend to make sense.

Both cards were featuring eight gigabytes of GDR six, which is interesting because the 5700 compared to the 2060 12 60 only has six gigs of GDR six.

You're getting more V RAM, and with that, you're getting, well, better performance across the board.

But I can already hear the NVIDIA fan boys out there screaming.

But it doesn't have tens, of course, and it doesn't have our tea cores.

Well, I guess this is where you get to have a fun opportunity to for choice, because it's one of those things where if you wanted to compete with him, video aimed he didn't have anything until July of this year because 5 90 was the best you could get.

That didn't come anywhere near competing with the 2000 Siri's Weatherby a 26 year up.

Well, now the same price point.

You get that option.

Do you want rob performance?

Which is what you can get with obviously with the 5700 and 5700 cc's tea?

Or do you want the extra features that could potentially be adopted in the future more widely, But at the huge F.

P s tax that R TX in real time, the X ers are retracing is gonna cost you.

So this is where if you want the pretties, I guess you go within a video card.

If you want the performance just no matter what, then you get the Andy card.

Because if you go in the video card, you just disabled all the time.

Then technically, get better performance with Andy card, and there's a couple new functions that we still want to test here internally because they're talking.

They're talking about anti leg, which is supposed to improve the lag between your monitor and your graphics card.

When they said anti leg, I immediately thought of like fast and furious, and I've seen in my brain like superstar out there on to step in there.

Just I really want to know exactly how that works.

Um, but yeah, there was zero mention of our of real time ray tracing, which I found kind of interesting, considering the fact that nappies architecture is running on the next generation game consoles.

And they specifically mentioned real time retracing for the consuls.

And Lisa Suze Kino even started with We love the PC space.

We love the PC platform.

That is where our passion isn't seven.

She talks about that, but zero mention of retracing their.

So maybe this is where we're waiting for potentially a new flagship card to replace Vega that could potentially then compete with that high end in video price point as well as give me that real time retracing.

Or maybe they're doing what a lot of people think of video should have, which is just okay.

You made this thing and it works.

Now improve it internally before you release it to the public.

So you get the frames that people want and obviously the real time retracing.

So I feel like with graphic side of things.

A lot of folks aer disappointed because they really were expecting a m d is nah v to just bring it.

But where they're bringing in is where most people are shopping going on.

The $0.200.500 dollars is where most people spend their money.

Most people spend that money closer to the $200 range.

And I'm curious is if we're going to see a r d n a graphics card in that 200 to $359 price point.

Although we've got a $349 we're a 57 100.

So, yeah, I sell a lot to wait for a lot to learn, but we don't have that much information yet on exactly when these cards will be available.

Yeah, so anyway, just another piece talking about some of the news that's out there.

You guys probably already heard this information.

You're going, J.

This is redundant.

Why are you talking about it?

Well, I've got my audience.

I'm still obligated to talk to you about this sort of stuff.

This is why we have this channel so that we can talk about this sort of stuff.

But in July, we're gonna obviously be talking about the new graphics are the new C pews and doing some tests on that, and I'll tell you what Skunk Works is currently running a 16 4 processor.

It's running a 79 60 x.

And if we see the 16 core 39 50 x, beating the 79 60 X, it makes me kind of want to switch that computer back to Andy for the hell of it, considering that's how this channel started was with an a m D rig of mine.

I'm just curious as to how Intel is gonna answer.

So alright, guys, sound off.

In the comments below on, how you feel about the new lineup of CPU is now that we've seen pricing and what the actual performance of these, according to the chart stacks up.