Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • PETER ALEXANDER, SHOULD BE QUITE AN EVENTFUL FEW HOURS DOWN THERE

  • AN EVENTFUL FEW HOURS DOWN THERE IN THE AMWAY CENTER, I BELIEVE

  • IN THE AMWAY CENTER, I BELIEVE THEY CALL IT.

  • THEY CALL IT. AS I MENTIONED, PRESIDENT TRUMP

  • AS I MENTIONED, PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS BLOWN UP OUR PRESIDENTIAL

  • HAS BLOWN UP OUR PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS.

  • POLITICS. AND THERE'S ARGUABLY NO BETTER

  • AND THERE'S ARGUABLY NO BETTER EXAMPLE OF THE NEW REALITY WE'RE

  • EXAMPLE OF THE NEW REALITY WE'RE ALL GRAPPLING WITH THAN MY NEXT

  • ALL GRAPPLING WITH THAN MY NEXT GUEST.

  • GUEST. IN MANY WAYS, ANDREW YANG'S

  • IN MANY WAYS, ANDREW YANG'S CANDIDACY IS PROOF OF HOW

  • CANDIDACY IS PROOF OF HOW VULNERABLE SOME SEE THIS

  • VULNERABLE SOME SEE THIS PRESIDENT'S RE-ELECTION CHANCES

  • PRESIDENT'S RE-ELECTION CHANCES BUT ALSO HOW UNPREDICTABLE OUR

  • BUT ALSO HOW UNPREDICTABLE OUR POLITICS HAVE BECOME.

  • POLITICS HAVE BECOME. HERE WE HAVE A BUSINESSMAN OUT

  • HERE WE HAVE A BUSINESSMAN OUT OF NOWHERE, NO PRIOR POLITICAL

  • OF NOWHERE, NO PRIOR POLITICAL OR MILITARY EXPERIENCE, NOT ONLY

  • OR MILITARY EXPERIENCE, NOT ONLY VYING TO DEFEAT THE PRESIDENT,

  • VYING TO DEFEAT THE PRESIDENT, BUT ALSO GETTING ENOUGH VOTERS

  • BUT ALSO GETTING ENOUGH VOTERS TO TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY THAT HE'S

  • TO TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY THAT HE'S MADE THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE

  • MADE THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE STAGE.

  • STAGE. MR. YANG JOINS ME NOW.

  • MR. YANG JOINS ME NOW. ANDREW YANG, WELCOME TO "MEET

  • ANDREW YANG, WELCOME TO "MEET THE PRESS DAILY," SIR.

  • THE PRESS DAILY," SIR. >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME, SIR.

  • >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME, SIR. IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE HERE.

  • IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE HERE. >> LET ME GO WITH THIS IMMEDIATE

  • >> LET ME GO WITH THIS IMMEDIATE PREMISE HERE.

  • PREMISE HERE. WOULD YOU BE HERE IF DONALD

  • WOULD YOU BE HERE IF DONALD TRUMP HADN'T WON THE PRESIDENCY?

  • TRUMP HADN'T WON THE PRESIDENCY? >> CATEGORICALLY NOT.

  • >> CATEGORICALLY NOT. I'M RUNNING TO SOLVE THE

  • I'M RUNNING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS THAT GOT DONALD TRUMP

  • PROBLEMS THAT GOT DONALD TRUMP ELECTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.

  • ELECTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. PRIMARILY, THE FACT THAT WE

  • PRIMARILY, THE FACT THAT WE AUTOMATED AWAY 4 MILLION

  • AUTOMATED AWAY 4 MILLION MANUFACTURING JOBS IN MICHIGAN,

  • MANUFACTURING JOBS IN MICHIGAN, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, WISCONSIN,

  • OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, WISCONSIN, MISSOURI, AND IOWA.

  • MISSOURI, AND IOWA. BUT I WOULD NOT BE RUNNING IF

  • BUT I WOULD NOT BE RUNNING IF DONALD TRUMP WERE NOT OUR

  • DONALD TRUMP WERE NOT OUR PRESIDENT TODAY.

  • PRESIDENT TODAY. >> WHAT IS IT YOU THINK THE

  • >> WHAT IS IT YOU THINK THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY MISUNDERSTOOD

  • DEMOCRATIC PARTY MISUNDERSTOOD ABOUT TRUMP'S APPEAL FOUR YEARS

  • ABOUT TRUMP'S APPEAL FOUR YEARS AGO?

  • AGO? >> WELL, IF YOU REMEMBER, DONALD

  • >> WELL, IF YOU REMEMBER, DONALD TRUMP POINTED OUT THE

  • TRUMP POINTED OUT THE DEVASTATION AND SUFFERING IN

  • DEVASTATION AND SUFFERING IN MANY AMERICAN COMMUNITIES.

  • MANY AMERICAN COMMUNITIES. >> HE WASN'T ALONE, THOUGH.

  • >> HE WASN'T ALONE, THOUGH. MANY DEMOCRATS POINTED THIS OUT.

  • MANY DEMOCRATS POINTED THIS OUT. BERNIE SANDERS POINTED THIS OUT.

  • BERNIE SANDERS POINTED THIS OUT. BARACK OBAMA POINTED IT OUT FOUR

  • BARACK OBAMA POINTED IT OUT FOUR YEARS EARLIER.

  • YEARS EARLIER. THAT'S WHY I ONLY -- HE WASN'T

  • THAT'S WHY I ONLY -- HE WASN'T THE ONLY ONE.

  • THE ONLY ONE. HE'S JUST THE MOST RECENT ONE.

  • HE'S JUST THE MOST RECENT ONE. >> WELL, BERNIE SANDERS

  • >> WELL, BERNIE SANDERS DEFINITELY POINTED OUT THE SAME

  • DEFINITELY POINTED OUT THE SAME THING, BUT IF YOU REMEMBER THE

  • THING, BUT IF YOU REMEMBER THE PREVAILING RESPONSE WAS

  • PREVAILING RESPONSE WAS AMERICA'S ALREADY DOING GREAT.

  • AMERICA'S ALREADY DOING GREAT. AND YOU KNOW, LIKE, AMERICANS

  • AND YOU KNOW, LIKE, AMERICANS HEARD THAT AND DID NOT THINK

  • HEARD THAT AND DID NOT THINK THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WAS

  • THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WAS TRULY TRYING TO SOLVE THE

  • TRULY TRYING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS ON THE GROUND THAT MANY

  • PROBLEMS ON THE GROUND THAT MANY AMERICANS WERE EXPERIENCING.

  • AMERICANS WERE EXPERIENCING. AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE

  • AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MANUFACTURING WORKERS WILL NOW

  • MANUFACTURING WORKERS WILL NOW HAPPEN TO THE RETAIL WORKERS,

  • HAPPEN TO THE RETAIL WORKERS, THE CALL CENTER WORKERS, THE

  • THE CALL CENTER WORKERS, THE FAST FOOD WORKERS, THE TRUCK

  • FAST FOOD WORKERS, THE TRUCK DRIVERS.

  • DRIVERS. WE'RE IN THE MIDST OF THE

  • WE'RE IN THE MIDST OF THE GREATEST ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

  • GREATEST ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION IN THE HISTORY OF OUR UNCOUNTRY

  • IN THE HISTORY OF OUR UNCOUNTRY AND DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE LASER

  • AND DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE LASER FOCUSED ON ADDRESSING THAT

  • FOCUSED ON ADDRESSING THAT REALITY THAN FOCUSING ON THE

  • REALITY THAN FOCUSING ON THE SYMPTOM, WHICH IS DONALD TRUMP.

  • SYMPTOM, WHICH IS DONALD TRUMP. >> IN SOME WAYS, YOUR SIGNATURE

  • >> IN SOME WAYS, YOUR SIGNATURE PROPOSAL DOESN'T NECESSARILY

  • PROPOSAL DOESN'T NECESSARILY SOLVE THE PROBLEM.

  • SOLVE THE PROBLEM. IT FEELS LIKE A BAND-AID.

  • IT FEELS LIKE A BAND-AID. AND I SAY, YOUR SIGNATURE

  • AND I SAY, YOUR SIGNATURE PROPOSAL, THIS UNIVERSAL INCOME,

  • PROPOSAL, THIS UNIVERSAL INCOME, BECAUSE YOU'RE TRYING TO FILL

  • BECAUSE YOU'RE TRYING TO FILL THE GAP AS WE FIGURE OUT WHAT

  • THE GAP AS WE FIGURE OUT WHAT THE JOBS OF THE 21st CENTURY

  • THE JOBS OF THE 21st CENTURY LOOK LIKE.

  • LOOK LIKE. AM I BEING TOO CYNICAL ABOUT IT?

  • AM I BEING TOO CYNICAL ABOUT IT? >> IF YOU THINK WHAT HAPPENED TO

  • >> IF YOU THINK WHAT HAPPENED TO COMMUNITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY

  • COMMUNITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY IF EVERY AMERICAN ADULT GOT

  • IF EVERY AMERICAN ADULT GOT $1,000 A MONTH, IT WOULD CREATE

  • $1,000 A MONTH, IT WOULD CREATE 2 MILLION JOBS IN OUR

  • 2 MILLION JOBS IN OUR COMMUNITIES, HELP RECOGNIZE THE

  • COMMUNITIES, HELP RECOGNIZE THE KIND OF WORK THAT MY WIFE DOES

  • KIND OF WORK THAT MY WIFE DOES EVERY DAY AT HOME WITH OUR TWO

  • EVERY DAY AT HOME WITH OUR TWO BOYS, ONE OF WHOM IS AUTISTIC.

  • BOYS, ONE OF WHOM IS AUTISTIC. IT'S NOT A BAND-AID.

  • IT'S NOT A BAND-AID. IT SUPERCHARGES OUR ECONOMY AND

  • IT SUPERCHARGES OUR ECONOMY AND CREATES JOBS IN THE DIRECTION WE

  • CREATES JOBS IN THE DIRECTION WE NEED TO GO, WHICH INCLUDES THE

  • NEED TO GO, WHICH INCLUDES THE CARING COMMUNITY, ARTS, AND MAIN

  • CARING COMMUNITY, ARTS, AND MAIN STREET JOBS BECAUSE OF AN

  • STREET JOBS BECAUSE OF AN INCREASE IN CONSUMER BUYING

  • INCREASE IN CONSUMER BUYING POWER.

  • POWER. >> SO YOU THINK ONE OF THE

  • >> SO YOU THINK ONE OF THE POSITIVE ASPECTS ABOUT YOUR PLAN

  • POSITIVE ASPECTS ABOUT YOUR PLAN IS IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO PURSUE

  • IS IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO PURSUE AN ART AND REALLY COULDN'T

  • AN ART AND REALLY COULDN'T AFFORD TO MAKE A LIVING DOING

  • AFFORD TO MAKE A LIVING DOING IT, YOU'RE GIVING THEM AN

  • IT, YOU'RE GIVING THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO IT.

  • OPPORTUNITY TO DO IT. I GET THAT, BUT HOW DOES THAT

  • I GET THAT, BUT HOW DOES THAT GROW OUR ECONOMY?

  • GROW OUR ECONOMY? >> WELL, OUR ECONOMY RIGHT NOW

  • >> WELL, OUR ECONOMY RIGHT NOW IS UP TO A RECORD $20 TRILLION,

  • IS UP TO A RECORD $20 TRILLION, UP $5 TRILLION IN THE LAST 12

  • UP $5 TRILLION IN THE LAST 12 YEARS ALONE.

  • YEARS ALONE. THE PROBLEM IS THAT WE HAVE

  • THE PROBLEM IS THAT WE HAVE THESE WINNER TAKE ALL DYNAMICS

  • THESE WINNER TAKE ALL DYNAMICS THAT THE GAINS ARE CONCENTRATED

  • THAT THE GAINS ARE CONCENTRATED IN JUST A HANDFUL OF INDUSTRIES

  • IN JUST A HANDFUL OF INDUSTRIES AND COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS.

  • AND COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS. AND SO IF YOU SPREAD THAT BOUNTY

  • AND SO IF YOU SPREAD THAT BOUNTY MORE BROADLY THROUGHOUT THE

  • MORE BROADLY THROUGHOUT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY, IT DOES CREATE

  • AMERICAN ECONOMY, IT DOES CREATE OPPORTUNITIES INCLUDING IN THE

  • OPPORTUNITIES INCLUDING IN THE ARTS, BUT ALSO ENTREPRENEURSHIP.

  • ARTS, BUT ALSO ENTREPRENEURSHIP. AND I'M A SERIAL ENTREPRENEUR.

  • AND I'M A SERIAL ENTREPRENEUR. WE NEED TO HAVE MORE AMERICANS

  • WE NEED TO HAVE MORE AMERICANS BEING PUT INTO POSITION TO DO

  • BEING PUT INTO POSITION TO DO THE KIND OF WORK THEY ACTUALLY

  • THE KIND OF WORK THEY ACTUALLY WANT TO DO.

  • WANT TO DO. >> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BORDER.

  • >> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BORDER. THERE IS A LOT OF ANGST AND

  • THERE IS A LOT OF ANGST AND ANXIETY OVER THE BORDER.

  • ANXIETY OVER THE BORDER. THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES THE ISSUE

  • THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES THE ISSUE IS OUR ASYLUM LAWS.

  • IS OUR ASYLUM LAWS. DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THAT SOME OF

  • DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THAT SOME OF THIS HAS TO DO WITH JUST, YOU

  • THIS HAS TO DO WITH JUST, YOU CAN'T PULL MONEY AWAY FROM

  • CAN'T PULL MONEY AWAY FROM CENTRAL AMERICA.

  • CENTRAL AMERICA. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A DIFFERENCE

  • WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A DIFFERENCE TOLERANCE POLICY HERE.

  • TOLERANCE POLICY HERE. WE HAVE AN INCREASE IN MIGRATION

  • WE HAVE AN INCREASE IN MIGRATION OVER THE BORDER.

  • OVER THE BORDER. WHAT WOULD YOU BE DOING ABOUT

  • WHAT WOULD YOU BE DOING ABOUT IT?

  • IT? >> THE FIRST THING WE HAVE TO DO

  • >> THE FIRST THING WE HAVE TO DO IS PUT ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO

  • IS PUT ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO WORK AT THE BORDER.

  • WORK AT THE BORDER. WE HAVE A SHORTAGE OF NOT JUST

  • WE HAVE A SHORTAGE OF NOT JUST ASYLUM JUDGES AND FACILITIES,

  • ASYLUM JUDGES AND FACILITIES, BUT EVEN BORDER PATROL

  • BUT EVEN BORDER PATROL PERSONNEL.

  • PERSONNEL. THERE ARE HUNDREDS, MAYBE

  • THERE ARE HUNDREDS, MAYBE THOUSANDS OF UNFILLED POSITIONS,

  • THOUSANDS OF UNFILLED POSITIONS, BECAUSE THESE POSITIONS DON'T

  • BECAUSE THESE POSITIONS DON'T PAY AS COMPETITIVELY AS OTHER

  • PAY AS COMPETITIVELY AS OTHER ROLES IN OUR GOVERNMENT.

  • ROLES IN OUR GOVERNMENT. AND ALSO, THESE ARE NOT

  • AND ALSO, THESE ARE NOT APPEALING PLACES TO LIVE.

  • APPEALING PLACES TO LIVE. SO WE HAVE TO DO THE WORK THAT

  • SO WE HAVE TO DO THE WORK THAT WE KNOW NEEDS TO BE DONE IN

  • WE KNOW NEEDS TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO HAVE OUR POLICIES

  • ORDER TO HAVE OUR POLICIES ACTUALLY BE EFFECTIVE ON THE

  • ACTUALLY BE EFFECTIVE ON THE GROUND.

  • GROUND. IT SERVES NOBODY IF THERE'S A

  • IT SERVES NOBODY IF THERE'S A MULTI-MONTH OR EVEN YEAR-LONG

  • MULTI-MONTH OR EVEN YEAR-LONG WAITING PROCESS TO HAVE AN

  • WAITING PROCESS TO HAVE AN ASYLUM HEARING.

  • ASYLUM HEARING. >> I WANT TO GO BACK TO YOUR

  • >> I WANT TO GO BACK TO YOUR UNIVERSAL INCOME PROPOSAL,

  • UNIVERSAL INCOME PROPOSAL, BECAUSE OUR DEBT IS ALREADY UP

  • BECAUSE OUR DEBT IS ALREADY UP TO $20 TRILLION.

  • TO $20 TRILLION. AND I KNOW IN SOME WAYS, IF YOU

  • AND I KNOW IN SOME WAYS, IF YOU ALREADY GET SOME GOVERNMENT

  • ALREADY GET SOME GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE, YOU WOULDN'T GET

  • ASSISTANCE, YOU WOULDN'T GET THIS MONEY.

  • THIS MONEY. BUT HOW DOES THIS NOT, EVEN IN

  • BUT HOW DOES THIS NOT, EVEN IN THE SHORT-TERM, INFLATE OUR DEBT

  • THE SHORT-TERM, INFLATE OUR DEBT AND PUT US IN A BUDGETARY CRISIS

  • AND PUT US IN A BUDGETARY CRISIS GOING FORWARD?

  • GOING FORWARD? >> WELL, IF YOU LOOK UP, CHUCK,

  • >> WELL, IF YOU LOOK UP, CHUCK, WHO ARE THE BIG WINNERS IN THIS

  • WHO ARE THE BIG WINNERS IN THIS ECONOMY?

  • ECONOMY? IT'S AMAZON AND OTHER $1

  • IT'S AMAZON AND OTHER $1 TRILLION TECH COMPANIES.

  • TRILLION TECH COMPANIES. AND IN AMAZON'S CASE, THEY'RE

  • AND IN AMAZON'S CASE, THEY'RE LITERALLY PAYING ZERO IN FEDERAL

  • LITERALLY PAYING ZERO IN FEDERAL TAXES.

  • TAXES. YOU'RE 100% RIGHT THAT IF YOU

  • YOU'RE 100% RIGHT THAT IF YOU HAVE THAT SITUATION, IT'S GOING

  • HAVE THAT SITUATION, IT'S GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT ZPLP.

  • TO BE VERY DIFFICULT ZPLP. >> SO YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE

  • >> SO YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE TAX STRUCTURE FIRST BEFORE YOU

  • TAX STRUCTURE FIRST BEFORE YOU HAND OUT THESE CHECKS?

  • HAND OUT THESE CHECKS? >> WE DO IT SIMULTANEOUSLY.

  • >> WE DO IT SIMULTANEOUSLY. AND WE WOULD BE TAKING MONEY

  • AND WE WOULD BE TAKING MONEY FROM THE AMAZONS OF THE WORLD

  • FROM THE AMAZONS OF THE WORLD AND PUT IT DIRECTLY INTO THE

  • AND PUT IT DIRECTLY INTO THE HANDS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS.

  • HANDS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS. >> EXPLAIN HOW THAT WORKS?

  • >> EXPLAIN HOW THAT WORKS? JEFF BEZOS WILL WRITE YOU A

  • JEFF BEZOS WILL WRITE YOU A CHECK?

  • CHECK? >> WE'LL DO BETTER THAN THAT.

  • >> WE'LL DO BETTER THAN THAT. WE'LL JOIN ANY OTHER ADVANCED

  • WE'LL JOIN ANY OTHER ADVANCED ECONOMY IN THE WORLD AND HAVE A

  • ECONOMY IN THE WORLD AND HAVE A VALUE-ADDED TAX WHICH WOULD GIVE

  • VALUE-ADDED TAX WHICH WOULD GIVE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC A TINY SLICE

  • THE AMERICAN PUBLIC A TINY SLICE OF EVERY AMAZON SALE, EVERY

  • OF EVERY AMAZON SALE, EVERY GOOGLE SEARCH, EVERY FACEBOOK

  • GOOGLE SEARCH, EVERY FACEBOOK ADD, EVERY ROBOT MILE.

  • ADD, EVERY ROBOT MILE. >> AND IF YOU'RE THE NOMINEE, I

  • >> AND IF YOU'RE THE NOMINEE, I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE PUSH EITHER A

  • HAVE SEEN PEOPLE PUSH EITHER A FAIR TAX OR A VAT TAX OR A

  • FAIR TAX OR A VAT TAX OR A NATIONAL SALES TAX.

  • NATIONAL SALES TAX. AND EVERY CANDIDATE THAT HAS

  • AND EVERY CANDIDATE THAT HAS TRIED TO PUT IT OUT THERE, IF

  • TRIED TO PUT IT OUT THERE, IF THEY WIN A NOMINATION, THEY GET

  • THEY WIN A NOMINATION, THEY GET EVISCERATED BECAUSE SOMEBODY

  • EVISCERATED BECAUSE SOMEBODY BASICALLY SHOWS, HEY, LOOK AT

  • BASICALLY SHOWS, HEY, LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST TO

  • HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST TO TAKE YOUR KIDS BACK TO SCHOOL

  • TAKE YOUR KIDS BACK TO SCHOOL NOW.

  • NOW. LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO

  • LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST TO BUY EVERYDAY PRODUCTS.

  • COST TO BUY EVERYDAY PRODUCTS. HOW DO YOU BEAT BACK WHICH HAS

  • HOW DO YOU BEAT BACK WHICH HAS BEEN A TRIED AND TRUED METHOD

  • BEEN A TRIED AND TRUED METHOD POLITICALLY TO DEFEAT NATIONAL

  • POLITICALLY TO DEFEAT NATIONAL SALES TAXES, TO DEFEAT THE VAT,

  • SALES TAXES, TO DEFEAT THE VAT, THINGS LIKE THIS, WHERE PEOPLE

  • THINGS LIKE THIS, WHERE PEOPLE SEE THE INITIAL BILL AND I DON'T

  • SEE THE INITIAL BILL AND I DON'T CARE WHAT KIND OF REFUND

  • CARE WHAT KIND OF REFUND SITUATION YOU PUT IN THERE, THAT

  • SITUATION YOU PUT IN THERE, THAT DOES SCARE PEOPLE.

  • DOES SCARE PEOPLE. >> WELL, IT'S MORE THAN A

  • >> WELL, IT'S MORE THAN A REFUND, CHUCK.

  • REFUND, CHUCK. IT'S ACTUALLY A DIVIDEND.

  • IT'S ACTUALLY A DIVIDEND. AND FOR EVERY DOLLAR FROM THE

  • AND FOR EVERY DOLLAR FROM THE VAT AMERICAN CONSUMERS WOULD BE

  • VAT AMERICAN CONSUMERS WOULD BE RECEIVING $3.

  • RECEIVING $3. IT WOULD INCREASE THE BUYING

  • IT WOULD INCREASE THE BUYING POWER OF APPROXIMATELY THE 92%

  • POWER OF APPROXIMATELY THE 92% OF AMERICANS.

  • OF AMERICANS. AND AMERICANS UNDERSTAND WHAT

  • AND AMERICANS UNDERSTAND WHAT $12,000 A YEAR WOULD MEAN FOR

  • $12,000 A YEAR WOULD MEAN FOR THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES.

  • THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES. VERY, VERY FEW AMERICANS WOULD

  • VERY, VERY FEW AMERICANS WOULD CONSUME ENOUGH FOR A MILD VAT

  • CONSUME ENOUGH FOR A MILD VAT COME ANYWHERE NEAR

  • COME ANYWHERE NEAR COUNTERBALANCING A $1,000 VAT A

  • COUNTERBALANCING A $1,000 VAT A MONTH.

  • MONTH. >> SO LET'S MOVE ON TO THE

  • >> SO LET'S MOVE ON TO THE SITUATION IN IRAN.

  • SITUATION IN IRAN. HOW WOULD YOU TRY TO DEAL WITH

  • HOW WOULD YOU TRY TO DEAL WITH IRAN'S BELLIGERENT NATURE IN THE

  • IRAN'S BELLIGERENT NATURE IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

  • MIDDLE EAST? THE BIGGEST CRITICISM OF

  • THE BIGGEST CRITICISM OF PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE IRAN

  • PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL WAS, OKAY, THE GOOD

  • NUCLEAR DEAL WAS, OKAY, THE GOOD NEWS IS, YOU GOT THEM TO AGREE

  • NEWS IS, YOU GOT THEM TO AGREE ON SOME LIMITS WHEN IT COMES TO

  • ON SOME LIMITS WHEN IT COMES TO THE NUCLEAR ISSUE.

  • THE NUCLEAR ISSUE. BUT IT DID NOTHING WHEN IT CAME

  • BUT IT DID NOTHING WHEN IT CAME TO THEM FUNDING TERRORIST

  • TO THEM FUNDING TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS AND THINGS LIKE

  • ORGANIZATIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT

  • THAT THAT.

  • THAT. WHAT WOULD YOUR ADMINISTRATION

  • WHAT WOULD YOUR ADMINISTRATION DO TO CURTAIL SOME OF THAT BAD

  • DO TO CURTAIL SOME OF THAT BAD BEHAVIOR BY IRAN?

  • BEHAVIOR BY IRAN? >> I WOULD LOOK TO VEREENTER THE

  • >> I WOULD LOOK TO VEREENTER THE NUCLEAR DEAL.

  • NUCLEAR DEAL. EVEN AFTER THE U.S. PULLED OUT

  • EVEN AFTER THE U.S. PULLED OUT UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION,

  • UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT

  • THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT SIGNED ON THAT ARE STILL THERE.

  • SIGNED ON THAT ARE STILL THERE. WE NEED TO DE-ESCALATE TENSIONS

  • WE NEED TO DE-ESCALATE TENSIONS IN THE IRAN REGION AND MAKE IT

  • IN THE IRAN REGION AND MAKE IT SO THAT THE IRAN GOVERNMENT'S

  • SO THAT THE IRAN GOVERNMENT'S INCENTIVES ARE ACTUALLY ALIGNED

  • INCENTIVES ARE ACTUALLY ALIGNED WITH OURS IN TERMS OF BOTH

  • WITH OURS IN TERMS OF BOTH DE-ESCALATING THE NUCLEAR

  • DE-ESCALATING THE NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT AND HOPEFULLY

  • DEVELOPMENT AND HOPEFULLY GETTING THEM TO REDUCE THEIR

  • GETTING THEM TO REDUCE THEIR FUNDING OF TERRORIST

  • FUNDING OF TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN OTHER PARTS OF

  • ORGANIZATIONS IN OTHER PARTS OF THE REGION.

  • THE REGION. >> DO YOU HAVE A THEORY OF THE

  • >> DO YOU HAVE A THEORY OF THE CASE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE

  • CASE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE TRUMP MEAT GRINDER?

  • TRUMP MEAT GRINDER? YOU KNOW, HE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY

  • YOU KNOW, HE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY OF TALKING TO THE PUBLIC, OF

  • OF TALKING TO THE PUBLIC, OF TALKING TO CANDIDATES.

  • TALKING TO CANDIDATES. WHY WILL YOU BE DIFFERENT AT

  • WHY WILL YOU BE DIFFERENT AT HANDLING THE TRUMP-STYLE OF

  • HANDLING THE TRUMP-STYLE OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN DIFFERENTLY

  • POLITICAL CAMPAIGN DIFFERENTLY THAN OTHERS HAVE TRIED AND

  • THAN OTHERS HAVE TRIED AND FAILED AT?

  • FAILED AT? >> WELL, THEY SAY, CHUCK, THAT

  • >> WELL, THEY SAY, CHUCK, THAT THE OPPOSITE OF DONALD TRUMP IS

  • THE OPPOSITE OF DONALD TRUMP IS AN ASIAN MAN WHO LIKES MATH.

  • AN ASIAN MAN WHO LIKES MATH. AND I'M ALREADY PEELING OFF

  • AND I'M ALREADY PEELING OFF THOUSANDS OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS,

  • THOUSANDS OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS, INDEPENDENTS, LIBERTARIANS,

  • INDEPENDENTS, LIBERTARIANS, CONSERVATIVES, AS WELL AS

  • CONSERVATIVES, AS WELL AS OBVIOUSLY DEMOCRATS AND

  • OBVIOUSLY DEMOCRATS AND PROGRESSIVES.

  • PROGRESSIVES. BUT I AGREE WITH MANY OF YOUR

  • BUT I AGREE WITH MANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES THAT WE NEED TO BE

  • COLLEAGUES THAT WE NEED TO BE FOCUSED ON BEATING DONALD TRUMP

  • FOCUSED ON BEATING DONALD TRUMP AND I'M THE IDEAL CANDIDATE FOR

  • AND I'M THE IDEAL CANDIDATE FOR THAT.

  • THAT. >> BUT DOES THAT MEAN TAKING HIM

  • >> BUT DOES THAT MEAN TAKING HIM ON DIRECTLY?

  • ON DIRECTLY? LEAVING THESE THINGS, NOT

  • LEAVING THESE THINGS, NOT LETTING STUFF GO UNANSWERED?

  • LETTING STUFF GO UNANSWERED? OR IS IT IGNORING SOME OF THE

  • OR IS IT IGNORING SOME OF THE ANTICS?

  • ANTICS? >> IT'S ABOUT CUTTING TO THE

  • >> IT'S ABOUT CUTTING TO THE HEART OF THE MATTER AND THE

  • HEART OF THE MATTER AND THE TRUTH.

  • TRUTH. AND I'VE TALKED TO MANY PEOPLE

  • AND I'VE TALKED TO MANY PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP WHO

  • WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP WHO RECOGNIZE THAT HIS BLUSTER IS

  • RECOGNIZE THAT HIS BLUSTER IS NOT SERVING THEM WELL.

  • NOT SERVING THEM WELL. IT'S ONE REASON WHY MANY

  • IT'S ONE REASON WHY MANY AMERICANS WHO VOTED FOR DONALD

  • AMERICANS WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP ARE LOOKING FOR A

  • TRUMP ARE LOOKING FOR A DIFFERENT SOLUTION.

  • DIFFERENT SOLUTION. AND I'M HAPPY TO SAY THAT MY

  • AND I'M HAPPY TO SAY THAT MY CAMPAIGN IS DRAWING MANY OF

  • CAMPAIGN IS DRAWING MANY OF THOSE VOTERS OVER TO OUR SIDE OF

  • THOSE VOTERS OVER TO OUR SIDE OF THE AISLE.

  • THE AISLE. >> WHY AREN'T YOU RUNNING FOR A

  • >> WHY AREN'T YOU RUNNING FOR A LOWER OFFICE FIRST AND MAYBE SEE

  • LOWER OFFICE FIRST AND MAYBE SEE IF YOU CAN WIN AND GET MORE

  • IF YOU CAN WIN AND GET MORE PEOPLE TO MAINSTREAM YOUR

  • PEOPLE TO MAINSTREAM YOUR PROPOSALS?

  • PROPOSALS? I JUST SAY THAT, YOU KNOW,

  • I JUST SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, SHOOTING FOR THE PRESIDENCY, I

  • SHOOTING FOR THE PRESIDENCY, I GET IT.

  • GET IT. IT IS ONE WAY, AND YOU'RE

  • IT IS ONE WAY, AND YOU'RE CERTAINLY GETTING MORE ATTENTION

  • CERTAINLY GETTING MORE ATTENTION THAN YOU WOULD IF YOU WERE

  • THAN YOU WOULD IF YOU WERE RUNNING FOR THE U.S. SENATE

  • RUNNING FOR THE U.S. SENATE SOMEWHERE, BUT ISN'T IT MORE

  • SOMEWHERE, BUT ISN'T IT MORE PRACTICAL TO TRY TO BUILD THIS

  • PRACTICAL TO TRY TO BUILD THIS GROUND UP?

  • GROUND UP? >> CHUCK, I DEARLY WISH THAT I

  • >> CHUCK, I DEARLY WISH THAT I FELT LIKE WE HAD THE TIME.

  • FELT LIKE WE HAD THE TIME. BUT THE REALITY IS THAT ROBOT

  • BUT THE REALITY IS THAT ROBOT TRUCKS ARE FIVE TO TEN YEARS

  • TRUCKS ARE FIVE TO TEN YEARS AWAY FROM HITTING OUR HIGHWAYS

  • AWAY FROM HITTING OUR HIGHWAYS AND DRIVING A TRUCK IS THE MOST

  • AND DRIVING A TRUCK IS THE MOST COMMON JOB.

  • COMMON JOB. 39% OF OUR MALLS ARE CLOSING IN

  • 39% OF OUR MALLS ARE CLOSING IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.

  • THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. SO IF I TOOK DECADES TO TRY TO

  • SO IF I TOOK DECADES TO TRY TO CLIMB THE POLITICAL LADDER,

  • CLIMB THE POLITICAL LADDER, UNFORTUNATELY, OUR ECONOMY WOULD

  • UNFORTUNATELY, OUR ECONOMY WOULD BE TRANSFORMING UNDERNEATH OUR

  • BE TRANSFORMING UNDERNEATH OUR FEET.

  • FEET. WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME FOR

  • WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME FOR SOMEONE TO PLAY POLITICAL

  • SOMEONE TO PLAY POLITICAL GAMESMANSHIP.

  • GAMESMANSHIP. >> ALL RIGHT.

  • >> ALL RIGHT. ANDREW YANG, AS I SAID, ONE OF

  • ANDREW YANG, AS I SAID, ONE OF THE MORE UNUSUAL CANDIDATES AND

PETER ALEXANDER, SHOULD BE QUITE AN EVENTFUL FEW HOURS DOWN THERE

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級 美國腔

全文 Andrew Yang:我已經剝掉了數千名特朗普的支持者|MTP日報|MSNBC (Full Andrew Yang: I'm Already Peeling Off Thousands Of Trump Supporters | MTP Daily | MSNBC)

  • 4 0
    王惟惟 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字