Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • so with that I'm going to turn it over or Garfinkel who with his colleagues

  • Jane well Vogel and Heidi Alan looked at the status of the profession and

  • scholarship around to Social Policy so thank you mark thanks to all of you for

  • coming after a long conference and I hope that what we present will make your

  • Wow so the paper that I'm doing is social policy and Social Work in the

  • 21st century and with two co-authors Jane wall Fogle and Heidi Allen neither

  • of whom are here but they have expertise in areas that I don't and made it very

  • important contributions so our charge is to assess the condition of social policy

  • research in social work at the dawn of the 21st century we also say a little

  • bit about the state of the profession in terms of influencing policy just

  • focusing on the scholarship for a moment it's a daunting challenge to and Markin

  • it at this and his comments to assess the role of social policy research and

  • social work because the field is so broad including includes obviously

  • poverty anti-poverty research tower welfare health aging housing

  • neighborhood and Community Development anti-discrimination policy some would

  • say still criminal justice policy of they were not intimately involved in

  • that any more tax policy is relevant as well and

  • gender policy so and I could go on that's a partial list so the question

  • that we face the first question was what do we talk about so our solution was to

  • focus on only three areas and the criteria for choosing the areas one that

  • the areas be everyone would agree that the areas we choose are central to

  • Social Work a second and more pragmatic was that we have some expertise in this

  • area and that's why we have three of us I have expertise in the broad area of

  • anti-poverty policy or generally social economic well-being a chain waffle who

  • has expertise in child welfare and Heidi Allen expertise in health policy the

  • method which I'll come back to at the end you should think of what we're doing

  • it's a in some ways novel I hadn't thought of initially but what we do is

  • focus on what we think are really seminal contributions coming from people

  • in social work and we so we focus on just leading research in these three

  • areas I'll come back to that and say the limits of that and to summarize the

  • findings Social Work scholarship is remarkably strong and I'm an optimist by

  • nature but I think I hope to convince you that that's not just the reflection

  • of my personality rather it's a reflection

  • the evidence so I'm gonna begin with anti-poverty policy or economic

  • well-being or generally again the vastness of the literature just in this

  • area requires narrowing and we've narrowed to four areas core poverty

  • research child support asset development and comparative research cross national

  • comparative research with respect to core party research I'm going to begin

  • with overarching research on poverty and here the first thing I thought about was

  • the Institute for Research on poverty has published I think it's now four

  • volumes on fighting poverty confronting poverty understanding poverty there was

  • a fourth but two of those three were edited by Sheldon Danziger who was a

  • member of the faculty at the University of Wisconsin in Madison and these are my

  • these were at the time they were published must reads for people who took

  • seriously scholarship we're interested in overall scholarship in poverty and

  • here I'm gonna divert a little bit to the state of the profession so again I

  • think very impressive four of the 13 directors of the Institute for Research

  • on poverty came from Social Work I've the only profession that has a stronger

  • representation economics same thing with respect to there's now a National

  • Academy of Science Panel charged with coming up with how do we reduce poverty

  • child poverty by half in the next ten years

  • again four of the 15 National Academy of Science members are

  • social work come from Social Work the

  • again the only profession that has stronger representation economics

  • poverty measurement I'll just talk about two contributions there

  • one is the as I think probably most of you know that in 1995 the National

  • Academy of Science recommended that we adopt a new measure of poverty as

  • opposed to the official measure lots of weaknesses of the official measure I

  • will focus on only one which is the official measure doesn't count the

  • benefits from the programs that we have actually expanded the most especially

  • with respect to child poverty so food stamps is not counted the Earned Income

  • Tax Credit is not counted public housing is not counted in the official measure

  • finally in 2011 or 2012 the Census Bureau published a supplementary measure

  • of poverty the SPM and I'm gonna talk about the OPM that's the official

  • measure of poverty they didn't replace the official measure

  • it's called supplementary measure D and lots of differences I'm just focused on

  • one it counts all these benefits cats all these benefits and a group of us at

  • Columbia University myself Jane wall Fogle a student at the time Liana Fox

  • and a research scientist Chris Weimer and there are two or three others the

  • co-authors what we did was to publish take the SPM back in time historically

  • so the Census Bureau only published data for the teens

  • I think they go back to 2011 but we took it all the way back to 1967 and the

  • difference in the reduction in poverty is dramatic if you look at the official

  • measure the trend in child poverty is actually child poverty goes up a little

  • from sixty-seven to the current period if you use the SPM we reduce child

  • poverty by more than forty percent that's a very different narrative the

  • first narrative is we threw money at problems that didn't work the second

  • narrative is that money was well spent it was very effective in reducing

  • poverty a second area I'd cousin and by the way that was cited in the

  • president's annual economic report of the president on the occasion of the

  • 50th anniversary of the declaration of war on poverty there's a chapter in that

  • report of the president economic report of the president that looks at a 50-year

  • look back on the war on poverty and our work is central to that material

  • hardship social workers have made seminal contributions on material

  • hardship I remember when I first the the concept was invented by said the

  • measurement was first done by sandy Jenks the first couple of times I saw

  • and I had a student in class that I poo pooed the measure and said well I'm

  • skeptical about it I was that wrong about that and a number of people from

  • Social Work have published very convincing papers of why this is a good

  • measure five minutes I thought I had 30 minutes oh my god okay well

  • enough Santa biding economic insecurity is perhaps a better measure so alright

  • Chuck I'm gonna go through this quickly child support

  • I've made some contributions in that dan Meyer and Maria cancion at the

  • University of Wisconsin have made seminal contributions in this area in

  • child support I would say that contributions from social workers

  • dominate the literature and moving ahead quickly to asset development so

  • yesterday we gave an award to Michael Jordan for his work and asset

  • development as I've said to friends and colleagues he makes me look like a piker

  • in terms of what he's done and asset development I don't want to say he's he

  • and his students and colleagues are the entire literature but it's pretty

  • remarkable pretty remarkable contribution comparative research icon

  • and cameramen using the Luxembourg income study again social workers have

  • made incredible contributions their modern case studies we have some

  • remarkable examples chin gala sitting in the audience there has done a study of

  • China China's the bowel system it's the largest public assistance

  • program in the world and Jane waffle goes book on child poverty Britain's war

  • on poverty again remarkable important study a child welfare this this is our

  • area we have the professional it's like maybe we should curse God for giving it

  • to us it's the hardest area but we haven't we have it and the scholarly

  • contributions have been remarkable

  • they're people sitting in the audience here

  • Jane wall Fogle you can look down the list this is just child maltreatment and

  • child protection but also if you look at foster care guardianship adoption and

  • independent living again very impressive a couple notes on the current state of

  • scholarship we'll come back to them if you have questions aren't the health

  • policy well health policy is an area which we literally chose because it's

  • not an area where we've had this kind of influence but it's an area where Social

  • Work is playing a incredibly big role and a growing role and scholarship now

  • is beginning to emerge so especially in the area of one way I think about health

  • policy and the role of Social Work is that a lot of health problems are not

  • best addressed by health professionals they're actually best addressed by

  • social workers because a lot of the issues about health are not just health

  • profession related quickly and so I think two interesting developments in

  • health is that we now have a chance that there may be a National Academy of

  • Science panel created that would be take a look at the role of Social Work in the

  • conclusions so a scholarship is strong in

  • anti-poverty research and child welfare promising and health policy in terms of

  • policy influence I would say the professional role is mixed we have a

  • very prominent place at the table but what we've actually achieved if we

  • should only view it as limited it's not that we've not achieved anything but

  • we've not achieved what we aspire to and we need to work on that with respect to

  • pass the future success I would say the keys are and if you go back and look at

  • the slides you will see one is to remain up to date in research skills second to

  • hire scholars from different disciplines and I would say especially economics I

  • had a little bias I'm a half economist myself but I think it's not just bias I

  • think if you look at the contributions working in interdisciplinary teams I

  • think that's essential and if you looked at the items that are listed you'd see

  • an enormous amount of interdisciplinary cooperation creator played leading roles

  • in research institutes and laboratories I think it's I began with the Institute

  • for Research on poverty I think you will see Institute's scattered across the

  • country that social workers are involved in I think that's essential for our

  • continued leadership and second I think and this is something we are very good

  • at comes naturally to us which is collaboration with government and also

  • with foundations but I think the collaboration with government us being a

  • practice profession makes it a knack even when we have better so limitations

  • then that methodology is unique you could say for focusing on first-rate

  • papers to make the claim that Social Work research is strong is it some way

  • there's an element of tautological but here's the thing we could have come up

  • empty that is there could you know if we use that as the test there could have

  • been no papers and the contrast between health where we have less and

  • anti-poverty research we have more is an second the focus on our own expertise

  • question raises the question is are our findings generalizable I think the

  • answer is yes I think all across the country in different areas you will find

  • first-rate contributions from Social Work but that's a hypothesis I don't

  • have the evidence I didn't present the evidence lastly let me say it's a

  • preliminary draft and look forward to feedback first Mara

  • thank you

  • thanks much or yes we have Maura Curtis from one of the institutions that the

  • rivers talking about as the Institute for search on poverty as they're

  • discussing

  • hi so I had the benefit of reading the whole PowerPoint slide so maybe you'll

  • get some of it in the context of of my comments so this was a fun and

  • interesting task what Earvin colleagues were charged with doing and so in

  • thinking about providing comments on something like this about the nature and

  • state of a Social Work research and policy in particular and areas of

  • competence in areas moving forward it's a big question yeah so I thought about

  • it in this way policy practice in historical context that's what I craved

  • I craved that it create a bit of historical context and I kept thinking

  • about the fruit the fierce urgency of now like the times were living in now in

  • reference to where we have expertise historically so what was the author's

  • charge what they were charged with doing was to assess the conditions of social

  • policy research in social work at the dawn of the 21st century and make

  • recommendations for future success it's daunting I agree with herbed at all it's

  • a hard thing social policy research is very broad poverty child welfare health

  • aging housing neighborhood and Community Development anti-discrimination criminal

  • justice tax and gender and others and so their approach as Earth outlined was to

  • focus on three areas that are central to social a society and social work and I

  • would add existing expertise and developed infrastructure structural

  • relationships trust and historical practices okay and so they came up with

  • these three pots poverty child welfare and then health with newer research

  • focusing there okay so it's a big test so then I wanted to restate it okay so I

  • would restate the challenge a bit more broadly I think there's a number of ways

  • to approach thinking about this task both both conceptually and practically

  • so it's overwhelming and it's overwhelming for what I think is a good

  • reason the breadth depth and function of Social Policy Research and Social Work

  • it's conducted by Social Work scholars or in and on systems delivering Social

  • Services and by a wide range of actors within allied with or produced by an

  • agency or governments we'll need for policy research finding so that function

  • of how folks are doing their work determines in part the the questions

  • asked in the policy process so let's think about those three core areas

  • particularly for the first two there's no doubt and both the present and

  • current historical dominance of Social Work scholars in these areas and what

  • I'm struck by which makes my point okay earth was talking he's talking about

  • this person who he trained who then went over here and this person who knows this

  • person so you see the how the focus of the training around a particular

  • substantive area and then where people go into different systems and then the

  • potential for that collaboration over time even out of interest area I think

  • that matters so I think about history opportunities because I'm a hopeful gal

  • I'm hopeful gal and expansion I want to know why why dominates in child welfare

  • right in particular why domiciled wofford why dominates in poverty it

  • wasn't that folks set around necessarily in the linear fashion and said oh I'm

  • going to take on child welfare there's a particular history to each one of these

  • develops areas of dominance so to put more formally each area of current

  • dominance has a story that combines a seized or facilitated presence in

  • response to an observed social problem right place right time research labor

  • opportunity professional policy practice dominance governments will change that

  • needs to be delivered or evaluated and it's a confluence of these different

  • pressures and then the expertise is developed ok so because I like to but so

  • then I took a little time rereading some stuff and thinking about who doesn't

  • want to think about Fran miss Perkins who doesn't want to think

  • about Frances Perkins her time at Hull House her time in New York State an

  • architect of the New Deal hey Harry Hopkins and then where he goes and so

  • that's an older example but that example of how these folks interacted in these

  • different functions different roles and different systems and then went into

  • different systems and then when they needed to know something about something

  • that they didn't know there was someone in their network in their system who

  • didn't know that and so then they reached out across and abroad

  • okay so here's my today what are the opportunities what are the new

  • opportunities have a concerted attack on the basic structure of the welfare state

  • right now and norms of democratic process opened up for social policy

  • research and practice thank you I don't have the answer to this question but I

  • want to entertain the question because will I become concerned about what I am

  • I know know how I was trained to think about the world but I don't know what I

  • don't know and I don't know who I don't know and that lack of knowing that means

  • I might miss opportunities that combine the political context that we're living

  • in and maybe there's practice dominance in an area but it doesn't get half

  • infrastructure or research infrastructure but maybe it's deeply

  • important to the profession the nature of the democracy or the unraveling of

  • our welfare state I want social work to be there I want to lose any of that

  • we're doing but if there's new places I want to know that I know what they are

  • so how do we take into account the fierce urgency of now that will ensure

  • we have maintained and expanded the reach of our professional presence and

  • policy practice and have some kind of method for not for understanding how to

  • incorporate the time in which we're living so that we have methods for not

  • missing the next

  • that'll keep us busy great thank you very much more so we have we have time

  • for questions comments and all I would say is I would ask you to keep your

  • questions or comments to one minute or less that's actually a fairly long

  • period of time and it'll allow us to have more and if nobody comes up you can

  • continue your question after that but for now let's just do that

  • and then please identify who you are and where you're from

  • is this on you know I'm Bobby Everson's from the University of Pennsylvania I am

  • a self-proclaimed ethnographer and I can do work with low-income families and

  • economic mobility and I have statements more than questions but I don't want you

  • to forget Diana Pierce's influence on the Supplemental measure o the with her

  • self-sufficiency standard she was quite her work was quite notable in

  • influencing that that measure and I also want to really encourage us beyond

  • generalizability to the depth and the substance that can take place in terms

  • of policy influenced by qualitative work my work in particular has had quite

  • strong policy influences which has really been that's the satisfaction of

  • it so keep on with what you're doing and extend it and that's thank you

  • hello do you want me to introduce myself yeah Lenna the pom Nassif from Rutgers

  • so this is a question that I don't know if anyone can actually answer but my

  • concern over these last years that I've been here in the profession is the lack

  • of focus on social policy across many schools of Social Work as most of you

  • know I think many of us experience the same thing most of the students that are

  • coming in in terms of the master's programs are not interested at all in

  • social policy they're all interested in clinical work and I this is I think a

  • problem so I'm just curious about what your thoughts are on that so actually

  • I'll address both of the comments briefly so I think qualitative work is

  • very important I in the paper on quantitative work but that is not to

  • disparage the qualitative work at all it's also the case I think that there's

  • nothing new about the disproportionate focus on practice as opposed to policy

  • but I think that all schools as far as I know social work require policy in their

  • curriculum and whether we should do more and that's a good question it used to be

  • I just speak of my own University that we had a year-long social policy of

  • course that was certainly the case that SSA when I got my master's degree it was

  • year-long we're now down to one semester so I think there is a there is an issue

  • and maybe we could ensure

  • hi I'm Charles E Lewis jr. and I have a non-profit the Congressional Research

  • Institute for Social Work and policy and what we do is try to engage social

  • workers on the hill and if if possible to bring research that would have some

  • impact on legislation I'm currently working with Michael Jordan and the with

  • his child savings accounts and we're actually negotiating with congressman

  • Carl Crowell from New York who introduced the bill in 2015 to see if he

  • can reintroduce that bill with a few revisions that Michael is trying to put

  • into it but it we're on the hill trying to change policy or influence policy my

  • question is how much do we ensure that our research will have impact on policy

  • is the policy driving the research or are we doing research hoping that it

  • might have some some policy implications

  • also Garfunkel Ward's bite was my dissertation chair so I wanted I wanted

  • to just say something Lenna where are you Anna so you know you

  • know what I've come to with that idea in terms of with the math I'm teaching

  • undergrads now with the master's students is that all of these master's

  • students regardless of their preferences are policy practitioners because they

  • are street-level bureaucrats right and so I frame it that way and then I frame

  • it within the context of the code of ethics it's not and they seem to be

  • takers because I think for social workers who are practicing it's really

  • very hard they're gonna go into state agencies they're going to be asked to

  • deliver policies that are dead set against the code of ethics and we're in

  • essence asking them to hold to the line it's not - right but that's what I've

  • done with it so if I have some bit of peace with

  • because it's a hard it's a hard thing to do right

  • I'm the piece about the research so don't you think Charles it's both right

  • I mean so sometimes we're producing work because I'm at IRP right and there's in

  • this relationship with the state so sometimes we're producing research work

  • that the state needs to do what it needs to do and maybe gets used in maybe a

  • dozen and then we're doing the other parts of our job other people have

  • deeper knowledge in this but I think about it is I always look for the sweet

  • spot because don't want to do things I don't want to do and I don't want to do

  • things I don't think matter so when I'm in the room with people at least and

  • these things are negotiated I try to find the sweet spot where the the

  • problem conceptualization and the product that we're going to produce if

  • it's shared enough one would hope that the results then are how I experience it

  • from where I'm sitting and I know whether people think but sultans NASW

  • have had the opportunity over the last thirty years to work in three social

  • work organizations at that intersection of research policy practice and

  • education and I also had F as my social policy professor at the University was

  • constant only forty some odd years ago but I was just kind of delighted and I

  • guess I sort of took a breath of fresh air when you said that actually our

  • social works impact on social policy in these areas was good because I feel like

  • in my thirty years there's been so much sort of denigration of the profession

  • and what the profession does and there's so much good work going on and so I

  • think valuing that and honoring that and lifting that up is a really important

  • piece and just to address some of the issue around policy and integrating

  • policy throughout the profession and your comments or well taken you know

  • over the last year is one of the many initiatives that's gone on in Social

  • Work has been this sort of coalition to promote policy education and practice

  • and social work and about its eight ten months ago this was work policy

  • institute SW held a summit really looking at this issue and what we needed

  • to do in terms of the political land scape there are action briefs resources

  • and a full report from that that can be very helpful as schools of Social Work

  • that aren't that strong and conscious in attracting students who are really

  • interested in policy really want to look at how within field research practice

  • policy could be better integrated including what's were thinking about

  • when it's in Washington thinking about coupling the conference with some

  • Capitol Hill briefings and things like that so thank you my name is Cassandra

  • Simon and at the University of Alabama I am NOT a very eloquent speaker but I

  • usually able to get my point across I have an increasingly growing concern

  • about the really active role of Social Work as a profession in our role in

  • social justice and advocacy and activism and so since this particular piece has

  • to do with especially policy and policy practice understanding that we all have

  • to operate within the environments in which we live and that it's really nice

  • when we can find the sweet spots and we can find that shared part but I am

  • finding from talking to other people who have these same kinds of issues and we

  • just had a special interest group here swear on social justice in social work

  • research education practice and

  • educational practice and the profession about obstacles that are being put in

  • our way to actually teach students how to engage in legislative policy change

  • yes I am in a very red state I am in a state that was the continues to be the

  • last stronghold on Jim Crow laws and trying to continue to perpetuate those

  • in different ways and we are being blocked from using

  • university resources to allow students to try to affect legislative policies so

  • not being able to use university emails to promote to push forward petitions to

  • spread those petitions to all of our constituents where we're being

  • encouraged to find outside ways to do that and use outside this serves to do

  • that and so I how can we really teach policy practice if we're not able to

  • really have students when they have an opportunity to actually try to change

  • the legislative policies that are on the table but we can't actively engage in it

  • because oh oh well we don't want to upset upset the donors we don't want to

  • upset the legislators and I'm like I see increasingly there we are social workers

  • are no longer leading the charge for social justice we get on the backs of

  • issues that are safer we get on the backs of issues that are popular at that

  • time when I enter the profession it was because I thought that we were the

  • profession that would lead the charge to try to effect change that we would be

  • the ones in the front with the banner and it seems that now what we are doing

  • is just waiting for it to be a hot-button issue or for it to be

  • something that is relatively safe and again understanding that we all have to

  • operate we all need our jobs we all you know need a roof over our head and foods

  • to eat I mean and food to eat but I am very very concerned about the profession

  • as a whole and what it is we are becoming and not becoming anymore

  • especially in terms of issues of social justice advocacy and activism so

  • yeah so I really want to hear what everyone has to say here so my my take

  • on the current see that's what I mean about the times in which we're living so

  • the risks are disproportionately born right so scholars depending on the

  • university depending on what you research depending on whether or not

  • you're a tenured what your track is depending on whether you're at a state

  • or a private the risks are disproportionately borne to do the work

  • I recognize that profoundly and that is very much the truth and so I think then

  • the question then becomes for me what is the professional response to the fact

  • that it's disproportionately borne by those of us in the Academy depending on

  • where we vary across those four different domains and the risk is very

  • real I'm at a state system you know my syllabus has been for yet you can get it

  • on my you know these are chilling things these are real things and I feel what

  • you're saying and I feel that sense of fear and worry and on all of that it's

  • been I think it's if it's the context of the times that we're living and when I

  • get together with other scholars across discipline across university some

  • experience at more than other depending on the region of the country that

  • they're in depending on if it's a public or a private and all of that and I don't

  • think we've talked about that as a profession or academics at all and it is

  • disproportionately borne depending on the kind of research you do in the

  • populations that you work with I don't have an answer I hear your problem

  • I share it and it's disproportionately borne by the profession I agree I

  • actually have a question that I'd like to ask you so you mentioned we should

  • invite economists and/or fold of course we have economists but one thing that's

  • happened over the last 50 years is in fact there were no schools of public

  • policy when the National Conference assertion would start in fact there

  • weren't any for many years thereafter and you know this is sort of contested

  • professional turf now and I'm just kind of wondering you alluded to some of this

  • Urban Meyer you may have some thoughts about this as well but and we've got a

  • couple of minutes you know what do you think about that I mean it's just

  • something we shouldn't think about we shouldn't worry about I know I have

  • students that are told by faculties well if you really wanted me a policy

  • scholar you should go to you know in their master's program we're told you

  • should go to a policy school so I haven't studied that empirically but you

  • know that issue I'm wondering how you respond to that and what do you think

  • about it I think that's bad advice

  • they are schools of public policy are potentially a competitor but they're

  • also potentially collaborators and I don't fear them

  • I don't again that may be a personality trait but I think there's plenty of room

  • for them and for social work and I think we have some comparative advantages over

  • schools of public policy which by the way are old they weren't called schools

  • of public policy they were called schools of public administration and

  • they were a wind of political science what's changed is they've hired lots of

  • economist and in some places they're dominated by economists but they don't

  • have the practice background that we have and they they don't have the close

  • connection to practice that we have that's one and second they cover a vast

  • range so social social policy for them is just one minor field a minor field

  • and I want to return to the Mara's comments the fierce urgency of now

  • because I think Mars right and it reflects concerns that were just raised

  • I didn't thank you yes so look we live in a awful environment we have a

  • president who's a racist we haven't experienced that none of us have

  • experienced that in our lifetimes but we have experienced it historically it's

  • there it's in some level racism is not new to us at all and it's different

  • because we just elected a black president and we thought we were doing

  • much better and then what we were so there's no question we've gone backwards

  • the scholarship that we are doing as a profession prepares us for when there is

  • an opening and there will be an opening Donald Trump is not going to be

  • President forever the 2018 elections are very important things could change and

  • we have to be part of making that change so in terms of the fierce urgency of now

  • it's not scholarship actually I think it's advocacy and being engaged in the

  • field back to scholarship though for a moment and preparing for when openings

  • come right now in the National Academy of Science panel and reducing child

  • poverty in half child allowances universal child allowances are the

  • number one policy on the agenda when I came into the profession the profession

  • was for child allowances my actually the first paper I published in social work

  • with evidence of a little bit of knowledge being a dangerous thing I

  • argued for a negative income tax as opposed to a child allowance once I

  • learned the little more economics I realized how flawed the argument I was

  • using which came from economists by the way but was not a correct use of

  • economics the profession has to be prepared I think we are that scholarship

  • in a lot of areas is preparing us for the next generation great actually I'm

  • not I want to thank

so with that I'm going to turn it over or Garfinkel who with his colleagues

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 美國腔

社會工作的貢獻 (The Social Work Contributions)

  • 9 0
    540455851 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字